T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1514.1 | | BRULE::MICKOL | If you think of losing, you've lost | Sun Jun 30 1991 00:03 | 13 |
| You are damn right there are double standards, especially between Customer
Services and Sales. Generally related to Hotel/Motel accomodations and air fare.
For example, while all of the Sales & Sales Support people here fly to
training in New England (1 hour flight), Customer Services people have to
drive (6-7 hour drive). Really wise use of their time, eh?
The sooner there is consistency across Customer Services, Sales and EIS, the
better off we'll all be.
Regards,
Jim
|
1514.2 | | CSSE32::RHINE | | Sun Jun 30 1991 10:58 | 23 |
| I recently saw a memo describing the results of an expense audit in the
US. The abuses described were extremely disturbing. The good news is
that the result is supposed to be streamlined, easy to understand, easy
to deal with policies.
One of the problems I have seen over the past 15 years is that policies
are treated as guidelines and are not taken seriously very often. Our
corporate culture has espoused "do what's right", which has been
interpreted "do what is right for you".
Establshing sensible, fair policies with a well defined, fair exception
process, and universal implementation would be beneficial to all of us
and to the well being of DEC. I am a manager and do not want to be
treated any differently than the people in my organization.
I travelled to CXO several weeks ago. It appears that hotel expense
policy is being enforced through AMEX. People used to stay at
Executive Suites, which is deemed to be too expensive and not on the
list. Lower cost motels that were never booked (Days Inn,etc) are now
on the approved list. I don't have a problem with this as long as the
place is clean, comfortable, and has a bath tub, color TV, and
telephone.
|
1514.3 | Do your own negotiations for hotel rates | TIGEMS::ARNOLD | Some assembly required | Sun Jun 30 1991 17:54 | 44 |
| Frequently a trade show or convention held in a major city is held in
the "downtown" area, which is typically not noted for low hotel rates.
But at the same time, while all of us may not have the time to do what
I did in the note below (which I posted in the NOTED::ON_THE_ROAD
conference last month), it was worth the effort for me, and ultimately
saved Digital a few bucks.
fwiw
Jon
<<< NOTED::DISK$NOTES2:[NOTES$LIBRARY_2OF5]ON_THE_ROAD.NOTE;2 >>>
-< Business travel >-
================================================================================
Note 519.0 Use your own rate negotiation at hotels No replies
TIGEMS::ARNOLD "Some assembly required" 28 lines 19-MAY-1991 20:54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In these economic times, just thought I'd mention something that has
occurred to me a few times recently that seems to be taking form in the
hotel industry. I was in Phoenix recently, supporting two trade shows
that were happening simultaneously at different locations. I picked a
hotel that was somewhat in the middle of the two locations, but of
course, that hotel was not offering the "conference rate" from *either*
of the two shows. I called the hotel SALES DEPARTMENT (*NOT* the
non-empowered person working the reservations phone), explained the
situation, stated that I'd REALLY like to stay there. They called me
back about an hour later saying they would be willing to *beat* the
lowest convention rate at any of the convention-recommended hotels.
Last week, I found I would be supporting a trade show in Atlanta next
month. I don't care for the hotel chain who is the only one (as far as
I can tell) offering a convention rate, so I called another hotel about
two blocks from where the convention is to be held, talked to the SALES
DEPARTMENT, explained about the show and said that I'd much rather stay
at their hotel IF they could beat the rate of the convention-
recommended hotel. (The "standard corporate discount" rate at this
hotel was $78/night more than what I was asking them to beat). They
called me back an hour later and said they would match the rate.
By the way, these are "brand name" hotels, not Motel-6 or Red Roof
Inns. It appears that they have finally faced the fact that it's
beneficial to negotiate rather than leave a room empty.
fwiw
Jon
|
1514.4 | Does AMEX thank you for doing their job? | WEACDU::MANNON | | Tue Jul 02 1991 21:06 | 55 |
| <re: .3>
Jon, it's admirable that you take the time to make your own travel
arrangements; especially in light of your much-sought-after programming
talent!
However, I believe that one of the reasons for booking travel through
AMEX - IS for aggregate COST SAVINGS. The key *must* be aggregate
because I'm able to find lower rates whenever I make my own
arrangements.
So, if we spend � to 1 hour of DIGITAL's time chasing down airfares and
roomrates - the very things DIGITAL expects AMEX to do - are we really
saving DIGITAL money? What *IS* AMEX's added-value?
If AMEX is DIGITAL's sole travel agent (ie. negotiates travel on
DIGITAL's behalf), then maybe our redundant efforts are:
(1) distracting us from those activities for which
we are being paid, and
(2) on an *aggregate* (there's that word, again!) basis
are actually saving Digital less than we think.
What do you think?
The main reason is that I frequently do my own legwork is that I
have not been very satisfied with AMEX's arrangements. I spend a
substantial part of my time on trips that last anywhere from 1 week to
3 weeks. As an individual, I have been able to find lower airfares
than they have quoted me ( I have an account on CompuServe and can access
the SABRE system).
Also, I have to constantly remind them that our Region's maximum hotel
allowance is $65 (to which they respond "Well, I'll see what I can
find")! Several months ago, after asking me where in L.A. I needed to
be (so that they could find accomodations close by), they put me in a
Hilton in a bad part of Los Angeles for $105/night. Because L.A is so
expensive, I got the rate approved. However, the place smelled so bad
that after the first night, I searched for another hotel for my 2-week stay.
I found a very clean (and new) Holiday Inn for $85/night within walking
distance from the customer I was working at. (In downtown L.A., that's
a good rate).
Making my own arrangements (when I can) is worth the effort for me. I
try to find a hotel/motel that is close enough to the customer site
that I don't need to rent a car. AMEX hasn't been much help in that
regard. So most of the time I end up calling the customer to get
recommendations from them and either call the hotels myself or
call AMEX with the particulars.
--Bruce
|
1514.5 | | RICKS::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 225-5487, 223-3326 | Wed Jul 03 1991 00:32 | 9 |
| re: -.1
The reference to AMEX reminds me of when I used to work at the
smorgasbord. Customers asked how it was that we could make any money
providing such a wide selection of good food at such a reasonable cost.
We told them that we lost money on every customer, but we made up for
it in volume ... ;^)
Steve
|
1514.6 | | SMEGIT::ARNOLD | Some assembly required | Wed Jul 03 1991 10:46 | 25 |
| re .4
Many of us don't have time to make our own hotel/air reservations, nor
to spend inordinate amounts of time looking for the best rates, or
checking to see if Amex gave us the best rate. I do it sometimes, when
I have time, mostly on my *own time*, for the following reasons:
1. If I am successful in finding a better air/hotel rate, then
Digital saves money.
2. Frequently (as in the case reported a few notes back), in addition
to the cost savings, the location was much more convenient to
the two places I had to be simultaneously.
I have never gotten grief from booking a hotel outside of Amex, though
in that case, Amex does not get any commission on that hotel. I have,
however, gotten grief from not booking air via Amex. But I do know
that for air specifically, if we find a better fare that Amex did not
offer (and was available at the time the reservations were made!),
please document that fact and send it in a mail message, since as
reported in another note in this conference, that mail message
represents significant jing in Digital's pocket for that month via
penalties to Amex.
Jon
|
1514.7 | | TEACH::GREENBERG | Terminally Addicted | Wed Jul 03 1991 12:13 | 21 |
|
I think the reply describing the smoragasbord hit the nail on the
head as far as AMEX and Digital's "negotiated rates" go. I got
the following information from a coworker this morning. This is
regarding a Digital customer training location.
"I have gotten a little better news on the Sheraton Great Valley
at the Penn State site for those of you with AAA. AAA offers
a rate of $65.00 there as opposed to the "Great Value Rate" of
$80.00 or the Digital Rate of $83.00. A word of advice though
when dealing with American Express. Make sure you tell them
to check for the AAA discount. They claim AAA is never as good
as our rate but as you can see it beats us by a good bit."
I think it is common in our office is that we have to turn
down hotels offered by AMEX, reminding them that the hotels exceed
our limits, frequently finding a better hotel rate ourselves.
|
1514.8 | Back on the list | CREME::SCHULTZ | Peripheral Visionary... | Tue Jul 09 1991 17:27 | 9 |
| RE .2
The Embassy Suites is "BACK ON THE LIST" of hotels in CXO, it seems
they re-negotiated prices when they learned we were dropping them. Its
the only NICE hotel in the area that is close to CXO and CXN facilities
I've also stayed at the $56.00 a Night Hilton off Garden of the Gods
and it too was acceptable.
|
1514.9 | | BSS::D_BANKS | David Banks -- N�ION | Wed Jul 10 1991 10:37 | 17 |
| Re:<<< Note 1514.5 by RICKS::SHERMAN "ECADSR::SHERMAN 225-5487, 223-3326" >>>
> We told them that we lost money on every customer, but we made up for
> it in volume ... ;^)
I'm still trying to work the math on this one... :-)
Re: <<< Note 1514.8 by CREME::SCHULTZ "Peripheral Visionary..." >>>
> The Embassy Suites is "BACK ON THE LIST" of hotels in CXO, it seems
> they re-negotiated prices when they learned we were dropping them. Its
> the only NICE hotel in the area that is close to CXO and CXN facilities
I've never had a problem with either the Sheraton or Marriott, both of which
are *very* close to CXO or CXN, or are they no longer on "the list"?
- David
|
1514.10 | Some insight into Amerx process... | PIPPER::LEBLANCR | Ruth E. LeBlanc, Pipper::LeBlancR | Wed Jul 10 1991 13:22 | 37 |
| I talked about a year ago with a DEC person whose job is to negotiate
with Amerx. Two things she said may apply to this discussion:
1) If you do find better rates somewhere, get the information from
the vendor and call Amerx with that information; they'll book
it for you. Unfortunately, they can't be everywhere and know
every place; they just see what's on their system as available.
IF you find something better, great, but have Amerx book it so
(a) you stay in-line with policy and (b) they learn about the
place and can therefore update their system.
2) While a rate may seem higher to us, we're not privy to the
negotations between the vendors and Amerx. If, for example,
they work a lot with a specific hotel, they might get a
refund at year-end to account for volume. Or, if they can
prove through their records that they sent X-number of people
to a certain hotel one year, they're given a lot more
leverage when they go to negotiate lower fares with that
hotel. If we book things ourselves, Amerx won't have the
advantage of knowing where they can make the best savings
for DEC.
I might not have all the facts right (for example, I don't know if
there are year-end volume refunds), but I do know that Amerx has an
automated tracking system for hotels, airfare, etc., which enables them
to break-down all pertinent information when it comes time to
negotiate with various vendors. So, if you do find a better rate, just
let 'em know and they'll take it from there. Or, if you're really
nervous about missing the rate, make the reservation and call Amerx
with the reservation number/information so they can switch it from your
personal booking to their 'official' booking (keeping you in-line with
policy, and keeping their records as accurate as possible).
Hope that helps.
Regards,
|
1514.11 | how low can you go? | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Wed Jul 10 1991 16:34 | 11 |
| re: .8, .9
When I worked at CXO for a couple of weeks in May of 1989 I wanted to
stay at "the cheapest motel in Colorado Springs". If I remember
correctly I got a room for $17.50 a night, at the blockhouse on the
northwest corner of Garden of the Gods and the freeway. I don't
remember the name of the place, and it changed affilitations while I
was there.
It wasn't high-class accomodations, but it was adequate for my needs.
John Sauter
|
1514.12 | Red Roof is very nice too!! | COOKIE::LENNARD | Rush Limbaugh, I Luv Ya Guy | Thu Jul 11 1991 13:26 | 9 |
| Re -1 ..... sounds like the "Super 8", which is the chain I always try
to use when travelling on my own. Nice rooms, free cable, free morning
paper and coffee and dugnuts.
Now if you want really cheap, I know a joint on South Nevada that
charges only $45.00 a WEEK!!! Of course, you might have to adjust to
a reasonable amount of "activity" in adjoining rooms during the night.
Actually I would only recommend this hovel for management and marketing
folks {:^)
|
1514.13 | Lets get back to the subject | MAIL::ALLER | | Fri Jul 12 1991 13:09 | 9 |
| re . last several
These are really nice comments, but what do they have to do with the
original topic.
I too think there is a double standard with "marketing" and "services".
This double standard doesn't just apply to travel.
Jon Aller
|
1514.14 | | CSC32::CINQUEMANI | | Wed Jul 24 1991 13:52 | 3 |
| re. -1
You are correct !!
|