T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1728.1 | who knows I hope someone cares!!!! | WR1FOR::SHERRILRO | | Thu Jan 16 1992 21:07 | 4 |
|
When was her 15 year service date?? It may have just taken the
"system" six months to send it to her. (My 10 year certificate
came in the middle of my 11th year)
|
1728.2 | | BAGELS::REED | | Fri Jan 17 1992 10:10 | 7 |
|
Karen, my buddy got his 10 year award from personnel along
with his TFSO paperwork on his check-out day!
The document means nothing, I trashed mine the day I got it.
It has no meaning, no value, no sincerity.
|
1728.3 | | VCSESU::BRANAM | Steve, VAXcluster Sys Supp Eng MRO1-3/SL1, DTN 297-2625 | Fri Jan 17 1992 13:18 | 3 |
| On the other hand, one might look at it as at least some token of appreciation
for the 15 years she did give Digital, although I am sure I would not
appreciate the token much in such a situation.
|
1728.4 | Cloudy?? | CSC32::R_HARVEY | Hi Tech goes BOINK! | Fri Jan 17 1992 18:43 | 9 |
|
.3
Methinks you look at the world thru BULLSH*T colored glasses.
It's market hype, no more no less.
rth
|
1728.5 | Bulk mail from Utah | FDCV09::CONLEY | Chuck Conley, ACO | Fri Jan 17 1992 19:06 | 9 |
|
A little over four years ago, I received an unmarked letter from
Utah, sent bulk mail, containing a form letter listing the choices
that I had for my twenty year service award. I almost threw it
in the wastebasket, thinking it was junk mail.
Do they still do it that way?
Chuck
|
1728.6 | ex | BAGELS::REED | | Mon Jan 20 1992 10:06 | 6 |
|
.5 yup
|
1728.7 | | LABC::RU | | Mon Jan 20 1992 11:53 | 5 |
1728.8 | | CIS1::FULTI | | Mon Jan 20 1992 12:11 | 19 |
| re: .7
> Do you know why this happens?
Why what happens?
a. 15 year employees are TFSO'd
b. They receive recognition of 15 years of service on the day
they leave
c. A third party handles the awards selection and distribution
> It cost DEC over million/year for using NON-Digital MIS product.
What non-Digital products, who is using it, what would/could
it be replaced with, how much would it cost to replace it.
> This may be the evidence of what they've accomplished.
Who or Whom, is 'they'?
|
1728.9 | | CNTROL::DGAUTHIER | | Mon Jan 20 1992 12:46 | 7 |
| Wow, so much ingratitude.
I sort of like it when my boss pops into my office to say "good job" or
"keep up the good work". Maybe that's what the corporation's telling
an employee at their 5-10-15 year anniversaries.
I'm curious, what beyond a letter and a token gift would you expect?
|
1728.10 | Beeeg difference.. | BAGELS::REED | | Mon Jan 20 1992 13:06 | 17 |
|
.9 Whoa! Big difference between having your boss stop in and say
"Nice Job!", (that's sincere, that's gratitude, that's nice),
and a timer going off every 5 years to remind someone/something
to send you a thank you card.
Which would you prefer... your boss stopping in from time to
time to tell you that you did a good job and he appreciates it,
or the "Certificate of Appreciation" every 5 years.
I don't want a "token gift" as you so rightly call it. But,
let me also say, the dinner is/was a nice thing. I felt that the
speaker was thoughtful, sincere, enjoyable. It wasn't as good for
the soul as one or two sincere "Good/Nice Job" comments by someone
that really knows who I am and appreciates my efforts.
|
1728.11 | | NYEM1::GRAY | | Mon Jan 20 1992 13:36 | 8 |
| re: .9
Perhaps you would feel as good if your boss decided to automate the
"attaboy" or "attagirl" by submitting a batch job to flash a generic
message on your screen at the appropriate time.
The recognition gifts have about as much meaning and warmth as mail
addressed to "occupant".
|
1728.12 | We don't need a dedicated "tie-tac" department | TLE::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Mon Jan 20 1992 13:48 | 5 |
| We employ over 100000 people. If we can stay out of the business of publishing
our own glossy catalog of tie-tacs and keeping a tie-tac inventory, by cost-
effectively hiring a company in Utah to do the shipping and mailing, then it's
the right thing to do.
/AHM
|
1728.13 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Mon Jan 20 1992 14:11 | 13 |
| I received my 10 year certificate today. My manager made a big
thing of giving it to me in front of the rest of the group. OK, so
maybe I please easy but it was nice. If it means nothing to you fine
have it your way. But for someone who for the first few years of
his career dispared of ever finding a company to stay at for a real
career hitting 10 years felt rather good to me.
So the certificate is no big deal. And I admit that I was more
excited about the change to my vacation time. But the 10 year
certificate will replace the 5 year one that's been on top of my
dresser for the last 5 years.
Alfred
|
1728.14 | depends on how it is done | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Mon Jan 20 1992 15:03 | 4 |
| When I got my 15-year certificate my supervisor presented it to me at a
group meeting, with everyone in the cost center present. The presen-
tation was more important than the certificate.
John Sauter
|
1728.15 | How it's done ? | WITKA::MILLERR | | Mon Jan 20 1992 15:19 | 4 |
| When I got my 5 year certificate, my ex-manager (2 years previous),
came to my office with the certificate, saying he'd had it sitting
on his desk for the past couple of years...I was IMPRESSED.
Ron
|
1728.16 | | MEMIT::CANSLER | | Mon Jan 20 1992 16:53 | 3 |
|
at least you got one..
|
1728.17 | | CGVAX2::CONNELL | Visualize whirled peas! | Mon Jan 20 1992 17:09 | 24 |
| I also received my 5 year certificate at a staff meeting. It was
presented by my manager. I was very appreciative of the fact. The gift
was another story. While I am pleased that DEC goes to the trouble of
giving you a gift at anniversary time, mine was handled very poorly. I
chose a pen and pencil set and received a belt buckle. The buckle is
absolutely useless. I was given a time limit to correct the mistake,
that's OK, retail does that too. I was told I would have to go through
my personel rep to do this. I told her about it. She said to get the
paperwork and material together and to fill out form mumblepfitz, get
the package to her and she'd handle it. It's 3 years later, she's no
longer with DEC. I never saw her again. No big deal. I wasn't anxious
for anything on the list anyway. I just didn't want to make it seem
like I was snubbing them. They did go to the effort and it wasn't the
company's fault that the rep didn't do her job.
Didn't go to the dinner. It was held in another site, at lunch time, in
their cafeteria, and I only have 30 minutes for lunch, don't drive, and
had to choose from the standard cafeteria menu anyway. The site is
several miles from my site. Couldn't get there, order a burger, eat and
listen to speeches and make it back to my site in 30 minutes, on foot.
Heck, I can barely make it to my own caf and back and eat in 30
minutes.
Phil
|
1728.18 | Par for the Course? | LNGBCH::MUELLER | | Mon Jan 20 1992 18:20 | 7 |
| I received my 10 year certificate about six months late, in the mail.
The site team hosted an evening dinner to which a guest and I were
invited. No one from my organization was there and therefore they
'forgot' to mention me. It was embarassing. My boss NEVER mentioned
anything about my 10 year service date. Boy do I feel 'valued'!
|
1728.19 | I USED to be proud of my 10 year ceritificate | SUFRNG::REESE_K | just an old sweet song.... | Mon Jan 20 1992 20:54 | 21 |
| I'm a little late getting back in here, but I think some of you
are missing the point.
My friend was TFSO'd 9 July 1991.....her 15 year anniversary date
was 10 January 1992, she received the certificate in the mail shortly
after January 10th!!
The more we thought about it she didn't know whether to laugh or cry.
I suggested she contact the woman whose name was on the letter that
accompanied the certificate and ask her if her "gift" for her 15th
anniversary was that "package" she was handed last July 9th :-)
The issue here isn't gifts....tie tacks, barometers etc. Good grief,
anyone not aware of TFSOs must have been in a coma for the last
2 years. One would think this would have been an area that would
have been triple checked; but since someone already mentioned a friend
who was handed their certificate the same day they were TFSO'd.....that
pretty much sums it all up :-(
K
|
1728.20 | Take a positive approach? | GIAMEM::MUMFORD | Dick Mumford, DTN 244-7809 | Tue Jan 21 1992 08:39 | 10 |
| re: string
Perhaps it would be a good idea to turn this into a positive by
submitting a DELTA suggestion that Personnel look into this seemingly
heartless practice. It may just be one of those areas that Digital has
overlooked while developing TFSO. I'm sure nobody sat down and said
"let's do this to further devalue folks and make them feel REALLY bad".
As I've said before, I hope Digital never gets *real* good at routine
usage of TFSO as a management tool.
|
1728.21 | Sarcasism on medium | CSOA1::ROOT | North Central States Regional Support | Tue Jan 21 1992 09:34 | 10 |
| Re: .20
Me thinks your talking about the old DEC when they would not have had
to think about this topic as an after thought and personnel was
available to help DEC personnel and not just be a propaganda machine
spouting their rhetoric for the managers.
Regards
Disgruntled
|
1728.22 | I think the sentiments are a bit misplaced | BIGJOE::DMCLURE | Just say Notification Services | Tue Jan 21 1992 10:16 | 21 |
| I think the person mentioned in .0 has a right to be pissed.
Not because they got a late certificate, but simply because they
were TOFU'd (or TSFO, or whatever the hell it is called).
On the other hand, I look at those five year certificates as
milestones. It is sort of an achievement to survive this place
that many years, and I think those certificates should be viewed
as medals of endurance (kind of like running a marathon or something).
All I know is that if I were about to hit my 15th year and was TOFU'd
right before I made it, I'd be pissed if I *didn't* recieve that
brass ring (belt buckle or whatever). My biggest fear in life is
that of living until the day before my 100th birthday and dying
right before I make the big three digits! What a let down that
would be!
To summarize, I feel the sentiments of .0 are somewhat misplaced.
They should be pissed about getting TOFU'd just before making the
15th year milestone, but should be proud of getting the certificate
anyway.
-davo
|
1728.23 | | COOKIE::LENNARD | Rush Limbaugh, I Luv Ya Guy | Tue Jan 21 1992 14:14 | 11 |
| I don't care if we've got a million damned employees, the sanitized
process used to "award" the tacky gifts is disgraceful. It should be
looked into and corrected immediately. Surely we can save money
somewhere else, such as eliminated a couple valuing differences topics.
One point of lite I'm aware of though is that when a project specialist
in my group was TSFO'd just days after getting her five year
certificate....she threw the damned thing at her manager...Beautiful!!!
The whole thing is about on the same level as the annual
turkeyforturkies fiasco.....also demeaning.
|
1728.24 | Look, a prize for you! Woof! | DDIF::RALTO | I survived CTC | Tue Jan 21 1992 16:53 | 29 |
| re: .23 Dick
Hey, welcome back :-)
re: Cold, impersonal distribution mechanism for gifts
...is the primary reason that I've never accepted one. For the 5-year
prize, some internal bureaucrat literally harassed me for weeks,
wouldn't accept a "No, thanks" response (apparently there was no
such box to check off on her form), sent mail and called over and
over again, and then finally, in desperation, just sent me one of
the prizes at random via interoffice mail. I sent it back to her.
It's probably folks like me who provoked them into changing the
procedure into a "Look what you've won!" form letter from some
unknown external company! And now it's even easier to blow the
thing off... just circular-file the form letter, and you never
hear from them again. I got more perverted pleasure from manually
shredding the form letter and lovely brochure than I ever would've
gotten from the prize itself.
I don't think anyone should ever get prizes just for warming a
chair for "x" number of years. Someone who's filled in ten years'
worth of crossword puzzles is just as valued as someone who's
saved the company millions of dollars. At least the puzzle-solver
gets a shiny new pen for the next ten years' worth of puzzles.
Chris
|
1728.25 | | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 | Tue Jan 21 1992 17:11 | 5 |
| I always turn prizes over to my wife ... well, except prizes like the
pen I got for working with the DEC WANcontroller 620! I'm keeping that
'cause it MEANS something to me! :)
Steve
|
1728.26 | I can't stop those peas from whirling around in front of me.... | VCSESU::BRANAM | Steve, VAXcluster Sys Supp Eng MRO1-3/SL1, DTN 297-2625 | Tue Jan 21 1992 17:11 | 13 |
| I worked 9 years at Texas Instruments before coming to DEC. They were almost
identical in their anniversary recognition system. Most people felt pretty
silly getting a genuine 4k gold layered tie tac with simulated pearl. However,
to me the fact that someone stood up and said, "Thanks for spending the 5 years
with us," was pretty nice, even if it did require an automated notice from
personnel. I don't expect my boss to take notice of my years ticking by so much
as I expect him to notice what I accomplish (assuming I *do* accomplish
something ;^) ). Probably a handshake would suffice for most people in place of
a gift. But if we were to eliminate the recognition entirely, you can bet
people would get upset. They would complain, "I worked at that place for
years and they never even noticed." The fact that they do notice is nice. The
fact that there are so many people to keep track of that it becomes an
unfeeling, dehumanized procedure is unfortunate.
|
1728.27 | | MEMIT::CANSLER | | Wed Jan 22 1992 08:12 | 4 |
|
I am glad this came up I was supposed to get a Belt Buckle, at 5 year
from what I understand from these notes I miss my lunch, buckle and
certificate about 5 years ago.
|
1728.28 | constructive suggestions? | ENABLE::glantz | Mike @TAY 227-4299 TP Eng Littleton | Wed Jan 22 1992 08:46 | 12 |
| If I could think of a more human way to handle this in an organization
the size of Digital/US, I might be upset at the "impersonal" way in
which it's handled. In many other Digital locations, particularly those
outside the US, the process is much more personal, because the
organizations are much smaller and more personal in all other ways,
too. A five- or ten-year dinner and award in a small country is a nice
affair, and most people feel pretty good about it. In the US, I don't
see how it could be much different from the way it is, so I'm just glad
it's done at all.
I hope I still work for Digital for my 15th (and 20th)!
|
1728.29 | | LABRYS::CONNELLY | Television must be destroyed! | Wed Jan 22 1992 08:57 | 7 |
| re: .28
> -< constructive suggestions? >-
There should be an option for you to have whatever amount of money gets spent
on your prize to go to a charity instead (if you want). That way the people
who don't want a prize would have a better alternative.
- paul
|
1728.30 | | ODIXIE::MOREAU | Ken Moreau;Sales Support;South FL | Wed Jan 22 1992 12:15 | 26 |
| RE: .27:
> I am glad this came up I was supposed to get a Belt Buckle, at 5 year
> from what I understand from these notes I miss my lunch, buckle and
> certificate about 5 years ago.
You don't happen to work for Educational Services, do you?
I worked for Ed Services (in BUO, the world headquarters of Ed Services) for 7
years, when Del Lippert was head of Ed Services. I transferred to Engineering
(in ZKO) for another 4 years. When my 10 year anniversary came, I got the
form letter in the mail, decided on the pen-and-pencil set, and received same
in short order.
In a group meeting (120 people) I was publically awarded my 10 year
certificate with some nice words from my manager as to my contributions in
the time I had been there. During the presentation, my manager said words
to the effect of "now you can place it next to your 5 year certificate".
I said "huh? You get one of these for 5 years?".
In checking with other people who were in Ed Services at the time, no one
that I am aware of got 5 or 10 year awards. We were not even aware that
Digital did such things. Once I joined Engineering, my joke has been that
"No, I didn't work for Digital at 5 years, I worked for Ed Services..."
-- Ken Moreau
|
1728.31 | | MEMIT::CANSLER | | Wed Jan 22 1992 17:03 | 3 |
| Ref: .30
No, I work for MFG.
|
1728.32 | Relationships don't come with guarentees | DENVER::ZIMMERMAN | Karen Zimmerman | Wed Jan 22 1992 18:36 | 9 |
| I agree with most of the responses that the timing could be better.
But length of time in any company, organization and relationship does
not guarentee a lifetime 'commitment' by either party. Employees and
spouses leave on their own accord just as companies look at the 'bottom
line' and decide what relationships they have to improve or end.
I just received my 5 year certificate and gift and am pleased to have
been part of the company for that period of time. However, I may get
the package one of these days and don't feel that the company owes me
anything. They pay me and I give them my best effort - a relationship.
|
1728.33 | Wasn't it 14.5? | SAHQ::HUNTER | | Thu Jan 23 1992 13:25 | 10 |
| Did I miss something?
The person that recieved the 15 year certificate in .0 actually never
reached that milestone! It was absurd to send her the certificate, and
simply shows how poorly we integrate our own functions.... I guess we
are too busy doing a bang up job for our customers.
How embarrassing!
pH
|
1728.34 | | GLDOA::PINTO | | Sun Jan 26 1992 14:20 | 5 |
| Is it possible due to the length of service the person in .0 completed
prior the July TFSO, that her actual last date of termination from
the company was sometime after her 15 year anniversary date. Under
the TFSO packages, your last day of service on the company books is
not your last day in the office.
|
1728.35 | Some scars were starting to fade..... | SUFRNG::REESE_K | just an old sweet song.... | Mon Jan 27 1992 20:28 | 41 |
| Thank you .33 you caught the point I was trying to make.
My friend had been around the company long enough to know that a
"group" award ceremony is usually held for 10 years and above. For
my 10 year....there were people who were celebrating 10,15,20 & 25 years,
etc....many field organizations combine the award dinner so that
just one dinner is held per year.
*IF* she had celebrated 15 years at or before the time she was
TFSO'd, she would have understood the time lag in the certificate
reaching her; she might have been a little dismayed and shrugged
it off.
Her 15 year anniversary date WAS January 10, 1992....she received the
certificate in her home mail January 16th. Her feelings were
exactly as you stated; WHY send a certificate supposedly recognizing
a milestone that she had NOT reached at the time of her TFSO?
~~~
Re: last.....I thought your last day of service on the company books
was the day you cashed out that final check - for her that was some
time in September, 1991. We mulled your scenario ourselves, but
thought it was more than a little tacky and definitely misguided to
think someone would appreciate receiving the certificate 6 months
after the fact. After talking to an accountant today and seeing
how much she's going to owe Uncle Sam for 1991.....she pondered why
they couldn't just stretch out all those weeks of pay due...then she
wouldn't be taking such a tax hit for the bracket that lump sum
threw her into :-}
We ARE supposed to be a computer company, right? Our facility is
going through the current TFSO right now.....most of us are trying to be
sensitive to everyone because we don't want to add to anyone's misery.
A letter came with the ceritifcate; the certificate was mailed directly
from Parker Street. Someone had to do a pull from some database
to do the mailing <---- this is where common sense should have kicked
in.
K
|
1728.36 | put the annoyance to good use | STUDIO::HAMER | complexity=technical immaturity | Tue Jan 28 1992 09:44 | 6 |
| Was her package amount based on 14 years or 15 years? Seems as if the
company thinks she was here for 15 that should be the TFSO amount.
It might get their attention, anyway.
John H.
|
1728.37 | | SUFRNG::REESE_K | just an old sweet song.... | Tue Jan 28 1992 20:53 | 30 |
| -1
From all calculations it was based on 14 years, plus vacation time
unused, etc.
Considering the hit she is now taking on her taxes; I don't think
she'll fight to be considered for an additional 6 months of service.
The way her accountant explained it.....the taxes that were taken out
of the final check were at the rate that was normally deducted from her
weekly paycheck.....since her final check was in September, the IRS
is treating this as though she didn't pay taxes for 1 quarter of the
year.
She started working within a week at Avnet, add that salary to the
buyout package and that put her over $90,000 as income for 1991.....
in a bracket that may be technically accurate, but not a true indi-
cative of her normal income.
Maybe instead of offering folks help with resumes as they leave....it
might be nice to offer some tax assistance. My friend is no dummy,
she called corporate for assistance with her IRA and 401K;
unfortunately the person who was to provide assistance with these
issues gave her inaccurate info regarding the 401K and that
exacerbated the tax problem further.
Karen
|
1728.38 | 'not to be construed as tax advice' disclaimer :-) | TOOK::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum | Tue Jan 28 1992 23:56 | 9 |
| When marginal tax rates went up to 70% (a few years ago) people could
file for "income averaging" (schedule G??) when they got an unusually
large income one year.
Since many of us are already in the 28-31% range (top bracket) is
doesn't make sense to income average any more (it doesn't make a
difference if it doesn't change your marginal tax bracket).
r
|
1728.39 | My bleeding heart just clotted... | BIGJOE::DMCLURE | Just say Notification Services | Wed Jan 29 1992 12:54 | 17 |
| re: .37,
> She started working within a week at Avnet, add that salary to the
> buyout package and that put her over $90,000 as income for 1991.....
Excuse me, but I seem to be losing the ability to feel sorry for
this individual (that was the point of this note wasn't it?). I mean,
sure it's a bummer that she lost her job at DEC and ok, so maybe the
15 year certificate was bumbled a bit, but at least she has a job now.
There are a lot of people who I'm sure would love to have her problems.
It would be nice to think that other terminated DECies ("DECterms?")
manage to land another job within a week of getting their final DEC
paycheck too. Sounds like her wound should heal pretty fast - salt
or no salt. I'll reserve my bleeding heart for those who aren't so
lucky.
-davo
|
1728.40 | Remember that straw that broke the camel's back? | SUFRNG::REESE_K | just an old sweet song.... | Wed Jan 29 1992 13:50 | 30 |
| davo -
She isn't looking for someone to feel sorry for her; she wanted
accurate answers to questions when she asked those questions of
the people she was directed to (in the TFSO package). I still
think a little consideration over the service recognition isn't
too much to ask......some very sloppy handling of a lot of issues.
FWIW, she just came back from a 6 day round-up held by Avnet...
Avnet has picked up a lot of ex-DEC reps. My friend booked one
million dollars worth of *DEC* equipment for Avnet. She had the
dubious distinction of sitting with a former DEC rep who was
so embittered by his treatment at TFSO time that he was bragging
about his one million dollars of *another* vendor's equipment sold.
He commented he'll recommend DEC equipment in a solution as only
a last resort - is this how we want former employees to feel/act?
Distributors pay cash on the barrel; that goes along way toward
your salary and my salary. She got a 6620 installed in this area before
any current DEC sales rep......got precious little commission off it
because DEC and Avnet wanted a foot in the door at this account.
ATDs are business partners, they've scooped up many former reps. A
lot of DEC jobs could depend on systems sold thru ATDs, so it might
be nice if we could prevent any more poop from being shoveled down
the chute at the former employees who trying to maintain a positive
attitude towards DEC.
K
|
1728.41 | | BIGJOE::DMCLURE | Just say Notification Services | Wed Jan 29 1992 16:26 | 10 |
| re: .40,
> She isn't looking for someone to feel sorry for her; she wanted
> accurate answers to questions when she asked those questions of
> the people she was directed to (in the TFSO package).
I was mainly referring to the title of the note. I guess I'm
just a little envious of the resulting salary you quoted that's all.
-davo
|
1728.42 | NOT 90K/year | SAHQ::HUNTER | | Wed Jan 29 1992 22:51 | 23 |
| The $90K was the total of wages to date at DEC (thru SEP), her wages at
Avnet, and her lump sum distribution.....
Not the same thing as making a $90K salary!
For what it is worth, we consistently bungle the simplest of
administrative tasks. This is just one example. It makes it very
difficult for a Digital employee to defend and respect the company!
And to compound the issue further:
Ask a headhunter what they think of our sales force and commission
plan...
Ask a software vendor what they think of our technical support...
Ask wallstreet how we have handled the layoffs...
We simply cannot get anything done lately!
|
1728.43 | Not even close to $90K! | SUFRNG::REESE_K | just an old sweet song.... | Thu Jan 30 1992 17:55 | 19 |
| .42 hit it.......when you roll everything up it puts her into the
$90K bracket, that isn't a realistic scenario. She wasn't even
close to being in a $90K salary bracket; but that is how she will
be taxed for 1991.
Her TFSO packet contained names of people who were to assist her
with any questions she might have. She has been given inaccurate
info on insurance options; she was told she would have a specific
amount of time to roll-over her $401K account and made crucial
decisions made on the info relayed to her. Now an accountant says
the IRS will not allow her to do what she had been assured she could.
For those of you in here who have now been hit, please have someone
knowledgeable go over the tax burden that might befall you next year.
The process is difficult enough without having someone tell you next
year that you owe the IRS a 4 digit sum of money.
Karen
|