T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2291.1 | need more info | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Tue Dec 22 1992 14:47 | 4 |
| Who paid for it? METpay or Digital? If METpay that's their business
not Digital's.
Alfred
|
2291.2 | They probably paid for it | PHAROS::FANTOZZI | | Tue Dec 22 1992 15:10 | 6 |
|
It looks like it is a METPAY deal with it being distributed out by
the person internally handling METPAY for the company.
METPAY probably paid for it.
|
2291.3 | It is a special relationship | SNAX::PIERPONT | | Wed Dec 23 1992 05:30 | 23 |
| Ther is a special arrangement between METPAY and DEC. When I signed on
many years ago, having an insurance company "with in-house offices" was
discribed as a benifit. There are things that METPAY must live up to,
ie; minimum percentage of employees participating in the program in
order to continue to be the one "with in-house offices". DEC supplies
space and phone service [probably at some costto METPAY] and allows
checkoff for thoise weekly payments. In turn METPAY has access to
employees [by verture of being on site], provides a discount, accepts
weekly payments and, because of the special group risk pool of DEC
employees, even rebates an amount of the premium each year.
I wil not debate thier rates [there is already a note for that].
I personally prefer the weekly payments [and aftter 12 years would hate
to have to make those large % payments each month/quarter. I can add
and delete coverages without taking time off from work.
I don't want to lose "in-house insurance office" ability. METPAY has
been around ~14 years and there was one before them.
Howard
Suggestion: Recycle the mailing and make the paper go farther.
|
2291.4 | I'm calm now.. | USCTR1::MMCCALLION | | Wed Dec 23 1992 08:52 | 5 |
| Why couldn't METPAY verify current users? Aren't they computerized
yet?
I will put the stuff in the recycle bucket although only the memo paper
is approved for this site.
|
2291.5 | This is wasteful | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG2-2/BB9 226-7570 | Wed Dec 23 1992 13:12 | 6 |
| I agree that this mailing is a waste of Digital's resources. Even if Metpay
paid for the printing and envelopes, I doubt they reimbursed all the site mail-
rooms for the labor of handling this stuff. And most of it is NOT recyclable.
I wouldn't be surprised if Metpay's and Digital's databases are not com-
patible. If so, it would be impossible to delete current Metpay customers from
the mailing list.
|
2291.6 | | CSC32::J_OPPELT | JANE!!! Stop this crazy thing! | Wed Dec 23 1992 17:10 | 7 |
| > I agree that this mailing is a waste of Digital's resources. Even if Metpay
>paid for the printing and envelopes, I doubt they reimbursed all the site mail-
>rooms for the labor of handling this stuff. And most of it is NOT recyclable.
Surely, with the serious issues facing Digital, this one pales
in significance.
|
2291.7 | Recycle any old thing, we'll sort it out for you | TLE::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Thu Dec 24 1992 10:44 | 16 |
| Re .4:
> I will put the stuff in the recycle bucket although only the memo paper
> is approved for this site.
At ZK, Digital pays for a senior member of the cleaning crew to move every
recycled item from the "was recycled" dumpster into either the "can be recycled"
or "can't be recycled" dumpster. So if your site is like mine, recycle all the
looseleaf binders, day-minders, VHS videocassettes, and glossy METPAY circulars
you want: someone is there to compensate for people unclear on the concept.
Re .6:
Maybe the mail rooms reassigned the people who had been in the search for
personal mail.
/AHM
|
2291.8 | | MROA::SRINIVASAN | | Thu Mar 17 1994 15:26 | 3 |
| Has any one received the annual dividend checks from Metpay. I thought
they send this around Feb /March time frame
|
2291.9 | | BSS::GROVER | The CIRCUIT_MAN | Thu Mar 17 1994 15:32 | 1 |
| March ain't over yet.....!
|
2291.10 | | MILPND::CLARK_D | | Mon Mar 21 1994 08:53 | 2 |
|
They will be mailed the end of April.
|
2291.11 | | COMET::WARNOCK | | Tue Apr 05 1994 03:23 | 6 |
| re:.10
I received mine this last Saturday. A nice surprise, after
reading your note I had given up until the end of April.
Tim
|
2291.12 | Nice $$$ | CAPL::LANDRY_D | Warbirds 1939-1945 | Wed Apr 06 1994 13:22 | 3 |
| Got our's Monday 4-Apr
:^)
|
2291.13 | what Metpay dividend? | CSC32::MA_BAKER | | Tue Apr 19 1994 14:54 | 2 |
| Could someone explain the Metpay dividend. I have had Metpay for car
and home for 2 years and I have never heard of a dividend. Thanks.
|
2291.14 | | BSS::GROVER | The CIRCUIT_MAN | Tue Apr 19 1994 15:07 | 3 |
| Have you had an accident in the passed... Call, talk to them, they'll
explain...
|
2291.15 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Apr 19 1994 15:13 | 1 |
| Dividends vary from state to state. Ask you local Metpay person.
|
2291.16 | not in CO | CSC32::B_GRUBBS | | Tue Apr 19 1994 15:46 | 6 |
|
I called last year and was told we didn't get a dividend payback in
Colorado. If someone in colorado is getting one (and was only insured
in colorado all last year), let me know so I can disupute.
--Bert ( i used to get one when I was insured in MA by metpay)
|
2291.17 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Apr 19 1994 16:10 | 7 |
|
We live in Colorado, and just deposited our METPAY dividend
last week.
We have homeowners insurance only.
|
2291.18 | I thought it sounded fishy | CSC32::B_GRUBBS | | Tue Apr 19 1994 16:17 | 9 |
|
The first year I was here I had both a renters and auto, and didn't
get one.
Last year, I only had auto, no homeowner. I'm going to check with
them again tonight since I've already got three who say they've
been getting the dividend.
--bert
|
2291.19 | | BSS::CODE3::BANKS | Not in SYNC -> SUNK | Thu Apr 21 1994 18:43 | 7 |
| I got a MetPay check. I live in Colorado and have auto insurance only.
It seems from previous replies that those who only have one type of insurance
got a check whereas those who have two types didn't? Seems the wrong way
round...
- David
|
2291.20 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Thu Apr 21 1994 20:18 | 2 |
| I live in Arizona, have both auto and home with Met and received a
check from the auto program.
|
2291.21 | two policies is no bar | COMET::SUDKAMP | Last of the small time spenders. | Fri Apr 22 1994 17:06 | 7 |
|
Re: .19
I have both renters and auto insurance with MetPay. I cashed my
dividend check about 2 weeks ago.
Greg Sudkamp (one of the Greg Brothers.)
|
2291.22 | Moderator warning... | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Fri Apr 22 1994 17:11 | 6 |
| Please no more "I got my rebate check" comments.
Thanks,
Bob - Co-moderator DIGITAL
|
2291.23 | | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | neck, red as Alabama clay | Fri Apr 22 1994 17:42 | 5 |
|
I got my winfall check. ;')
Sorry Bob, it's been a long day.
|
2291.24 | | STRATA::JOERILEY | Legalize Freedom | Sat Apr 23 1994 02:29 | 14 |
| RE:.22
> <<< Note 2291.22 by ROWLET::AINSLEY "Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow!" >>>
> -< Moderator warning... >-
>
>Please no more "I got my rebate check" comments.
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>Bob - Co-moderator DIGITAL
Why?
|
2291.25 | | CTOAVX::SMITHB | | Sat Apr 23 1994 21:46 | 1 |
| Because the rest of us get the point...
|
2291.26 | another "why"? | SNELL::ROBERTS | fire Hillary! | Mon Apr 25 1994 11:57 | 6 |
| >CTOAVX::SMITHB
> Because the rest of us get the point...
I don't recall asking you to speak for me.
|
2291.27 | Please use 'SEND/AUTHOR' for any other questions concerning this topic | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Mon Apr 25 1994 12:03 | 6 |
| re: .24, .26
Why? Because as someone else has pointed out, we don't need an entry from
everyone who has received a rebate check.
Bob - Co-moderator DIGITAL
|