T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2509.1 | For those who wait. | GAAS::BRAUCHER | | Tue May 25 1993 10:46 | 9 |
|
At home I have THREE computers - a Rainbow, a 286, an old Mac. All
of them I got for FREE, practically. The 286, for example, was for
dogsitting for somebody's 2-week vacation (a non-Dec friend). I also
have 2 free printers, a free DEC modem (and a cheap second-hand Hayes),
and mucho FREE software, bootlegged and undocumented. I bet I get a
free 386 within 2 years. A free Alpha, by 2000. In America, if you
are willing to be late, you can get yesterday's in-thing for a song.
|
2509.2 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Tue May 25 1993 10:58 | 9 |
| > Am I the only one who finds this policy moronic and spiteful?
No you are not. I too have a Rainbow at home. It doesn't get much
use since I bought a 486 system but I could get some more use out
of it if I could add some memory and/or disk. But it would have to
be cheap or free to be worth it. I suspect that there are idle memory
upgrades and disk around Digital I could use.
Alfred
|
2509.3 | Just ask to borrow it for home | TLE::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Tue May 25 1993 11:13 | 7 |
| Re .0:
Just ask to borrow it for home use. You should be able to keep it at home with
no hassles as long as you work for the company. The inventory/asset management
hassles which keep you from buying the system or getting it as a gift don't seem
to apply to home loan equipment.
/AHM
|
2509.4 | donations | ANARKY::BREWER | nevermind.... | Tue May 25 1993 11:21 | 13 |
| No, you are not the only one who has a problem with this process.
I tried to get some components that were excess and being shipped
to the scrap pile (at that time, in Phoenix, now in New Hampshire?)
that were sorted so that there were no DEC part numbers on them
donated to the local college for lab use. I got it done once, it took an
act of congress, and was told not to try it again.
This was not a local decision, but rather a corporate one.
Right now, any scrap components from here in NM gets trucked to
New England to get crushed.
|
2509.5 | my expeinces with older DEC PeeCeees | STAR::ABBASI | | Tue May 25 1993 11:39 | 15 |
|
i have a pro-350 PeeCee too at home, 5 MB hard disk, 640 K memory
and Venix (unix flavour) OS inside it.
i tried to sell it for 50 bucks so i can use the table space it is
taking, but was not lucky, i want to try again sometimes.
.0
did DEC make Rainbow after or before the Pro-350 PeeCee?
i kind'a liked the PRO-350 when i used it , i did not used Rainbow, but
i did use VAXmate. i like the VAXmate too.
\nasser
|
2509.6 | I miss Corporate Salvage, too | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Tue May 25 1993 13:26 | 20 |
| Old computers and their components, as well as all sorts of other
interesting obsolete or no-longer-used stuff used to go to Corporate
Salvage, which used to be in Maynard. There was some sort of scandal a
few years ago about the most-useable of the stuff being siphoned off
and ending up in used-computer warehouses, or even at customer sites
(same serial numbers as things that were supposedly scrapped, anyhow),
and the facility was closed down. (From the dealings I had with Salvage
when it existed, it wouldn't surprise me too much if the allegations
were true.) Now we have the PDC store, which is good if you are looking
for a sturdy workbench for your basement without paying a fortune for
it, as I was last weekend (haven't reassembled it yet, but it was
$25!), but the computer components are all scrapped out instead. You
can still get oscilloscopes and various emters, sometimes, though the
'scopes are no longer $100, which is what I paid for mine (modulo the
cost of the parts to get it back into working order). I, too, think
that I could make better use of a lot of scrapped-out stuff than having
it crushed for the recycleable metal it's made of, but I guess the
old scandal caused too much trouble at high levels or something.
/Charlotte
|
2509.7 | Latest update on the salvage scandal | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | You are what you retrieve | Tue May 25 1993 13:48 | 38 |
| Copyright � 1993 Dow Jones & Co. from Press Release News Wire
BOSTON REAL ESTATE BROKER PLEADS GUILTY TO INTERSTATE SHIPMENT OF STOLEN
PROPERTY
BOSTON, May 18 /PRNewswire/ -- A Boston real estate broker pled guilty today
to charges of interstate shipment of stolen property in the Digital
Equipment Corporation investigation.
United States Attorney A. John Pappalardo announced that Denis Palmisciano,
42, of Lynnefield, Massachusetts pled guilty today before United States
District Court Judge Douglas P. Woodlock to two counts of interstate
shipment of stolen property. These charges each carry a maximum term of
imprisonment of five years and a fine of $250,000.
According to evidence presented at the hearing, Palmisciano acted as lookout
and driver for two thefts committed in February, 1989, from a Digital
Equipment Corporation warehouse in Whitinsville, Massachusetts. The stolen
products, DEC servers, were sold to companies in Minnesota and California
for $337,100.
Mr. Palmisciano is the fifteenth person convicted in the prosecutions of
persons who participated in the theft of computer products from the Digital
Equipment Corporation. Sentencing was scheduled for July 20, 1992. Last
week, Michael Edwards, a Boston area bookkeeper, was sentenced to fifteen
months in prison for his role in generating cash for the members of the
conspiracy.
The case has been investigated by Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and Special Agents of the Criminal Investigations Division of
the Internal Revenue Service. Digital Equipment Corporation provided
assistance during the investigation. The case has been prosecuted by
Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael K. Loucks.
/CONTACT: Kathleen Griffin of the U.S. Attorney Office Massachusetts,
617-223-9445/
18:56 EDT
---
|
2509.8 | | SOFBAS::SHERMAN | empowerment requires truth | Tue May 25 1993 13:55 | 13 |
| Fine. Now please explain how .7 relates to my asking for several
components to use in my Rainbow. Even if I were dastardly enought to
try and *sell* them, it seems unlikely that the $25 or so I'd realize
would jeapordize DEC's revenue stream. This assumes I could *find*
someone else out there also using a Boat Anchor 100+.
DEC is simply terrified that it might somehow do something _nice_ for
its employee. Can't have that.
kbs
|
2509.9 | Try our Distributors... | CGOOA::DTHOMPSON | Don, of Don's ACT | Tue May 25 1993 14:31 | 16 |
| ...to get Rainbow pieces.
I had great luck. Often they will provide a trade-in allowance (on the
same plan as a car dealer: You can have the new (&(& for $20,000, or I
can give you 4,000 for your JJJ and you can get a similarly equipped
but serial-numbered differently (&(& for $24,000 and the other dealer
will give you back the full 12,000 purchase price of your JJJ and sell
the (&(& for a mere 32,000.
The dealer (computer dealer) get's nothing for the Rainbows, and often
will give them away. One of mine was even shipped to me by courier
from 500 miles away!
Not only will you get hard disks and memories, you'll get a good
supply of spare parts which are becoming harder to find.
|
2509.10 | maybe it's smarter to scrap? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Tue May 25 1993 14:39 | 38 |
|
I can think of a few reasons:
1. There is always a risk that scrapped material ends up "for sale"
somewhere, and:
o Having written it off and scrapped it, DEC could inadvertantly
commit some small book-keeping error.
o DEC does not want to risk creating a black market for scrapped
parts that might encourage pilfering of and dealing in scrap.
(as per .7)
o DEC does not want to "back door support" obsolete products.
It's expensive and doesn't help us sell new models.
2. DEC may still be getting some fiscal advantage from the scrap.
o There may still be some kind of inventory value offsettable
against corporate taxes. (a writeoff would not apply
if the material was not subsequently scrapped.)
o There may be a contract to supply x quantity of scrap per
month for precious metal recovery. (Thar's a motherlode
in them thar motherboards).
3. The processes in place to manage excess inventory & scrap are probably
tuned efficiently to getting rid of it en masse. Generating internal
requests costs time and money - far more than the part is
worth. Too many ad hoc requests and you have a significant overhead.
That's a few reasons why DEC might *appear* to be being mean. They all
have a potential -ve revenue impact, could just be good business sense.
Regards,
Colin
|
2509.11 | Bury the problem | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | You are what you retrieve | Tue May 25 1993 17:15 | 9 |
| re: .8
Everything connected to the scrap and salvage of unused, unwanted, and
obsolete equipment has been a major headache for the company.
It's just simpler to designate all this stuff for a landfill than deal
with the problems other replies have mentioned.
Who wants another scandal?
|
2509.12 | Customers suffer & we loose $ too. | PFSVAX::MCELWEE | Opponent of Oppression | Wed May 26 1993 02:34 | 22 |
| Re: .8-
>Everything connected to the scrap and salvage of unused, unwanted, and
>obsolete equipment has been a major headache for the company.
What's really ironic is that we are being forced to drop
maintenance contracts at sites ready and willing to continue paying
big $ because of non-available/ obsolete parts.
The site I'm referring to has custom CSS h/w for a realtime system
which was developed with government funding in the 1970s. They simply
do not have the resources to upgrade.
I've suggested that we buy used complete machines while they can
still be found to continue the contract, but it appears the logistics
of this is too much despite the pennies-per-pound cost of spare iron.
The real obstacle is the CSS devices. This stuff was largely hand-made,
some of it on W series modules with wire wrapped interconnects. We've
had to repair these to the chip level for years already though, so
I still consider dropping the contract to be an unnecessary move.
Phil
|
2509.13 | | 16BITS::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed May 26 1993 09:53 | 6 |
| I believe that there's also been discussion (either in here or in EMPPURPRO)
about some IRS considerations. Apparently if DEC makes some of their used
products directly available to employees, it needs to be treated as income
or a benefit or something or other. I can't recall the specific details.
-Jack
|
2509.14 | regulations | XLIB::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, ISV Tech. Support | Wed May 26 1993 12:40 | 5 |
| I think Jack may be right. We had a "used furniture" sale here in
Marlboro and I had to sign a paper that essentially says "Digital is
not in the furniture business."
Mark
|
2509.15 | | SOFBAS::SHERMAN | empowerment requires truth | Wed May 26 1993 14:31 | 9 |
| >> I think Jack may be right. We had a "used furniture" sale here in
>> Marlboro and I had to sign a paper that essentially says "Digital is
>> not in the furniture business."
That explains it! If DEC sold obsolete computers, you'd have to sign a
paper saying that "Digital is not in the computer business"!
8*)
|
2509.16 | PRO & Rainbow hail from the same time frame re: .5 | GLDOA::MORRISON | Dave | Wed May 26 1993 18:12 | 3 |
| re: .5 - Rainbows & PROs were made over the same time period, circa
1983/4/5. The PRO models were 325, 350, 380. Rainbows were 100 and
100+. DECmate IIs also came out at this time.
|
2509.17 | Depreciated from $3k to $0? | WFOFAC::GRABOWSKI | | Thu May 27 1993 00:23 | 12 |
|
We built the rainbow/pro/decmate boxes here in WFO around
83-84 till they phased them over to the Far East.A friend here
bought a top model rainbow thru EPP for $3K+.At the first TFSO
here people who left could buy a rainbow/pro/decmate for $200
if a manager signed it off as being that particular persons own
desktop system.I got two friends to get me a Pro380 and Rainbow
190 that way.I wish I could get half that for them now after
building a 286 clone that'll run rings around either!
John Grabowski WFO
|
2509.18 | evolution | MEMIT::SILVERBERG_M | Mark Silverberg MLO1-5/B98 | Thu May 27 1993 07:49 | 6 |
| I use my rainbow 100+ ( with my 10mb drive partitioned for CPM and
DOS) as the base stand for my VAXmate. Building on the natural
evolution, I hope to someday have an Alpha PC
Mark
|
2509.19 | Salvage scandal? | PASTA::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Jun 09 1993 15:30 | 9 |
| re .7: I remember the early stories about this. They referred to major
thefts from Digital warehouses. I don't recall anything aobut its being
thefts of salvaged parts. And it was acutal theft -- including using
subverted security guards to get physical access -- not misappropriation
of stuff that was destined for landfills. Who would sneak into a
warehouse to steal salvage? Are we talking abvout different stories?
Thanks,
Larry
|
2509.20 | | XLIB::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, ISV Tech. Support | Wed Jun 09 1993 15:43 | 6 |
| Maybe different stories, but the truth is the same. The people that run
salvage operations don't know what's valuable and what is not. If you do
the paperwork and send a new Alpha AXP system to salvage, my guess is that
they would destroy it.
Mark
|
2509.21 | silence is golden | TARKIN::MCALLEN | | Wed Jun 09 1993 19:31 | 5 |
|
See topic 1535.
1535 EMIRFI::SEGAL 16-JUL-1991 0 DEC Lawsuit & FBI
Indictment RE: DEC Salvage Scheme
|
2509.22 | | BJ6000::DAVE | Outlanders, Do it Again | Thu Jun 10 1993 14:04 | 11 |
| I had it explained to me in some detail a few years ago. The current publicity
is a separate incident.
What was happening with salvage was that employees could buy things dirt cheap
from them. They had no way of knowing the good from the bad and sold anything
they got. Unfortunately some people realized this and shipped perfectly good
items to salvage and then raced over and bought it as it arrived. So because
of a few bad eggs, it was cheaper and easier to can the whole employee purchase
rather than try and fix the system.
Dave Brunell
|
2509.23 | Sorry, I just couldn't resist | CGOOA::DTHOMPSON | Don, of Don's ACT | Thu Jun 17 1993 14:40 | 6 |
| Re: .19
"Who would sneak into a warehouse to steal salvage?"
Why, the same bright people paying the rent to store it, that's who!
|