T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1267.1 | Good luck | MILKWY::MORRISON | Bob M. FXO-1/28 228-5357 | Sun Nov 11 1990 19:33 | 6 |
| Good luck in your internal job search. I wouldn't want DEC to lose someone
of your caliber.
Thank you for mentioning the risk that people who have been in transition for
a while may be the first to be laid off if DEC has a "real" layoff. It's one of
many things to think about if one decides to stay on after being offered the
package.
|
1267.2 | Comment and Farewell | QURUSH::DIIULIO | So...System been down long? | Mon Nov 12 1990 10:15 | 22 |
|
I would like to say the memo in .0 was very well written and
expresses the very core of what is going on. I myself have been
got up in the transition and decided to move on. Based on some
of the information in the memo and the fact that if/when DEC has
a layoff I would probably be got up in that too. So it would be
better that I take the money and run. I have some good leads on
the outside and feel I maybe better off by it.
I feel that the next five years at DEC will be tough. The
company has grown too fast and needs to be shaken out a little.
Again I feel that I will be better off in a smaller company.
Those of you who are wondering what I did, I was programmer and
have worked for DEC 10 plus years. Also those years for the most
part were good years. I will miss some of the people I have
worked with and for. In a sense this is my farewell to Digital.
Regards,
Rich Di Iulio
|
1267.3 | Mixed Feelings on Transition | USCTR2::DIIULIO | | Mon Nov 12 1990 12:34 | 42 |
| I couldn't let this note go by without adding to the base note as well
as my husband's response (Rich DiIulio). I have been with DEC since
1971 (19 years). I saw many times when salary planning was moved out
and have weathered many storms myself. Fortunately, for the two of us,
I am still employed here and hope that I may be in a little bit more of
a stable environment. We met in DEC and part of our everyday life has
been sharing the experiences of the work day. It is like losing a part
of yourself when your spouse leaves the company under such
circumstances.
At times I felt we worked like a team inside of DEC. We helped each
other during the day and Rich taught me many things in the area of
programming and System Management. I feel like I am losing a team
member, or co-worker to see him leave.
I have to admit there are some ups and downs of working so closely in
the same company, but I have to admit, that we were from different
parts of the company with different experiences and shared knowledge
with each other.
Rich has been a very highly motivated person in the computer world. At
times, I wish I had some of what motivated him in the computer
industry. There were many days that he worked late and then came home
and logged into work to check on jobs running. As well as many
weekends. There have been times when he had to go into work to monitor
jobs and I would go with him. I felt we were like a team, sharing a
job.
I have mixed feelings about his leaving the company, but from what I
know of his technical skills and motivation, I know that he will find a
job and will be greatly appreciated.
I can sympathize with anyone going thru this. Again, being in a
situation of being married to someone leaving at this time, It isn't
just the one individual that has to deal with the situation. It is a
joint decision. (And it is not an easy one to make!)
Yes, Rich even taught me how to use the NOTES files.
Sue ...
|
1267.4 | a West coast option | MADRE::BORDA | | Mon Nov 12 1990 13:51 | 15 |
| Anyone interested in working on the West coast? Our group has been growing
steadily, and will continue to do so. The products? RISC ULTRIX
workstations. I've been here 4 years, and have seen the size of the
group explode. There ain't no end in sight. Though the company is a
bit shaky right now, it will survive.
The weather's great, there are lots of fellow New Englanders, and
there's plenty of work to be done. So, perhaps when the internal
hiring freeze ends, some might want to check it out. There's lots of
positive energy out here!
Best of luck to all of you.
Karin
|
1267.5 | | COOKIE::LENNARD | | Mon Nov 12 1990 16:59 | 10 |
| .0 should be very concerned about the four week period to find a new
job. That is absolutely ridiculous, and deliberately calculated to
unload people. I was in a large transition move several years ago when
it was EASY to get a job. It was very unusual to even get the initial
response from Recruiting in four. The average wrap-up time for an
interview cycle in my organization was 14 weeks!!! ......and that was
quite often after really pushing on the hiring manager for a decision.
God help anyone who is dependent upon Personnel to help them through
this!
|
1267.6 | "initial response" is YOUR phone call | MRCSSE::COLMAN | | Mon Nov 12 1990 17:34 | 55 |
| I am trying to identify a DIGITAL employee who might be "in transition"
and "looking" for a job in Marlboro, and who might describe him/herself
(approximately) as follows:
I enjoy contributing to DIGITAL's "bottom line" via the planning,
developing and coding of application software. I work best with
those who have service and/or product tracking responsibilities
who look to me to help them fulfill those responsibilities.
Because my background includes formal engineering and mathematics
training as well as on-the-job business experience, I can understand
and communicate business and technical needs as presented by
technical as well as non-technical individuals, usually with a
minimum of detailed direction. Then, via my generation of ad hoc
software, I can turn those needs into timely solutions (i.e. reports
and/or graphs). Often, and probably appropriately so, my solutions
point the way to further needs.
In many cases, my code interrogates large databases and sometimes the
particular application requires combining the contents of databases.
If the questions put to me are sound and the required data exists, it
becomes my challenge to properly manipulate the existing data and to
produce reports that become a basis for sound management decisions.
For example, reports can point out recurring system hardware and/or
software problems early in a given product's life, so that dollar-
saving modifications can be made to similar systems that have not yet
shipped. Databases that I've worked with include LARS, CLAS,
Corporate Sales Tape, Customer Database, and System "T." These
databases contain answers to questions like WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, HOW,
WHO, and HOW MUCH.
Examples of software that I have developed include the tracking of
reliability, repair installation, and materials data from the field
for key products and applications. I have contributed to algorithm
and metric generation to measure components of Digital's Field
Service business and have served as a technical consultant in areas
of data access, tool development and system usage.
I'm also reasonably facile at automating previously-manual data entry,
computing, and reporting systems.
I program mainly in FORTRAN and RDB.
Please contact me if the above (approximately) describes you.
regards,
george colman
DTN 297-4159
HPSMEG::COLMAN
|
1267.7 | If your looking now, I hope it's not too late | GUIDUK::B_WOOD | Having a wonderfull Alaska Summer | Mon Nov 12 1990 19:03 | 7 |
| The buzz word for the 80's and 90's in jobs is NETWORKING. Loosely
defined, this is the art of always knowing what your best option is and
who your next boss is. Those caught in the transition and now looking
for jobs are in trouble. As with most employers, most digital managers
probably already have a candidate in mind when the post a job req.!
|
1267.8 | Make sure what you do is important | DELNI::B_DONOVAN | Pinin' for the fjords | Tue Nov 13 1990 07:19 | 14 |
| One of the lessons that I learned from .0 is that the whole idea of
the "Transition Program" is to eliminate jobs - not people - as a means
to reduce headcount. There are two implications for that:
1. It's not how you do the job but what job you do that counts in terms
of job security
2. The company stills needs to figure out how to identify and eliminate
non-performers as a means to manage headcount.
I think we also need to do a better job in finding ways to keep our
best and brightest - we're going to need them.
Bill
|
1267.9 | What I think is 'important' | MAGOS::BELDIN | Pull us together, not apart | Tue Nov 13 1990 08:27 | 35 |
| re .8 by DELNI::B_DONOVAN
>> -< Make sure what you do is important >-
Perhaps a workable definition of 'important' is
"in the revenue, not the overhead, stream".
That stream (in my mind) includes only:
Designing products
(from concept to manufacturing spec's)
Manufacturing products
(from mfg spec's to finished goods at customer's dock)
Selling products and services
(corporate and new accounts and catalog sales)
Delivering services
and
activities that are 'essential' to them. (and 'essential' support
will change from time to time).
That stream excludes (read and weep):
Group level manufacturing functions
Support for support functions (like SW for internal use)
Internal services that can be purchased outside
Bookkeeping and accounting for internal dollar swapping
Centralized functions not supporting grass roots work
Regards,
Dick
|
1267.10 | Downsizing is the name of the game! | LINCN3::PDYER | Philip Dyer DTN 343-1872 | Tue Nov 13 1990 10:44 | 12 |
| Re .5
We have been told explicitly that Digital wants us to leave the
company. While we have the option of looking for another job
in DEC or remaining in the ERC, the focus in on downsizing, not
redeployment. And the four week window from 19 November to 14
December is time to make a decision and to look for others jobs
both inside and outside DEC. Of course, it will be hard to find
jobs in four weeks, especially during the holiday season, but
four weeks is better than two weeks, etc.
Philip
|
1267.11 | | COOKIE::LENNARD | | Tue Nov 13 1990 11:24 | 12 |
| Two questions...
- Anybody believe that we will ever see a list of managers that have
be "transitioned"; or that the ratio will be anything like that
imposed on the troops.
- Why are we not seeing an early retirement option? I can't even
think of a major computer vendor who hasn't made that about the
first thing they offered. I'm talking about an enhanced 5-5-6
program, or something like that.
Can't believe how this whole thing is being mis-managed.
|
1267.12 | Believe it, believe it! | TROPIC::BELDIN | Pull us together, not apart | Tue Nov 13 1990 11:59 | 27 |
| re .11 by COOKIE::LENNARD
> Two questions...
> - Anybody believe that we will ever see a list of managers that have
> be "transitioned"; or that the ratio will be anything like that
> imposed on the troops.
yes some managers, not the ratio
> - Why are we not seeing an early retirement option? I can't even
> think of a major computer vendor who hasn't made that about the
> first thing they offered. I'm talking about an enhanced 5-5-6
> program, or something like that.
Some locations use early retirement, some don't - more or less, local
option
> Can't believe how this whole thing is being mis-managed.
Its being managed in the same way we got into this mess. By delegating
to middle managers with no cross checks from their managers. Each
organization is deciding for itself what the program is and how to
implement it.
We all appreciate decentralization when we like the freedom we have, but
we curse it when others have the freedom they shouldn't. ;^)
|
1267.13 | ? | SAURUS::AICHER | | Tue Nov 13 1990 15:59 | 19 |
|
> - Anybody believe that we will ever see a list of managers that have
> be "transitioned"; or that the ratio will be anything like that
> imposed on the troops.
No...however I've been seeing something very interesting.
A lot of supervisors are being promoted to manager
or team leader type positions lately.
Could this miracle re-org be a way of appearing to eliminate a layer
of management without really losing people?
Anyone else see this?
Mark
|
1267.14 | Aw....not in Digital | COOKIE::LENNARD | | Wed Nov 14 1990 11:27 | 2 |
| re .13 -- most entrenched bureaucracies can become very creative
organizationally when anus-protectus becomes the order of the day.
|
1267.15 | Goodbye MSB, Hello ESG! | FROSTY::HYER | | Thu Nov 15 1990 11:33 | 10 |
| RE: 0 <From the originating author>
I have been successful in my search for continued employment in
DEC. Monday, I begin my new position with the European Technology
Group as ELSI Technology Support Manager - US.
I appreciate all the mail of support in response to my message.
Regards,
Dave
|
1267.16 | Thats the ticket more management and less "workers" | KNGBUD::B_SIART | THE/OWLS/ARE/NOT/WHAT/THEY/SEEM | Thu Nov 15 1990 14:20 | 10 |
|
reply .13
Yes I have seen this trend, I know personally of an organization
which recently promoted five of their supervisors to managers. Then
presto, no more supervisors. And THEY are claiming that they reduced
a layer of management. However they also lost eight workers to the
buyout/transistion program.
|
1267.17 | Long commute to transition center? | MILKWY::MORRISON | Bob M. FXO-1/28 228-5357 | Sun Nov 18 1990 17:00 | 10 |
| Re: 4 weeks is not enough: Dave Hyer was lucky. Few people can find a new job
in DEC in 4 weeks unless they already have a standing offer from someone at the
time they are offered the package. So that means if you stay on, you have to
spend time at a transition center. Which leads to a problem: Many plants have
assigned, or will assign, their people to transition centers that are 30 to 60
miles away. If you don't live near the transition center and can't relocate
easily at your own expense, you will have to do a lot of commuting. If you do
relocate so as to be near the transition center, you may have to relocate again
in 6 months or so to be near your next job. Is there anyone reading this who
has encountered this problem?
|
1267.18 | DO IT RIGHT | RAVEN1::DJENNAS | | Wed Dec 05 1990 13:24 | 16 |
| I have been at DEC for 18 months when Transition struck( First Pass), I
was in a bad working situation in my "new" group. Anyway, by the end of
the second week, I had two job offers outside, one local; and one
internal. I chose to stay *&*#@% and was relocated by DEC. The
Transition selection criterion however, was based on the extracurricular
performance vis-a-vis the selector and his entourage. Why don't we
put in transition those people who got us in this mess in the first
place, those that were still building empires while everybody
had to endure a salary freeze, even though they were tough words from
senior executive management, that practice continued well after the
"Hiring Freeze". What happened to accountability or is it just the
" right word " for these times. We are STILL in the dark ages!!
Good luck to all of those affected, that includes me and DEC.
Franc.
|