T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2037.1 | Well... | GUCCI::HERB | Al is the *first* name | Tue Aug 04 1992 22:27 | 2 |
| >4-AUG-1992 21:11
I think you're late. You better wait till tomorrow and try again. :^)
|
2037.2 | That's when mine starts! | 11SRUS::KRUPINSKI | Repeal the 16th Amendment! | Tue Aug 04 1992 23:12 | 3 |
| When your boss says it does...
Tom_K
|
2037.3 | neverending story | LABRYS::CONNELLY | Round up the usual suspects! | Wed Aug 05 1992 00:56 | 4 |
|
The real question is: when does it end?
;-) paul
|
2037.4 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Wed Aug 05 1992 08:32 | 6 |
| re .0:
At the time that allows you to fulfill all of your work
obligations for the day.
--Mr Topaz
|
2037.5 | | SUBWAY::BRIGGS | Have datascope, will travel. | Wed Aug 05 1992 10:17 | 2 |
|
It's never too late.
|
2037.6 | official policy is that it varies | ALIEN::MCCULLEY | DEC Pro | Wed Aug 05 1992 11:18 | 4 |
| .0> What time are we supposed to come in to work?
See the introduction to Personnel Policies and Procedures section 6.40
(VTX ORANGEBOOK) which says it is set by local management.
|
2037.7 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | ...57 channels, and nothin' on... | Wed Aug 05 1992 11:48 | 6 |
|
Stretching back 20 years or so, the "standard" DEC business day was:
Manufacturing: 7:30 to 4:00, 30-minute lunch at 11:30
All else: 8:15 to 5:00, 45-minute lunch starting at 12:00
|
2037.8 | ! | FUNYET::ANDERSON | Bye George | Wed Aug 05 1992 12:01 | 3 |
| � 8:15 to 5:00, 45-minute lunch starting at 12:00
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa! That's the best laugh I've had all week!
|
2037.9 | on lunch timing | STAR::ABBASI | i^(-i) = SQRT(exp(PI)) | Wed Aug 05 1992 12:05 | 2 |
| plus if you go to the cafe at 12:00, all the best food is gone by
then, i dont like to eat left overs.
|
2037.10 | | JUPITR::BUSWELL | We're all temporary | Wed Aug 05 1992 12:37 | 17 |
| Three boys are fighting over how fast their dads cars are.
1st boy " my dad gets out of work at 4:30 and is home by 4:45 my dad
works at Wang".
2nd boy " that's nothing, my dad gets out at 4:30 and is home by
4:40, my dad works at Data General".
3rd boy " my works at DEC and he is home by 3:00"
1st boy " but when does he get out of work"?
3rd boy " oh 5:00 "
Buzz
|
2037.11 | | METSYS::THOMPSON | | Wed Aug 05 1992 15:10 | 10 |
|
Well, I went on the introductory management course that was titled
something like "Essentials for new Managers at Digital". In that
course they produced the policy that says the day starts at
8:15 and ends at 5.oo as was said a while back.
There were no ifs and buts about this, it was also stated that turning
up late 3 times in a row was grounds for dismissal.
I've never seen that enforced but, in times like these, it's an awful
lot cheaper for a Cost Center (DEC) to do this than pay for a TFSO.
|
2037.13 | | SYSTEM::COCKBURN | Craig Cockburn | Wed Aug 05 1992 16:38 | 13 |
| > <<< Note 2037.11 by METSYS::THOMPSON >>>
>Well, I went on the introductory management course that was titled
>something like "Essentials for new Managers at Digital". In that
>course they produced the policy that says the day starts at
>8:15 and ends at 5.oo as was said a while back.
and the author of that note is my manager and we work in the UK, and
the site is pretty deserted at 8:15, and people really only start
leaving in numbers from 5:30pm. 8:15 - 5pm sounds like US hours.
Craig
|
2037.14 | And yes, people work all sorts of hours outside their standard ones here as well | KERNEL::BELL | Hear the softly spoken magic spell | Thu Aug 06 1992 05:48 | 14 |
|
At the UKCSC the "standard" day is 09:00-17:30 but 'official' variations
include starting at 07:00 ["earlies"] or at 16:00 ["lates"] then working
the same number of hours. The call handling and diagnosis people run 12
hour shifts to provide 24x7 cover. Some software groups - including the
one I'm in - run a standard day but provide out of hours cover via pager
whereas others require a body in place. As .6 said, it boils down to a
decision by local management (ie., *your* manager). If you have reasons
to want to change it, try persuading him/her - if the preferred starting
time has no [negative] business impact (eg., doesn't invalidate customer
contracts or expectations) then you've got a chance.
Frank
|
2037.15 | shifting hours to avoid L.A. traffic | SWAM1::MERCADO_EL | | Thu Aug 06 1992 22:30 | 14 |
| ....and if you fight the L.A. traffic and have an understanding
manager you come in around 9-9:30 and leave around 7 - 7:30 p.m.
As long as the work gets done and my customers are happy it really
shouldn't be an issue if my day starts an hour or so later than
most. I'm also always available on pager even though I only get paid
for one week a month. By shifting my hours away from the very long
and miserable rush hours I save myself about 1 to 1-1/2 hours a day
and am a much less stressed (and hopefully more productive!) employee.
There are also more and more people in this area who are working from
home one or two days a week as well.
-Elizabeth
|
2037.16 | Flexible work-hours | FLYWAY::BENZ | ASSETS Business Development, DTN 760-2356 | Fri Aug 07 1992 03:37 | 8 |
| In Switzerland, as from the 1-Oct, the official working hours are
between 0600 and 2000 Monday to Saturday, and you work your contracted
amount of hours (40 for a full-time employee) within this band after
discussion with your boss and within legal bounds (minimum 30 min lunch
with an 8 hour day, min 60 min lunch with a ten hour day, max 10 hours
per day work).
Of course you can always work more.....
|
2037.17 | RE: 14 Works both ways! | GUCCI::RWARRENFELTZ | | Fri Aug 07 1992 09:03 | 12 |
| re: 15
I am just the opposite of you. I work in MD & my customer is a
government agency. He's at his office from 7:00 - 3:00PM. With my
managers' (the previous 5 I've had the past 30 months) approval, my
hours are 6:30AM - 3:30PM. I miss the rush hour both ways, I have the
copiers & faxes to myself and my COR(T) can always reach me.
I feel I am a more productive employee, less stressed, and hopefully I
can keep my account satisfied and my job.
Ron
|
2037.18 | A little flexibility is in order | CORPRL::RALTO | It's all part of the show! | Fri Aug 07 1992 13:01 | 19 |
| Digital once lost a valuable and productive employee, because
some control-freak manager wouldn't allow the employee to shift
their working hours *fifteen minutes* ahead of the 8:15-to-5:00
hours, to participate in a carpool in the early eighties (when
carpools were still in vogue).
No aspect of the employee's job required presence at specific
time periods. No reason was given for the refusal other than
along the lines of "those are the hours I want you here". This
"arbitrary and capricious" power display led to the employee
reluctantly but finally resigning. The manager was incredulous,
and wouldn't believe until the very end that the person would
actually leave.
It was actually worth a chuckle or two towards the end, to watch
the manager's fury increase as he was forced to realize just who,
in the final analysis, had the real power after all.
Chris
|
2037.19 | | ODIXIE::RHARRIS | Bowhunters never hold back! | Fri Aug 07 1992 13:38 | 12 |
| As long as you get your job done is my opinion. I know people that
come in at 7 and leave at 5 that don't even work. I know people that
come in around 9-9:30 and leave at 4 and are excellent performers. I
myself come in around 8, eat lunch from 11-12, and leave at 5.
Sometimes I leave at 6 or 7, and sometimes get in around 9.
I guess it really depends on the kind of work you do, desk job vs.
assembly line or time schedule work, and also your manager. But
globally I think the generic is 8:15 to 12, and 12:45 to 5.
bob
|
2037.20 | | ALIEN::MCCULLEY | DEC Pro | Fri Aug 07 1992 13:57 | 23 |
| .11> I've never seen that enforced but, in times like these, it's an awful
.11> lot cheaper for a Cost Center (DEC) to do this than pay for a TFSO.
Could be a lot more expensive too.
If somebody at risk of TFSO were able to show unfair termination (which
might include violation of rules previously unenforced, or enforced
inconsistently between employees at risk and other employees), they
could probably take the corporation for punitive damages as well as
actual damages.
If they were smart enough to dig out a pattern of such discrimination
they might even be able to go with a class action suit.
I'd certainly hope that all the managers and organizations within the
corporation are smart enough to understand that it isn't "the right
thing" to expose the corporation to such a legal risk. Of course if it
is truly justified then they should do the "right thing" in terminating
for cause, but it seems to me that the sort of suggestion implied in
.11 would be just plain stupid!
--bruce
|
2037.21 | | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Fri Aug 07 1992 17:25 | 9 |
| re .18
And I bet I know where that manager is working now! Still a DECcie
after all these years (bloops).
-sandy
(but then that's another note!)
|