T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2287.1 | Don't count on it | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've Got Three Knees!! | Sat Dec 19 1992 19:55 | 2 |
| Just a rumor and probably not going to come true. IMHO the last SERP
was it. No more.
|
2287.2 | Another early retirement offering | GRANPA::JNOSTIN | | Thu Dec 24 1992 13:32 | 3 |
| I heard (only a rumor at this time) that there will be another early
retirement offering. The age would be lowered to 48 years old and older.
It will take place sometime in Q3.
|
2287.3 | Not likely | ICS::DONNELLAN | | Thu Dec 24 1992 23:57 | 9 |
| About a month ago I checked with personnel on this one. It was pointed
out that in order to do this, several months of advance planning was
required, including filing certain exception documents with the
customer. There was nothing going on at the time, and this person
claimed that she would be involved if there were.
So, it is unlikely that this will happen. Given the current climate
and the rumors that the next package will be considerably less, it is
hard to imagine that a new, attractive package in isn the offing.
|
2287.4 | say what? | REGENT::REGENT::BLOCHER | | Tue Dec 29 1992 16:53 | 7 |
| >required, including filing certain exception documents with the
>customer.
Customer? I know we are all trying to "think Customer" but in that
sentence, it didn't make sense!
|
2287.5 | Oops! | ICS::DONNELLAN | | Wed Dec 30 1992 12:00 | 4 |
| RE:.4
Your're right. I meant to say government, rather than customer. That
would indeed be taking "Think customer" to new heights.
|
2287.6 | Retirement Package? | POBOX::SCHWARTZINGE | It's gonna get better | Mon Jan 24 1994 10:00 | 5 |
| Has anyone heard that they will be offering a new retirement package?
The rumors are flying around here.
Thanks, Jackie
|
2287.7 | yes | PASTA::MENNE | | Mon Jan 24 1994 10:31 | 1 |
| Yes, I hear it all the time in other notes in this conference.
|
2287.8 | Buyout | POBOX::SCHWARTZINGE | It's gonna get better | Tue Feb 08 1994 13:13 | 7 |
|
Its buzzing here that there will be a "buyout" instead of early
retirement. There's a formula and everything! ! ! !
Jackie
|
2287.9 | Change of terms? | TINCUP::VENTURELLA | | Tue Feb 08 1994 13:18 | 5 |
| re: -1, Please define "buyout" vs say TFSO?
thanks,
joe
|
2287.10 | Yeah, I've heard the same rumor here in ALF via a guy from CXO, ... | YUPPIE::COLE | Paradigm: a 50 cent word downsized 60% | Tue Feb 08 1994 13:30 | 16 |
| ... which lend it all SORTS of credibility, right? :>)
I don't remember the exact formula, but, based on years of service,
age less than 55, and a couple of multipliers, you come up with a number
that is multiplied by your annual salary.
The way I heard it, this is your "buyout", retirement lump sum,
what ever you want to call it. And it also appears that if you aren't 55,
you have to role it into an IRA or similar vehicle or you incur about every
penalty known to God, man, and the IRS! This should keep a lot of lower
middle-agers from bailing, unless they've got a job lined up for the next
Monday!
After disbursment, I don't what rules about medical and other
insurance apply, but my guess is that Digital won't do anything that won't
cut the weekly costs immediately.
|
2287.12 | | POBOX::SCHWARTZINGE | It's gonna get better | Tue Feb 08 1994 14:51 | 18 |
|
The way we heard it, the "buyout" buys all of your interest in Digital,
pension, etc.
Here's the formula we heard:
Salary x .015 = X
X x 9 = Y
55 - your age + yrs of service = Z
Y x Z = $Buyout.
Astronomical!....I think!
Jackie
|
2287.13 | gonzo math? | CSOADM::ROTH | NRA membership: 800-368-5714 | Tue Feb 08 1994 15:17 | 5 |
| Re: .12
Can that be right? If you do the calcs you get less $ the older you are.
Lee
|
2287.14 | Not for me... | CSC32::D_ROYER | You tucha my Karma, I breaka you face | Tue Feb 08 1994 15:23 | 10 |
| I just used the formula, and I came up with a few thousand over a years
salary. That is not much in my books.. I have a fully vested
retirement, why give it up for less than $100K?
It is as Stupid as the SERP I checked out last time.
It is okay if you are able to go straight to another job, or have
a side business.
Dave
|
2287.15 | on retirment age and related | STAR::ABBASI | always give a check,it might be mate | Tue Feb 08 1994 15:50 | 10 |
| hi,
what is the earliest age a DECeee can retire?
is it 59 as for the federal government, or can a DECeee retire
before that age but get less retirement money?
thanks,
\nasser
who_would_like_to_retire_some_day
|
2287.16 | Don't trust this formula | WIDGET::KLEIN | | Tue Feb 08 1994 16:00 | 20 |
| The formula cannot be right.
Assume age = 20 and years of service = 1. The formula yields Z = 36.
For age = 30 and years of service = 11, formula also yields Z = 36.
And for age = 40 and years of service = 21, formula still yields Z = 36.
I can't believe that all three of these (hypothetical) people would get
the same multiplicative factor Z in their buyout. The first person is
young and has only been contributing for one year. The last person has
been contributing for 21 years and gets the same benefit (!)
Salary x .015 = X
X x 9 = Y
55 - your age + yrs of service = Z
Y x Z = $Buyout.
-steve-
|
2287.17 | Car SLT, Where are You???? | DPDMAI::SODERSTROM | Bring on the Competition! | Tue Feb 08 1994 16:10 | 4 |
| It's really sad when we have to discuss the rumor in this file
and not hear anything from senior management concerning its
validity/invalidity.
|
2287.18 | | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Tue Feb 08 1994 16:54 | 13 |
| Re: .17
Like the SLT has nothing better to do than rumor control for everything you
see in this notesfile.
This particular one is so stupid it doesn't even deserve the disk space.
On behalf of the SLT, I'll deny this rumor for you. A package with this
formula does not exist. Period. Never will.
You have my word on it.
Bob
|
2287.19 | So, when's it official? | DYPSS1::COGHILL | Steve Coghill, Luke 14:28 | Wed Feb 09 1994 08:38 | 1 |
| This calculation for me is about $250K. Sounds good to me.
|
2287.20 | | DELNI::DISMUKE | | Wed Feb 09 1994 09:00 | 4 |
| Yeah, I'll take the $90K and run with it!!
-sandy
|
2287.21 | the parade continues | AMCUCS::YOUNG | I'd like to be...under the sea... | Wed Feb 09 1994 10:00 | 34 |
|
This sounds a little fishy to me. First of all the calculation
should result in
Salary X .015 X 9 which results in a simple
Salary X .135 = Y
This simplifies the math but then if you rearrange the second portion
of the equation it makes more sense.
your age - 55 + yrs of service = Z
Y x Z = $Buyout.
> Astronomical!....I think!
It would be astronomical under the original conditions.
But if you calculate the buyout for 3 persons each with a salary of
$50K you'll get the following:
Person A is 30 years of age with 10 years of service
Person B is 40 years of age with 20 years of service
Person C is 50 years of age with 30 years of service
you'll get buyout values of
Person A; $6750 x (30 - 55 + 10) = -$101,250 (gee, you'd pay!)
Person B; $6750 x (40 - 55 + 20) = $33,750 (not very good)
Person C; $6750 x (50 - 55 + 30) = $168,750 (only sounds good)
Hope this isn't too much rain!
cw
|
2287.22 | buy-out include pension? | BUSY::RIPLEY | | Wed Feb 09 1994 12:47 | 8 |
|
Am I to assume that by "buy-out: this means ALL Digital
investment in me? That would include any pension $$
wouldn't it? Under that assumption I don't think it
would be such a good deal. Probably not even worth
asking if I am right in believing that this whole idea
is total hogwash!
8^)
|
2287.23 | Gimme a break! | FINALY::BELLAMTE | Recycled RP06 mechanic. | Wed Feb 09 1994 12:50 | 2 |
| I think the Random Rumor Generator must be working overtime to
come up with this silly nonsense.
|
2287.24 | | DYPSS1::COGHILL | Steve Coghill, Luke 14:28 | Wed Feb 09 1994 13:05 | 3 |
| Re: .22
Not only pension, but probably health care too.
|
2287.25 | It could make sense | DBSALF::QUINN | Crying? There's no crying in baseball! | Wed Feb 09 1994 15:16 | 11 |
| re: 22
But if you think you wont be working for DEC this year or in the next
couple of years you have to look at it differently. Once you leave, your
pension benefits no longer increase. You actually start losing benefits
because of inflation. If your 45, and your benefit is $100 when your 65,
the money wont buy near as much in 20 years. If you get a buyout, you
probably will need to get another job, but you can invest the lump sum
and be a lot better off when you retire.
- John
|
2287.26 | this company *runs* on rumors! | CSC32::K_BOUCHARD | | Wed Feb 09 1994 16:08 | 6 |
| Hey,if it weren't for rumors (silly and otherwise) what good would this
notesfile be,huh? Whadya think anyway,we all read these notes just to
read about the latest on "matrix management" and all that rot about MCI
calling cards? Gimme a break!
Ken
|
2287.27 | Yup! | POBOX::SCHWARTZINGE | It's gonna get better | Thu Feb 10 1994 09:05 | 8 |
| RE: .26
Ken:
RIGHT ON!
j
|
2287.28 | "... a clean windshield and a shoeshine!" | FINALY::BELLAMTE | Recycled RP06 mechanic. | Thu Feb 10 1994 11:35 | 7 |
| Re: .26
You're right, of course, Ken. I would never be so foolish as to
suggest otherwise. These rumors are much more intertaining, and
often more enlightening, than the management-speak mumbo-jumbo
that sounds like an old "Firesign Theatre" album we hear so much
these days.
|
2287.29 | To answer .9 | POWDML::PIMENTEL | | Thu Feb 10 1994 13:22 | 6 |
| answer to .9 The "Buy Out" was the first form of TFSO. The company
asked you do you if wanted a package or do you want to stay and look for a
job? I believe those days are gone. It's strictly TFSO - almost no
choice you are gone. Back in 1990 when my husband took the "Buy Out"
his choice was stay and look full time for a new job or take 88 weeks pay.
(That was his particular package after 16 years at DEC).
|
2287.30 | More rumor!! | YUPPIE::COLE | Paradigm: a 50 cent word downsized 60% | Thu Feb 10 1994 13:47 | 3 |
| Word going around ALF, and based on some contact with Mass. people
is thst Digital has registered a "retirement plan action" with the State of
MA. Apparently this will give them the option to act if desired.
|
2287.31 | I rememember climate control | PEKING::POLLINGTONI | Ian Pollington | Thu Feb 10 1994 16:00 | 10 |
| NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SUBJECT OF THE NOTE!!!!
Jeez, there's a blast from the past. The Firesign Theatre!
I used to import those guys albums cos no-one in England
seemed to stock them. Many a weird evening was spent.
Are they still cutting records?
Ian
|
2287.32 | Still around. | PFSVAX::MCELWEE | Opponent of Oppression | Thu Feb 10 1994 23:12 | 6 |
| Re: .31- Firesign Theatre:
Yes, they performed at the Orphium Theater in Boston a few months
back.
Phil
|
2287.33 | | BOSDCC::CRONK | | Fri Feb 11 1994 10:36 | 2 |
| Re 30. What does 'Digital has registered a "retirement plan action"
with the State of MA' mean?
|
2287.34 | | XLIB::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Development Assistance | Fri Feb 11 1994 10:58 | 1 |
| just wishful thinking by alot of people in Georgia.
|