| Title: | The Digital way of working |
| Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
| Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 5321 |
| Total number of notes: | 139771 |
I am wrestling with the future. Mine and Digital's
If I understand correctly, and lately I haven't, Digital's vision is of
Silicon/Software/Services.
By silicon I hope this means Computer boxes, whatever the technology,
DEC engineered, from the datacentre, to the Desktop. Having said that,
I wonder if that flows to Disk Storage, Terminals + Printers, Tape drives,
Network devices ?
I still believe our customers need high powered, balanced, open
Systems.
Software - Kernel Open operating sytems, VMS/OSF/Alpha AXP
Major support for NT, DOS, SCO,
Best in Class PC Integration - PATHWORKS family.
NAS - multivendor communication.
Services - Not the "fix the broken product for a price thing", but
selling a solution to a customer to make them more productive. This
includes Systems Intgration, Outsourcing, employing resources, that
come from other vendors, unless we can provide them profitably from
within.
If standard Digital Hardware products, sans PC's
don't break as often, the software gets installed and runs first time
every time, then our $$$$$ increase, through lower costs, and higher
customer satisfaction. But you can only sell so many Fridge's!!
This though, puts the pressure on Customer Services, to deploy their
large OPS, RDC, IS, CSC's, PMG, somewhere else in DEC. Lower
population from 1 sector to where?
I see a migration from Datacentre technology and thought, back to our
roots in distributed computing, at the DESKtop. But the difference
now in our product/service offerings, is the new markets that we
opened up in the 80's. From the lab/enginneer to commercial/banking,
Telco's, publishing, etc., Computers haven't really changed that
much from the 60's, They still have a CPU, I/O, Memory, Storage,
Operating system, and applications. Smaller, cheaper, faster.
the demands on a Computer Vendor, have increased, at least from the
non traditional computer user's view, Check out many of the features in
NT, OS/2, DOS and you will find many similarities to VMS. So our
customers demand multitasking, DESKtop Productivity using windows,
multiuser, interoperability, entreprise resource sharing. Gee we've
had that for a long time!!! Or most of it anyways!!
We have a great story to tell, and so we should, with Alpha AXP.
Out of this customer demand for 21'st century computing today we have
supplied Alpha AXP. 64bit technology, humongous, memory and storage
resources.
Client server systems: Advantage servers, we do not sell enough, we
don't market enough, we don't teach our people enough.
X-Windowing terminals ditto
CD-ROM technology, ditto
What skills should I be chasing in the 90's ??
from CSS Board repair, to PDP 8's/11's , 15's, 20's, VAX's, RISC,
servicing, to Sales to Product management, What's next?
GP
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2248.1 | It's 5 things now | SMAUG::GARROD | From VMS -> NT; Unix a mere page from history | Fri Nov 27 1992 19:26 | 14 |
Re:
> If I understand correctly, and lately I haven't, Digital's vision is of
> Silicon/Software/Services.
I think another couple of PCUs have managed to get snuck into the
"vision". Last I heard it was:
Silicon/Software/Services/Networking/Storage
I believe this 5some was put out at the Annual meeting.
Dave
| |||||
| 2248.2 | DCE, NT, OO | TLE::JBISHOP | Tue Dec 08 1992 11:53 | 26 | |
re .0, skills for the 90s
Here's what I'm studying:
o NT -- not a sure bet, but Microsoft is currently hot. I
bought myself a PC and got the Beta release CDROM, also the
book _Inside_NT_, which I recommend as being clear and
very readable.
o DCE -- It's an OSF standard which DEC has an implementation
of. NT includes a DCE-like set of functions (they re-wrote
from specifications so as not to have to pay a royalty).
Luckily I get to do this as part of my job. DCE supports
distributed computing, including client-server as well as
other forms.
o Object Oriented -- I suspect this is less likely to be a
big winner, but again I get to do it as part of my job, so
why not?
But this reflects my own interests and background as a compiler
person for whom the system "guts" are interesting. People more
focused on the human end might look at visual programming, OLE
and DDE and virtual reality.
-John Bishop
| |||||
| 2248.3 | Still asking !! | KAOOA::PINKERTON | Prov 3:5-6 | Thu Dec 10 1992 10:54 | 71 |
I agree with your view re: NT. I also am buying a DECpc, 433dx LP
from the EPP.
I come from a hardware background, where software, seemed to be
something nebulous, poorly documented definitions to command strings,
that weren't intuitive enough for me.
So, DOS commands are relatively foreign, as DCL (unless it is a
clearly written recipe), but I understand software concepts, in a large
picture sense. getting down to the level of implementaion, coding, I
get mentally lost inside loops, and waste gobs of time.
Although, I have found that left long enough on my own I have mastered
OS/8 , LOTUS 123, STRIDE (KAO home grown reporting data base), VTX, Notes
(sorta), WPS/8, WPS/Plus, ALL-IN-1,
I had a windows terminal for about 6 months, and I tell you,
productivity plus !!!
Now the Challenge of the 90's !!
Hardware Platforms are no longer as restrictive as to applications. eg
the same look and feel to LOTUS 123 on my RAINBOW, as on VMS, as on
PC,
Although a Graphical User Interface (GUI) will aid me in my big picture
software inexpertise. ie: I hope to be able to do things that
computers were always able to do, and that is
create/edit/store/compute/print files. BUT A LOT EASIER ! for guys like
me who waste my time learning the intracacies of a software product and
all I wanted to do was to compute/print.
My first real experience with a computer was in the early 70's, when my
high school visited a University, and had a PDP 8, that had a Chess
game. Talk about teenage impressions!
We at DEC talk about NAS, being able to access the Mainframe and the
PC, and the server, and merge documents, graphs, reports from various
vendors on the network, and print it on the big Laser printer down the
hall.
I have found that within DEC to do this with any bit of ease, you have
to have a degree in VMS, DOS, and DECnet protocols.
I tried to teach a secretary how to copy files from 1 VAX to another,
simple enough if you know the DCL command string, but look at the whole
picture, it should be as easy as point, click, point, etc.,
We are still an engineering company creating hardware, software
products that are not "user friendly" to non Engineers.
Enough DEC bashing, ,I am really interested in skill sets for the 90's.
What if I got the "TAP" today, next week I was out looking for a job.
What skills should I be looking to acquire? Is it a matter of asking
myself, what am I interested in, then going to school, and picking out
the courses then job hunting?
What skills will be marketable in the 90's ? for a hardware background
boy, I can fix, sell, manage DEC products, but that would last me
about 6-12 months out on the street in the 3rd party, distributor,
consultant business. What then?
any ideas ??
Regards,
Gary
| |||||
| 2248.4 | SET MODE/ALERT=RATHOLE | ELWOOD::KAPLAN | Larry Kaplan, DTN: 237-6872 | Thu Dec 10 1992 11:59 | 6 |
> I agree with your view re: NT. I also am buying a DECpc, 433dx LP
> from the EPP.
>
So far, the only DECpc LP systems available on EPP have been the
333sxLP. Do you know something we don't ?
| |||||
| 2248.5 | Only in Canada, you say? Pity... | KAOOA::HASIBEDER | Trekkie DECie | Thu Dec 10 1992 12:12 | 1 |
New EPP for Canada, just announced 2 weeks or so ago... | |||||
| 2248.6 | STAR::ABBASI | i love cooked fried rice with curry | Thu Dec 10 1992 13:30 | 20 | |
.3
>What skills should I be looking to acquire? Is it a matter of asking
>myself, what am I interested in, then going to school, and picking out
>the courses then job hunting?
i really dont pay too much attention to this skills thing, what you
should do, is find what YOU really like to work on, what field is
really your are interested in, and learn every thing you can about
it and master it. that is all. you might end up in a filed that
do not pay much because what you happened to like to do is not
on the top-seller-list of this month edition, but if you dont care too
much about that, you'll be better off .
that is like my 2 cents on this .
buy,
/nasser
| |||||
| 2248.7 | A note of caution ... | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | Tue Dec 15 1992 03:35 | 20 | |
It all depends ....
In all seriousness, it depends greatly on whether you just want
something you enjoy (effectively as pocket money), or whether you
desperately need income to stay solvent.
Very difficult (but not impossible) to walk straight into a role that
gives both advantages. Some folk have the great fortune to have both --
the majority of the world's workers do not.
If you need income, the first task is to find out what people want to
buy using skills that you have, or can aquire. "People" may be
employers, or buyers.
If you need to stay occupied, but are less concerned about money, then
just identify what turns you on, with whatever is your personal mix of
people contact, income, personal stretch, work location etc.
Colin
| |||||