T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2619.1 | MCG | NIOMAX::LAING | Soft-Core Cuddler*Jim Laing*223-4793*PKO3 | Fri Aug 13 1993 12:39 | 10 |
| According to a phone call I receive (moments after I placed my note!)
it was the MCG, Media Communications Group, and they are now
Quantic Communication
in Andover, Massachusetts.
Whoever called (I can't remember your name), thanks!
Jim
|
2619.2 | | BOOKS::HAMILTON | All models are false; some are useful - Dr. G. Box | Fri Aug 13 1993 15:57 | 10 |
|
re -1
When you call them, would you do me a favor and ask how
they're doing? You could post the results here or EMAIL
me, if it's not too much trouble.
Thanks,
Glenn
|
2619.3 | | AIMHI::BOWLES | | Fri Aug 13 1993 17:08 | 9 |
| RE: .2
They shouldn't be doing too bad--we guaranteed to do a certain amount of
business with them for a few years (I think this may be the last year
of the guarantee). As a result, purchasing will *insist* that you use
Quantic (or at least get a bid from them) for any project which is even
remotely close to their set of skills.
Chet
|
2619.4 | uh, uh | 35918::CHERSON | the door goes on the right | Tue Aug 17 1993 13:46 | 7 |
| >They shouldn't be doing too bad--we guaranteed to do a certain amount of
>business with them for a few years
Er, hate to counter that rosy perspective, but their success is
measured on how much NON-DIGITAL business they win.
/d.c.
|
2619.5 | | POWDML::MACINTYRE | | Tue Aug 17 1993 14:30 | 17 |
| Think about this. How many companies can set up shop knowing that they
will be profitable for the first three years of operation? They can
devote a disprportionate amount of time, money and energy into
developing other business. The Quantic deal ranks up there as one of the
greatest sweetheart set ups of the century.
Add to the mix the fact that Digital's cost cutting measures led so many
groups to be very reluctant to spend money that Quantic had even more
resources available for non-Digital business, all the while pulling in
the Digital retainer.
It seems to me that it would take a mastermind his/her complete
commitment to screw that up and I don't think that is happening or is
it going to happen.
Marv
|
2619.6 | differing stories | BOOKS::HAMILTON | All models are false; some are useful - Dr. G. Box | Tue Aug 17 1993 15:05 | 8 |
|
re: .5
I've heard differing stories about how well they're doing, that's
why I asked if the person communicating with them could let
me know. I haven't heard one way or the other yet.
Glenn
|
2619.7 | MEDIA SERVICES SPIN-OFF | 58323::MARCOTTE | | Tue Aug 17 1993 15:26 | 3 |
| Well, I know Don Elias left and he was one of the principals.
That's all I know thus far.
|
2619.8 | Quantic worked fine for Systems Engineering | ODIXIE::DLEADER | Dave Leader | Tue Aug 17 1993 19:48 | 21 |
| I recently used Quantic Services to video tape the ceremony where Bob Palmer
and five VPs cut the ribbon on the announcement of Systems Engineering
Customer Center and engineering resources 'opening' up for customers' use.
You may have seen the press release in Livewire.
Quantic was the preferred vendor recommended by Corporate Public Relations.
There was no mention of a retainer, or discounted services as a preferred
vendor. In fact, my Corp. PR contact asked if I would like to consider
getting prices from other vendors. She said that for an event of such a short
duration (one half day of Quantic's time) that it probably doesn't make sense
to 'put it out for bid' since we have a preferred vendor.
I felt no pressure to use or not to use Quantic, but was being provided with
information from the corporate folks.
I felt that I decided to use Quantic, based on information from someone who
has experience in the area of media productions.
Dave
|
2619.9 | | JGODCL::KWIKKEL | The dance music library 1969-20.. | Fri Aug 20 1993 07:04 | 5 |
| Hi,
A hint, please read the last issue of Fortune magazine. ;^)
Look who's No.1 in the 500 listing.
Jan. ;^)
|
2619.10 | More Observations | AIMHI::BOWLES | | Fri Aug 20 1993 10:38 | 21 |
| From .5:
>>Think about this. How many companies can set up shop knowing that they
>>will be profitable for the first three years of operation? They can
>>devote a disprportionate amount of time, money and energy into
>>developing other business. The Quantic deal ranks up there as one
>>of the greatest sweetheart set ups of the century
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I couldn't agree more. I never understood why we (Digital) felt such
an obligation to insure the success of a group we were eliminating.
How many other TFSOed groups got this kind of corporate guarantee?
Maybe other purchasing groups treat the situation differently, but my
recent purchasing encounters have *insisted* that we get a quote from
Quantic. And, no, Quantic *does not* give any special price to
Digital. They are, in fact, often more expensive than other vendors.
However, Quantic often gets the business just because they are an
"approved vendor" and there's less hassle.
Chet
|
2619.11 | | XLIB::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Development Assistance | Fri Aug 20 1993 11:09 | 4 |
| So, Chet. Are you saying that you'd be willing to have more hassle if
the vendor were cheaper?
Mark
|