T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2195.1 | Don't Complain! | FORTSC::CHABAN | Pray for Peter Pumpkinhead! | Tue Nov 03 1992 13:58 | 8 |
|
>Has anyone seen differently? $1100 seems outrageous. Thanks.
Yeah things are different here in CA and they're different in my
home state of NJ. ;-)
-Ed
|
2195.2 | I'm about choking on mine | ICS::NELSONK | | Tue Nov 03 1992 15:59 | 9 |
| I can't speak to the car plan part of it, but here in the
People's Republic of Massachusetts, I'm paying $1800 a year to
insure a 9-year-old station wagon with 153,000+ miles on it
and a 10-year-old pickup truck with 90,000 miles on it. The
truck is probably going to be taken off the road, because we
can't really afford to insure it anymore. I mean, this is
hardly his-and-hers Cadillacs. We do have a high deductible
($500) but we also carry a lot of coverage ($100,000/$300,000).
FWIW.
|
2195.3 | METPAY | NYTP22::NAEGELY | TPU 88 IM 91 | Tue Nov 03 1992 16:14 | 5 |
| I suggest you try METPAY if available in your area. I just
received a price quote from them for my car in NJ and they
were very reasonable, relatively speaking that is...
Their number is (800)541-8483...
|
2195.4 | Different rates for different states | MSDSWS::RCANTRELL | | Tue Nov 03 1992 16:24 | 20 |
| Here in Tennessee my plan B insurance costs about 700.00 per year.
Thats with the 100000/300000/100000 coverage. I think different states
have different rates. It also depends on the automobile. Sporty cars
get fairly expensive to cover but family cars are not. I drive a
conversion van and its not very bad. I tried METPAY but they were more
expensive than Prudential which is where I have it now. METPAY didnt
give me the coverage on the conversion that they should have. I have
learned that you have to watch insurance companies when insuring
conversion vans.
Try a lot of different companies though because each one will have a
different price. I have even called different agents for the same
company and got two different prices. (i.e. Allstate)
Rick
|
2195.5 | At least you had a choice in the past | USHS01::HARDMAN | I do Windows | Tue Nov 03 1992 18:11 | 19 |
| Welcome to Plan B! At least the rate has gone up from the measly $200
per month that we used to get! In Desktop Services we've never had a
choice. It was Plan B or Plan B. ;-) My manager at the time thought
that the $200 was a good deal, since he got the money for leaving his
car in the parking garage at the office or airport. On the other hand,
I was averaging over 1,500 business miles per month, which will
depreciate a vehicle to nothing in very short order. He couldn't
understand why I was always complaining about Plan B.
The required insurance in Houston proper was about $1,700 per year. It
dropped to $1,200 when I moved to the suburbs in a different county.
The 8 cents per mile didn't even cover fuel costs and the $200 per
month didn't cover depreciation and maintenance costs by a long shot.
Basically, it cost me a few bucks to subsidize Digital for two and a
half years. :-( The new base rate helps, but don't send any former
Plan A folks to me for sympathy! :-) :-) :-)
Harry
|
2195.6 | | GLDOA::MADISON | | Tue Nov 03 1992 19:23 | 5 |
| I also live in Michigan. If you can get Insurance for 1100.00/yr you
better take it. I'm 35 with a perfect driving record. I've been
shopping around for insurance for a 1993 Escort wagon. The best I've
found was for approx. 1700.00/yr. I checked with METPAY to find out
that they're about 200.00/yr MORE expensive.
|
2195.7 | | GLDOA::MADISON | | Tue Nov 03 1992 19:33 | 7 |
| Keep in mind "Cheap is Cheap". You may save a couple bucks up front by
shopping around but when it comes time for a claim you may have
difficlulty with the insurance company. Consumers Reports magazine had
a article back in September 1989 wich rated homeowners insurance
companies. You may want to see where your prospective carrier winds up
on the list. Even though they rated homeowners insurance you could use
it as a guide for auto insurance.
|
2195.8 | My $.02 | PTOECA::MCELWEE | Opponent of Oppression | Tue Nov 03 1992 23:56 | 15 |
| The main factors in car insurance costs are (not necessarily
in this order):
1) Your Zip Code. (Traffic density, theft/vandalism stats.)
2) Repair costs (historical or projected)
3) Theft rate for the model.
4) Your accident/ driving record.
5) Deductibles elected & full or limited tort (right to sue) where
applicable.
Phil
|
2195.9 | | PRMS00::TLIGHTON | Redskins - 1991 NFL Champions | Wed Nov 04 1992 00:06 | 20 |
| >> The main factors in car insurance costs are (not necessarily
>> in this order):
From what I could see, you left out a couple that I'll toss into the
ring...
a) the type of vehicle
b) the other items you have insured with the company
I live in VA and just setup coverage on my new (92) Caravan. It's just
about $600 per year. That is for a very low deductable with as good or better
coverage than is required by the Plan B rules. We also have our house and our
other vehicle insured with the same company - Allstate. When my wife's
Explorer got hit about 2 years ago (other driver's fault), Allstate was alot
easier to work with than the other person's insurance company. All in all,
I've been quite happy with all of the service I've received from them over the
years. As always, your milage may vary...
Tom
|
2195.10 | And insuring Digital | ESGWST::HALEY | PowerFrame - Not just an Architecture | Wed Nov 04 1992 01:17 | 4 |
| Another major variable is whether or not you need to add a third party as
insured, such as Digital for Plan B coverage. About a 15% adder for me.
Matt
|
2195.11 | Beware of Allstate | MSDSWS::RCANTRELL | | Wed Nov 04 1992 08:28 | 24 |
| Speaking of Allstate,
I used to cary Allstate insurance until I had to make a claim. I had
my house and two cars with them for 7 years. My van got broken into
while sitting in my driveway and someone stole the stereo system and
some CD's. The replacement cost for the stereo was 1.local cost 498.00
but Allstate mail orders these items and since the cost to mail order
the stereo was only 459.00 thats all they would pay. Even though it
takes two weeks to get it through mail order. My deductible is 500.00
so that loss was not covered. I had no problem with this.
My complaint was the CD's. If your Cd's are in your vehicle then they
are not covered. If they are in your house they are covered by your
home owners. So the moral of the story is, don't carry your music
media in your vehicle.
As far as I'm concerned, the "Good hands people" can stuff it. BTW,
they were one of the most expensive companies to go with but I chose
them because I figured they would have good claims services. Bull
____!!!
Rick
|
2195.12 | Bob Hope said it best | ICS::NELSONK | | Wed Nov 04 1992 14:07 | 14 |
| I am under the impression that here in Mass., one of the reasons why
car insurance is so expensive is that the insurance companies are
not allowed to advertise, or is it that they aren't allowed to
offer competing rates/rate structures. ??? Anyone clarify? Please,
this is a request for info only, NOT A RATHOLE about insurance costs,
either here in Mass. or elsewhere. TNX.
Re .11 -- Bob Hope said it best. About 20 years ago, a fire destroyed
the expensive luxury home he was building in the Hollywood Hills.
When it came time to file a claim, "The Good Hands people gave me
the finger."
|
2195.13 | what I hear on the news and read in the paper | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Wed Nov 04 1992 14:49 | 9 |
| > I am under the impression that here in Mass., one of the reasons why
> car insurance is so expensive is that the insurance companies are
> not allowed to advertise, or is it that they aren't allowed to
> offer competing rates/rate structures.
In MA insurance rates are set by the state. Every year the companies
ask for a big raise and the state gives them a little one.
Alfred
|
2195.14 | | ROYALT::KOVNER | Everything you know is wrong! | Wed Nov 04 1992 15:13 | 13 |
| In Massachusetts, car rates are regulated. There was an
experiment a few years ago in which the rates were deregulated;
they went up very quickly. So much for the theory that
competition would lower rates. They were then regulated.
Mass. rates are high because of the high rate of accidents
here; if you've seen the roads we have it's not surprising.
(Note that the rate of fatal accidents is not very high;
most accidents occur on congested roads where the relative
speeds are low enough not to kill.) Also, car theft
rates are very high. Mass. used to be the car theft capital,
this was taken over by New Jersey recently. (or at least
for the cities; Lowell used to be highest, Newark is now.)
|
2195.15 | Not additional insured party, neccessarily. | PTOECA::MCELWEE | Opponent of Oppression | Thu Nov 05 1992 00:59 | 14 |
| RE: .10-
Digital does not require that you have them named as an additional
insured third party, but rather that they be notified of the coverage
you have selected and any changes on such coverage. I have a rider
attached to my policy that's termed "Additional Interested Party-
Employer". This did not raise my premium when I had it added per Fleet
policy police threat mail.
Various Ins. Co.s call it different things; some may require adding
an additional insured party in lieu of the above. You might want to
check with your agent to see if you've the right thing.
Phil
|
2195.16 | Additional Cost to add Digital = $0 | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Thu Nov 05 1992 11:04 | 13 |
| Since the inclusion of an additional interest does not increase the insurance
companies liability under the policy, there is no reason for them to charge
you extra for listing the additional party.
The policy limit (100K/300K/25K) is the same, regardless of the number of
additional interested parties.
This is very different from listing additional NAMED INSURED parties.
If you are paying more for listing Digital as an additional interested party,
I would shop around.
Bob
|
2195.17 | Metpay quoted me $2064 / 6 months '92 Lebaron | SWAM2::BARNETTE_NE | | Thu Nov 05 1992 11:57 | 1 |
|
|
2195.18 | Possible misunderstanding | NWD002::GARRETTJO | | Thu Nov 05 1992 13:45 | 2 |
|
Was that to BUY one?
|
2195.19 | I suppose it could be worse? | TOHOPE::REESE_K | Three Fries Short of a Happy Meal | Thu Nov 05 1992 13:47 | 26 |
| Hmmmmmm, mileage really does vary :-)
When Metropolitan notified me that the rate for my '91 Geo Metro was
increasing by $30 per six month period (and this included a 10%
discount for my excellent driving record), I decided to contact
Allstate because I have Allstate for my house <--- I assumed they
still offer discounts for multiple items covered by them.
My Allstate agent said to let him run some numbers; when he called
me back he said that even with the house, if he added coverage for
the car....the car insurance would be approx $100 higher per year!
Go figure!! My Allstate agent said Met's rates would be hard to
beat in this state. I KNOW it could be worse, but $960/yr seems
like a lot of bucks for a pregnant roller skate.....even if it is
a 5 speed, a sports car it is NOT!!
Once upon a time car insurance in metro Atlanta *was* pretty cheap;
then No Fault became the law, ya'll know what happened to the rates
after that. Georgia has now repealed the NF law, but the rates haven't
decreased :-)
It was the reverse on the house though, Allstate is much cheaper than
Met.....oh well.....
K
|
2195.20 | DEC insurance | ESGWST::HALEY | PowerFrame - Not just an Architecture | Thu Nov 05 1992 14:06 | 10 |
| re DEC rider
Perhaps my mistake with getting the insurance was that I actually took the
requirements sheet from Fleet with me when I went to the insurance cos.
The additional interested party listing was aimed at lein holders and the
like. I was told by several Insurance cos that the requirement from DEC
would raise my price. Could this be a Ca. only thing? Could this be poor
reading by 5 Insurance Cos.? Could this be poor wording by fleet?
matt
|
2195.21 | | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Thu Nov 05 1992 14:35 | 11 |
| Could be failure to push back... 8^) (Just kidding!)
If your "regular" coverage was not 100/300/25, then you can expect a moderate
increase in your rates.
You should not see an increase for simply listing Digital as an additional
interest.
BTW, IMHO anyone who has less than 100/300 is underinsured these days.
Bob
|
2195.22 | Another datapoint | NWD002::GARRETTJO | | Thu Nov 05 1992 15:42 | 10 |
|
When I was on plan B, I had DEC as an "additional named insured" on my
policy. This was what fleet required (3 years ago), and it caused my
insurance to go up significantly for two reasons:
1. Business use of the vehicle.
2. Additional named insured.
The delta was about $20 a month, as I recall.
|
2195.23 | CA is no different. | SWAM2::MCCARTHY_LA | Texas Supply Chainsaw Massacre | Thu Nov 05 1992 17:04 | 11 |
| re: .20, .23 (CA and "add'l insured"):
Didn't happen to me. There *is* an additional cost for insuring a
vehicle for business us vs. personal use, presumably because of
increased risk to the insurer. It's one of the many things that the
plan "B" monthly sum is supposed to cover. (Of course, it doesn't come
close to it :-( )
Adding Digital as an "interested party" *does not* increase risk or
price. If this happens to you, whoever wrote the quote/policy either
didn't understand you, is incompetent or is dishonest.
|
2195.24 | and that was for the "digital special" rate | SWAM2::BARNETTE_NE | | Thu Nov 05 1992 17:23 | 7 |
|
Re .18, that was to insure a '92 Chrysler Lebaron convertible (which
I decided not to buy after I got this bad news) to plan-b specs. BTW,
I have 1 ticket - "70mph in a 55mph zone" - and 0 accidents in the last
3 years.
The Metpay rep indicated that it was due to the neighborhood I live in.
|
2195.25 | Forgot the :') again | NWD002::GARRETTJO | | Thu Nov 05 1992 17:50 | 9 |
| re: 24
I was being facetious. The amount you quoted was very nearly what the
car payment should be, upwards of $300 a month. If insurance costs
more than the car, something has gone very wrong. If the insurance
alone takes your plan B payment, there is no way you can win.
As an aside, you can rent a car with insurance for between $150 and
$200 a week. At some point, this could be cheaper than owning.
|
2195.26 | | ESGWST::HALEY | PowerFrame - Not just an Architecture | Thu Nov 05 1992 19:48 | 10 |
| re <<< Note 2195.23 by
> Adding Digital as an "interested party" *does not* increase risk or
> price. If this happens to you, whoever wrote the quote/policy either
> didn't understand you, is incompetent or is dishonest.
I can't ignore the fact that the fault could also be mine.
Matt
|
2195.27 | | PRMS00::TLIGHTON | Redskins - 1991 NFL Champions | Thu Nov 05 1992 23:15 | 16 |
| > My Allstate agent said to let him run some numbers; when he called
> me back he said that even with the house, if he added coverage for
> the car....the car insurance would be approx $100 higher per year!
> Go figure!! My Allstate agent said Met's rates would be hard to
> beat in this state. I KNOW it could be worse, but $960/yr seems
> like a lot of bucks for a pregnant roller skate.....even if it is
> a 5 speed, a sports car it is NOT!!
That suprises me. I'm amazed that it varies by that much state to
state. My wife and I (early 30s, good records) now pay around $1200 / yr for a
91 Explorer and a 92 Caravan (both with >= plan B requirements). I haven't had
any of the problems with the claims either. They weren't the cheapest I found,
but they weren't nearly the most expensive. I've been with them over 7 years
now and I'll stay until I find a better deal or a problem with them.
Tom
|
2195.28 | you NEED added insurance | SCCAT::SHERRILL | head between knees were goin down | Fri Nov 06 1992 17:10 | 8 |
|
A co-worker went to AAA to check out insurance prices with added
busniness coverage. The price was a little ove $300 more per year.
The agent also stated (after much pressure) that if this added
insurance is not added , and you have an accident while on company
business you could be left holding the bag. So me being a plan C
person at 22 cents a mile I will be paying out of my pocket to travel
for Digital.
|
2195.29 | More insurance tales | MAIL::WOOLLUMS | | Fri Nov 06 1992 22:50 | 22 |
| I just insured a '92 Dakota extended cab pickup for $824/yr. (My
manager bought off on the truck). I chose to carry significantly
more liablity than DEC required, since I already carry more on my
personal vehicles. I did get a multi-car discount since this my third
vehicle insured with the company. Following are a few other interesting
things that I learned from my agent.
1) Business use - My insurance company charges the same for business as
for a vehicle driven to/from work every day. Bottom line is you don't
get charged extra, but don't expect any discount (other than
multi-car).
2) Digital is listed as an "Interested Party" - This does not add to
the premium. The interested party status gives them the same rights to
notification that the lien holder has. However, Digital is not entitled
to any compensation for loss, and therefore poses no extra risk to the
insurance company.
Maybe they do things differently here in Missouri, but that's how it
worked for me.
Russ
|
2195.30 | | BVILLE::FOLEY | Self-propelled Field Service | Sat Nov 07 1992 01:31 | 7 |
| So, If I am on "Plan C" (no plan), does this apply to me?
Will my "Uncle Buck-Mobile" require "business" insurance? Does DEC have
any requirements in this area?
.mike.
(Looking for that "Winter Rat")
|
2195.31 | Who's car is it?? | KYOA::CRAPAROTTA | Joe, in Friendly NY.. SO WHAT!! | Sat Nov 07 1992 16:52 | 7 |
| I really wonder about the NO plan plan.. I mean if Digital decides that
I don't deserve a car, then my only responsibilty should be "Get to
Work".. After that if Digital wants me to go somewhere, then they
should supply the car... WHy should I use my car...
Joe
|
2195.32 | Supply and Demand | SMAUG::GARROD | Floating on a wooden DECk chair | Sat Nov 07 1992 21:21 | 22 |
| Re .-1
I'm not sure I agree with this reasoning. But the answer is probably:
- Same reason as you agree to supply your intellect
- Same reason as you agree to pay for your own clothes. You have
to admit you wear your own clothes out coming to work, so why
not your car too?
I guess it comes down to supply and demand. To answer the specific
question:
"Why should I use my car?"
I guess the answer is because if you didn't Digital might decide it no
longer needed your services. Of course if Digital gets too petty about
expenses it'll end up with a really dispirited set of employees and
will end up losing even more money. So there's a happy medium
somewhere. Unfortunately I don't think the people at the puzzle palace
have worked out where that happy medium is yet.
Dave
|
2195.33 | | MU::PORTER | savage pencil | Sat Nov 07 1992 22:59 | 18 |
| Yeah, but generally speaking, employers provide the tools
for the job.
Most employees have their own brains, so DEC doesn't
see any need to supply brains for employees.
Society expects people to walk around with clothes on
regardless of whether they're going to work, so DEC
doesn't provide clothes.
People don't necessarily carry computer terminals around
with them, so DEC provides terminals to employees who
need them to do their jobs.
I presume the car people are as peeved about having to
buy cars for DEC as you would be about having to
buy your own terminal.
|
2195.34 | and I know people who've purchased their own terminals too | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Mon Nov 09 1992 07:25 | 17 |
| > I presume the car people are as peeved about having to
> buy cars for DEC as you would be about having to
> buy your own terminal.
I think you are right. And lots of people can and do get by with
less in the way of cars than DEC field people often need. I know
the car I drove to work today in is not up to the job of a field
person. The demands of driving in traffic or 30-150 miles a day
are a lot harder on a car then my 12 mile direct (sort of) highway
commute. And I'd need a bigger car to carry passangers and/or
equipment.
Also lots of people don't need a car to commute to work. Car pools
van pools mass transit. All those are options for many people but
not our field people.
Alfred
|
2195.35 | Common practices | NWD002::GARRETTJO | | Thu Nov 12 1992 14:07 | 13 |
|
It is an accepted practice that employees provide their own brains and
their own clothing (in this industry). It is just as accepted a
practice that employers provide outside sales and service people with
cars or car allowances.
The original point was that DEC has strongly signalled, or implied,
that you only need a car if you drive more than 500 miles a month.
They have introduced a policy that provides transportation or a subsidy
for certain classes of employees and not for others within the same job
code. By using "miles travelled" as the criteria rather than functional
need, they have created a grossly unfair situation.
|
2195.36 | PLAN C (SEE YA!) | DCOFS::ALSTON | | Mon Nov 16 1992 12:59 | 45 |
| I have asked more than one "manager" about insurance responsibility for
plan "C" (cee-no-logic). There's not one "manager" in Digital Equipment
Corporation with the guts to answer a very simple question. WHO IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES IF YOUR VEHICLE IS BROKEN INTO/CARJACKED OR
DAMAGED WHILE ON DIGITAL BUSINESS???
I've seen memos stating Digital will hold responsibility for tools,
laptop, manaual, and/or parts in your vehicle. I have not see anything
in writting about using your vehicle in high-risk, high-crime cities
where your car insurance is already expensive for "pleasure" usage.
with the added "business" insurance, in D.C. it's a 25 to 35% uplift
in rates. But Digital doesn't care. You have employees with 5 to 20
years in service/sales who haven't purchased a car in years. The
average car payment is $350.00 per month (unless you buy a YUGO)
and to insure a "new" driver in my area is approx. $2000.00 per year.
Oh, sure you can lease a good car for a respected price, but with
milage restrictions and upkeep of the car if you want to turn in at the
end of the lease, 22c per mile won't help you.
And what about standby??? If Digital states you don't need a car to do
your job because you don't put 500 miles/month on your vehicle and you
are able to do your "job" effectively between 8:15 & 5:00 because of
adequate transportation (ie. bus, subway, cabs), when the cabs won't
pick you up and the subway and busses stop running, who's fault is it??
Again there's nothing in writing stating you need a car to do your
job....
I know I'm longwinded but this is my first entry.....
Did the Brainlords of Fleet realize that just because vehicle expenses
will go down, other expenses will go up..
ie. courier services ( the people who will deliver parts to customer
sites)
** remember it is the engineer's responsiblity to meet all customer
contractual responses... it's Digital's responsibility to insure
parts/test equipment arrive on the customer's site and once the
job is completed you contact the courier to return the parts/test
equipment to the office. **
transporation costs (bus fares, cab fares, subway fares)
|
2195.37 | Be glad you dont't have MI or MA Ins. rates! | GLDOA::MORRISON | Dave | Mon Nov 16 1992 23:28 | 4 |
| re: .27 - Must be nice to get 2 vehicles covered for $1200. In
Michigan I am being quoted 1200 / yr. for 1 Jeep Cherokee, which I am
considering -and I have a good driving record! The insurance in here
smells as bad as the Rouge river in Detroit!
|
2195.38 | It will likely come to litigation. | PTOECA::MCELWEE | Opponent of Oppression | Tue Nov 17 1992 00:40 | 22 |
| RE: .36-
> And what about standby??? If Digital states you don't need a car to do
> your job because you don't put 500 miles/month on your vehicle and you
> are able to do your "job" effectively between 8:15 & 5:00 because of
> adequate transportation (ie. bus, subway, cabs), when the cabs won't
> pick you up and the subway and busses stop running, who's fault is it??
> Again there's nothing in writing stating you need a car to do your
> job....
This is where your loyalty and resource management skills automagically
kick in to solve the problem: "We the willing, lead by the unknowning
have done so much with so little for so long that we are now qualified
to do anything with nothing." ;-).
You're correct- no one in "authority" is answering these concerns. It's
easier to take the "good offense is the best defense" stance. The
lawyers are pumped up, the bookies are pumped up, but the challenger
remains to be named in the bout..
Phil
|
2195.39 | I'm going Four-Wheelin' | BVILLE::FOLEY | Self-propelled Field Service | Wed Nov 18 1992 23:59 | 21 |
| The difference in insurance rates is truly amazing. I just insured my
"new" 1989 Ford F-150 4WD pickup for ~$320 twice a year. We went to the
same company my wife has her '85 Celebrity with, State Farm, bumped the
deductable to $500 and went from $293/6mo. to $230/6mo. I was also
quoted, in writing, "business use" for $305/6mo. on the truck.
Go figure.
Yes, I WILL be using the truck for Field Servicing, and NO, as yet
there is no cap on it. I need the snow and ice in the back for
traction. "Oh? it's wet/frozen/gone? Gee, that NEVER happened when I
had my nice warm/dry Taurus wagon."
A Sales Support type made an interesting observation; on "Plan C", I
can now carry a firearm. The "rules" state "company property" including
"company vehicles". Interesting concept when we all drive our own
vehicles.
.mike.
(and_no_I_don't_carry_it_but_jan_1_I_can_if_I_want.)
|
2195.40 | "C" What Dec Engineers Drive | DCOFS::ALSTON | | Thu Nov 19 1992 16:55 | 55 |
| I just recieved a memo from fleet without a name attached (suprized??)
stating the differences between personal and business milage. The memo
states plan A & B, but nothing about C. Once again, Digital management
hides behind paper and will not take responsibility for their actions.
I have been told so many times, "This is the new Digital" or many more
times "Digital will be profitable". When will we be told "Together,
Digital will profit, will take accountability for it's actions,
negative or positive". Will employee satifaction ever happen again??
Will Services ever get the respect or recognition as the major line
of communications between Digital and the customer?? Or will the
lines of communication be delayed because of lack of vehicle??
Back to reality.....
I've been on plan B for 7 years and enjoyed it. My insurance is
$1300.00 /yr. (Not if),when I drop my business insurance, I will
pay around $900.00 per year.
There are three different notes entries about plan B and C. I
thought Washington, D.C. was the only District affected by the
turn in your DECWRECK, buy a car, maintain your car, insure your
car, gas your car, carry parts in your car, report your car stolen
to the insurance company, have your car broken into and watch DEC
pay for that 9000 MCU module and tell you "sorry about your rear
window" and you must fix it because you need to run this call, fit
a 19" monitor in you Mazda Miata, drive your '68 Bug in 6" of snow
because the office is not closed and you have to swap a TU81 on site
in 1 hour.
Remember, the vehicle you buy can't break down.
Remember, the vehicle you drive has to start.
Remember, the vehicle you drive has to have tags.
Remember, the vehicle you drive has to have lights, tires, engine at
least one seat, a working stearing wheel and a front
windshield to break the wind.
NOTE*** Doors, floor, side windows, rear window, storage capabilities,
ignition screwdriver, undamged glove compartment, shocks,
breaks, hood, trunk, exhaust system, air staying the
in the tires, a clean RED rag in the gas tank, AM stereo with
optional 8-track with FM/CB converter, heavy rope to use
as a seat-belt or towing and tying vehicle, a bobbing-head
dog to cover the crack(not drugs) on your dash, fur for your
dash, a plastic cup for loose change, a way to shift the
car from park to drive with pushing it into to the street
without the help of freinds, windshield wippers, and a damn
good lawyer are optional.
REMEMBER
DIGITAL IS PAYING 22c PER MILE
FOR THAT MONEY, YOU CAN
AFFORD ALL THE ABOVE OPTIONS
|
2195.41 | Harry Callahan, Digital Services | RTL::LINDQUIST | | Thu Nov 19 1992 17:42 | 17 |
| �� <<< Note 2195.39 by BVILLE::FOLEY "Self-propelled Field Service" >>>
�� -< I'm going Four-Wheelin' >-
�� A Sales Support type made an interesting observation; on "Plan C", I
�� can now carry a firearm. The "rules" state "company property" including
�� "company vehicles". Interesting concept when we all drive our own
�� vehicles.
Is this for personal protection, or for those really
persnickety customer problems?
"Listen machine, did you crash five times, or was it
six? With all this console log, I kind of lost track
myself. This is a .44 magnun, the world's most powerful
handgun. It can blow your i-cache clear across the
room. You've got to ask yourself one question, machine,
DO YOU FEEL LUCKY? WELL DO YOU, MACHINE?"
|
2195.42 | Overheard in Computer Room | GRANPA::BPALUS | | Thu Nov 19 1992 20:24 | 7 |
| re: -1
"OK BO are we ready to SHOTGUN the parts in the cpu???
"Jest'a'min IKE lemmee git my double barrel 12 gauge smoothbore so we
kin really do it right"
|
2195.43 | These were bulletproof. | PTOECA::MCELWEE | Opponent of Oppression | Thu Nov 19 1992 22:43 | 6 |
| A .45 ACP metal jacketed round will not completely penetrate an 11/70
backplane at 25'. We tried it at a range once. Be sure to use something
with the proper velocity and energy to ensure a quick kill when
threatening machinery.
Phil
|
2195.44 | August 29 1997 2:14am EST | DCOFS::ALSTON | | Fri Nov 20 1992 09:00 | 10 |
|
Choice of "tools" for achieving the job....
44 caliber with autoloader
45 long range with laser sighting
plasma rifle with 400 watt range
'55 cadilac
I'lll beeeeeeee bak !!!!!!!!!!
|
2195.45 | Customers _DO_ carry guns | SCAACT::RESENDE | Y R U U? | Fri Nov 20 1992 10:00 | 13 |
| re: last several on firearms
You laugh. Back in the late '70s, I had a customer pull a shotgun on me and
my manager (we were a DEC OEM) and a (former) Digital employee (Barry Milberg).
Seems that the OEM was a little cash short and was delivering 11/10's for the
price of 11/34's, and backfilling them. The customer was a hunting enthusiast.
Also an M.D.
It's a long story, fun to recall now, but not to live thru then. Another story
that will die as we scatter to the corners of the earth, sigh. Bye Barry.
Steve
|
2195.46 | | PEACHS::MITCHAM | Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta) | Fri Nov 20 1992 10:17 | 7 |
| >You laugh. Back in the late '70s, I had a customer pull a shotgun on me and
>my manager (we were a DEC OEM) and a (former) Digital employee (Barry Milberg).
I'll bet that had Barry talking straight, didn't it. :-)
(If I recall correctly, Barry had a bit of a stutter, didn't he?)
-Andy, who was acquainted with Barry during his tenure here in Atlanta
|
2195.47 | | ECADSR::SHERMAN | Steve ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 MLO5-2/26a | Fri Nov 20 1992 10:28 | 5 |
| re: .46
I knew it was sometimes tough to order a system from Digital, but ...
Steve
|
2195.48 | $235.00 | CSOA1::DWYER | RICK DWYER @CYO | Fri Nov 20 1992 11:41 | 7 |
| I currently carry on my personal car the same limits of coverage
required by Digital. I just called my insurance agent and ask what the
additional cost would be for declaring the car as being used "primarily
for business." The additional cost for a 1991 Toyota Celica in
Cincinnati, Ohio for a person of my age and driving record is $235.00
per year. At $.08 per mile it will only take 2,937.5 miles to pay for
the increase.
|
2195.49 | Plan B car? | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Fri Nov 20 1992 11:50 | 6 |
| re: .48
At $.08/mile, that implies a Plan B car. The ~$350/month payment
should cover that in one payment, even after taxes.
Bob
|
2195.50 | Don't forget maintenance, etc. | CSOA1::DWYER | RICK DWYER @CYO | Fri Nov 20 1992 13:58 | 7 |
| re .49
Remember too that the $350, really $315 for CYO, also has to pay the
gas, maintenance, and make the car payment. The celica in my example,
is my wife's car. I am on plan A, but will change to plan B, so I need
a car. I just used my wife's car as a means to determine the
additional insurance cost.
|
2195.51 | Sure $315 a month. What if...... | DCOFS::ALSTON | | Fri Nov 20 1992 17:01 | 11 |
| RE. 50
Can you fit yourself, an RA82 HDA, Power Supply, the RA82 kit,
AND a VR290 and take it all to one site on one trip
for $315.00 p/month & $0.08 per mile.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
what a feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeling !!!!!!!!!!!
And then there's the next DECService call.................TU78.....
............Down, RDG not testing..................................
|
2195.52 | I know where I can get an 11/750 too! | BVILLE::FOLEY | Self-propelled Field Service | Fri Nov 20 1992 20:49 | 14 |
| I'll bet you all of the above will fit in the (8') bed of my truck...
Some of it may not be there when I get back from call #1, but what is
(self) insurance for anyway?
RE: the bulletproof 11/70;
I have a TS11 in the garage, and Ruger Redhawk. This could be fun...
For a while I had an RA60 pack on the wall of my cube, with holes from
calibers through it. 12 gauge slug? No problem. .44? Same. .357? 2
platters and a bulge in the 3rd. .38? one platter, small bulge. .22?
one platter, tiny bulge. .45? see .357.
.mike.
|
2195.53 | | PTOECA::MCELWEE | Opponent of Oppression | Fri Nov 20 1992 23:24 | 5 |
| RE: .49, .50-
..and watch that $315 shrink from the withholding it's subject to.
Phil
|
2195.54 | imagine police without cars | WETONE::LICATA | Mark @548-6455 | Thu Dec 03 1992 02:45 | 8 |
|
Now that I'm not forced to drive a recent vintage auto, I can buy
some real horsepower. So when I cant fix a problem I can take my dress
sharp and suck up attitude to the parking lot and leave noise, smoke,
and black marks all over the customer and DEC office lots. Maybe with
posi-traction I can spell .22 (cents) with one movement.
they cant call my parents this time...
|
2195.55 | no business insurance required ?? | TOOHOT::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Sun Jan 24 1993 20:59 | 13 |
| In reading the CURRENT (effective 14-JAN-1993) fleet policy on VTX,
there is NOTHING stated about needing business insurance for Plan B.
All it says is that you must carry a minimum of $250000/500000 bodily
injury and $100000 property damage, and have Digital named as
Additional Interested Party (and be notified of any changes in
coverage).
If this is truely the case, it'll save me over $200/year.....
Comments ??
|
2195.56 | | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Sun Jan 24 1993 22:21 | 5 |
| re: .55
Digital doesn't require it, but your insurance company probably will.
Check with your insurance agent and see what they say.
Bob
|
2195.57 | changed ?? | TOOHOT::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Mon Jan 25 1993 08:29 | 11 |
| < re: .56
> Digital doesn't require it, but your insurance company probably will.
> Check with your insurance agent and see what they say.
A few of the folks here in our office were told by their mgr that
Digital DID require it... and he wouldn't turn their plan B forms in
until they showed him proof of having business insurance. It cost them
an extra $250/year. They claim it stated right on the Plan B form that
it was a requirement, but it wasn't on the Plan B forms I saw.
Did this used to be a requirement that has changed ??
|
2195.58 | | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Mon Jan 25 1993 08:55 | 8 |
| Perhaps the mgr was confusing business insurance with the "interested
party", or whatever it was called, clause.
Call fleet and see what they say. Then call your insurance agent. I'd
hate for you to discover that you weren't covered AFTER you had an
accident.
Bob
|
2195.59 | the scoop.... | TOOHOT::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Mon Jan 25 1993 14:52 | 17 |
| I spoke with Greg Vokes in Fleet this morning. Here's the scoop -
The "old" policy (and it's still on the Plan B form) required coverage
of 100000/300000 for bodily injury and 25000 for property damage - it
also REQUIRED that you notify the insurance company that this was
business insurance, and show Digital proof of that. Effective Jan 1, '93
the business insurance requirement is dropped, but the required
coverage increased to 250000/500000 bodily injury and 100000 property
damage. It also requires that Digital be named as an additional
interested party.
He said anyone with the old coverage limits will be receiving
notification that they will have to send Digital proof that they have
increased to the new limits (within the next 6-8 months I think he
said.....)
|
2195.60 | More grapevine, indirect pussyfooting changes. | PTOECA::MCELWEE | Opponent of Oppression | Mon Feb 01 1993 23:36 | 27 |
| So, has anyone inquired about the cost of increasing their
liability limit to 250000/500000 etc. and also dropping business
use?
This seems the sort of request would raise some questions
from your insurance agent.
I received a "Transportation Memo" or somesuch that discussed
the change in required coverage as if it had been telepathically
become common knowledge. The statement was made that it had been
in the policy for "quite some time" yet <SET FLAME ON> WHEN I CHECKED
THE FLEET POLICY MANUAL, THE PLAN B INSURANCE SECTION WAS LAST UPDATED
14-JAN-1993. IN FACT, IF I DID NOT READ THIS CONFERENCE, I MIGHT STILL
BE UNAWARE OF THIS. <SET FLAME SIMMER>.
The memo also stated that the increased coverage was because
Digital's coverage begins at the >250000/500000 point, and employees
essentially have to cover the hole between the 100000/300000 old
limit and this. <SET FLAME ON AGAIN> SO WHEN DID DEC'S LIMIT CHANGE
OR DID SOMEONE JUST NOTICE THIS? <SET FLAME SIMMER AGAIN>.
The last annoying comment I remember is that it was estimated that
the increased coverage would only average $100. Perhaps the
geographically distributed Plan B allowance will be averaged upward to
cover this? NOT.
Phil
|
2195.61 | Left holding the bag again.... | SWAM1::MORRISON_DA | | Tue Nov 16 1993 16:00 | 9 |
| re: .60 - It seems that Digital secured a better insurance rate at the
point where they have liability (now moved up to 250K/500K) but at the
B plan driver's expense to cover the new delta. So the gunt gets
stepped on again - what's new? The mystery is - why would "business
insurance" not be required if Digital is still associated with the
liability? and when reading "Digital Eqpt. Corp. US Business
Transportation....." how easy will it be to convince the insurance
agent to sell you a policy at a normal "driven to work" rate? Yeah,
right!
|