[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

2746.0. "Did you know you committed???" by 31318::SASLOW_ST (STEVE) Thu Oct 28 1993 13:33

    How many people in the field know that they made a 1,2, or 3 year
    commitment (depending on who you talk to) to their CBU job on July 1 of
    this fiscal year??????
    
    Do you know that you cannot apply for any DEC job outside your CBU and
    get it without VP approval ???? and VP approval (according to Russ G.)
    will not be granted????
    
    Did anybody get a 1,2, or 3 year guarantee of employment???
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2746.1POCUS::RICCIARDIBe a graceful Parvenu...Thu Oct 28 1993 13:403
    Nothing formal.  A VP did mention to me that once I accepted a job, I
    was exected to remain there for at least a year.  Normally hiring managers
    will ask you up front for at least a two year commitment. 
2746.2Do you mean we have no choice where to work?COMET::BASCHALThu Oct 28 1993 16:1815
    RE: .0
    
    Do you mean that just by working in the field (and for a CBU) that
    I cannot apply for another position for somewhere between one and three
    years? 
    
    I could understand (sort of) not allowing people who were just hired
    into a position not to change jobs for a year or two, but to
    arbitrarily say that no one in the field can change jobs outside your
    CBU but within Digital for that length of time sound strange indeed.
    
    Next, they'll try to say you can't apply for a job outside of Digital,
    that unless you get tapped for TFSO.
    
    Jim
2746.3It Makes Sense to Me!ODIXIE::GELINEAUThu Oct 28 1993 17:5815
    
    I do not know of any formal notification given when presented the CBU
    job offer; however, it is reasonable to think that the CBU's would like
    to have longer term commits.  After all, how will they build industry
    expertise and focus with their sales, support, and management teams
    moving around the company?  
    
    There certainly were CBU deployment issues in the beginning, i.e. one
    CBU with too many folks and another under resourced; but, this has been
    worked out for the most part.  I expect that CBU's will want to keep
    their teams together long enough to see if this structure suits the
    demanding needs of the business thereby confirming that we got it right
    this time.
    
    Rgds,
2746.4Go forth and wander the scorched earth...DPDMAI::WISNIEWSKIADEPT of the Virtual Space.Thu Oct 28 1993 23:428
    I specifically asked that before I signed my letter of acceptance.
    
    The answer was no I was free to pursue any Digital opportunity
    I wished...
    
    Now about those multitudes of Digital opportunities;-)
    
    
2746.5RLTIME::COOKFri Oct 29 1993 09:0811
Like John, I specifically asked about any implied commitments.  I was told there
were no time commitments involved in accepting the July 1 offer.  I included
a statement to the effect in my acceptance letter and it was read and accepted
by mangerment.  I kept a copy of that letter.

Al Cook


    

2746.6Two smart people so far.31318::SASLOW_STSTEVEFri Oct 29 1993 12:157
    Re: .2 That is true in my CBU - CEM
    
    Re .4 and .5 That is contrary to what Russ G. says but I am glad you
    are smart folk. Hope that doesn't change should you try to execute it.
    
    Even personnel says .0 is true and there is no recourse.
    
2746.7Had to do something....RLTIME::COOKFri Oct 29 1993 12:5212
    
>    Re .4 and .5 That is contrary to what Russ G. says but I am glad you
>    are smart folk. Hope that doesn't change should you try to execute it.

At Digital it's been a long time since assurances from management, verbal or 
written, offered any protection from later decisions.  Not that smart, just
the best I could come up with on short notice.
    

al    

2746.8SYORPD::DEEPBob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708Wed Nov 03 1993 10:5311
Its standard operating procedure in most companies, and almost never set down
as "policy."   If someone wants you bad enough, they pull enough strings, 
make a strong enough business case, and press all the right buttons, and 
you're there.   Otherwise, you get the standard line about # of years in 
your current position, blah, blah, blah...   It just means the hiring manager
either had an "easier" candidate, and/or didn't have enough political clout
to hire you.

Not fair, just reality.

Bob
2746.9Read my lips: NO TRANSFERS31318::SASLOW_STSTEVEMon Nov 08 1993 17:013
    Re .8 - Much worse than that. I was told no matter who wanted me, my
    CBU had the power to stop me from going and that was policy straight
    from Russ G.
2746.10TOOK::MORRISONBob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570Mon Nov 22 1993 14:258
  I'm still confused. Did Russ G. reset the "clock" on everyone in Customer
Service such that they must remain in their current CBU for X number of years?
Or did he say that people have a commitment for X years from date of hire?
Also, is "remaining in your CBU" the same as remaining in your current position?
  There have always been circumstances under which people could be "trapped"
in their current jobs in Digital, but this is the first I have heard of it
being applied en masse to a large group of employees (if my interpretation of
.0 is right).
2746.11Read my lips.31318::SASLOW_STSTEVEWed Dec 01 1993 11:328
    I meant what I said in the base note. That is what I was told by my
    District Manager and personnel. Supposedly it applied to everyone. I
    did nothing new when I was assigned to the CBU.
    
    Right now, it seems irrelavent since as a result of that decision, I am
    one hour away from my exit interview. I did have one choice left and I
    took it. I love my new job!! Farewell!