[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

2005.0. "Peons, common folk and expensive suits" by ICS::DONNELLAN () Tue Jul 21 1992 22:26

    I was struck by comments from Ken which indicated that he could not
    accomplish what he wanted to over the past couple of years and that was
    why the Board fired him.
    
    Put another way, this CEO, founder, owner, and ultimate entrepreneur
    could not produce in his own company the change that was needed in
    order to restore health and vitality.
    
    When I read these notes files, I hear the same kinds of frustration. 
    People have a sense of what is wrong, feel they have some thoughts
    about what is needed, yet express the same sense of powerlessness that Ken
    expressed.  These people, however, refer to themselves as peons,
    "common" folk, or whatever and refer to the top of the hierarchy as
    "expensive suits", "higher ups", etc.
    
    If the powerful do not have the power to change things, and if the
    powerless persist in believing that they do not have power to effect
    change, then is there any hope?  
    
    What makes us think that Bob Palmer can do what Ken couldn't?  How much
    impact can a leader really have, if the people s/he is leading do not
    want his/her leadership?  If we decide that we don't like Bob or his
    style of leadership, what are the prospects of success?
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2005.1ANTPOL::PRUSSDr. VelocityWed Jul 22 1992 02:581
    Power is only powerful if you have the stomach to use it..
2005.2"anatomy" of power?USCTR1::JHERNBERGWed Jul 22 1992 09:576
    
    
    -1.  I would think that the exercise of power has more to do with
         muscle than stomach, especially since the DEC stomach is now 
         empty.  And of course, keeping the "third" eye constantly open.
    
2005.3your power may be exercised by anotherSGOUTL::BELDIN_RD-Day: 251 days and countingWed Jul 22 1992 10:1510
    Common sense will tell you that a person who sees that the only way to
    solve his problem is to use methods which violate his principles, will
    let someone else (with fewer scruples) do the job.  I used to say that
    I needed a "gorilla" to walk behind me as I toured the plant, just to
    handle the ugly stuff.  I've gotten a little tougher, but I don't need
    him any more because I don't have the responsibility.
    
    fwiw,
    
    Dick
2005.4Choice, not abilityDYPSS1::COGHILLSteve Coghill, Luke 14:28Wed Jul 22 1992 12:3519
   Re: Note 2005.0 by ICS::DONNELLAN
   
    
�    If the powerful do not have the power to change things, and if the
�    powerless persist in believing that they do not have power to effect
�    change, then is there any hope?  
    
   
   1) Semantics: you are not powerful if you do not have the power.
   
   2) Choice: You can be powerful and choose not to use this power.  
   
   I believe #2 is the case with Ken.  If subordinates do not do what
   you want (or tell) them to do, then you have two choices; let it ride
   (do nothing), or fire them.  And you keep firing people until you
   find one who is willing to do what he/she/it is told to do.  
   
   One problem is that many times we are not talking about individuals,
   but whole organizations, or the good-ol-boy network.
2005.5RANGER::PANDYAWed Jul 22 1992 12:4516
                 -< Patience did not prove to be a virtue? >-
    
    Let me mention two quotes I have heard in relation to Ken's approach
    in trying to solve DEC's problems:
    
    1. If you focus on negatives, negatives get stronger and vice a versa.
    
    2. If you only have a small flashlight and have to climb a mountain at
       night but can only see a few feet beoynd you, that is the only way
       to start out (step at a time) until you reach the top.
    
    It seems Ken tried to approach things using these two principles but
    the board's patience may have run out due to the monetary pressures
    from the investors. Afterall, our dollar notes say "In God We Trust".
    
    -Atul
2005.6A1VAX::DISMUKESay you saw it in NOTES...Thu Jul 23 1992 10:108
    as I read the  basenote, I thought "there's the powerful and the
    powerless and in between we have all those who THINK they are the
    powerful, but should be thinking they are powerless".
    
    -sandy
    
    (or something like that)