T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1532.1 | Are you returning to the same entity or a different entity? | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Mon Jul 15 1991 09:45 | 16 |
| re: .0
This is in no way an official answer. If you want that, you are asking in the
wrong place.
That said, various entities within DEC have their own seperate badge numbering
scheme. For example, the U.S. has one, GIA another, etc. From what I have
seen, if you leave an entity and return to the same entity, then yes, you should
get the same badge number back. If you return to a different entity, then you
get a new one.
BTW, the U.S. job application form says, (or at least used) that if you want
your old badge number back, you must supply it on the application, or a new
one will be issued.
Bob
|
1532.2 | Official place | UPROAR::DARRALLD | Dave Darrall 867-8214 | Mon Jul 15 1991 09:55 | 12 |
| Thanks Bob
I didn't fill the standard application form so did not have the choice
of entering my old badge number.
You mention looking elsewhere for an official answer, where would that
be ?
Thanks again
Dave D
|
1532.3 | | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Mon Jul 15 1991 10:56 | 10 |
| re: .2
What I meant was that NOTES files are not sources for official answers. Some-
times they can provide pointers to official sources.
I guess you are having a battle with your local personnel organization over what
your correct badge number should be. I don't know what the proper escalation
procedure would be.
Bob
|
1532.4 | | CSC32::S_MAUFE | a stopped clock is right twice a day | Mon Jul 15 1991 13:45 | 7 |
|
I moved from the UK to the US last year and kept my basingstoke badge
number.
simon
ps, welcome back 8-)
|
1532.5 | | ASICS::LESLIE | Wile E. Coyote. Genius | Mon Jul 15 1991 23:28 | 7 |
| As I recall, from seeing the OJP's, DESISco jobs are not the same as
DIGITAL jobs. Different t's and c's of employment, for one thing.
I'd speculate that as a result, you may have a new badge number to
differentiate you from a 'real' DIGITAL employee.
- andy
|
1532.6 | Still got it. | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Tue Jul 16 1991 06:04 | 3 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
I kept mine when I started in Germany, after resigning in Australia
|
1532.7 | Thanks | UPROAR::DARRALLD | Dave Darrall 7769 8214 | Tue Jul 16 1991 06:52 | 23 |
| Hi again
So the word is that DESISCo can give me a new badge number if they want
to, but there are examples of people moving between Digital companies
and keeping their badge numbers. DESISCo do have different terms and
conditions, mainly because the company was purchased on mass from
another parent company, although there are moves to keep DESISCo in
line with Digital.
There are also examples of people transferring from DIGITAL UK to
DESISCo and keeping their badge numbers so I don't reckon they are
using new numbers to make a difference.
What I reckon as happened is that a mistake as been made, but their is
not alot I can do, especially now all my payroll stuff as gone through
ETC, will I be able to get my old number back if I transferred again,
eg If I got a Job in the US would I have a choice of two numbers or
would I get a third ??
Thanks for the help
Dave
|
1532.8 | | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Tue Jul 16 1991 10:29 | 7 |
| re: .7
One thing to keep in mind no matter where you go, if your old badge number
is already assigned to someone in the new entity, you will obviously be assigned
a new number.
Bob
|
1532.9 | Another Me ! | UPROAR::DARRALLD | Dave Darrall 7769 8214 | Tue Jul 16 1991 12:17 | 13 |
| Hi again Bob
do you mean that badge numbers can be re-applied to other people in the
same subsid,
Or that the same number may be issued at different locations ?
I was under the impression that the number was unique across the world
and that it would not be re-issued !
For instance there is no 235603 out there and I don't expect to meet one
Dave D
|
1532.10 | | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Tue Jul 16 1991 14:59 | 5 |
| re: .9
If I remember correctly, numbers are not unique corporation-wide.
Bob
|
1532.11 | 80,000 + # | ODIXIE::QUINN | | Tue Jul 16 1991 16:26 | 5 |
| I started working for DEC in Puerto Rico 11 years ago. I got a 4
digit badge number. When I transferred (not quit and rehired) back to
the states 4 years later, they put an 8 in front of my number.
- John
|
1532.12 | ELF etc | UPROAR::DARRALLD | Dave Darrall 769-8214, DESISCo SEG | Thu Jul 18 1991 13:58 | 8 |
| Hi
Re badge numbers not being unique.
What about ELF and the CSC's that use badge numbers as an
identification, a unique identification ?
Dave the curious
|
1532.13 | | ASICS::LESLIE | Wile E. Coyote. Genius | Thu Jul 18 1991 15:13 | 8 |
| DEC corporate badge numbers are definitely unique. However, as I
understand it, until a local country subsidiary is tied into the
system that allocates them, they issue their own. I know several people
from various non-US countries that have heen allocated a corporate
badge number siome time after acquiring their local badge number upon
joining.
- andy
|
1532.14 | unique numbers worldwide? | CSC32::K_BOUCHARD | Ken Bouchard CXO3-2 | Thu Jul 18 1991 18:38 | 9 |
| I believe that DEC personnel issues blocks of badge numbers to each
company entity worldwide which would insure that each and every
employee has a unique badge number. This is the only way that our CSC
system could work since the PMF (personnel master file) is referenced
every time a remote support call is logged at a CSC so that caller
information can be put with the call. All hell would probably break
loose if more than one employee popped up with the same badge number.
Ken
|
1532.15 | I know, too many questions too early.. | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Fri Jul 19 1991 09:41 | 9 |
| re: .14
Ken,
Don't the CSCs in the U.S. only serve the U.S.? Aren't the various entities
personnel files seperate? Could I call one of the CSCs in Europe or the U.K.
and have them verify my badge number?
Bob
|
1532.16 | DEC hombres from down South | CSC32::K_BOUCHARD | Ken Bouchard CXO3-2 | Fri Jul 19 1991 16:16 | 7 |
| Our CSC here in the springs (at least the remote support part) now
takes calls from DEC people in Central and South America and the
information on the call screen looks normal. This is what leads me to
believe that there must be just a single personnel file for ever part
of the globe.
Ken
|
1532.17 | Experience | AGOUTL::BELDIN | Pull us together, not apart | Fri Jul 19 1991 16:55 | 16 |
| I was hired here in Puerto Rico and given a 4 digit badge number. The
next year, when I transferred to Maynard, I got a new five-digit badge,
but the last 4 were the same as my PR badge. When I came back, I got
the 4-digit badge back, but I'm still on record up north with the
5-digits. I use it for dealings with the DLN and such.
Conclusions:
1) Yes, there is a single badge number sequencing system, at
least within Digital and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
2) Yes, you should get your old badge number back if you return.
3) No, there is no guarantee that I have it right.
Dick
|
1532.18 | can't get there from hee-ya | BUSY::BELLIVEAU | | Fri Jul 19 1991 22:10 | 20 |
| RE: .10
right.
RE: .14
I don't think so
RE: .15
I doubt very much the C.S.C. in Europe or the U.K. could verify your
badge.
Everyone knows who badge #1 belongs to - This same number references a
DEC employee in Ireland, who also has a 3-digit badge # in DEC
Ireland's numbering scheme. This just illustrates that there is not
just one "central" PMF. But knowing Digital, did anyone really
expect that it would be that simple ? ;-)
|
1532.19 | | CSC32::J_OPPELT | It's the Joe-meister! | Sun Jul 21 1991 15:31 | 3 |
| Does it really make a difference what badge number you have?
Joe Oppelt
|
1532.20 | | SX4GTO::HOLT | | Tue Jul 23 1991 00:23 | 4 |
|
having a low number is supposed to be cool..
|
1532.21 | Shiveerrrr....! | CHEFS::HEELAN | Andaluz por deseo | Tue Jul 23 1991 07:37 | 8 |
| Having _no_ badge number is definitely icy!.
(The Iceman cometh !)
:-(
John
|
1532.22 | ELF entries | UPROAR::DARRALLD | It is I, Le Funk 769-8214 | Wed Jul 24 1991 09:24 | 29 |
| Hi
seems to be a bit of controversy here. I still reckon that badge
numbers are corporate wide (that is what I was told and cause of things
like the CSC and ELF)
I have found that Personel here at DESISCo have got their own system,
having departed from DEC UK they followed different thinking.
Do we agree that ELF is corporate wide ? I can get Europe, GIA and the
US on my ELF, right ?
Find 1 will bring up Ken Olsen, and ONLY ken Olsen, so that supports my
theory.
I tried 2 and 3 etc but no body is listed. Then I tried another famous
number, 100 which should be Edson De Castro (ie no one listed). But I
got Arthur Vartanian from GIA listed with that number. This implies
that either numbers are reallocated or that some group was integrated
into the corporation scheme of things and got low numbers or indeed
Arthur does not have a standard number and the 100 refers to his Local
number !
What do people think of this then ?
Making this note a little more topical, what badge numbers will the
Phillips guys get then ??
Dave D
|
1532.23 | you've found the REAL-ONE AND ONLY BADGE 100 | GIAMEM::VARTANIAN | | Wed Jul 24 1991 16:18 | 22 |
| I got a chuckle out of your statement..."another famous number, 100
which should be Edson DeCastro" and " Arthur does not have a standard
badge number".
Makes me wonder where you get your information.
If it might put your mind at ease, I can assure you that Mr. DeCastro
did not wear badge # 100 as I am the one and only badge number 100 in
the Corporation. =
I know that because I worked with the man 30 years ago and It certainly
would have been noticed if two of the 87 employees in the corporation
sported the same badge number, especially where we all knew each other.
I think that you can be pretty sure that badge numbers are assigned
in a continuing string corporate wide,in some cases by blocks.
So, hopefully, ELF will continue to show ONLY ONE badge #1 and ONLY ONE
badge #100 . If I see differently, I will be SHOCKED. I think I
remember what Ed's badge number really was, but all I can say is that
it was CLOSE to 100.
what Mr. DeCastro's badge number really was.
|
1532.24 | Sorry, BUT ? | UPROAR::DARRALLD | It is I, Le Funk 769-8214 | Thu Jul 25 1991 05:44 | 34 |
| Hi
Sorry about that. I have read in a couple of places that 100 was ED,
and people in DEC have told me the same when we got round to talking on
the subject, although I now see that I am obviously wrong. Sorry
So with this can all the people out there accept that badge numbers are
corporate wide and unique.
This still leaves questions like whether numbers are reassigned at all?
----so far we have said NO
Whether they are transferred between companies
----there are examples, but it is not always done
Another point I want to raise. My personnel records go with 235603.
This means that anything good or bad I did before is now lost. In my
case, because I did leave the company this may not be so bad (except
for the fact that I have been re-hired without any reference to what I
may have been like previously), but what about people that are
internally transferring. Do they lose long service benefits (5 year
diner etc) and how about their redundancy payments ? Would promotion
be affected by this ? How about if they transferred between companies
to hide a bad record ?
As far as I can see it is better for the company, once it as managed to
set up these unique numbers, is for them to be kept by one person and
to have the associated records that go with that person transferred.
What do you think ?
Dave D
|
1532.25 | At least this was the case. | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Thu Jul 25 1991 06:14 | 5 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
There is only one EMF (Employee Master File) and it has a unique Badge
number. If you are in that file (ie ELF) then you have a unique
number, somewhere.
|
1532.26 | apology not necessary | GIAMEM::VARTANIAN | | Thu Jul 25 1991 11:27 | 27 |
| Dave,
I wasn't looking for an apology.....just wanted to give you the facts.
I'm not up to date on the present policy/practices on badge number
assignments but I would think that it makes the most sense to freeze
a persons badge number when they leave Digital and issue a new
number and treat them as a new employee if they return. However, I
think that the previous badge number should certainly be mentioned
in the records so that previous records could always be referenced.
When I say LEAVE Digital, I mean with no definite plan of returning.
I would think that if the departure was a pre-arranged leave of
absence type of thing, or a transfer to another area, that the
original number would stand. But..who knows. The Company is so
large and so spread out now ,that it has become very difficult to
have all areas follow the same lines of thought and procedures so there
probably is some deviation in policy and definitions among the many
sites.
Sure, I'm proud of my badge number and I'm proud to be one of the
foundation builders of this great corporation but I can't see getting
hung up on a badge number alone. Actually, what difference does it
make? Especailly now that we're up to 6 digit numbers.
Guess I've rambled long enough. Have a nice day!
|
1532.27 | | TELGAR::WAKEMANLA | A Renaissance Man | Thu Jul 25 1991 13:20 | 9 |
| Freezing Badge Numbers,
The corporate Badge Numbers are issued once (hopefully). There
are a lot of benefits that are tied to that badge number, such as
your DCU account. I do know of one instance where two people
ended up with the same badge number, it took six months to get
it straightened out.
Larry
|
1532.28 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Fri Aug 02 1991 15:34 | 9 |
| Even when you get your old number back after quitting and being rehired,
your benefits (vacation accrual, five-year dinners, etc.) are reset to
zero -- at least in the U.S. There is a short grace period, in which
you can be rehired and your resignation will be "forgotten." But in the
U.S., unless you leave on a leave of absence, when you come back you are
a new employee with two weeks of vacation per year, no matter how many
years of previous service you had.
/john
|
1532.29 | | ASIC::BARTOO | RoboCo-op | Sun Aug 04 1991 14:23 | 10 |
|
RE: .28
Not true for everyone! From the period December 1990 thru January 1994
I will have been terminated and re-hired by DEC 4 times.
My vacation and sick days accrue.
|
1532.30 | crystal ball? | CECV03::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Mon Aug 05 1991 09:05 | 5 |
| re: <<< Note 1532.29 by ASIC::BARTOO "RoboCo-op" >>>
< Not true for everyone! From the period December 1990 thru January 1994
^^^^^^^^^^^
< I will have been terminated and re-hired by DEC 4 times.
|
1532.31 | | ASIC::BARTOO | RoboCo-op | Mon Aug 05 1991 09:46 | 6 |
|
> -< crystal ball? >-
No, job offers.
|
1532.32 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Mon Aug 05 1991 12:42 | 8 |
| As a Co-op student, you are a special case.
Going back to school between work quarters is the same as a person going on a
leave of absence.
However, if you were to work somewhere else (other than a student job at
your university) in-between, you would be reset to zero, just like anyone
else.
|
1532.33 | | ASIC::BARTOO | RoboCo-op | Mon Aug 05 1991 13:20 | 17 |
|
Nope! I was terminated.
I know because I had to fill out all the new-hire forms again, just
like 6 months ago. They told me I was terminated when I complained
about the paperwork! ;-)
I left Digital before in March. They didn't know I was coming back
until May, so they had no way of knowing if I was going to work
somewhere else in between.
I got the same badge number back, and I still have sick days from last
winter.
N
|
1532.34 | Co-ops ARE handled differently | NODEX::GEARIN | | Mon Aug 05 1991 14:03 | 5 |
| As .32 pointed out, co-ops are a special case, and your situation
does not apply to the scenario that this note is addressing.
David
(A former co-op)
|
1532.35 | | ASIC::BARTOO | RoboCo-op | Mon Aug 05 1991 14:38 | 16 |
|
David, the former co-op
Note .28 says "Everyone." It is making a sweeping generalization that
is not true. Not only is it not true about co-ops, but it is also not
true about summer hires. That is the scenario. Being a co-op has
nothing to do with it.
The fact is, Digital keeps "tabs" on its terminated employees. And
certain terminated employees come back to the same benefits they left
behind.
Nick
|
1532.36 | | RBW::WICKERT | SSR IM&T Consultant | Thu Aug 08 1991 00:20 | 10 |
|
That's a real bummer! :-(
All of the many top 100 companies I've consulted to have a different
policy. Most of them start you off reset after the re-hire but once
you've been with the company a year you get all your service time back.
-Ray
|