[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

1818.0. "Outsourcing suit" by MRKTNG::SILVERBERG (Mark Silverberg DTN 264-2269 TTB1-5/B3) Tue Mar 24 1992 08:03

(posted with permission)

Copyright � Dow Jones & Co. 1992
Source: Dow Jones News Service
Headline: Former Kodak Workers Sue Kodak, Digital Equipment
Time: Mar 20 1992 1744


Story: 
  ROCHESTER, N.Y. -AP- Eastman Kodak Co. has been sued by 11 former employees 
who say the company pressured them to take jobs with Digital Equipment Corp. 
two years ago when Kodak transferred its telecommunications operation to 
Digital.  Kodak's retirement plan and Digital are also named in the suit. 
  Kodak spokesmen would not comment on the suit. 
  In the lawsuit the employees claim Kodak pressured them into joining Digital 
by blocking opportunities to transfer within Kodak.  They said Kodak and 
Digital misled them about what their jobs would be with Digital.  In addition, 
their responsibilities were downgraded at Digital and their benefits lowered. 
  Each employee is suing Kodak for $5 million and, its retirement plan and 
Digital for for an additional $5 million each.  They are also seeking their 
old Kodak positions, compensation for lost benefits, and an affirmative action 
program for older employees. 
   5:44 PM
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1818.1Some more detail from VNSERLANG::HERBISONB.J.Tue Mar 24 1992 10:4641
<><><><><><><><>  T h e   V O G O N   N e w s   S e r v i c e  <><><><><><><><>

 Edition : 2541              Tuesday 24-Mar-1992            Circulation :  8182 
        
VNS COMPUTER NEWS:                            [Tracy Talcott, VNS Computer Desk]
==================                            [Nashua, NH, USA                 ]
        
 Digital, Eastman Kodak - Sued for $5 million each over outsourcing
	{The Wall Street Journal, 23-Mar-92, p. B6B}
   The companies have been sued by 11 former Kodak employees who charged that
 Kodak unfairly pressured them into working for Digital, which allegedly lies
 to them about its benefit plan. The suit, files in U.S. District Court in
 Rochester, N.Y., seeks $5 million in punitive damages from each company.
 Both companies said they can't comment on pending litigation. The employees,
 aged 44 to 64, allege that Kodak discriminated against older workers by
 cutting off other career opportunities so they were forced to accept jobs at
 Digital, which performs telecommunications contract work for Kodak under an
 alliance called Telstar. About 250 workers became Telstar workers in February
 1990, according to Rochester lawyer Donna Marianetti, who filed the suit Feb.
 25. Ms. Marianetti has other age-discrimination suits pending against Kodak.
 The move was part of Kodak's highly applauded "outsourcing" strategy, which
 saves Kodak the cost of benefits by farming work out to contractors. The
 lawsuit alleges that Kodak's plan is to use outsourcing to reduce its
 Rochester payroll to about 18,000 employees from the current 39,600. The
 plaintiffs charge that Digital misled them by telling them they would keep
 their same jobs and titles at Digital, while getting at least comparable
 benefits. But instead, the employees lost job responsibilities and Digital
 told them it's dissatisfied with the Telstar alliance, so the employees'
 future is unclear, according to the suit. Meanwhile, Kodak improved its
 retirement benefits. The suit alleges that Kodak knew it would improve its
 retirement packages when its workers moved to Digital, but didn't tell them.


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
        Please send subscription and backissue requests to CASEE::VNS

    Permission to copy material from this VNS is granted (per DIGITAL PP&P)
    provided that the message header for the issue and credit lines for the
    VNS correspondent and original source are retained in the copy.

<><><><><><><><>   VNS Edition : 2541     Tuesday 24-Mar-1992   <><><><><><><><>
1818.2ASICS::LESLIEDigital - we&#039;re #2Tue Mar 24 1992 12:576
    I think it is a very bad idea to have this or any other notes
    conference containing comment upon this or any other current lawsuit in
    which DIGITAL is involved. Please restrict any replies here to fact, no
    comments.
    
    /andy
1818.3Topic writelockedQUARK::LIONELFree advice is worth every centTue Mar 24 1992 13:155
I agree with Andy, but believe it is inappropriate to have any discussion 
here at all on the topic, even with "just the facts".  I have disabled
further replies.

			Steve