Title: | The Digital way of working |
Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 5321 |
Total number of notes: | 139771 |
Anybody notice how shabby the latest DECWORLD magazine was? I usually enjoy the engineering slant it has (had?) exposing the big ideas behind the products. I wonder if the magazine's obvious poor quality and shallow content is reflective of anything? Any others notice? jb
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1975.1 | Step in the right direction | SMAUG::GARROD | Floating on a wooden DECk chair | Thu Jul 09 1992 18:51 | 7 |
Re .0 Maybe most of the people have been reassigned to do something more useful. If so that's a good sign. Next step is to tube the publication altogether. Dave | |||||
1975.2 | The clue's been taken? | MLTVAX::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Thu Jul 09 1992 22:05 | 4 |
Management Memo was much better this month. The only contributors were Ken and John Sims. -Jack | |||||
1975.3 | DEC lebt nicht von Luft und Liebe | SORGEN::HELMUT | Fri Jul 10 1992 08:40 | 20 | |
re .1 perhaps you'd like to read note 1969.0 . For example! An other little example for our great marketing job is that anyone will hardly be able to find an article in a relevant bussiness magazine that doesn't claim Digital to be a minimaker; The minimaker. You like to hear this?? Who is going to buy minis today? If I'm only half right, getting 'open systems' is what customers want first. HP is manifacturing minis too, and we have to admit they do a much better selling job, BUT you'll hardly find HP to be called a 'minimaker'. I think lessening concentration on marketing aspects even more is a big step ahead to the edge of precipice. helmut |