T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2069.1 | i love a good rat-hole | MU::PORTER | was it something that you said? | Tue Aug 25 1992 14:40 | 10 |
| >We build complimentary products.
Is this
(a) a product which says nice things about you?
(for example, a compiler linked to a voice
synthesiser: "hey, nice programming, dave")
(b) a product which they don't charge you for?
|
2069.2 | ref .1, my attempt an outlining the meanings | STAR::ABBASI | I spell check | Tue Aug 25 1992 16:04 | 11 |
| I think it means a product that compliment in a cohesive and harmonious
and in concert and in tunes and in accords with the other products you
may already have installed in your existing operating and working
environment whether it may be business or non-business related
activities.
but I love you idea of a talking compiler, we have such a product
by any fluke of a chance?
thank you,
/Nasser
|
2069.3 | | DENVER::DAVISGB | Another hot number from the 50's | Tue Aug 25 1992 16:17 | 4 |
| I just thought it was a novel approach to getting an employee's
attention....like we get all kinds of mail talking about downsizing,
and product delays...here's something CHEERY for a change!
|
2069.4 | | MU::PORTER | was it something that you said? | Tue Aug 25 1992 17:32 | 4 |
| re .2
You need to check usage as well as spelling, Nasser!
There ain't no such meaning for "compliment".
|
2069.5 | a comment on early comment made commenting on the wrong word | STAR::ABBASI | I spell check | Tue Aug 25 1992 19:53 | 18 |
| there is no such meaning to that word !?
now you tell me, Dave, after all the self struggle I had to accept
and go through as I endured the deep thought to come up of those highly
selected words before publishing .2
this is too hard, one has to in addition to spell checking, also know
what words actually do mean!!
I am seriously starting to think of leaving the business of commentating
to something less drastically and dramatically challenging.
thank you,
/Nasser
I spell checked
|
2069.6 | | JMPSRV::MICKOL | We won with Xerox in '92 | Wed Aug 26 1992 00:16 | 7 |
| I'd like to complement everyone in this topic for their total abuse of the
English language.
Jim
I smell checked
|
2069.7 | | SHALOT::ANDERSON | Save the turkeys! | Wed Aug 26 1992 10:38 | 5 |
| Nasser:
Don't change a thing. We love ya, baby!
-- Cliff
|
2069.8 | | STAR::ABBASI | I spell check | Wed Aug 26 1992 11:17 | 19 |
| ref .7
>Don't change a thing. We love ya,
thank you cliff, you are just being very kind, words like that is what
make believe there is still hope and peace for all of us as we
go through this all together united and in high spirit with love
in the air to fuels our hearts as we climb the stairs to the light
shining ahead.
thanks again.
>baby!
I AM NOT YOUR BABY , PLEASE !!!!!!
I AM NOT A BABY, I AM NO ONES BABY, I AM NOT, NOT , NOT , NOT !!!
thanks!
/Nasser
|
2069.9 | Need DECgrammar anyone? | RIPPLE::NORDLAND_GE | Waiting for Perot :^) | Wed Aug 26 1992 14:34 | 8 |
|
Re: last string
Nasser, Porter (.4) was right, you need to do more than spell check.
After all Bush's 'know gnu taxis' gets through just fine but has little
meaning. But I love your enthusiasm (and creative usage) - don't quit
noting because of some sniveling nit pickers.
|
2069.10 | | MU::PORTER | was it something that you said? | Wed Aug 26 1992 15:15 | 3 |
| Even DECgrammar wouldn't be enough - both "complementary software"
and "complimentary software" would pass muster. What we
need is DECsemantics!
|
2069.11 | we could use a local chapter of Nitpickers Anonymous | CUPTAY::BAILEY | Season of the Winch | Wed Aug 26 1992 16:08 | 8 |
| What we need is to worry less about spelling and grammar, and more
about the content of the message.
It is true that when one has nothing significant to say, one can always
focus on the insignificant.
... Bob
|
2069.12 | Group rates for Cerebral Insurance | MARX::BAIRD | Not running? NOW I'm for Perot! | Wed Aug 26 1992 18:26 | 13 |
|
Nasser is one example of what it's like to have 'artificial' removed
from 'artificial intelligence.'
Automated tools don't help with his replies - you need to think!
Often times, the pain this process (thinking) causes to some, manifests
itself as 'nit' replies.
J.B.
(Former "Nasser Nit Replier")
|
2069.13 | | DENVER::DAVISGB | Another hot number from the 50's | Wed Aug 26 1992 20:31 | 10 |
| re .11
really! Could you guys go rathole in someone else's note?
And whil yor at it...delet yor dam spel cheker.
gil
8')
|
2069.14 | in these times, we should all calm down and reflect | STAR::ABBASI | Spell check, its good for you | Thu Aug 27 1992 01:24 | 18 |
|
Please , please folks, calm down, we should not fight with each other like
this, we should love each others and hold in high esteem other peoples
feelings and noting emotions, remember we are in this all together, we
must hold hands, embrace and look to the bright future in high spirit and
the powers of inspirations that is hidden dormant deep within all of us as
we marsh against the obstacles no matter what they may be with the
strong believe than we will concur and override them in feverish
insight and raised enthusiasm that will show every one the true meaning
of the power of unity and emotional ties that hold us all together.
remember, if you believe that you can do it, then you will !
thank you,
/Nasser
|
2069.15 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | We need some new clich�s | Thu Aug 27 1992 03:39 | 4 |
| But Nasser if we were seen holding hands and embracing, well people
might talk...
Jamie.
|
2069.16 | say what ? | CUPTAY::BAILEY | Season of the Winch | Thu Aug 27 1992 09:45 | 11 |
| RE .13
Yo ... Gil ... GIL! WAKE UP DAMMIT!
Why you pickin' on me, when the seven replies prior to mine and the
rest of the ones after it are also ratholes?
... Bob (who doesn't use no steenking spel chekker)
P.S. - ^!^
`-'
|
2069.17 | very good | CDROM::HENDRICKS | The only way out is through | Thu Aug 27 1992 11:56 | 9 |
| Nasser's notes are thought-provoking - I like them.
But .14 had to have been written by a new product I didn't even know we
had:
DECpsychobabble
;-)
|
2069.18 | Correction...and back to the original subject | DENVER::DAVISGB | Another hot number from the 50's | Thu Aug 27 1992 12:47 | 26 |
| re .16
Bob, I was agreeing with you....not picking on you....
> What we need is to worry less about spelling and grammar, and more
>about the content of the message.
>It is true that when one has nothing significant to say, one can always
>focus on the insignificant.
And I said "Really!" as in right on...how true....my thoughts
exactly....
Back to the original subject....I was mad about this cooperative
marketing (choose your noun...partner... whatever) trying to get sales to
push their product by saying " Hey! There's only cheery news in this
envelope, and nothing about how screwed up your company is!"
I mean we are having trouble, but we don't need our friends to remind
us of it, after all....
And then everyone went off on another spell checker rathole and clogged
up this note.
|
2069.19 | Still on track with original subject... | MARX::BAIRD | Not running? NOW I'm for Perot! | Thu Aug 27 1992 13:15 | 18 |
|
re: .18
Hmmm... I just reread the basetopic and the replies. I must
disagree with your conclusion. In content, style, or
inference (or all of these, in some cases) each reply is
seems be quite in keeping with the topic, IMHO.
Perhaps it is the lack of the phrase "...cooperative
marketing..." in the replies that fails to call attention
to the thread of discussion. Perhaps.
Then again, maybe I'll have to quit telling the waitress,
"I'll have what he's having" when I'm in a resturant,
sitting near /Nasser.
J.B.
|
2069.20 | a real-life Emily Latella ... ;^) | CUPTAY::BAILEY | Season of the Winch | Thu Aug 27 1992 14:47 | 6 |
| >> Bob, I was agreeing with you....not picking on you....
Oh ... never mind ... ;^)
... Bob
|
2069.21 | I resemble that statement... | DENVER::DAVISGB | Another hot number from the 50's | Thu Aug 27 1992 23:01 | 10 |
| All I want to know is ....
What's all this discussion about the Air Solution?
Never mind...
|