T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2584.1 | equivalent to the flow chart on which the last box says "And Then a Miracle Happens" | LACGID::BIAZZO | How low can we go? | Mon Jul 19 1993 12:14 | 11 |
| What you are witness to first hand is one of the many disconnects that exists
between the VPs that spew forth their grandiose plans and promises to the media
and our customers and then delegate the responsibility "to make it happen" to
the dregs that have been screwing things up for years. The middle management of
this company is still making their own agenda.
If you think accountability is now in place, you're sadly mistaken.
Until there is some action to go along with all the words that have been flying
around the past few months we will remain on a downward spiral.
|
2584.2 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Mon Jul 19 1993 12:37 | 11 |
| Your experience sounds similar to my brother-in-law's, who runs a
small trucking company and who wanted to upgrade his computer
equipment.
In the past, customers often had to beg us (literally!) to sell them
equipment. We could get away with that when we were pretty much the
only game in town; customers would put up with the aggravation of
buying stuff from us because they pretty much had to. They don't
have to anymore. And they won't. And they aren't.
Why can't we make it easy for people to buy stuff from us???
|
2584.3 | turning down $$$s, WHY????! | BSS::GROVER | The CIRCUIT_MAN | Mon Jul 19 1993 13:49 | 17 |
| Small Businesses turn into BIG businesses sometimes...
After all, look at Digital.. Digital started of in a barn/garage.. I
wonder what would have been the outcome if some of Digitals' original
vendors has taken the same attitude as Digital takes now..
Digital can not afford to be so rightious as to turn down ANY customer.
After all, there are many more small companys out there than larger
ones...
Someone has to fix this problem NOW..! Not later, NOW! No committee,
NOW!
My Opinion!
Bob G.
|
2584.4 | | NETWKS::GASKELL | | Mon Jul 19 1993 13:53 | 14 |
| Sad - its more of the "same old same old.
Ten years ago a civil engineer doing work for me asked me if I
could get a response for him from our Sales department. He wanted
someone to come and talk to a convention of 1000+ civil engineers in San
Francisco, about what DEC had to offer. Although each civil engineer
there represented an individual business, the overall sales would have
been in the millions--their Association was trying for equipment
compatibility between their memebers, trying to get everyone on the
same equipment and software.
I think you can guess the outcome........after many phone calls and
a rather confusing conversation with a rather acid young man in Sales
I gave up and the CE's bought from a competitor.
|
2584.5 | Very Small, very soon. | ELMAGO::JMORALES | | Mon Jul 19 1993 13:58 | 13 |
| These examples truly demonstrate that we have not done our job to sell
small amounts of our PC's to individual customers and/or small
business. What a shame !!!!!! That is why there is still
an excellent business for folks like DELL, COMPAQ, Radio Shack, among
others, that are serving this one/two unit market needs.
I personally do not think it is a matter of 'ease of doing business'.
The real problem lies in the fact that we are in our 'Confort Zone'
when the orders are in the $ 100,000.00 and over mark, but will not
put enough effort on 'smaller' orders. Get the biggest bang for the
buck attitude, that's what I call this. Folks, the sad news is:
1) Small Business is the ONLY thing that is growing this days, with
some few exceptions. If we do not pay attention, we will become very
small very soon.
|
2584.6 | Is there a solution??? | USCTR1::JHERNBERG | | Mon Jul 19 1993 14:54 | 53 |
|
I wrote the basenote which presented the problem now, I'd like to offer
a solution....}-)!
The small business market is unique....as is, I am sure, every market we
sell to....with the very great exception that the person who is drawing
up the specs, soliciting the quotes, running to banks for financing,
balancing the books, signing the payroll checks and sitting across the
desk from our DEC salespeople are nearly always the same person. *And*
that person most likely has put himself in hawk up to is a** for the
privlidge of working him/herself to exhaustion with alarming frequency.
When you say to this person; ship date in 10 weeks, we will no longer
be supporting the cheaper of two solutions, you just can't buy one
piece of (....) you have to buy a dozen to get any kind of discount,
you are...1) being disrespectful because you haven't bothered to
understand the "under the gun" nature of small business and that these
people often have every penny right down to their homes riding on their
business and...2) being judgemental in that as a salesperson you have
judged this account to be unworthy of your time based on the yields,
not the importance of what you are selling to the small business
person. Sales helped me earn some of my undergradute dollars and I was
trained by one of the most mean-spirited persons God ever let live but
he taught me one thing I've remembered to this day....treat your
customers...all your customers...as though you can't get along without
them and do it so often that they believe that they can't get along
without you. And herein lies the solution....get a group of
salespersons who believe in that philosophy and who aren't in sales to
rival Donald Trump. Yes, many sales people out there are seething
right now but wait a minute. For those of you who must support a large
house or a small one, a large family or a small one...}-)...and
especially those who must do it alone, it just may not be possible for
you to concertrate on very small accounts. I don't know how the new
incentive package effects salepersons so I apologize for my ignorance.
If this information is available, I'm certainly willing to read it.
So why not start a special unit within Sales for those people who aren't
after the brass ring, or those who have had a hectic sales career and
now want to wind down or perhaps those who are lucky enough to have two
incomes coming in and would like to deal with small start-up companies.
What a novel idea....reward people who are willing to work with those
upon whom they might have a hugh impact but probably will never be
jackpot salesperson of the year!
Just MHO....
|
2584.7 | how quickly they forget | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (381-0899 ZKO2-2/T63) | Mon Jul 19 1993 15:40 | 5 |
| re Note 2584.3 by BSS::GROVER:
> After all, look at Digital.. Digital started of in a barn/garage..
!!!!!!!!!!
|
2584.8 | wrong headset | SMURF::WALTERS | | Mon Jul 19 1993 16:24 | 8 |
|
Didn't he read our adverts? You have to sit in front of your desk and
*imagine* a PC.
%-)
|
2584.9 | | TLE::TOKLAS::FELDMAN | Opportunities are our Future | Mon Jul 19 1993 16:39 | 27 |
| re: .0
My most recent experience with Desktop Direct was the opposite. I
didn't have to wait very long. I was treated courteously and
efficiently by a sales rep (Marc) who took the time to look up
part numbers and investigate a confusing listing in the price book.
Finally, he looked up the expected delivery time. He knew full well that
I was just collecting the EPP price info and would place the order at a
later date, if at all.
Of course, I knew enough not to call an order line 15 minutes before
closing time. I also know enough to distinguish between EPP purchases
and third party business purchases. For better or worse, the EPP program
has consciously decided to give less service to EPP purchases than
to external purchases. Besides, even if there had been a discount, it is
against policy for you to use your discount on behalf of an unrelated third
party. If I were calling Desktop Direct for a friend, I wouldn't even
mention that I worked for Digital -- it's irrelevant.
I believe we're still in a situation where demand exceeds our supply.
I'm sure the PC folks are working hard at increasing our capacity, but in
the meantime, we're going to have delivery delays. This isn't the sort of
thing that can be changed overnight.
Gary
|
2584.10 | | 34823::RILEY | I *am* the D.J. | Mon Jul 19 1993 20:20 | 19 |
|
Four months ago I called Desktop Direct for a friend. I used the
friends name and number.
I said that I was interested in Desktop Publishing Software and NEEDED
TO MAKE A DECISION ASAP. I asked the person on the phone what Digital
had available and he said that they'd send me a catalog.
I told him that I needed to make a decision soon....so he said that
he'd send out the catalog "NEXT DAY".
NINE weeks later I received the catalog.
Unfortunately, 7 weeks earlier my friend bought software from IBM.
I've been given the impression for YEARS now that we are only
interested in the "big" sales.
"jackin' the house", Bob
|
2584.11 | It ALL mounts up! | 17576::BOUDREAU | | Tue Jul 20 1993 00:48 | 2 |
| Walmart did $63 BILLION in onesy twosey sales last year. I guess we at
digital could learn a thing or two from that!
|
2584.12 | | 48978::KINACI | as one does.. | Tue Jul 20 1993 03:39 | 19 |
| .0
A friend of mine who is an ex-Deccie had a similar experience. He was
given a budget of $15K to buy some equipment they needed. Still feeling
some of the old loyalty he figured he would give Digital a call. This
happened in the last month of FY93. One of the first things the salesman
asked him was whether he could buy any of the stuff he was ordering before
the end of the month. My friend told him, he doubted that he would. The
salesman took the info, said he would get back to him with a quote within
a week. He hasn't heard from the salesman since.
This friend works for a prestigious company which deals in aerospace
technology. They went to a competitor and got what they needed. He
says he will have a budget of $100K in the upcoming year for just such
purchases. He will not call Digital this time.
Life goes on.
Suz
|
2584.13 | 900 seconds and counting... | 50375::MTANNER | D'ye ken John plunk | Tue Jul 20 1993 06:24 | 26 |
|
RE -9
>>Of course, I knew enough not to call an order line 15 minutes before
>>closing time.
This is irrelevant. If we're serious about what we're doing, you should
work those 15 minutes without any clock-watching.
>>I believe we're still in a situation where demand exceeds our supply.
>>I'm sure the PC folks are working hard at increasing our capacity, but
>>in
>>the meantime, we're going to have delivery delays.
I didn't get the impression from the basenote that this was being
questioned. What was being deplored was the attitude that was presented
on the telephone.
We should be selling to small companies like there is no tomorrow and
the people in the front line should be bending over backwards to do it,
as I'm sure some people are. Sadly, not all seem to have the same
philosophy.
Cheers,
Mark.
|
2584.14 | Make a phone call Boss... | LUNER::SAUDELLI | Taurus the Bull | Tue Jul 20 1993 10:37 | 17 |
|
How difficult and time consuming would it be(very little) for
the individual managers of these groups to "Test" the order system of
which they are responsible? A simple task would be for these
individuals(managers/supervisors) to randomly call and inquire about
purchasing a DEC/DIGITAL PC/system. This call would be placed to thier
own direct reports, the individual calling could use a fictitous name
and find out exactly how thier direct reports deal with the potential
customers. Just a simple phone call will reveal the way a customer is
dealt with. Based on this periodical practice, management can get a
understanding as to what it is like dealing with DEC, and can make
improvements in the ordering process.
Or is this scenerio to easy? Or am I a tad out of touch?
randy
|
2584.15 | tried once by my recollection | KISMIF::WITHERS | | Tue Jul 20 1993 11:22 | 15 |
| This was done once before as I recall and the memo I saw thru the
grapevine wasn't very pleased with the results. It was in the early
days of 1-800-PC-BY-DEC and addressed that ordering an Intel PC product
got extremely confusing as 1-800-DIGITAL didn't always know to connect
you with the aforementioned PCBYDEC number. Comments included some
``dunno'' type responses and some re-directs to local sales offices,
some of which gave further ``dunno'' answers. This is sketchy but as I
recall only a low (25%?) number of calls had the desired, simple
transfer to the PC order line from the DIGITAL order line.
George
[If this is completely wrong, I'm sorry ... it was quite a while ago
and just an FYI message I remember seeing.]
|
2584.16 | | BOT000::LANE | Good:Cheap:Fast: pick two | Tue Jul 20 1993 11:42 | 12 |
| Saw an ad on the tube the other day by General Electric. Starts off with
a guy looking at a large jet engine with some kind of problem, switches
to someone in a kitchen with another problem and was followed by similar
scenes with other GE products. Goes on to say something to the effect
that if you have troubles/questions/etc about ANY GE product, call
1-800-.... Open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.
Left me with the impression that GE is not going to tolerate ANY confusion
on the part of it's customers. One number, all problems handled, no
questions asked.
Why can't we do that?
|
2584.17 | elevate to senior management | ZIPLOK::PASQUALE | | Tue Jul 20 1993 13:50 | 11 |
|
re:. back some...
When these problems are discovered is anything done to bring it to the
attention of the appropriate senior managers rather than just posting
it in a notesfile? I would expect that in times like these, that this
would be standard procedure. If appropriate senior manager doesn't re-
spond or does but not to your satisfaction then push it to the next
level until there is some indication of success. It's critically
important that issues that negatively effect our ability to return to
profitability are brought to senior managements attention.
|
2584.18 | Who's going to write the letter to BP ? | ELMAGO::JMORALES | | Tue Jul 20 1993 14:18 | 6 |
| Re: .17
100% in agreement. There's also a couple of excellent ideas
expressed here. I like the one of calling the 800 number and place
an order, to see how it goes. We should do it, after all our jobs
are the ones at risk. So, who is going to write the letter to BP ?
|
2584.19 | | BOT000::LANE | Good:Cheap:Fast: pick two | Tue Jul 20 1993 14:21 | 8 |
| |When these problems are discovered is anything done to bring it to the
|attention of the appropriate senior managers rather than just posting
|it in a notesfile?
Oh, come on....
When you're talking about 800 numbers, your primary concern is what the
customer thinks of it. It's the manager's job to KNOW how well it works.
|
2584.20 | Complaining only does any good if people care | SMAUG::GARROD | From VMS -> NT, Unix a future page from history | Tue Jul 20 1993 14:36 | 13 |
| There is no point in elevating things to senior management because they
never reply. I'll give you a specific example.
Recently I was extremely displeased with the ineptness of the Computer
Operations Group in LKG (amongst other things they lost an incremental
backup). In the process of handling this I wrote a memo containing
questions to Gabe Carbone the manager of Computer Operations in LKG. It
contained questions. To date I have not received a reply.
A manager that actually cared whether their group was functioning
effectively would have replied.
Dave
|
2584.21 | A word of explanation. | USCTR1::JHERNBERG | | Tue Jul 20 1993 14:50 | 105 |
|
re: .9
My most recent experience with Desktop Direct was the opposite. I
didn't have to wait very long. I was treated courteously and
efficiently .....
****I am glad that you have had positive experiences; I wish ALL experiences
were positive....after all *my* salary is also dependent on positive exper-
iences becoming product purchases. Your tone seems to be that I take some
kind of satisfaction in my negative experiences; rest assured, I do not.
Of course, I knew enough not to call an order line 15 minutes before
closing time.
****I must agree that a previous noter wrote that time to closing should make
absolutely no difference in the way that any customer is treated. For all the
person on the other end of the phone line knew, I could have been a purchase
agent for Norton, Wyman Gordon, or any of many other large local businesses.
Since when is respect for a customer time related? However, to be fair, another
situation was a call to the DECdirect technical line to follow up on a software
question I had on a system that I purchased myself. I called at 5:30 and was
told call back later, you are an employee. I then called at 7:00 and was told
we are busy, call again, you are an employee. Finally at 7;30 after being told
to call tomorrow, I refused to hang up and was transferred to someone in Col-
orado Springs who could not help me solve my problem (improperly installed
mouse driver, not rocket science but I'm new to PC's) and I bought a DOS book
and did it myself...are you going to tell I should have done it myself in the
beginning??
I also know enough to distinguish between EPP purchases
and third party business purchases. For better or worse, the EPP program
has consciously decided to give less service to EPP purchases than
to external purchases. Besides, even if there had been a discount, it is
against policy for you to use your discount on behalf of an unrelated third
party.
****Revenue is revenue regardless of its source save criminal. My dollar as an
employee is the same dollar as any customer would spend. And the attitude of
the sales force should be that every dollar is precious! The accumulation of
a fortune starts with a single buck!! As far as violating policy the person
I was calling for, by the time I might have gotten the DEC system, will be my
husband. I called a spade a spade at the time it was a spade! And you have
missed the point....the attitude is what I am addressing and as far as the
person on the other end of the phone was concerned, she could have cared less
who was going to purchase the system or their relation to the company.
If I were calling Desktop Direct for a friend, I wouldn't even
mention that I worked for Digital -- it's irrelevant.
****The situation surrounding a potential purchase should be the business of
any DEC salesperson and one of the stated goals of DECdirect is to become a
secondary sales force...that was part of the written mission statement when the
group was first formed. Gathering information about a customer's inquiry
should be an entree to a sale and from a sale to a bigger sale.
I believe we're still in a situation where demand exceeds our supply.
****Once again, this had nothing to do with attitude. Whether or not, DEC
can meet demand does not/should not determine the civility of those persons
that the customer must deal with over the telephone.
I'm sure the PC folks are working hard at increasing our capacity, but in
the meantime, we're going to have delivery delays. This isn't the sort of
thing that can be changed overnight.
****Of course it can't be changed overnight....it should have never happened
in the beginning. Where was the forecast? Where was the manufacturing and
logistic planning? Post facto doesn't cut it when there are half a dozen
outlets that can sell the same product that you do and you can just pull them
off the shelf and put them in your shopping basket. DEC's advantage is its
reputation as the producer of the finest hardware available. That is what
prompted my acquaintance who owns the art gallery to call DEC's customer line.
He had prior computer knowledge and figured DEC hardware is so good than
their network knowledge was probably very good as well. He pick up the phone
with a positive attitude toward DEC and was already convinced DEC was the way
to go. He didn't have any EPP issues to work out...he was not laboring under
the secondary service that EPP receives....this was a real live customer and he
was treated with disrespect. That is what I am talking about. And while I'm
on the topic of respect, maybe the sales force would universally treat our
customers with respect if they themselves were universally treated with
respect by the company.
That, Gary, is what I am talking about.
In the end, how I am treated, as an individual, may well be of little conseq-
uence to anyone but me, but where do I end and the rest of the customers begin?
My remarks are not potshots at Sales. I would certainly be more than willing
to face the very situations that I outlined in my basenote if DEC would would
hire me as a salesperson. In my opinion, salespeople are the life's blood of
any company and whenever there is a slump, they are the first to ask to bleed
in this company. In addition, I have been told that the attitude of the "old
days" is that DEC products sell themselves so we don't need salespeople. Re-
cently, Bob Palmer made a comment to a national audience that DEC had the worst
sales force in the industry. I am sorry I do not remember the event, I think
it was the DECUS meeting and if I have not portrayed this accurately I apolo-
gize to Mr. Palmer and to the readers of this note. *Yes* he did go on to
qualify himself by saying that the problem stemmed from management but why make
that statement in the beginning? Could he not have made his point with just
as much candor but with dignity and respect for those he was condemning?
My points are these: 1) respect the customers, 2) respect and support the
people who must convenience customers that DEC can serve them well. This does
not mean that I can't try to bring to light situations in which 1) or 2) are
ignored. It just so happens this particular time I got caught up in 1).
It has not been my intent to criticize but to offer constructive
criticism hence my second note and I will be more than happy to discuss
it with anyone on that basis.
Janis
|
2584.22 | EPP != at cost ... therefore ... EPP == profit | KISMIF::WITHERS | | Tue Jul 20 1993 15:12 | 11 |
| I just want to add a note of agreement with .21 WRT EPP support...
Digital's EPP program offers a 20% discount. This is a fine discount
but still leaves enough profit where I would view myself as a customer
deserving customer respect and support. If Digital wants to offer
equipment to employees at internal cost, then I will understand that I
have not signed up for true ``support'' but the current EPP program is
not offering discounts of that magnitude.
George
|
2584.23 | | SPECXN::WITHERS | Bob Withers | Tue Jul 20 1993 15:40 | 18 |
| Re: Knowing when to call:
I, as a customer, shouldn't have to know or care. I recently upgraded several
hundreds of dollars of Borland software. I did it at 2 in the afternoon on a
Sunday. I recently decided (at the last moment) to order something from
PC connection and called them at five-before-midnight on a Tuesday. The
product arrived at 9:18 the next morning. I had a bunch of software I wanted
to register with Microsoft. I didn't want to send four reply cards, so I
called Microsoft Sales and they registered me over the phone. For that matter,
WinFAX pro registered itself.
The point? Digital's attitude is that if you want to do business with Digital,
you do it Digital's way. The attitude is totally unacceptable in today's
competitive environment. A 50% or worse rate of good experiences smacks of
arrogance or ignorance.
BobW
|
2584.24 | Pockets not deep enough? | SALEM::BOUDREAU | | Tue Jul 20 1993 19:19 | 10 |
| Last year my wife had $86,000 to spend on computer equipment for her
company. It was her decision on what she purchased. Needless to say
she insisted on giving Digital the business $$$. This had the potential
of bringing lots more business to DEC for the industry she was in
was just getting into computers in a big way and they would look at
the most sucessful platform as a standard. Anyway we gave her the
business ^&*#@!. Nothing was purchased from Digital nor will be in
the future.
Sad. Anybody home?
|
2584.25 | MicroAge - one of the answers? | SAHQ::BAINE | | Wed Jul 21 1993 11:10 | 14 |
| With Digital's new partnership with MicroAge (see the LiveWire article
of a couple days ago), do you think some of these problems will be
alleviated? Won't this type of retail business cater to small
businesses?
As for a direct sales force, there are now only 60 PC-dedicated sales
reps in the U.S. to sell our PCs. Anything else goes through one of
the other channels. A profit margin of 2-3% does not allow us to spend
much time selling these boxes, especially to smaller businesses who are
going to buy fewer than 1,000 PCs. It will be interesting to see how
well our systems sell through MicroAge.
KB
|
2584.26 | Just Asking | SPECXN::BLEY | | Wed Jul 21 1993 11:31 | 14 |
|
Everybody is siting cases of the "small business" not getting any
attention.
Has anybody seen or heard of Digital's ***OFFICIAL*** policy on
"small businesses?" Maybe it is company policy NOT to deal with
smaller companies. In the "past" a Digital sales person was not
ALLOWED to sale below xxx dollars, they HAD to turn the lead over
to one of our OEMs, VARs etc. Is this still the case?
Could the sales person have turned the lead over to one of these
OEMs, etc. and it is really the OEM that is dropping the ball?
|
2584.27 | you must insist... | ZIPLOK::PASQUALE | | Wed Jul 21 1993 14:11 | 24 |
| re:.20
> Recently I was extremely displeased with the ineptness of the Computer
>Operations Group in LKG (amongst other things they lost an incremental
>backup). In the process of handling this I wrote a memo containing
>questions to Gabe Carbone the manager of Computer Operations in LKG. It
>contained questions. To date I have not received a reply.
>A manager that actually cared whether their group was functioning
>effectively would have replied.
Obviously this is up to you. But if it was something that you regarded
as very important then you would take the next step, which would be to
attempt to contact this person one more time, then off to the next
manager higher up in the food chain than this person and so on. The
point is we've got to (or maybe we don't have to, depends on ones
outlook) insist that people be accountable and not settle for anything
less.
|
2584.28 | One small step missing | AGENT::LYKENS | Manage business, Lead people | Wed Jul 21 1993 14:32 | 10 |
| The horror stories entered here on behalf of small business trying to buy
from Digital are symptomatic of a larger problem. I agree that Digital may
not be able to service smaller business given lower profit margins. However, that
being the case, anyone who answers a Digital publicly published phone should be
able to direct a small business customer to an "appropriate" sales channel.
Ignoring or being rude to a potential customer because we can't supply them
cost effectively or don't want their business directly is UNACCEPTABLE and
creates the kind of customer reaction and perception as described.
-Terry
|
2584.29 | "measure success, one customer at a time" | BSS::GROVER | The CIRCUIT_MAN | Wed Jul 21 1993 14:47 | 15 |
| If these "small business" sales are to small for sale-folks, why then
doesn't DECdirect or some other orders taker take these orders.
If it is a question of trying to find out what the small business
needs/wants, why not have the small business speak with a technical
person, on the phone, to get the order straight/correct, then maybe
conference in an order taker, to assist the customer in the order
process.
This type of process should not take that much time.
Just my opinion!
Bob G.
|
2584.30 | | ICS::CROUCH | Subterranean Dharma Bum | Wed Jul 21 1993 15:35 | 7 |
| Clang,
Watch it Bob, you're making too much sense.
Jim C.
|
2584.31 | Customers, we don't need no stinkin' customers | BSS::GROVER | The CIRCUIT_MAN | Wed Jul 21 1993 16:10 | 4 |
| I'm sorry.. 8^(
Bob G.
|
2584.32 | | THEBAY::CHABANED | Choose Your Dilusion | Wed Jul 21 1993 16:29 | 9 |
|
I used to work in channels. Signed up a number of small VARs who sell
to small business. Given what I saw, we don't even take the that
channel seriously.
Makes me sick.
-Ed
|
2584.33 | We are all Sales Reps !! | KAOOA::PINKERTON | Prov 3:5-6 | Thu Jul 22 1993 15:41 | 63 |
| re.last few
I , as well used to work for Channels. Canada DECdirect handled
everything from the DeskTop to the Data Centre. Until recently, there
was no PC focus there. Our VAR's and Distributors were the channel
for our customers to call. Guess what, they weren't up to speed
either, the customers would come back to DECdirect to get the " right
Technical answers" and then place the order with the VAR's and
Distributors.
You get what you measure!! We were measured on CERTS, not our
ability to sell solutions. In fact, it was a real hurdle (read
management issue) to direct the customer to a VAR/Distributor, and then
get credit for the sale. I had a $10M budget, and I tell you it was
difficult to sell large volumes of PC's to my assigned accounts!
Our PC's (1-2 yrs ago) were not perceived as being " first in Class"
but just expensive. Our customers expected clone prices, but with DEC
like Sales/Support.
Times have changed in Canada, a year has gone by since I left, they put
a real focus on the DeskTop, with a dedicated PC rep, training,
VAR/Distributor PC focus, CDN fed Gov't account, $$$$$, shortened
product lead times, etc.,
In all, it made it easier for the customer to purchase DECpc solutions.
Also giving the customers many channels to get Technical Sales
solutions, and quick order placement.
Still, I hear the same stories, customers getting bounced around, wrong
departments, receptionists, CRR's, Service reps, mangers, all sending
customers every where but DECdirect, or our Channels partners.
What internal message system do we univesally use that no one reads?
All-In-One !! I suggest Subliminal messages to let every one be aware
of the sales channels that our customers can call or better yet, "
Mr/MS. customer would you like to speak to our Sales channel of
choice,I can connect you right now if you wish? "
The message has not become part of the DEC culture, the right sales
resources are not always in the local sales office!! Call
1-800-PC-BY-DEC or whatever it is called, 1 stop shopping, without
wasting valuable customer time, and possibly loosing business, every
customer interaction should be viewed as a Potential Sales Call. we
are in a commodity buying market, driven by low $$, high product
expectations, ease of use, 1-800-call for advise, .
DEC's strategy is to be the PC vendor of choice. Just like FORD/GM, we
are the factory, there are sales channels, that may or may not be part
of DEC, that our customers should call for these products. Its, should
be up to each and every one of us to help qualify any customer inquiry
to a: what is the customer looking for? (qualify the call)
B: what is the best resource to service the customer's needs,
C: and send them there.
my 2 cents worth.
Gary Pinkerton
|
2584.34 | Be realistic | TOHOPE::REESE_K | Three Fries Short of a Happy Meal | Mon Jul 26 1993 20:06 | 24 |
| .33 spelled it out best.
We've had this discussion many times before. Pioneer, Avnet and
other authorized distributors are in place for a reason. Lobbing
mortars at sales isn't going to help. We have done a sorry job in
explaining that orders of XXX amount are expected to be placed thru
one of our channels. I think a lot of us could have done a better job
in getting some of these leads to our channels.
Unless and until *someone* with authority within Digital starts en-
suring that these leads are presented to the proper channel, there
will be many small businesses that think we just aren't interested.
Considering how sales has been gutted, do many of you *really* expect
a Digital sales rep to handle ALL leads internally?
If handled properly, a lead for a small to mid-range business could
be passed to an ATD (or whatever) without offending the prospective
customer....and hopefully the business would get booked.
Karen
|
2584.35 | | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | Neck, red as Alabama clay | Tue Jul 27 1993 07:59 | 5 |
|
Most departments have been gutted, Karen.
Mike
|
2584.36 | Here's some realism | VMSDEV::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Tue Jul 27 1993 13:25 | 14 |
| I'm new to this note, but was recently involved in a similar situation.
> Unless and until *someone* with authority within Digital starts en-
> suring that these leads are presented to the proper channel, there
> will be many small businesses that think we just aren't interested.
No disagreement. But all I know is I was told "have them go thru Avnet".
Neither I nor the potential buyer know who Avnet is nor how to
contact them. (I'm an engineer, not a channels marketer).
Another customer lost to a competitor.
John
|
2584.37 | you want answers go somewhere else, we just do clues | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Tue Jul 27 1993 13:40 | 12 |
| > Neither I nor the potential buyer know who Avnet is nor how to
> contact them. (I'm an engineer, not a channels marketer).
Sometimes it seems that we don't provide solutions, we provide clues.
Sometimes the clues aren't enough. We work this way with customers all
the time. We say RTFM when the customer has already tried the fine
manual. We say "go to Avnet" as if the whole world knows how to do
that. We do this internally as well. Ask someone for the answer to the
question and get a pointer to a pointer to a pointer. Answers? We don't
do that.
Alfred
|
2584.38 | | XLIB::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Development Assistance | Tue Jul 27 1993 13:50 | 1 |
| Avnet 1-800-426-7999
|
2584.39 | | MEMIT::CANSLER | | Tue Jul 27 1993 14:14 | 8 |
|
ref all replies:
My wife tried the same as all of you; she finally bought two
Sparc 5000's from Sun; delivered in 48 hours and was installed the third
day, 4th day sales was there for training.
bc
|
2584.40 | Sub-optimized our way to failure | AMCUCS::HALEY | become a wasp and hornet | Tue Jul 27 1993 18:19 | 33 |
| It certainly seems like we try very hard to invent boundaries, even when
there is no need to. Every group has their own short-hand, and even they
often misuse the language in expression. (The oft repeated AC current
example). When an engineer is told to have somebody do something such as
"have them go through Avnet" without help in how to do that BOTH parties
are at fault. The communicator did not know the audience, and the receiver
did not understand the words. The communicator should have worked harder,
and the receiver should have asked a question, "How?"
Either party could have gotten the job done in the earlier example, but
neither did it. When I was at a start-up we were constantly told "Only
half the people in the company are doing engineering, but ALL of us are
doing sales work."
The field has been cut by approximatley 35% and had their individual yields
raised by 41%. Translated, this is a lot fewer people doing a lot more
work. Naturally they were also told that we will modify your pay and you
have the opportunity to earn more or less. To earn more you will need to
work with distrubutors.
The lack of training of Digital employees in basic business skills never
ceases to amaze me. We have people who can't read a balance sheet, reach a
sales channel, determine their overhead, or make simple financial
calculations. We don't publish our expected IRR, we don't train people in
basic financial analysis, we simply set up stove pipes of information and
hope the sub-optimized systems somehow work.
If you can't understand our channel strategy, find a way to learn it. If
you can't understand our financial report, take the time to read and ask
questions. We as a company are perfect proof that sub-optimization is a
shortcut to failure.
Matt
|
2584.41 | We COULD still help turn some around | TOHOPE::REESE_K | Three Fries Short of a Happy Meal | Tue Jul 27 1993 20:09 | 50 |
| Thanks Matt, you articulated my thoughts of "how" it's supposed to
work very well. I attempted a response earlier, but lost the reply.
We are all sales reps. Over the years I've been contacted a number
of times by friends who worked for small-to-mid size companies wanting
to purchase our equipment. OK, so I knew because of my exposure that
they would not be assigned to an internal rep. I knew who could pass
the lead to the appropriate channel and I always followed up; all were
satisfied whether it was Avnet, Pioneer or whatever re-seller handling
the lead.
Customers DO shop around; they call us directly and a lot of them
call each ATD in their area....shopping around so to speak. A friend
who was in direct sales and now works for a distributor said she was
always frustrated when she found she was *competing* with one of own
re-sellers because unless the potential customer needed some sort of
custom solution that the re-seller couldn't deliver <--- doesn't happen all
that often; she would usually lose the sale to the re-seller when
price was the determining factor.
Digital doesn't lose in this scenario folks because the re-sellers
pay cash on the barrel for the HW/SW up front; they get discounts that
can be passed along to the buyer that internals couldn't begin to give.
I wonder how happy some of these "potential" customers would be if
the had someone internal rep hold their hand all the way, make them
feel good and then found out later they could have gotten a better
price from a re-seller <---- wonder who would hear these screams?
Oh, and in the meantime, I wonder how a large, installed-base account
would feel if they couldn't get a sales rep to respond in a timely
fashion when that same rep's time was being consumed on a sale that
wouldn't return much to Digital based on that rep's time, etc?
I've been with the company long enough to know it isn't easy doing
busy with us; but if enough of us take the time to do more than just
say "call _pick_your_re-seller_" everyone would come out ahead.
Trust me, the re-sellers would LOVE to get some of these leads; and if
we finesse it properly, the buyer isn't offended because he has to
deal with one of our re-sellers. If we couldn't handle leads for
small-to-mid range companies when we had quite a few more sales reps;
how in the world can we expect the remaining reps to handle it now?
There has been a solution/process in place for quite some time; it's
too bad different groups outside the sales organization couldn't be
made aware of how to handle these potential sales.
Karen
|
2584.42 | Don't chide us; educate us | SMAUG::GARROD | From VMS -> NT, Unix a future page from history | Tue Jul 27 1993 22:46 | 36 |
| Re "the last several"
Several of the last notes tell us to "refer small business to
resellers". I kind of knew this but I like I'm sure many others have no
idea which reseller to specify. The names I've heard are AVNET and
PIONEER.
Please could somebody point me at a VTX database that details all our
resellers and points out the differences between them. It should answer
questions such as:
What's the difference between the resellers (PIONEER AVNET etc)?
Are the resellers geography based or industry based Who covers
what?
What are their phone numbers?
What's the best way to make sure a lead has been followed up by
a reseller?
It's all very well for you to lecture is on how great our channel's
strategy is but if it is secret and the average employee doesn't know
about it then it is useless to those of us that come across a friend
that would like to consider DEC gear.
Hey me, I still can't work out why we have
DECdirect
PCBYDEC
Desktop Direct
and
1-800-Software
Yes I've read the VTX stuf under VTX PCSOFTWARE (I believe) that
attempts to distinguisg them but I'm still confused. There still seems
to be an enormous overlap.
Dave
|
2584.43 | | POCUS::OHARA | Don't ask. Don't drop the soap. | Wed Jul 28 1993 08:52 | 12 |
| RE: <<< Note 2584.41 by TOHOPE::REESE_K "Three Fries Short of a Happy Meal" >>>
>> Digital doesn't lose in this scenario folks because the re-sellers
Yeah, we do lose something. Our cost of sales goes up because we're spinning
wheels unnecessarily. I predict we're going to a model where distributors will
be the first line product sales and Digital will be the "value-added" providor
where apropriate. If there's price competition, let it be among the
distributors, who are better prepared to react to that type of sale.
Bob
|
2584.44 | Someone throw me a life jacket, please! | TOHOPE::REESE_K | Three Fries Short of a Happy Meal | Wed Jul 28 1993 14:59 | 49 |
| Bob,
I think we're in violent agreement here. Our cost of sale wouldn't
go up if the lead got to the re-seller *before* too many people
within Digital spent too much time spinning their wheels, I thought
that was the point I was trying to make.....
Dave,
Unfortunately, I don't believe there is a VTX database etc. containing
the info you mentioned. Since this discussion started, I decided to
contact my buddy in southern area who usually handled these referrals
for me to see if there was a fairly simple process I could post in
here for folks. Her job fell under the sales organization's umbrella;
I was unable to reach her....she was TFSO'd last week in June :-(
Now I'm really starting to feel grim. From what I can remember from
past discussions with her, I knew she contacted someone at the potential
customer's company to qualify the lead (to help in determining which
re-seller) to pass the lead to. If I recall correctly, because we
have more than one re-seller in most geographies, it was not proper to
just pick your re-seller of preference (assuming we had one) and pass
all the leads to that re-seller - the leads were to be spread equit-
ably along lines already determined by the channels organization.
I spoke to several people within the sales organization to see if I
could determine who is now handling this type of responsibility; so
far I haven't been able to come up with anything.
I *know* several of our largest re-sellers hired quite a few of the
sales reps who were TFSO'd since the summer of 1991....they did this in
anticipation of business that they were led to believe would be coming
directly to them <--- because this is not happening, a lot of friends
are now being let go by the re-sellers.
I've been trying to stay optimistic about things, positive thinking,
ya know, right!!! What is making me crazy about this right now is
that one thing that stands out from the first BP DVN I watched was
that Mr. Palmer specifically mentioned he would be concentrating on
re-newing relationships with our re-sellers and also trying to bring
more VARs and OEMs aboard.
I refuse to give up at this point; but I'm having a difficult time
suppressing a memory of an old movie I watched - some of you may have
seen it. People were getting into lifeboats while others stood by
singing Nearer My God To Thee (as the Titanic went down) :-(
Karen
|
2584.45 | Shouldn't this be fixed? Who should fix it? | SMAUG::GARROD | From VMS -> NT, Unix a future page from history | Wed Jul 28 1993 17:09 | 16 |
| Re .-1
I think my point is proved. If even you don't know how to refer calls
to resellers how do you expect any of the rest of us to know? From what
I understand you are in the 1-800-DECSALE organization which I would
have thought would be the first place that may be expected to know
this information or at least where it is.
Please don't get me wrong I'm not criticising you personally. I think
this is yet another example of how the communication structure of DEC
is severely broken. About the only thing it seems to work for is
sending out adverts for "touchy feely courses" for the full time course
and meeting goers and for the dissemmination of fluff filled messages
from personnel that try to prove the sky isn't blue.
Dave
|
2584.46 | Dave, where is *my* life jacket? | TOHOPE::REESE_K | Three Fries Short of a Happy Meal | Wed Jul 28 1993 20:10 | 22 |
| Dave,
I tried to help; I'm now as frustrated as everyone else in here.
No, 1-800-DEC-SALE can't take care of lead referrals; we stay ex-
tremely busy providing sales support to the internal reps who remain,
ATDs, we've added OEMs and VARs to our base. I had some knowledge of
the process because of some personal friends involved in that process;
they are now gone from the company!
The point I was trying to make is that there used to be a specific
structure and people in place in each sales geography to process the
leads and make sure they were handled properly. If (and it seems
true) that the folks handling this function were all TFSO'd, I honestly
don't know what to suggest.
As reading other topics suggest, we aren't doing a bang-up job of
marketing/advertising our new products to the public; IF a group still
exists to process such leads (as it seems many of us have been able
to do in the past) this organization has managed to become one of our
best kept secrets :-(
|