| re Note 1281.0 by BOSACT::CHERSON:
> I was wondering had heard anything official about the concept of the "virtual
> office", i.e., working out of one's home.
I believe that the term "virtual office" was used in a recent
Jack Smith memo (since rescinded) not to mean "working in the
home" but to mean "if you work anywhere in the greater
Maynard area, your office is considered to be virtually
everywhere, and thus you cannot get reimbursed for
inter-plant travel."
Bob
|
| I have been working in a Digital "virtual office" for ten years as a
"PSS/EIS" Software Specialist. I guess it is now called the new
"Customer Services" organization headed by Russ Gullotti (Friday's
VOGON news). I have been predicting that move for five years now.
Makes big sense to me.
Digital Virtual Office: No Digital office space, a mailbox, two file
cabinet drawers, little company contact, last in line to touch or
possess new stuff. Working for a minimum of two different bosses,
sometimes with differing goals (gosh, that sounds a little like a
virtual office at home when the wife asks you to raise your feet so she
can vacumm around you). I used to resent it, but I could never deny
the business sense of it.
The real problem was/is related to the following. In the old days when
Software Services was one organization, it was the folks that were "out
of a job" that got all the new goodies or enjoyed the office scuttlebut
because they happened to be around the office daily. Now it is the
Sales Support folks and that is one of the fundamental reasons for the
big migration to that job title.
Current benefit though: The customer is paying green dollars for me
for the next year and that = fewer worries about the recession and
obvious consequences thereof.
Fred
|