T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2130.1 | | THATS::FULTI | | Thu Sep 24 1992 13:33 | 10 |
| re: .0
So, she could have worded the letter better. Besides that, what was wrong with
what she did? I think it demonstrates the enterprising spirit that DEC is/was
supposed to have fostered. Was it an out right scam? If not then whats the harm?
People out of work may need insurance and if she could provide it, well...
I'm also glad the DEC didn't just hand out names but, I have to admire her
determination.
- George
|
2130.2 | I'm more concerned with the registry | ELWD1::OBRIEN | | Thu Sep 24 1992 13:51 | 14 |
|
I am more concerned that she could take down license plate numbers,
go to the registry and get home addresses. Why would the registry
give out that kind of information without it being related to some
kind of motor vehicle issue? And what about DEC security? I would
think that what the woman was doing would fall under the suspicious
character category and security should have noticed her and told her
to leave.
On the other hand, maybe she should have gone to personel and asked
them to tell TFSO candidates about her service and if they wanted to
they could get more information from her.
|
2130.3 | Reply to .02 | MAAIDS::RWARRENFELTZ | | Thu Sep 24 1992 14:00 | 8 |
| Reply to .02
It doesn't take a brain scientist to be able to pull off what she did.
Anyone can gain access to the Registry's database.
I do agree with your comment about DEC Security. But maybe they were
busying escorting our beloved friends who were TFSO'd out of the
building.
|
2130.4 | | USPMLO::JSANTOS | | Thu Sep 24 1992 14:41 | 6 |
| Security did just what you suggested. She was on the property and
security escorted her off. She then sat across the street on a public
street and took numbers down as folks left. BTW, I called her and told
her that this was causing a problem (her sending out letters). She said
she understood the problem because she was laid off from a place
recently. She also said she would stop doing this...
|
2130.5 | sending letters is ok, but as long as they dont call home | STAR::ABBASI | the risk of cooking the x-mass turkey | Thu Sep 24 1992 15:46 | 11 |
|
i dont see any harm if she just sends the letters to the employees, as
long as she does not call us at home, that will be annoying, i hate
those strange people who call you home trying to sell you things, like
these newspaper people who seems to call every other week wanting to sell
their paper , every time they call they get me when iam in the middle of
my daily nap, i keep telling them that i cant read, but they dont seem
to get it, i know they'll call again.
/Nasser
|
2130.6 | I think it just shows entrepenurial spirit | PUERTO::ALVAREZ | This space for hire | Thu Sep 24 1992 16:52 | 15 |
| Here in Puerto Rico, we are given a three-day training in how to start
your own business. This program is subsidized by the goverment and the
instructors mentioned that they are having a booming business. This
prompted some of the attendees to (half-jokingly) mention that they were
profiting from somebody else's sorrow.
I saw it as an eye-opening experience, and for the first time since March
when our layoffs were announced, I'm looking positively to my termination
date.
In a capitalist society, you try to take opportunities where they are,
as long as they are legal and ethical. (the training I mentioned above
included a section on ethics).
Miguel A. Alvarez (first time writer)
|
2130.7 | Bloody Mary Ins. Co. Inc. | LEDDEV::DINANT | | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:07 | 11 |
| My thanks to security for throwing her off the property.
IMHO there's something immoral about capitalizing on someone's misery.
I mean really, an enterprising insurance salesperson could have sold
life insurance to the christians as they marched into the collisium
too! They probably needed it but it just smacks of opportunism.
It's just very tacky, unsympathic and unfeeling. Maybe what I really
object to is the WAY she did it and the way she worded the letter...
YUK!!
I don't think I would want someone that out-for-themselves handling my
insurance.
|
2130.8 | | USPMLO::JSANTOS | | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:10 | 6 |
| re.5 When these people call you at home tell them you are busy and you
would like their home number so you can call them at their home at your
convenience. When they tell you they don't like to take work related
calls at their homes tell them you don't either..... I saw this on tv
so I tried it and it works.....Of course this depends - if the person
is working out of their house it won't work....
|
2130.9 | | MU::PORTER | Consultant Clacker | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:16 | 5 |
| re .-1
It'd work for me even if they work at home.
My waking hours are slightly later in the day than most people
around here so "at my convenience" would probably be at, oh, 1:00am. :-)
|
2130.10 | People just don't realize | SMAUG::GARROD | Floating on a wooden DECk chair | Thu Sep 24 1992 18:08 | 15 |
|
Re:
> I am more concerned that she could take down license plate numbers,
> go to the registry and get home addresses.
Welcome to the world of today and big brother. It astounds me that
people don't realize how easy it is to get info on others. Witness my
earlier note here. That was with the help of the Mass Registry and an
inept DEC VTX database designer it would have been dead easy for
someone find out the salary of any Digital employee who lived in MA who had
a MA driving license with with their SS number as their license number.
In case you weren't aware MASS driving records are public record.
Dave
|
2130.11 | Some people are slime... | TEMPE::MCAFOOS | Spiff readies his daring escape plan... | Thu Sep 24 1992 18:57 | 17 |
| > I am more concerned that she could take down license plate numbers,
> go to the registry and get home addresses.
Some people do this all the time.
When I was in CA, a young lady working for me received a letter from a man
that saw her in a gas station.
He took her plate number and wrote to the DMV (I suppose that's "Registry"
to you in Mass.) with some story about her being involved in an accident.
The DMV gave him her name and home address with no questions asked.
Naturally, the letter was a come on, asking her for a date, etc.
Some people have no moral values at all.
Bob.
|
2130.12 | could be deemed illegal | NEURON::STAHLY | 10$: BRB 10$ | Thu Sep 24 1992 20:39 | 6 |
|
Now days, could the new "stocking" laws be applied to .11
i.e. - This type of activity is illegal in some states in the U.S.
|
2130.13 | | MU::PORTER | Consultant Clacker | Thu Sep 24 1992 21:56 | 2 |
| New stocking laws? They're telling us what we can wear on
our legs?
|
2130.14 | That should be "stalking"! | LJOHUB::NSMITH | rises up with eagle wings | Thu Sep 24 1992 22:22 | 1 |
|
|
2130.15 | yes, thank you | NEURON::STAHLY | 10$: BRB 10$ | Thu Sep 24 1992 23:18 | 5 |
|
re: .14 - thank you
|
2130.16 | | NEST::SLOOPY::YOUNG | | Fri Sep 25 1992 10:45 | 10 |
| The Mass. Registry seems to be very cooperative!
I got hit by a bus leaving a concert once. The bus driver didn't have
his registration with him. A call to the bus lines the next day only
produced an answer of "We insure our buses with many insurance
companies" and he hung up on me. I called the Registry and gave them
the license plate number. Within 30 seconds I had the Insurance company
name and all sorts of info about the insured. It was simple.
And I got my car fixed, too :-)
|
2130.17 | | JURAN::VALENZA | Bat child escapes! | Fri Sep 25 1992 12:31 | 11 |
| Registration information is, as was already pointed out, a matter of
public record. This is also true in Colorado (and I would guess it is
true in all states, though perhaps not), but there you have to pay a fee,
show identification, and sign your name when you request that
information. I was told by an employee of the license branch in
Colorado Springs (I never heard it called a "Registry" before I moved
to Massachusetts) that those additional requirements were established
in response to some incident where a man did get registration
information on women he found attractive and subsequently harass them.
-- Mike
|
2130.18 | and you KNOW what the lines are like. . . | POWDML::COSTIGAN | | Fri Sep 25 1992 17:16 | 6 |
| You at least have to come into the Registry to fill out a form; I don't
know about a fee because I just inquired about the procedure. They do
give you the information, but I believe it has to be in conjunction
with an actual motor vehicle violation.
|
2130.19 | No Such thing as Privacy, anymore | COMET::BARRIANO | choke me in the shallow water... | Fri Sep 25 1992 23:36 | 23 |
| re <<< Note 2130.18 by POWDML::COSTIGAN >>>
-< and you KNOW what the lines are like. . . >-
> give you the information, but I believe it has to be in conjunction
> with an actual motor vehicle violation.
not in Colorado, all you have to do is say you want to do a tag trace, they
give you a short form to fill out and you pay $3 (I think). You don't need
to give a reason at all. You can make up a plausible reason if you want, but
I don't think they care as long as they get their $3. I had a problem with some
work I'd had done on a car. I got the license plate number from the mechanics
car, got his drivers licence # and address from the motor vehicle dept. I took
him to small calims court & won. When he didn't pay I got a lein against his car
(easy to do when you have a court judgement) and he had to refund my money or
lose his car. There's no such thing as privacy any more, you can get all sorts
of information about nearly everyone, if you know where to look.
Regards
Barry
|
2130.20 | | METSYS::THOMPSON | | Sun Sep 27 1992 11:54 | 13 |
|
I think it's easy to get information out of the Mass. registry even if
it's for commercial reasons. I kept getting mail shots for Toyota owners
as my 2 year old Toyota was supposedly coming up to the time when
people usually change them [I don't own a Toyotal]. I just trashed the
mail shots until one day I got a Tax demand for the car from the Town.
I found out that the town got the information about the car from the
Registry. Further investigation revealed the Registry had my car
details completely wrong, I wasn't the least bit surprised about that
but I was that the details of my car had been "leaked" for commercial
purposes. No wonder Mass. car theft is so high, the thieves can probably
get names and addresses of all the people who have the type of
car they want to steal.
|
2130.21 | Anyone See 48 Hours Last Week? | ALAMOS::ADAMS | I'm a dot... | Sun Sep 27 1992 17:48 | 11 |
| A small company I worked for was very successful in getting the entire
state of Nevada's license and registration records for a political
candidate we were doing work for. Cross-ref'ed with TRW data (SSN
are/were you ID number on your license), very effective canvasing and
direct mail campaigns were launched (circa 1985-86).
It was very scary finding out just how much data you can get from
'information brokers'. I had to wash my hands for weeks after that
project...
--- Gavin
|
2130.22 | WOW...WOW..What a Country..What a joke! | BSS::GROVER | The CIRCUIT_MAN | Mon Sep 28 1992 09:36 | 9 |
| SO.... Let me see if I got this right....?????!!!!
The Privacy act is for sale.... As long as you have the $$$ you get the
goods, on anybody, at anytime..!!!!????
I love this country.... It's gettin' wonderfuller and wonderfuller
everyday..... What a country..!
|
2130.23 | privacy | SGOUTL::BELDIN_R | D-Day: 184 days and counting | Mon Sep 28 1992 09:42 | 3 |
| This is a Soapbox topic, come join us!
|
2130.24 | Mass. Facts | KALI::PLOUFF | Owns that third brand computer | Mon Sep 28 1992 12:25 | 13 |
| This is getting very far off "the Digital way of working," but to
forestall more speculation about getting driver's records in
Massachusetts, here are the facts. This is from personal experience.
To obtain the license and registration records for a Massachusetts
resident, first get as complete a name and address as possible, with
license plate number if possible. Go to the Mass. Registry of Motor
Vehicles, 100 Nashua St, Boston (behind North Station) to the third
floor. There, for a $5 fee, a Registry employee will provide complete
records, no questions asked. The Registry said on the phone that this
service is not available at branches.
Wes
|
2130.25 | An opportunity for yuks I'd say... | FSOA::SLIEKER | | Tue Sep 29 1992 15:03 | 10 |
| What registry? what fee? just go to any police station and give them
a halfway plausible reason why you need it and they'll do it while
you wait. I've done it a number of times. They have handed me the
whole print out, right down to the SS # and DOB. Just look legitimate,
I've only been questioned once and they still gave me the info. The
letter from the "rebel without a clause" insurance agent sounds like
a kick. I'd respond with the following letter. " Dear soon to be
indicted insurance agent. In view of your up coming need for quality
legal representation, my I offer the following....." should get an
amusing response...8^)
|
2130.26 | | THATS::FULTI | | Tue Sep 29 1992 15:15 | 19 |
| re: .25
> I'd respond with the following letter. " Dear soon to be
> indicted insurance agent. In view of your up coming need for quality
> legal representation, my I offer the following....." should get an
> amusing response...8^)
I don't get it, just what is it that you think that she would/should be
indicted for? Is it illegal to jot down someone's license plate number
and take it to the authorities (whomever they are) and ask for the name,
address, etc, etc? If so, the authorities should be indicted for giving
it out.
The tale told in .0 strikes me as one where if she was totally successful
in her endeavor and 10 years from now she was to her company what Ken is to DEC,
people would be saying "Gee, what a creative idea she had, I wish I had thought
of it".
- George
|
2130.27 | what if? | THATS::FULTI | | Tue Sep 29 1992 15:51 | 13 |
| Let me ask the following question to those who think the woman in .0
did something illegal:
What if, instead of being an insurance agent, she owned a company and
felt that she could use alot of those that were to be laid off from
DEC. Further, not wanting to pay 'headhunter' fees she decided to do
what the person in .0 did. Thus the letter that DEC people got didn't say that
she wanted to sell them insurance but, said that she wanted those interested
to come in for an interview. What whould you say then, based on how she
ultimately got names and addresses?
- George
|
2130.28 | you can't hide, even if you think you can | SGOUTL::BELDIN_R | D-Day: 183 days and counting | Tue Sep 29 1992 16:09 | 8 |
| George has it right! Anyone is free to make any observations s/he
wants while on the public roads. Your license tag number is not yours,
it belongs to the state. Your name and address are not private, they
are public property. There seems to be a lot of misunderstanding about
what rights and privileges people really have. The right to be
anonymous is not one of them.
Dick
|
2130.29 | sound bite | XLIB::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, ISV Tech. Support | Tue Sep 29 1992 16:16 | 1 |
| just because it's legal, doesn't make it RIGHT!
|