T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2379.1 | | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Patrick Sweeney in New York | Fri Feb 19 1993 20:59 | 12 |
| Kam,
The Partners programs are a way to share information among employees
that have a larger need to know that casual interest employees.
Writers in these conferences have just a little bit more confidence
that they won't see it next week in Digital Review because the
conferences for the partners discussion are members only.
There's no great barrier to becoming a partner. You find out what
programs exist by the VTX main menu selection "Access", then
"Contacts and Organizations", then "Field Management Guide to Support".
|
2379.2 | right... | PHONE::GORDON | | Sun Feb 21 1993 07:57 | 10 |
| re: .1
the only problem with that is the"people who determine who has a
larger need to know" .....
some of them don't have a clue, I spent two days trying to get access
to one of these accounts just to get info on LED displays for a
flamingo that was broke....
|
2379.3 | | BHUNA::BHARRIS | | Sun Feb 21 1993 10:18 | 5 |
|
** News Flash **
OpenVMS is really not Open. A layered product called Notes can restrict
people from accessing specific information.
|
2379.4 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Sun Feb 21 1993 15:05 | 12 |
| RE: .3
That's bull-pucky. A single layered product doesn't make an
operating system open or not. Besides, you can get Notes
readers for MS Windows and Unix environments. And servers
for OS/2 environments.
Let us not confuse politics with openness.
If I only had a nickel for every whining note in here...
mike
|
2379.5 | | MU::PORTER | savage pencil | Sun Feb 21 1993 18:54 | 2 |
| Uh, Mikey, get a grip! .3 was poking fun at the base note,
by restating the gist of the argument in plain English.
|
2379.6 | Nar | 42702::WELSH | Think it through | Mon Feb 22 1993 03:04 | 15 |
| The base noter's other point, that things like MS-DOS and Unix are
more open, is also doubtful.
Recently I got 386MAX for my home PC and eagerly installed it. Quite
apart from the fact that the amount of available memory fell (this
product is supposed to increase it) my mouse stopped working with
MS-Windows. A week, several complete system restores, and several
books later, I have a working system again.
Having read the Microsoft manuals and struggled with files like
DOSSHELL.INI, whose contents don't seem to be documented anywhere,
I am inclined to prefer good old OpenVMS which at least offers
the "orange wall" (now grey by corporate decree) of documentation.
/Tom
|
2379.7 | | VMSMKT::KENAH | Your intelligence is sexy... | Mon Feb 22 1993 09:10 | 16 |
| I assume your comments about the OpenVMS Partners were made without
knowing who the Partners are; yes, in a sense we are all partners in
our desire to promote products that will help the company, but most of
us don't meet the criteria needed to become OpenVMS Partners.
As was mentioned earlier, the OpenVMS Partners are an international
group of men and women with outstanding technical and business
expertise; they champion OpenVMS, but more importantly, they do the
right thing for Digital.
If you're interested in getting access to the conference, contact
VMSMKT::VMS_PARTNER. If you're interested in becoming an OpenVMS
Partner, send your request to the same account. If you qualify,
you'll be sent an application form.
andrew
|
2379.8 | | WLW::KIER | My grandchildren are the NRA! | Mon Feb 22 1993 11:24 | 73 |
| I think a little additional explanation of the Partners programs
are in order...
The Partners programs, of which OpenVMS is only one, were
instituted and are coordinated and supported by Marketing and
Engineering on a world-wide basis to attempt to solve some
problems that they were having. The fact that the field is a
major benificiary is an intended side-effect, but the drive came
from Marketing and Engineering.
These problems were basically how to collect information from the
trenches about what our customers are demanding from or
experiencing with our products without swamping the Engineering
and Marketing organizations which would prevent them from doing
their jobs. Also, they wanted a mechanism to diseminate
information to the field but in a manner that would allow some
small degree of control over where that message went and guidence
on how to interpret it. If this sounds like Spin Doctoring, well
to some degree it is.
What the OpenVMS Partners organization came up with (and is
mirrored with minor differences in most other Partners programs)
was to designate individuals in each major field Sales Support
organization unit, usually the Account Group. These people were
not some elite group, but they did have to have strong skills in
OpenVMS. In my area I can identify a couple people who I would
consider my superior in technical knowledge of OpenVMS but they
either were not interested in taking on the additional
responsibilities imposed by the program or were otherwise already
fully committed to something else. Note that with the number of
Partner programs extant that nearly everyone in an office may be a
partner in a program. The idea is to give Engineering and
Marketing a *manageable* number of people to deal with. The
OpenVMS program has about 130 members that may decide to call the
Product Manager for a given VMS release - that's still a
significant number of potential interruptions but far less than
you might expect without the program. In return, Engineering and
Marketing gives us a week long data dump every six months and then
voluntarily sits in a panel and takes our feedback on what is
working and what is broken. Of course this process occurs via
mail and notes and phone all year long, but at these meetings we
really come loaded for bear - after getting input from our peers
here in the Field. It is this kind of unfiltered exchange that
finally brought us multiuser licenses for VAX workstations, and
helped move up the priority of VMS Posix and is causing
Engineering to finally find ways to decouple new hardware support
from the OpenVMS release process.
We in the field have to commit time and effort to the program
above and beyond our normal responsibilities - which requires
local management support. We are expected to be primary PID
presenters and the main point of focus for interaction with
Engineering and Marketing for our AG and a clearinghouse for
information directed out to the field - which takes anywhere from
10-25% off the top of our available time - time that the Sales
Reps we support may initially begrudge but over time, at least in
my area, have come to really appreciate the increase in both
quantity and quality of information that can be applied to their
sales efforts.
Yes, we receive information via mail and a restricted conference
that not everyone sees, but in return we are trusted to pass that
information on where we see benefit to do so - I have never
witheld information solely because I felt it was `sensitive' - but
I do keep track of where I sent it and I provide the receiver with
enough information to make their own determination of how to use
the info - I am not a gatekeeper or a filter so much as I am an
interpreter and a research aid. When I have questions outside of
my area of expertise I call my Unix Partner or my CASE Partner,
etc. When they need OpenVMS info they call me.
Mike
OpenVMS Partner for the Ohio Valley
|
2379.9 | The .0 base note is a really low blow. | ANGLIN::SCOTTG | Greg Scott, Minneapolis SPS Support | Thu Feb 25 1993 01:40 | 24 |
| Oh, boy,
I'm in a feisty mood tonight and the base note made me mad! Andrew and
Mike in the last couple replies were really rational, so I only have
this to add:
Try accessing the UNIX_PARTNER notesfile if you're not a member of that
group. You will find that is also a members-only notesfile. Try
accessing the Network Partners' notesfile. You will find this too is
a members-only notesfile. These are members only for good reason as
the last 2 replies explained.
But by your reasoning in .0, you must therefore imply that Digital's
UNIX is not open and neither is Digital's networking. And of course,
this is absolutely the wrong conclusion.
Try getting a bunch of people to agree on what "open" means. It's a
relligious exercise.
But it's just silly to use the fact that a members only notesfile
exists on a topic to determine whether something is "open" or not.
- Greg Scott, tired OpenVMS partner in Minneapolis, probably in
political trouble again.
|
2379.10 | | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Patrick Sweeney in New York | Thu Feb 25 1993 07:49 | 9 |
| People,
Give it a rest. The question was asked and I answered it two hours
later.
The rest of the replies are just beating a dead horse.
This is a misunderstanding over what the partners program is and it's
been clarified.
|
2379.11 | | HARBOR::JACKSON | King Cynic | Sun Feb 28 1993 10:34 | 11 |
| RE: .0
Give me a break bill, you should know better!
Now, tell me, how many members-only notes conferences have you
moderated and/or created in your time at DEC? I*KNOW* that it's a
non-zero number....
-bill
|