| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1709.1 | NH View, 16 December. What a joke! | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Thu Jan 02 1992 12:13 | 7 |
| I just spent about ten minutes trying to figure out why the calendar published
in New Hampshire View shows 54 Thursdays!
The reason is that it shows a June 31st, two September 30ths (my birthday
comes twice this year?!), a September 31st, but no August 29th or 30th.
/john
|
| 1709.3 | But all the columns line up. | NANOOK::SHERK | | Thu Jan 02 1992 12:46 | 9 |
| Yes,
Truly a collectors item.
However, this is what you get when you use one of those automated
tools that quietly brings those widow 30 and 31's up to fill out
the blanks on the previous line.
Aren't computers wonderful! :-)
Ken
|
| 1709.4 | | WKRP::LENNIG | Dave (N8JCX), MIG, Cincinnati | Thu Jan 02 1992 22:49 | 5 |
| re: .0
Interesting; I wondered if this was one of those years...
Time to do some calculations...
|
| 1709.5 | XCUSME | VICKI::PWILLIAMS | | Fri Jan 03 1992 15:40 | 1 |
| Re .2: Appropos node name. ;-)
|
| 1709.6 | They're back!!!!! | MRKTNG::SILVERBERG | Mark Silverberg DTN 264-2269 TTB1-5/B3 | Fri Jan 10 1992 06:23 | 9 |
| A whole new batch of the DEC. 16, 1991 issue of New Hampshire View
showed up in the lobby of TTB for distribution to the employees today.
These "new" copies still contain all the calendar errors noted.
Send me mail if you want your very own "collectors" copy 8^)
Mark
|
| 1709.7 | | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Do you want a happy God or an angry God? | Fri Jan 10 1992 17:33 | 4 |
| I'd like a collector's copy of NHV. Thanks.
Pat Sweeney
NYO 6B
|
| 1709.8 | correct calendar in Jan. 13 issue of NH View | HUMOR::EPPES | I'm not making this up, you know | Mon Jan 13 1992 13:58 | 4 |
| Just for the record, the calendar is correct in the January 13 issue of NH View,
which showed up in the ZKO3 lobby today.
-- Nina
|
| 1709.9 | | ISLNDS::TOMAO | T-47 days and counting | Mon Jan 27 1992 13:27 | 4 |
| Back to the basenote for a minute. Metpay bases the weekly deductions
on 50 weeks not 52. So this year we get 3 *free* weeks instead of 2.
Joyce
|
| 1709.10 | Is this for real ? | ELWOOD::KAPLAN | Larry Kaplan, DTN: 237-6872 | Tue Jan 28 1992 13:06 | 4 |
| Whasis ??? I've never gotten any "free" MetPay weeks. When are they
supposed to occur ?
L.
|
| 1709.11 | maybe it's the other way around? | TOOK::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum | Tue Jan 28 1992 23:47 | 9 |
| MetPay based on 50 weeks, hmm.
If my yearly payment is $500, does that mean my weekly payment is $10
(based on 50 weeks)? In which case, in a 53 week year, my annual payment
becomes $530 (when it is supposed to be only $500)?
Seems a little odd.
r
|