[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | The Digital way of working |
|
Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
|
Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 5321 |
Total number of notes: | 139771 |
1535.0. "DEC Lawsuit & FBI Indictment RE: DEC Salvage Scheme" by EMIRFI::SEGAL (Len Segal, MLO6-1/U30, 223-7687) Tue Jul 16 1991 18:33
The following is copied verbatim, no guarantees that there are no
typos. It is lengthy (132 lines), but quite comprehensive in
describing the allegations by DEC with regard to the Salvage
Program.
It is particularly upsetting to note that on numerous occasions back
in the early 1980's, Corporate Officers were advised of
"abnormalities" in how Salvage was being run (and requesting an
investigation)...no interest was expressed in investigating the
allegations. The (now-defunct) DEC Computer Club's former president
sent letters to the top officers of DEC, none of the officers
expressed interest in following up, and the letters resulted in acts
of revenge (upon the letter's author) by the people running the
Salvage Program. If someone had listened...DEC could have saved $
millions (according to the allegations in DEC's suit, described
below).
NEWS FLASH: WODS Radio, Boston just had a news story interviewing
an FBI Agent who has been investigating the allegations listed
below. They just indicted 16 people in this alleged racketeering
scheme. They set the loss to DEC at $6.4 million!
Permission is hereby granted for anyone to re-post or forward this
article (internal OR external to DEC, since the source is an
external publication) PROVIDING THAT ALL THIS TEXT/HEADER PRIOR TO
THE <FORMFEED> BELOW IS REMOVED.
(copied without permission: DIGITAL NEWS, July 8, 1991)
DEC Sues: theft, bribery
By Kyle Nitzsche
Four companies and 16 individuals have been named in a civil
racketeering suit filed by Digital Equipment Corp. that charges
millions of dollars were made in a fraudulent scheme to sell
illegally obtained CPU module boards, DECservers, peripherals and
other equipment.
In the suit filed June 14 in U.S. District Court in Boston, Digital
is seeking to recover an unspecified amount from the defendants,
whom Digital has charged with violating the federal Racketeer
Influenced, Corrupt Organizations Act. Digital also claimed
infringement to its trademark, unfair competition and violations
under the laws of numerous states.
The availability of below-market-priced goods resulting from the
defendants' activities deprived Digital of "substantial profits,"
said Ann Fullerton, Digital spokeswoman. Digital has filed a motion
to obtain the companies' business records to determine the actual
amount of the damages it will seek. She did not know if criminal
charges would be filed.
The suit comes just two weeks after a Massachusetts used equipment
dealer and an associate were arrested on charges of attempting to
sell allegedly stolen Digital CPU boards. Members of the used
equipment community were quick to condemn the alleged actions and to
come to the defense of legitimate resellers.
"Guys who sell stuff that's hot or stolen ought to be put in the
slammer or shot," said Mike Monroe, division manager for El Camino
Resources Ltd., a $400 million lessor and reseller of new and used
Digital and IBM equipment. "This kind of thing undercuts and hurts
all legitimate business, so we're happy that they're caught. But
we're concerned that they even exist."
Monroe and James Claypoole, chairman of the Ethics and Industry
Practices Committee of the DDA (Digital Dealers Association), a
professional group for used equipment dealers, said the volume of
sales of illegally obtained equipment is high enough to affect the
entire market.
Claypoole, who is also president of Bay State Computer Group Inc.
in Boston, said that because stolen equipment is sold for much less
than legitimate goods, honest dealers lose their competitive
advantage. And in tough economic times, customers who are more
concerned than ever with finding the best deal, may unwittingly
become ensnared in illegal distribution schemes.
"We've been approached by people who have a product whose history is
questionable all too frequently," Monroe said. "We're in the market
daily, and I'd guess we hear about something like this a couple of
times a month. Just the other day [we heard about] six brand new
[VAX] 6000 memory boards with a questionable origin."
The suit alleges that equipment was first illegally obtained by
Currie Enterprises Inc. of Salem, N.H. and Clinton, Mass., whose
principal owner is Raymond B. Currie, of Brentwood, N.H. Currie
could not be reached for comment. From 1982 to 1988 he held
contracts with Digital to destroy obsolete or rejected DEC equipment
and to sell reclaimed raw materials.
Digital claims that Currie and two of his sons, Gregory S. and R.
Paul Currie, violated the contracts, and after failing to remove
Digital logos, sold much of the equipment on their own and with the
help of Edward F. Desmond Jr. Desmond was an employee of Currie
Enterprises who started his own business, Carlyle-Omni Realty
Investors Inc., in Lexington, Mass. Desmond, and Gregory and R.
Paul Currie are defendants.
The Moore Group of Torrance, Calif. bought most of the equipment
sold by Currie Enterprises and Carlyle-Omni, according to the suit.
Evan Padilla, one of The Moore Group's directors, is also a
defendant but could not be reached for comment.
The suit charges that Padilla and two other principals of the
company - who are now in bankruptcy court and therefore not named as
defendants - knew the equipment had been fraudulently obtained.
After altering serial numbers on some equipment, The Moore Group
then allegedly resold much of it to defendant Warren K. Haeberle,
then vice president of Electronic Service Specialists Ltd. of
Menomonee Falls, Wis. Haeberle could not be reached for comment.
Principals of Currie Enterprises, Carlyle-Omni, The Moore Group and
Haeberle all "made millions," the suit charges.
Equipment was also obtained by bribing Digital employees responsible
for overseeing Digital's equipment-destruction contracts, according
to the suit. Raymond Currie and Desmond allegedly bribed John J.
Trebendis, manager of two Digital property disposal centers in
Massachusetts, and Joseph V. McGee, a supervisor in several
disposal facilities who reported to Trebendis, "on a regular basis
with cash and other forms of consideration," according to the
complaint.
In a brief telephone interview, Trebendis said he is innocent.
The suit charges that in return for the bribes, Trebendis and McGee
failed to ensure Currie Enterprises destroyed the equipment.
McGee's employment at DEC was terminated in 1990 after he admitted
stealing at least 300 computer module boards, according to the
complaint.
Digital stopped doing business with Currie Enterprises in 1988 after
an employee learned equipment from Currie had entered the
marketplace. But in 1988, Desmond formed a new company, first
called Windham Recovery Inc., then renamed Windham Systems Inc.
Windham applied for and eventually won contracts with DEC to destroy
equipment and reclaim raw materials.
McGee allegedly sold the boards to defendants Bradford W. Blakeley
and Philip M. Carnovale, both of whom own Windham stock. Denis M.
Palmisciano, a director of Windham, is also a defendant in the suit.
The suit alleges Palmisciano and Carnovale bribed an employee at a
DEC warehouse in Whitinsville, Mass., entered the premises and stole
equipment. In June 1989, Palmisciano was arrested on charges of
possessing thousands of DECserver products stolen from a Woburn,
Mass., facility.
Digital also claims that in 1989 Desmond and others bribed Louis
Buckman, a security guard at Digital's Athol, Mass., warehouse.
While Buckman served as lookout, equipment was stolen and shipped
mostly to The Moore Group, according to the suit.
Equipment was also obtained through "fraudulent misuse" of Digital's
promotional and repair programs, such as DECmailer and DECdirect,
through which users send equipment to Digital for repair or upgrade.
-------
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1535.1 | Followup on Salvage Scam | IMTDEV::BRUNO | Father Gregory | Thu Aug 20 1992 18:01 | 59 |
| Subject: Guilty plea entered in Digital theft scheme
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 92 10:57:55 PDT
BOSTON (UPI) -- A Massachusetts businessman Thursday pleaded guilty to
a multimillion dollar scheme to steal computer boards and products from
Digital Equipment Corp. and launder the proceeds.
Edward Desmond Jr., 28, formerly from Lexington, also admitted to a
scheme to defraud the Capital Bank and Trust Co. by falsely inflating
the purchase price of a land parcel by $1 million, and to bribing a
senior bank lending officer.
U.S. Attorney John Pappalardo said Digital lost more than $10 million
because of the theft scheme, Capital Bank lost more than $1 million, and
Bank Hapoalim lost more than $6.5 Million.
In addition to Desmond, three other defendants have admitted to
various charges in the scheme to steal from Digital. Desmond is
scheduled to be sentenced on Nov. 6.
He pleaded guilty to racketeering, money laundering, interstate
shipment of stolen property, bank fraud, bank bribery and making false
statements to a federally insured financial institution. Pappalardo said
no plea bargain arrangement has been made with Desmond.
The charges against Desmond stemmed from three indictments handed up
in July 1991.
The Digital indictment named 16 other defendants, including two
company employees, two former Digital warehouse workers, an accountant
and a real estate agent in Boston and the owner of a Boston bookkeeping
service.
The indictment charged that the defendants shipped stolen computer
products by air freight and tractor-trailer to California and elsewhere
and made more than $6 million from the scheme. Desmond collected more
than $2.7 million, it charged.
The second indictment alleged Desmond conspired with lawyer Paul
Cooperstein and developer Sohiel Omar to defraud Capital Bank by using a
"land flip" scheme to falsely inflate by $1 million the price of a
parcel in a loan application for $2.96 million.
The third indictment said Desmond bribed Alan Rose, senior lending
officer at at Bank Hapoalim, to approve a $6 million loan to Desmond and
his company. Rose pleaded guilty to bribery charges and was sentenced to
27 months in prison.
The case was investigated by the FBI and the Internal Revenue
Service.
Desmond was an employee of Currie Enterprises Inc., with offices in
Clinton, Mass., and Salem, N.H.
Most of the computer thefts occurred after Windham Recovery Systems
Inc. of Boston won a contract from Digital in March 1989 to process and
reclaim precious metals from computer products and boards.
Desmond was identified as a hidden partner in Windham Recovery.
|
1535.2 | "lamb's head" scoop? | TARKIN::MCALLEN | | Fri Aug 21 1992 13:14 | 3 |
| Interesting! When will someone tell us the real soup
..err scoop, on the "severed lamb's head" episode?
|
1535.3 | Desmond got 8 years+ | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Patrick Sweeney in New York | Fri Jan 15 1993 09:42 | 30 |
| Copyright � 1992 Dow Jones & Co. from Wall Street Journal
Businessman Sentenced
In Scheme to Defraud
Digital Equipment
BOSTON -- Edward F. Desmond, a Massachusetts businessman, was sentenced to
97 months in prison for a scheme in which Digital Equipment Corp. was
defrauded of about $10 million.
Mr. Desmond has admitted to being part of a scheme in which computers and
computer circuit boards were stolen and resold in California. The scheme
allegedly involved at least 17 people, some of whom have already been
sentenced.
Mr. Desmond, whom the government considered one of the ringleaders, pleaded
guilty in August to charges of racketeering, money laundering, interstate
shipment of stolen property, bank fraud and making false statements to
financial institutions. He also received concurrent sentences for defrauding
Capitol Bank & Trust Co. and Bank Hapoalim in the scheme.
In sentencing Mr. Desmond, U.S. District Court Judge Douglas P. Woodlock
considered his admissions of being involved in separate frauds against Digital
even after he had come forward to cooperate with authorities -- actions that
U.S. attorney's office called "brazen."
Roger Cox, Mr. Desmond's attorney, said his client was mentally ill, and
expressed regret that his condition wasn't more carefully considered in
sentencing.
---
|