T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2984.1 | | CVG::THOMPSON | An AlphaGeneration Noter | Tue Apr 05 1994 15:38 | 3 |
| Dart boards with numbers on them seem to be fairly accurate. :-)
Alfred
|
2984.2 | DEC CBI2020-AA | DECWET::FARLEE | Insufficient Virtual...um...er... | Tue Apr 05 1994 16:21 | 1 |
| Don't forget to spec out the crystal ball interface...
|
2984.3 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Apr 05 1994 17:13 | 13 |
| I heard on NPR yesterday about a rooster, named Ted, who had won great fame
for his ability to pick winners of football games. Ted's owner would set
in front of Ted two signs with the team names; on each sign was a kernel
of corn. Also in front of Ted was a set of numbers indicating point spread;
each number with a kernel of corn. Whichever team sign and number Ted ate
the corn from was deemed to be the prediction.
Ted recently died; his duties assumed by his son, Teddie.
I imagine that Ted's method would work at least as well as any other that
Digital uses.
Steve
|
2984.4 | divide by 0 | CRONIC::AMARAL | | Tue Apr 05 1994 17:27 | 2 |
| divide by 0 - that's the amount your likely to see
|
2984.5 | Uncertainty | ANNECY::HOTCHKISS | | Wed Apr 06 1994 07:39 | 6 |
| re .3
Rubbish-far too accurate and gives a RESULT which can be tested
measured etc.Never do.What you need is something with a constantly
changing and never measurable result.
Can I suggest my patented Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle
Spreadsheet(TM)?
|
2984.6 | An 8.5x11 sheet, or a spreadsheet | CAPNET::PJOHNSON | | Wed Apr 06 1994 08:43 | 9 |
| Who is funding you? What for? Is that funding contingent on anything,
like deliverables or volume? Is there some reason that a commitment to
fund might not be met?
Even if you need to get involved in probability, a spreadsheet should
be pretty easy to throw together.
And for all the help you're getting from this conference, rolling your
own is probably the shortest path to completion ;^)
|
2984.7 | He'll be lucky | COMICS::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Wed Apr 06 1994 09:26 | 3 |
| .4� divide by 0 - that's the amount your likely to see
Maybe you mean multiply?
|