[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | The Digital way of working |
|
Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
|
Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 5321 |
Total number of notes: | 139771 |
1380.0. "Digital sales in Iraq" by SDSVAX::SWEENEY (God is their co-pilot) Fri Feb 22 1991 09:41
Copyright � 1991 Dow Jones & Co., Inc., All Rights Reserved
The following is output of the DowVision (TM) test system under development,
contact SDSVAX::SWEENEY for more information.
(Note this is from the newswire, text as it appeared in today's Wall
Street Journal differs from the following...)
Firms Supplied Iraq -2: All Say They Complied With Law
02 22 1991 0008
-0- 0504GMT
In addition, Presray Corp., Pawling, New York, sold rubber door seals to an
Iraqi agency, State Electrical Industries. Such seals could be used in nuclear
or chemical facilities to prevent the spread of contaminants, Presray said.
Varian Associates Inc., a Palo Alto, California, defense contractor, sold an
Iraqi government agency testing equipment that could be used to jam aircraft
electronic systems.
Canberra Industries, a privately held concern in Meriden, Connecticut, said
it sold environmental-monitoring equipment to the Iraqi Atomic Energy
Commission. It said that only one sale, for 25,000 dlrs, required an export
license.
All the companies said they complied with U.S. laws and hadn"t intended to
help the Iraqi military. "We don"t make foreign policy," said Mark
Frederickson, a Digital Equipment Co. spokesman. He said Digital Equipment"s
Iraqi sales, directly or through a London company, totaled 12 shipments, each
under 100,000 dlrs. He said his company had decided not to aggressively pursue
the Iraqi market.
Gary Milhollin, a Washington-based expert on Iraq"s weapons programs, says
many sales of dual-use goods were encouraged by the U.S. government.
Defense analysts said German companies took the lead in helping Iraq obtain
equipment that could be used in chemical, missile and nuclear-weapons
research. Gildemeister, for instance, linked up with major U.S. and European
companies to provide computers, sensitive electronic measuring devices, and
specialized photographic equipment, among other items, that were used in Saad
16. The complex, reportedly used for ballistic missile and chemical research,
was an early target of allied bombing.
Firms Supplied Iraq -2: All Say They Complied With Law
02 22 1991 0008
-0- 0504GMT
In addition, Presray Corp., Pawling, New York, sold rubber door seals to an
Iraqi agency, State Electrical Industries. Such seals could be used in nuclear
or chemical facilities to prevent the spread of contaminants, Presray said.
Varian Associates Inc., a Palo Alto, California, defense contractor, sold an
Iraqi government agency testing equipment that could be used to jam aircraft
electronic systems.
Canberra Industries, a privately held concern in Meriden, Connecticut, said
it sold environmental-monitoring equipment to the Iraqi Atomic Energy
Commission. It said that only one sale, for 25,000 dlrs, required an export
license.
All the companies said they complied with U.S. laws and hadn"t intended to
help the Iraqi military. "We don"t make foreign policy," said Mark
Frederickson, a Digital Equipment Co. spokesman. He said Digital Equipment"s
Iraqi sales, directly or through a London company, totaled 12 shipments, each
under 100,000 dlrs. He said his company had decided not to aggressively pursue
the Iraqi market.
Gary Milhollin, a Washington-based expert on Iraq"s weapons programs, says
many sales of dual-use goods were encouraged by the U.S. government.
Defense analysts said German companies took the lead in helping Iraq obtain
equipment that could be used in chemical, missile and nuclear-weapons
research. Gildemeister, for instance, linked up with major U.S. and European
companies to provide computers, sensitive electronic measuring devices, and
specialized photographic equipment, among other items, that were used in Saad
16. The complex, reportedly used for ballistic missile and chemical research,
was an early target of allied bombing.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1380.1 | When? | 16BITS::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Fri Feb 22 1991 10:29 | 9 |
| In order to discuss this rationally re: Digital's activities, I believe it would
be pertinent to know whether these sales/deliveries took place before or after
August 2, 1990. Is that information available? My feeling is that prior to the
Iraqi occupation of Kuwait and the ensuing UN resolutions, there were no
compelling reasons not to be doing "business as usual" with Iraq, or any other
country not under a trade embargo or export limitation of some kind.
-Jack
|
1380.2 | | GRANPA::JFARLEY | | Fri Feb 22 1991 19:37 | 7 |
| One does not need a "Trade Embargo" to not deal with a particular
country or company. If DEC or anyone else can not see what a particular
"Dictator" is doing in a third world country, then shame on them. If
dollars mean that much to our company in selling "Sadam" computer
equipment regardless of dollar amount that some "ivory tower" VP better
go see a head shrinker. There is in this case of "Iraq" in doing
"the right thing".
|
1380.3 | Mistakes happen, don't think it was deliberate decision | SUFRNG::REESE_K | just an old sweet song.... | Fri Feb 22 1991 20:37 | 25 |
| Just because we don't agree with a country/leader's politics,
doesn't mean we would refuse to sell to them because we feel
we are on a higher moral level.
The Denied Parties list is the official list that says who we
can and cannot sell to.....even then it's tricky if a couple
of countries decide to act as re-seller or intermediaries, etc.
Isn't that what happened to DEC a couple of years ago....we didn't
sell directly......there were 2 or 3 companies in between, but
DEC got hit with the fine from the Feds.
There was a rather interesting tongue-in-cheek article in the
Atlanta Journal last night stating the reason Gorbachev was
exerting such pressure to prevent a ground war is because if
Iraq totally falls.....he's lost one of his best clients.....G
Gorbachev wants to preserve what's left of the Soviet military
investment in Iraq and guarantee the Soveits a role in the
continued Middle Eastern turmoil.
I'm sure we've not been selling to Iraq since this mess started;
and before it started we thought Iran was our reason to worry in
the Mid East.
Karen
|
1380.4 | | SOLVIT::ALLEN_R | | Fri Feb 22 1991 20:42 | 14 |
| There is and always has been a problem in controlling sales of our
equipment outside the borders of the US. Its along the same lines of
selling software, people are not trained or are, but choose to ignore the
policies and procedures that are involved. We have an exports dept and
some good people that can help. But DEC makes a lot of sales every year.
I have been involved and seen cases where people within the company but
outside the US will ignore the policies of the company and the US
because they have determined it is not in any way detrimental to them
or their country to export to whomever they choose. That more
doesn't find its way into the wrong hands is a testament to those that
try to control the problem with the little resources and help they
get. It is not always possible to control the actions of resellers
and other third parties. Much of the business outside the US is not
done direct by Digital or its subsideraries.
|
1380.5 | I repeat, When? | 16BITS::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Sat Feb 23 1991 00:33 | 9 |
| So, I repeat my question of .1 - When did these transactions occur?
If prior to Aug 2, 1990 we would have been doing reasonable business with
Iraq just like anyone else in the world (except Iran!). If after, that's
different. If prior, what's the issue? If after, well, draw your own
conclusions . . .
-Jack
|
1380.6 | On a clear day... | AIMHI::TINIUS | My hobby is stuffing things. | Sat Feb 23 1991 15:29 | 11 |
| Re: Note 1380.2 by GRANPA::JFARLEY
> One does not need a "Trade Embargo" to not deal with a particular
> country or company. If DEC or anyone else can not see what a particular
> "Dictator" is doing in a third world country, then shame on them.
I'm glad it's so clear to you to whom we should sell or not sell. Now how
about a decision on Chile, Panama, Poland, Niger, India, Japan, Thailand,
Canada, Israel, Egypt, Ireland...
Stephen
|
1380.7 | "Rebuttal to note 6" | GRANPA::JFARLEY | | Sun Feb 24 1991 17:30 | 8 |
| Referring to note 6- It is a thing whether you want to believe it or
"having Moral Conscience". You did mention it in your own "hit" list
of countries. If you don't have some moral platitudes then let us sell
some Vax 9000's to dear old Russia, but I am sure you could raise some
objections to that. It really does matter in my book of morals, who we
sell to but I guess it doesn't matter to you. I guess the almighty
dollar must prevail to meet you sales quota for the quarter. I am just
returning your slice, should we proceed any farther?????
|
1380.8 | The difficult cases are more interesting | AIMHI::TINIUS | My hobby is stuffing things. | Sun Feb 24 1991 18:37 | 7 |
| Of course it matters to me to whom we sell our products and how they are used.
My point was that "see[ing] what a particular "Dictator" is doing in a third
world country" doesn't sound like very definitive criteria, and it's too easy.
If you think you can use a 'moral' judgment of the customer's behavior, then
what do you do in the difficult cases, for instance the countries I listed.
Stephen
|
1380.9 | | MAMTS5::MWANNEMACHER | let us pray to Him | Mon Feb 25 1991 12:39 | 6 |
|
FWIW-We stopped doing business with the Iraqi embassy after the embargo
was placed on Iraq.
Mike
|