T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2869.1 | How 'bout this round? | VMSNET::G_CHANG | TheFaceOfADragonFlyIsNothingButEyes! | Mon Jan 24 1994 14:14 | 5 |
| What groups were/are going to be affected? Rumor was that TFSO would
come today but we haven't heard anything.
--Gina
|
2869.2 | IMHO | POKIE::HORN | | Mon Jan 24 1994 15:12 | 5 |
| They've been late to make cuts before, so no surprise. They may be
re-evaluating everything in light of the latest earnings. Most likely
adding to the list.
Good luck to all.
|
2869.3 | DLS really means B.Y.E. | SWAM1::FISH_JA | a view from the water | Mon Jan 24 1994 15:28 | 11 |
|
No official word yet here, but we in DLS have been told tomorrow
(Tuesday) we will be informed of which individuals have been "affected"
within our group. This can only mean DLS is loosing more people.
DLS (digital learning services...once called educational services,
once called....)
:{
|
2869.4 | 1st Hand Knowledge | SWAM2::WALSH_JA | | Mon Jan 24 1994 16:39 | 40 |
| Having just (10:00am this morning) gone through the TFSO (Transition
Financial Support option) process with a HR (Human Resource) person
I believe I can speak with some knowledge on the "package."
Salary continuation for 4 weeks (plus one more check to make up for the
"missing paycheck effect" when you started working). Then a lump sum
payment of 1.)one week pay for each year worked (part of year will be
payed) 0-4 min.= 4 weeks 2.) vacation and personal holidays left on the
books are paid. I don't know about any max. on 1 & 2.
Health benefits continued for 4 weeks plus 1 week for each year of
service. You then have 30 days to assume the policy without an exam.
This is high risk for the insurance company and the cost maybe HIGH.
You might be able to get a cheaper policy on your own provided you
don't have an existing health condition. If you have an existing health
condition you'll want to assume the coverage of the policy (without the
health exam) mentioned above.
You will be given 6 months of "free" outplacement services of Drake Beam
Morin, a national company.
One last thing, when they give you the package (happened this morning
to me), you have until Friday (Jan.28, 1994 5:00pm EST) to find another
job within DEC (no it's not DEC anymore - make that Digital).
Now don't quote me on any of this. It's what I remembered and what's on
my paperwork. If you are TFSOed (let's call it layed off) you'll be
given all the necessary information.
Personally, I not bent or anything like that - a little disappointed
maybe, but I'm not going to flame about it (at least not when I have
internal job interview today at 4:00pm). We'll wait and see what I'll
have to say come Friday 5:00pm EST.
Regards and Best to "all who are in waiting,"
Jack Walsh
Formally, MCS Senior Technical Instructor
Costa Mesa, CA
|
2869.5 | | HAAG::HAAG | Rode hard. Put up wet. | Mon Jan 24 1994 17:55 | 13 |
| Note 2869.3 by SWAM1::FISH_JA
>No official word yet here, but we in DLS have been told tomorrow
>(Tuesday) we will be informed of which individuals have been "affected"
>within our group. This can only mean DLS is loosing more people.
this reallly fries my butt. i just deleted two memos from my management
advertsing two DLS positions looking to hire people in our PSC. and
people wonder why morale is in the tank. there seems no consideration
in trying to save expereienced people. hack here. hack there. add here.
add there. doesn't give one much hope that anyone really knows what the
hell is going on.
|
2869.6 | 7 days to go...? | SWAM1::FISH_JA | a view from the water | Mon Jan 24 1994 20:39 | 22 |
| 2869.4....
Jack, I for one will be interested to hear, if you so choose, how you
so quickly lined up an interview at 4:00 pm on the day you were
"tfso'd". that kind of knowledge may come in handy rather quickly to
us. Call me off line if you want.
-.1
It is not only your area that had req's open. Apparently there were
req's recently opened in Atlanta, or somewhere in the south. If these
are the memos you referred to, they may still be available. Who knows
how things work.
Also, it appears now our office is on hold until next week for
notification (unoffical word that has reached me). We must now all sit
on our hands for 7 days and wonder. I know it wasn't intended, but it
makes the days tick by all the more slowly.
|
2869.7 | MARVA support hit | KAOS::TURRO | Make it so number 1 | Mon Jan 24 1994 22:22 | 9 |
| Here in the MARVA district 4 seasoned district Support Engineers
3 of which I have known for 13 years . Their combined time with DEC
would probably exceed 50 years.
However Im glad its not me and I believe they were in the wrong place
at the wrong time. I wish them Good Luck in the future.
Mike Turro
|
2869.8 | Is there a new Wrinkle to a TFSO job search ? | STAR::PARKE | True Engineers Combat Obfuscation | Tue Jan 25 1994 10:00 | 4 |
| Re .4, having til Friday to get a Job.
Remember the recent memo, requiring a VP signature to hire someone who
has been notified.
|
2869.9 | | THEBAY::CHABANED | Spasticus Dyslexicus | Tue Jan 25 1994 10:26 | 14 |
|
I recently had a conversation with a manager who was hiring about said
memo. Seems he was concerned about how it might be "too difficult" to
push such an approval request through to a VP if the person in question
were "just a sales support person".
I almost hit the roof! Looks like this VP signature business is yet
another way to hurt the worker bees. And I thought it was a way put
and end to the "good old boy" network.
Silly me!
-Ed
|
2869.10 | Can't keep shufflin' the deck | POCUS::BOESCHEN | | Tue Jan 25 1994 16:22 | 10 |
| FABS got hit today. Don't know how many people.
It's very clear about this VP approval. Every time we have layoffs,
head count hasn't gone down as much as needed. So now they give you
'till the end of the week to line something up, and oh by the way,
a veep must sign off on it.
I bet all the veeps are in "closed" door meetings this friday.
IMO
|
2869.11 | the right person for the right job, not who you know | TLE::MCCARTHY | Back to BASICs | Tue Jan 25 1994 19:38 | 15 |
| My cut at the VP signature requirement (I work in engineering if it matters) is
some FINALLY realized that there were just too many people with open reqs
hiring people who were over or under qualified (either in title or pay) for
positions they have available - just because of an assumption of how this
person MAY perform at this job.
I have heard many stories of "high level manangers" suddenly becoming
an "individual contributor" while the current individual contributors are being
TFSO'ed. There are cases where this works, there are cases where this fails
(I've seen more failures that successes).
I like to think that the requirement is someone's attempt to cut down on the
"old-boy" network saving old friends or ex-co-worker at the last minute.
bjm
|
2869.12 | | THEBAY::CHABANED | Spasticus Dyslexicus | Tue Jan 25 1994 20:00 | 12 |
|
Re: .11
I agree that the scenario you describe SHOULD be how it works. My
question is, if a req is open and someone with the IDENTICAL job code
(and has had that job code for a number of years) applies for the job,
why should VP approval be needed?
I have nothing against requiring VP approval for people moving into
positions with dissimilar job codes and skillsets.
-Ed
|
2869.13 | another one here.....MKO1 | SOLVIT::BXOFRN::ROY | lose your step fall outa grace | Wed Jan 26 1994 08:46 | 23 |
|
CSS (now EIS?) in MKO got hit pretty hard. I had my meeting
yesterday at 11:30. Done Friday @5pm. My manager made it sound
like they would help to get the VP signature.
My problem with all this is that from my point of view, it 'seems'
like it's more workers than managers. But, what do I know?
Right now I'm struggling with whether I want to find another job
in DEC. Ooops, this isn't DEC anymore in name or nature......
The note from the fellow TFSO'd is right on as to the details.
Personally, I feel more sorry for digital than I do for myself.
Get those resumes up to date. There's very little warning, and
who gets hit defies logic.
Best of luck to you all,
Glenn M. Roy (sr. hw engineer if anyone knows of anything
in N.H. Mass. is a 2hr one way drive for me,
and would affect my ability to do a good job.)
|
2869.14 | EMPLOYEE BUYOUT!!! | DPDMAI::AUTRY | | Wed Feb 16 1994 10:23 | 4 |
| In the field there is a rumor about a voluntary transition package, has
anyone heard any details of the package?
TLA
|
2869.15 | How do I get off this ride? | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Wed Feb 16 1994 13:01 | 2 |
| No, that's "Bye-Out" - good-BYE, you're OUT. It similar to the open
door policy - there's the door...use it.
|
2869.16 | COPY OF THE MEMO ? | CAPNET::WENTWORTH | | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:56 | 16 |
| Can somebody please forward this memo. I have not seen it
nor has anybody I know seen this.
thank you.
<<< MORTAL::$1$DIA1:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DIGITAL.NOTE;3 >>>
-< The Digital way of working >-
================================================================================
Note 2869.8 Current TFSO package details? 8 of 15
STAR::PARKE "True Engineers Combat Obfuscation" 4 lines 25-JAN-1994 10:00:37.83
-< Is there a new Wrinkle to a TFSO job search ? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re .4, having til Friday to get a Job.
Remember the recent memo, requiring a VP signature to hire someone who
has been notified.
|
2869.18 | where? | POBOX::SCHWARTZINGE | It's gonna get better | Mon Mar 14 1994 13:55 | 6 |
| Are the TFSO packages listed in VTX somewhere?
Where does Digital list the current package?
Thanks,
J
|
2869.19 | Keep the benefits coming | MIMS::THOMPSON_A | Buck nekkid line dancer | Thu Mar 17 1994 10:23 | 4 |
| Don't know if this has been pointed out yet or not, but while searching
through VTX BENEFITS yesterday for some retirement information, I
noticed that TFSO is listed as a benefit. Guess we have to keep up with
the industry standard huh?
|
2869.20 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Another snowy day in paradise | Thu Mar 17 1994 11:57 | 4 |
| RE: TFSO as a benifit - It's got being dumped with nothing all to
pieces.
Alfred
|