T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1477.1 | Hey I just read the stuff!!! | BALMER::MUDGETT | One Lean, Mean Whining Machine | Wed May 22 1991 11:19 | 12 |
| Hi Mike,
I hope things are going well for you in DC and I am doing well here
in the "City That Reads" the same city that is having a terriable year
baseball-wise.
Could someone please refute this rumor quickly. I mentioned it in the
office this morning and now EVERYONE thinks I'M raising the company car
amount and they are wondering what I'm going to do with all the extra
money.
Fred Mudgett
|
1477.2 | that would make the difference | DYPSS1::DYSERT | Barry - Custom Software Development | Wed May 22 1991 15:36 | 4 |
| If Plan A does go up to $50/week I'm sure that DEC will have a lot more
Plan A cars in its inventory!
BD�
|
1477.3 | Yea, $300 per month PLUS the addition of about $130 a month ... | YUPPIE::COLE | Lead with a discount, close with an allowance! | Wed May 22 1991 18:08 | 4 |
| ... that I "pay" to DEC now in $30 weekly payments, would make
for a pretty good car lease, maybe with a maintenance plan!
But then again, there's that d$%^ed IRS deduction off the top!
|
1477.4 | remember $18 -->>> $30 ?? | GLDOA::MORRISON | Dave | Thu May 23 1991 00:11 | 7 |
| DOes anyone remember when the weekly "A" plan rate went from $18 to $30
and the reason given was the dramatic increase in the cost of gas?
Wonder what happened to the concept of being honest about the real
reason it went up - that would be O.K. If it was the real reason, why
did it not drop lower once gas evened out - and what would it imply
about future increases? Obviously we'll get what we get, but it makes
one wonder.
|
1477.5 | Cost of gas? Naaaaa! | SYSTMX::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Thu May 23 1991 12:31 | 23 |
| re: <<< Note 1477.4 by GLDOA::MORRISON "Dave" >>>
-< remember $18 -->>> $30 ?? >-
< DOes anyone remember when the weekly "A" plan rate went from $18 to $30
< and the reason given was the dramatic increase in the cost of gas?
< Wonder what happened to the concept of being honest about the real
< reason it went up - that would be O.K. If it was the real reason, why
< did it not drop lower once gas evened out - and what would it imply
< about future increases? Obviously we'll get what we get, but it makes
< one wonder.
While I don't have the pleasure of any company car now, I did have a
fleet vehicle when the weekly rate was increased from $9 to $18 in
1982, and from $18 to $30 in 1986 (I believe it was '86).
I *NEVER* heard anyone state the reason for either increase had
anything whatever to do with the price of gasoline. Rather, it had
everything to do with the cost of maintenance and cost of leasing...
plus the IRS nosing in and grabbing a piece of the "benefit" of driving
a fleet vehicle.
tony
|
1477.6 | A/B advantages | SCAACT::DIGITAL | | Thu May 23 1991 16:28 | 5 |
| re: 0
PLAN A Disadvantage: Clunky, poor handling, big box Taurus w/automatic
PLAN B Advantage: The car I want with great handling, small size, and a
five speed stick.
|
1477.7 | IRS did it to us !!! | DENVER::SHAWS | | Thu May 23 1991 17:47 | 5 |
| re .4 and .5
As I recall the increase had nothing to do with gas or maintenace and
everything to do with the IRS and their fringe benefit valuation rules.
|
1477.8 | RE: fringe benefit valuation | CUJO::BERNARD | Dave from Cleveland | Sat May 25 1991 12:55 | 11 |
|
I thought that the Plan A contribution was simply to pay our part
for personal use of a company car, as required by the IRS. If we're
out of town for a week, we can park the car and not have to pay.
If this is true, and the contribution goes to $50 a week, and our
personal use doesn't change, wouldn't we just get any excess
contribution back at the end of the year at tax time? This is too
simple, so I guess I'm missing something.
Dave
|
1477.9 | If the Plan A car has YOUR name assigned to it, ... | YUPPIE::COLE | Lead with a discount, close with an allowance! | Tue May 28 1991 09:38 | 11 |
| ... YOU pay $$$ per week, regardless, and I've never heard
of anyone getting money BACK from the FMV calculation, but I can't
say it's not possible.
The last time we had an option of paying a personal use
charge was in the '70's, when it was 9 cents per personal mile,
and that DIDN'T include home-direct commutes! I remember having
some weeks with no personal charge.
Now, it is a given that you use it for personal puposes,
even if you live at the office! :>)
|
1477.10 | exi`t | DENVER::DAVISGB | Can't come outta the booth | Tue May 28 1991 12:38 | 10 |
| I remember a week or two where the car was in the shop and I didn't pay
the charge (once when it was $9 and when it was $18.) The first time,
my boss said 'no...I had to pay' until I found the memo stating that if
the car was in the shop for more than 4 days in one week, no $18
payment...
If this comes to pass....Toyota here I come....
Gil
|
1477.11 | | CSOA1::PROIE | Wayne A Proie | Tue May 28 1991 13:07 | 19 |
|
Re: Last few
I was assigned to a project in Austria while I had a company car and
during this period (eight weeks) I payed no weekly fee. The car,
however, had to be parked at the office while I was away.
Before this occurred I was assigned to a project in Birmingham, Alabama
for over a year (my home office is Pittsburgh) and I took my company
car to Alabama. Since I considered all of the mileage incurred in
Alabama as company miles, I had a large credit at the end of the
year... - The credit was deducted from my W-2 so that the effect was
that I payed no taxes on this excess, but the excess was not returned.
Note that I flew back to Pittsburgh weekly and used my personnel car on
weekends and to go to/from the airport.
Wayne A. Proie
|
1477.12 | Park it & don't pay --> Floater vehicle | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Tue May 28 1991 14:37 | 10 |
| re: park the car and you don't have to pay
My understanding of this practice is that some Districts will do this
if they feel that they can make use of the vehicle for the week (you
park the car and give over the keys to somebody).
The car becomes a floater for the week, so someone else pays the
charge.
-- Russ
|
1477.13 | Plan B to 300? | STOHUB::BRDDOG::VEALE | | Thu Jun 06 1991 10:59 | 12 |
| Does any one know if the Plan B car rates are going up to $300.00 a
month?
I've seen some rumors in these notes files and have tried to
call Fleet, but all I get is either a busy signal or put on hold until
I must hang up.
Also can we get two door cars instead of four door cars?
Anyone with this info out there?
Ken Veale
|
1477.14 | US Fleet information | WR2FOR::SMITH_KE | | Mon Jul 22 1991 22:26 | 11 |
| RE: PLAN B OPTIONS
A Corporate VTX file entitled Fleet Administration - U.S. is
accessable via your terminal. Plans A and B are described
including a list of Plan B non-standard vechicles. While the
latest entries I saw were dated 24 May 1991, it is a place to
start. At the $ prompt keyin:
VTX US_Fleet
|
1477.15 | reply to .10 and .13 | MSDSWS::RCANTRELL | | Fri Aug 09 1991 10:05 | 14 |
| re .10
Please buy American. It could save a job. Possibly someone you
know like maybe one of your kids.
re .13
There is a list available that tells what a person can use on plan
B. It is under vtx us_fleet but local management can override this if
they wish. I personally use an S10 blazer 4-WD on plan B and its the
2-door model.
|
1477.16 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Fri Aug 09 1991 11:14 | 8 |
|
> Please buy American. It could save a job. Possibly someone you
> know like maybe one of your kids.
Stove-pipes are everywhere!
Heather - UK
|
1477.17 | | SOLVIT::DCOX | | Fri Aug 09 1991 14:12 | 27 |
| re > <<< Note 1477.15 by MSDSWS::RCANTRELL >>>
> -< reply to .10 and .13 >-
>
> re .10
>
> Please buy American. It could save a job. Possibly someone you
> know like maybe one of your kids.
Did you mean ......
Buy American; Chrysler, Dodge, Plymouth, GM, Ford all make cars in
Canada and sell them here.
Or.................
Buy American; Big 3 all import and sell Japanese and Korean models
under their own US labels.
Or perhaps.........
Buy American; Toyota Corollas made in California (same line as GEO
Prisms), Honda Accords (make them in Ohio and sell them in Japan),
Nissan Sentras (Tennesse).
|
1477.18 | the ugly american | LURE::CERLING | God doesn't believe in atheists | Mon Aug 12 1991 13:49 | 11 |
|
re: Buy American
I am an American, and proud of it. However, I work for Digital, an
international company. Imagine if all countries expressed the same
opinion. Digital would not be the company it is today. I agree with
the stovepipe comment. We have to forget parochialism. We live in a
global economy. Almost nothing is entirely `American' anymore, except
for our `ugly American' attitudes.
tgc
|
1477.19 | | FREEBE::REAUME | SIzzLE on SiX | Mon Aug 12 1991 15:52 | 12 |
| I'm another fleet user eagerly anticipating the next move by
Fleet administration. I have quite a few friends with company cars
(non-DEC, some competitors too) and when I told them about our plan
B they usually said "that sux!". I really think Digital is going to
have to evaluate how other companies are doing their Runzheimer
plans, just to make sure they are fair about the compensation.
Anyone considering Plan B for service use better keep the mieage
use in mind before jumping into an extended lease or car payments.
24K miles a year has been my average for the last three years (with
approximately 40% personal).
-John R.-
|
1477.20 | so,it SUX,eh? | CSC32::K_BOUCHARD | Ken Bouchard CXO3-2 | Mon Aug 12 1991 16:06 | 8 |
| When I went on plan B several years ago,it was explained that DEC is
paying you for the portion of the car that is used for COMPANY
BUSINESS. Many other companies are paying for you to HAVE a car period.
These companies are generally much more generous to employees but many
of them don't have anywhere near DEC's bank balance either. Frugal
companies survive longer than generous ones.
Ken
|
1477.21 | Proud to be, but free to buy... | BEAGLE::BREICHNER | | Thu Aug 29 1991 08:01 | 23 |
| Re: several ago
Just as a side note:
1- Beeing proud to be American, Japanese, German, French......
is great and deserves to be respected.
(remember the famous "value differences" thing)
2- Above sentiments do not fit anymore with modern worldwide
economic constraints ("devalue differences" might be appropriate
there.
3- Using the unemployment threat as opening statement in any
such discussions around economics makes me sick.
Recent example:
- French government starts talking about reducing defense budget
- Guess who reacted violantly and immediately in the media
with "precise" numbers of people that would loose their jobs.
Sorry for the inerruption,
Fred
|
1477.22 | "Buy domestic," not "buy American" | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Aug 29 1991 10:31 | 6 |
| Although we work for an international company, many of us (particularly folks
in the field) are dependent upon economic conditions in the country we live
in. It's certainly in the best interests of employees in Detroit
that the American automobile business be healthy. Likewise, it's in
the best interests of German DEC employees that the German automobile
business thrive.
|
1477.23 | Buy quality/value, not nationality! | KYOA::BOYNTON | | Fri Aug 30 1991 13:10 | 28 |
| re: .22 Sacks -< "Buy domestic," not "buy American" >-
> It's certainly in the best interests of employees in Detroit that
> the American automobile business be healthy.
I believe that more and more we are living in a borderless economy
where the best interests of all of us depends on working for and buying
from companies dedicated to providing quality and value at a
competitive price.
General Motors and Ford, in particular, have not been "American" OR
"Domestic" companies for decades. For decades, they have been selling
high quality, high value cars in Germany while, until recently, they
sold *junk* in the United States. From this, we know that GM and Ford
have been capable of producing high quality/value products all along!
It was only when the US consumer had a choice (Japanese) and revolted that
the big push for quality began in the US subsidiaries of GM and Ford in
Detroit.
The best way for all consumers, whether U.S. Citizens or German, to
assure healthy local companies that can compete in the world market, is
to incentivize *all* companies to strive to equal the best-in-class
product. We can only do this by *buying the best quality/value product*
REGARDLESS of the country where the parent company is legally
incorporated, or the country where the internationally produced
components are assembled.
Carter
|
1477.24 | Break Point ! | NEWVAX::TURRO | Watch the skies | Tue Sep 03 1991 02:26 | 18 |
| At what point does DEC say were not fixing cars anymore ?
Example
In the last 4months DEC has approved the following on my car
New tires,new brakes,new fuel pump,2 new motor mounts and a new
battery.
At a cost of approximately 1.5grand.
At this note I have over 77k on the car. Its in pretty good shape as I
have been pretty faithful with the maintenance.
It sounds as though were going for the 100k mark. I would like to try
as Ive never done it before.
Whats the break point ?
Mike Turro
|
1477.25 | Depends on who is paying you. | NEWVAX::MZARUDZKI | I am my own VAX | Tue Sep 03 1991 07:58 | 7 |
| re -.1
>>> What's the break point? <<<
When YOU cannot get to work anymore.
-Mike Z. ;^)
|
1477.26 | GE not DEC | LURE::CERLING | God doesn't believe in atheists | Tue Sep 03 1991 10:42 | 17 |
| DEC does not make the determination; the fleet maintenance organization
makes the call as to whether or not to fix the problem. In our case
this is GE Capital. I called them to ask some questions about this
kind of stuff.
One comment they made was that they are depreciating cars over 4 years
(this is the fastest IRS allows). We used to get rid of the cars after
3 years. Therefore, they wanted to maximize the return on selling a
car. Now, with us holding the car for the 4 years, and rolling up some
high miles, they will not be able to get as much for the vehicle so
they have to maintain it better to make sure it lasts the full four
years. As for the 100K mark, I made a comment about expecting that to
be my goal and they stated it was not likely that I would be keeping my
car that long. I don't know why, but evidently they will want it back
before I realize that milestone.
tgc
|
1477.27 | Gelco doesn't appear to pay any maintenance... | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Tue Sep 03 1991 14:29 | 8 |
| My manager has informed me that all maintenance performed on Plan A cars is
charged back to Digital. When they kept turning down my request for new shocks
for my car, I thought it was because they didn't want to spend the money. Now
it appears it's Digital that doesn't want to spend the money. I did finally
get them to replace 2 shocks. Now if I can only get them to replace my wiper
blades after 54K miles, I might be able to see when it rains.
Bob
|
1477.28 | | TOPDOC::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Tue Sep 03 1991 23:05 | 6 |
| RE: .27 "Gelco doesn't appear to pay any maintenance..."
What's Gelco? Is that any relation to GE Fleet Maintenance that was
hired to administer maintenace and repairs on Digital's fleet vans and
commuter vanpool vehicles?
|
1477.29 | re.28 | NEWVAX::TURRO | Watch the skies | Wed Sep 04 1991 00:32 | 4 |
| GELCO IS GENERAL ELECTRIC leasing company.
Mike
|
1477.30 | DEC - Lessee | NEWVAX::TURRO | Watch the skies | Wed Sep 04 1991 00:35 | 7 |
| re .26
DEC being the lessee ,is the bottom line in the repair decision process.
I have had to discuss the repair/abandon process with the fleet manager
in the past. I assume this has/will not change.
Mike
|
1477.31 | Your Joking ! | NEWVAX::TURRO | Watch the skies | Wed Sep 04 1991 00:37 | 7 |
| If hope your joking about the wiper blades. If not, purchase them at
your local auto parts store and put them on your expenses.....on your
car sheet under maintenance/repair catagory
Mike
|
1477.32 | | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Wed Sep 04 1991 09:34 | 7 |
| re: .31
No, I'm not joking. The past 2 times I've had the car in for service, I've
requested new wiper blades. I'm getting a strange whine from the front end,
so I'll take it in next week to get checked and ask for new wiper blades again.
Bob
|
1477.33 | | DENVER::BERNARD | Dave from Cleveland | Wed Sep 04 1991 10:05 | 6 |
|
Isn't there some sort of pittance, like $30, you're authorized to
spend without fleet's approval? Take a look at the plastic card
with your fleet/vehicle number.
Dave
|
1477.34 | | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Wed Sep 04 1991 11:47 | 7 |
| re: .33
You are right. I had forgotten about that. There are exceptions to the $30
rule and it seems like everything I want to do for <$30 is on the exeception
list.
Bob
|
1477.35 | If the vehicle is unsafe, DON'T TAKE NO FOR AN ANSWER | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Wed Sep 04 1991 14:12 | 15 |
| re: .34 (exceptions to the $30 rule)
Funny, I don't recall seeing any exceptions listed on the back of the
Plan A expense form. I'd just submit it, and if someone challenged,
I'd say that I was following the rules shown on back of the form.
If the car is unsafe in the rain due to the bad wipers, PUSH BACK!
Someone is saving $5 at the risk of your life!
If nothing else, I KNOW that you can expense emergency repairs. The
next time it rains constitutes an emergency as it renders the vehicle
unsafe for travel. Go to the nearest gas station or K-mart, get the
wipers, and write it off... (and, no, I'm NOT kidding)
-- Russ
|
1477.36 | Who really pays? | LURE::CERLING | God doesn't believe in atheists | Thu Sep 05 1991 10:57 | 17 |
| If maintenance costs are charged back to Digital, why to they complain
when I want to save the company some money by changing the oil on my
car instead of having it done? We have a contract with JiffyLube.
Take the car in and in less than 10 minutes you are back on the road
with a new filter and oil...and Digital is charged about $30. If I go
out and buy the oil and filter for $10 and put it in myself, I am told
not to do this. Seems like something is flaky.
Same goes for wipers. They would rather have you have a garage put
them in than you replacing them. Does the owning cost center get
charged for these smaller maintenance items versus the corporate fleet
program for the charged items? If Digital pays for all maintenance,
then the only thing I can guess is that the items entered on expense
forms are covered by local cost center and they do not want to have
these expenses.
tgc
|
1477.37 | | JAMMER::JACK | Marty Jack | Thu Sep 05 1991 11:16 | 2 |
| If your car throws a piston after you change the oil do you want DEC
to come after you for destroying it?
|
1477.38 | hassle | ELMAGO::MWOOD | | Thu Sep 05 1991 14:33 | 25 |
| I had a fleet car once for part of a temporary assignment. It was
nothing but a hassle. The car had numerous problems, the biggest
being that it always stalled at slow speeds. DEC was putting me
up in Worcester Mass at the time, and each time the car needed
servicing I had to take it to the Ford dealer near Maynard. I think
it took almost an hour to get there. Then arrange transportation
back. Each time it went in the dealer would do another tuneup and
soak DEC an outrageous sum. I checked the maintenance records from
before I received the car and the previous user had the same things
going on...I pushed back on the appropriate people within DEC, but
the problem never was resolved. The last straw was a flat tire. I
was told to go to a Firestone dealer. They had a deal where they fixed
the tire for a flat rate of 60.00 (I think this was through Gelco).
The tire was a 29.00 special. Dec was getting soaked. I reported this
also, but never heard back. At this point I decided it was taking
to much of my time, besides risking my safety stalling everytime you
pull into traffic. I turned the car back over along with some comments
on how I thought the whole program was run and got an Avis car for the
rest of my stay...Oh, and I got harrassed about changing my own oil
also...gee, sorry DEC, I saved you 12.00...If an engine blows after, it
blows. It would've anyways...There's no way anyone's going to collect
money to repair it from the user...IMHO...
Marty
|
1477.39 | say what? | LURE::CERLING | God doesn't believe in atheists | Fri Sep 06 1991 09:43 | 8 |
| Blows a piston because I changed the oil!?!?!?
That's a new one! If the car is going to blow a piston it will do it
no matter who changes the oil. I believe it is a matter of
beauracracy. Anytime one cannot save the company money because "that's
not the way we do it", it generally comes down to fiefdoms.
tgc
|
1477.40 | | JAMMER::JACK | Marty Jack | Fri Sep 06 1991 10:35 | 3 |
| You missed the point. I know they are almost always unrelated events.
But if you do your own work you have to assume the risk that you will
be blamed for something you didn't cause.
|
1477.41 | 91,000 mile,1988 Taurus | CSOA1::CONNER | Welcome to the jungle | Fri Sep 06 1991 11:41 | 29 |
| .36> If maintenance costs are charged back to Digital, why to they complain
.36> when I want to save the company some money by changing the oil on my
.36> car instead of having it done? We have a contract with JiffyLube.
.36> Take the car in and in less than 10 minutes you are back on the road
.36> with a new filter and oil...and Digital is charged about $30. If I go
.36> out and buy the oil and filter for $10 and put it in myself, I am told
.36> not to do this. Seems like something is flaky.
I was told that oil changes are different than other <$30.00 repairs in that
Digital (or GELCO) has negotioted with Ford, Chevy, and Firestone (maybe others)
to bill the oil changes thru GELCO (at least for the first 60,000 miles since
that was the original lease agreement with GELCO). Supposedly oil changes
are figured into the leasing costs and only cost Digital extra money if we
don't go thru the GELCO call before service routine.
Now for the real purpose of my note. My company Taurus has 91,000 miles on
it. My CC manager says there are no replacement cars available for me. I
hear from other sources that there are numerous extra cars due to the recent
layoffs. Next week I take my car in for repairs again. This is happening
more and more frequently. So far I've had new tires, brakes, and a transmission
rebuild, my gas guage fixed, headlights replaced, electrical short repaired,
speedometer cable repaired, etc...
Is anyone else putting up with this or am I just getting screwed over ? I'm
still paying $30.00 a week for this junker. It's getting to the point where
plan A is not a good deal when I'm driving a 91,000 mile, 1988 car. Whats's
the deal ???
Mike.
|
1477.42 | It's mostly a matter of liability | CELTIK::JACOB | Sex is DIRTY..when done properly | Fri Sep 06 1991 18:33 | 18 |
| The main reason that all maintenance is supposed to be done at a
dealer, or garage, and not by the driver is liability.
If you are changing the oil, and the car falls on you, Digital is in
for a big lawsuit if'n your significant other wants to pursue it.
Not saying that everybody is dumb enough to crawl under a car without
it being supported properly, but it's suprizing how many people do not
take adequate safety precautions before slithering under the car, and
when the car falls, it's almost always fatal.
To pay $21.95, which is the cost of an oil change here in Pittsburgh,
vs, oh about $500,000 in a lawsuit + legal costs, sounds smart to me.
That's 20,000+ oil changes.
JaKe
|
1477.43 | It's "Used Car" Time | FASDER::AHERB | Al is the *first* name | Fri Sep 06 1991 23:58 | 19 |
| re:41
There is someone assigned to your area (mine's out of Atlanta) to
track/manage the "fleet". My understanding has been that it costs the
company more money to continue leasing a low mileage unassigned car as
opposed to an assigned on with high mileage. My area rep has been most
helpful in assisting me in locating/replacement of a lower mileage/less
troublesome vehicle for replacement.
If in doubt, call Fleet Admin in NE and find out who the person is
that's responsible for your area.
To put it mildly, we are no longer dealing with new car replacement but
rather "used car" practices: What's out there that's better than mine?
It's really a take what you can get deal although some of these fleet
managers will work with you in trying to narrow choices such as "a GM
car with low mileage"...no choice or color or options.
Not bad..considering.
|
1477.44 | mental midgets | SALSA::MOELLER | Guy on a strange tractor | Tue Sep 10 1991 18:04 | 16 |
| o I checked my transmission fluid in my 1987 GELCO Taurus 4-banger.
Burned. Took it to our local GELCO-blessed service shop, to be
told that GELCO declined to pay for changing the transmission fluid
and filter. Reason ? If the transmission failed for any reason,
Ford would replace it free. I have to travel regularly between
Tucson and Phoenix, AZ - easily reaches 120F in the daytime. I
certainly wouldn't be happy at being stranded in the desert so
GELCO could 'save' $17.00 so Ford can spend $900.. I, too, use
the $30.00-and-under discretionary repair clause.
o Another time, GELCO Topaz, 45,000 miles, shock absorbers absolutely
gone, car bobbling and bouncing about, I went to the shop. Nope-
GELCO won't pay for shock absorbers, because they "aren't a safety
related item." !?
karl
|
1477.45 | I hope we maintain computers better ... | AUSTIN::UNLAND | Sic Biscuitus Disintegratum | Fri Sep 20 1991 03:02 | 25 |
| re: .-1 "shocks not a safety item"
Maybe different states have different rules and regulations about
this sort of thing? I recall having a similar conversation with
fleet many years ago, and the coup de grace was a comment the shop
mechanic made to the fleet bozo: "I don't think this car would
pass inspection this way; how up-to-date is your liability insurance?"
The struts were recharged or replaced or whatever it's called. I
don't know if the inspection laws are different here (Texas) or if
the mechanic was just blowing smoke, but I do know that the comment
got some attention focused on what the fleet bozo dismissed as a
"nuisance" problem.
A related peeve of mine is that the powers-that-be seem to have
forgotten that the company car is more than just a convenient perk
for employees, and that one of the main reasons we have cars is to
carry *customers* around. Personally and professionally, I'd be
*very* embarrased to take a customer to a meeting in a company car
that belched smoke and rattled and clanged over the slightest bumps.
Unfortunately, I've had to do exactly that, with the inevitable
comment being "Gee, DEC must be pretty bad off these days ..."
Geoff
|