T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2912.1 | Don't sweat the small stuff | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed Feb 23 1994 12:19 | 9 |
| > Unless I adjust my withholding for my regular paycheck to compensate
Bingo!
While I share the view that sometimes things are more difficult than they
need to be, do we always need to moan about things which are within our
own power to adjust?
-Jack
|
2912.2 | it would be so easy... | TOOHOT::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Wed Feb 23 1994 12:28 | 9 |
| >While I share the view that sometimes things are more difficult than they
>need to be, do we always need to moan about things which are within our
>own power to adjust?
Just seems that since payroll has access to all the info (my plan B
checks include total year-to-date withholding, salary, etc. from plan
B PLUS regular payroll checks) they could easily withhold the same
percentage for plan B as they do for the regular payroll checks
instead of less than 1%.
|
2912.3 | try DTN: 264-3478 | EMASS::KELLEHER | | Wed Feb 23 1994 12:35 | 2 |
| Someone there may be able to direct you to the right
person
|
2912.4 | The noisy wheel will get greased!!! | DPDMAI::AUTRY | | Wed Feb 23 1994 12:37 | 16 |
|
I have a plan B car and payroll withholds the proper amount, if they
didn't, I would be very angry. It is hard enough to do tax planning,
but with the added income (improper withholding) it would just make
December-April just that much more difficult. If I were you, I would
send mail messages to Cannon::payroll until the problem is fixed. The
only real other alternative is for you to escrow the tax rate
witholding in a money market or a savings account until December and
estimate you taxes based on the escrow + tax rate x salary. (what a
hassile!!!
TLA
|
2912.5 | NO WHINEING | ANGLIN::SULLIVAN | Take this job and LOVE it | Wed Feb 23 1994 14:34 | 11 |
| RE: .0
Aren't your Busness use of the Plan B car Deductable on your taxes?
If they are then you should be paying no taxes on the money you get
each month. If not then should you really be on Plan B?
RE: .1
AMEN!!!
|
2912.6 | Sure about that? | DPDMAI::EYSTER | Dogbert's Clues for the Clueless | Wed Feb 23 1994 15:15 | 10 |
| You've oversimplified an issue...to realize an actual deduction from
taxes of unreimbursed business expenses, I believe you must exceed
the standard deduction.
Also, you've got to fill out the additional forms, do the accounting,
pay an accountant, whatever. Reimbursed expenses should NEVER show up
as income.
(And "whining" is spelled w/o an "e" here in the South. Amen, brother,
hallelujah-gobble.)
|
2912.7 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed Feb 23 1994 17:43 | 26 |
| re: .2, Arlan
> Just seems that since payroll has access to all the info (my plan B
> checks include total year-to-date withholding, salary, etc. from plan
> B PLUS regular payroll checks) they could easily withhold the same
> percentage for plan B as they do for the regular payroll checks
> instead of less than 1%.
Yes - you are correct. It "seems" they "could easily" do that. I agree.
But, I have also been in this industry and working with computers for
over 23 years. I spent the first twelve or so of those actually doing
programming. You and I both know that the system in question "has the
data" needed to "do the right thing". But after years of listening to
people tell me "the system can't do that", or "the computer doesn't
work that way", or "there's no way we can change that", or similar
lame excuses, I found that it was far better for my health to walk
away and find out what other means I might have at my disposal to
achieve the desired net result. In your case, it would appear that the
desired net result can be achieved by adjusting your normal payroll
deductions. Should you "have to" do that? Of course not. But if walking
down to, or calling, your PSA and changing your W4 will get the proper
amount withheld to satisfy your financial concerns and at the same time
lower your blood pressure a few points, isn't it worth it?
-Jack
|
2912.8 | Lower witholding is the key! | NYOS02::CATANIA | | Thu Feb 24 1994 08:57 | 11 |
| I think the biggest problem was the legislation by former presiden
George Bush to reduce the witholding tax, while not reducing the tax
burden. I.e. you have more money in your pocket every week, but you
still have to pay the tax man the same amount at the end of the year.
An example is that I had a new deduction arrive last year. The
previous year I just about broke even. I figured this year I would get
a little back for a change.. NOT!
This was done to boost the economy before the election. I guess it was
a little late. :-)
|
2912.9 | They do it for me, than can do it for you | ANGLIN::ROGERS | Sometimes you just gotta play hurt | Thu Feb 24 1994 14:10 | 3 |
| Something seems goofy. My plan B check withholds less than it should,
but MUCH more than $1.xx per week. It's around $45 per week, for
Federal taxes alone, then add state and of course social security tax.
|
2912.10 | OOPS | ANGLIN::ROGERS | Sometimes you just gotta play hurt | Thu Feb 24 1994 14:11 | 1 |
| OOPS. I meant $45 per month.
|
2912.11 | Reimbursement check already taxed ! | ANGLIN::WOOLLUMS | Russ Woollums | Thu Feb 24 1994 21:30 | 22 |
| re .6
Just to add a little to the confusion, be aware that the monthly
payment has ALREADY been taxed. Therefore you do not need to consider it
when figuring your deduction. You do need to use the .08/mile
reimbursement, however. This gives you a net deduction of .20/per mile
(assuming you use the standard milage rate method).
Of course this is all subject to the 2% Adjusted Gross "floor" for job
related expenses. It would also be subject to whether one's total
itemized deductions exceeded the standard deduction. In my case the
deduction offsets most of the monthly reimbursement. However it is
quite possible that many people would be able to realize no deduction
at all for car expenses.
And here's another thing you may not have considered. Remember that
along with income tax, Social Security and Medicare taxes are also
withheld. You have no avenue at all to try to recover any of these
taxes.
If the current rumors are correct, Digital may "help" us reduce this
tax problem by lowering the monthly reimbursement to $200. :^(
|
2912.12 | got it corrected.... | TOOHOT::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Thu Mar 03 1994 22:03 | 12 |
| Okay - I spoke with Payroll and figured out that based on my number of
deductions, they are withholding the correct amount for the Plan B
checks since the check is separate from my regular payroll check. The
only way to fix it is to reduce the number of deductions which will
affect BOTH my regular check and the Plan B check....
re: a few back - I went thru the math on my Fed taxes to claim
unreimbursed employee expenses but it didn't exceed the 2% limit, so I
can't deduct any of the expenses for the car... just got hosed this
year when I didn't expect it...
Thanks for all the comments.
|