T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1210.1 | | DUGGAN::MAHONEY | | Mon Oct 01 1990 12:07 | 9 |
| Contract personnel who work for Digital do so on temporary basis, they
are employeed by employment companies and I heard that those companies
were duly notified that Digital would need their employees after last
friday, in my own opinion, Digital has done the right thing by those
employees... I know of a few who had been taken to lunch, who were
given many nice gifts and mememtos by fellow workers, and well, I trust
Digital and its employees. I am sure they did well.
Ana
|
1210.2 | R.I.F.S.O.P. | WMOIS::A_STYVES | | Mon Oct 01 1990 13:01 | 6 |
| Jon, I too have a acquaintance that was affected by this R.I.F. and
they were indeed given only a few minutes notice. I guess in these
days of big business and economic hard times this is going to become
standard procedure, alas!
Art
|
1210.3 | Not So Bad....just wait | COOKIE::LENNARD | | Mon Oct 01 1990 13:08 | 13 |
|
I believe we are talking about contractors here...and not temps. It
shouldn't have come as a surprise to anyone as Jack Smith mandated a
20% cut about a week before in his "I Want...." memo.
Sunmmary departures are a way of life for Contractors. I used to
manage an organization in MKO that had from 15-20 contractors on board
at any given time. Notifications on a Friday not to come in next week
were very common.
In general, contractors know the rules of the game....and I've had many
tell me that they prefer to work like this. No tears please!
|
1210.4 | Its part of contracting | DUGGAN::GREEN | | Mon Oct 01 1990 13:17 | 19 |
|
I was a contractor for seven years at Digital and other places.
This is part of the game when you are a contractor and if
you aren't prepared for it, you shouldn't be contracting.
I never personally faced a fifteen minute notice
but it was in fact, in every contract I signed.
I did get notice once on Tuesday that Friday would be my last
day at Honeywell, (along with three other contractors)
but it was something I was prepared for.
In fact, some of the justification for higher contract hourly
rates is a premium for just this type of risk. The fact that
the risk actually came to be is too bad, but its in the
nature of contracting.
Incidentally, I don't think this effected technical contractors
did it?
|
1210.5 | Short notice VERY common | TRCC2::BOWERS | Dave Bowers @WHO | Mon Oct 01 1990 13:50 | 6 |
| AS an EIS consultant, I've had this happen to me more than once. The shortest
notice weas being told at 11:30 AM that my services wouldn't be required
after lunch, since the system component I was working on had just passed
its acceptance test.
-dave
|
1210.6 | | CGVAX2::CONNELL | Reality, an overrated concept. | Mon Oct 01 1990 14:42 | 14 |
| Short notice is indeed common. I started at NQO as a temp order picker
on 3rd shift. After 2 weeks we were told that after 7 we would not be
needed and to not come back that night. The only reason I was shocked
was that my agency had told me that afternoon that my contract had been
extended and was now "open-ended". I guess the end was closed sooner
then they or I thought. I was called back within a month and hired
during the great hiring spree of 1984. So alls well that ends. At least
so far. BTW we were told at 3:00 in the morning and some people walked
out at that point. They were never called back. I know of one person in
my building who did this same thing last Friday. I belive our people
were given notice at lunch time. Sad, but the way of the world these
days.
Phil
|
1210.7 | | TIGEMS::ARNOLD | Cote d'Merrimacque | Mon Oct 01 1990 16:18 | 19 |
| "The way of the world", "that's the way it goes", etc, maybe my values
are too old-fashioned. In this particular case, the temp was NOT via
an outside agency, but a "DEC temp". She had just gotten word last
week that her contract had been signed thru March 1991. Then Friday
afternoon (less than 4 hours before the end of the day), she was told
about this thing. Granted, her manager really agonized over it, but
the end result was still the same.
In order for people affected like this to be able to plan for their own
futures and the future of their families that just might be depending
on that income, I still tend to think that Digital could have given
them more than a few hours notice, if not from a legal/personnel
standpoint, then at least from a viewpoint of moral decency and human
respect.
Sorry, I reserve the right to disagree with what appears to be the
majority opinion here so far...
Jon
|
1210.8 | View from a former temp | DOCTP::WESSELS | Show me the way to go home | Mon Oct 01 1990 17:22 | 69 |
| Well, Jon, I agree with you as well. I'll explain why.
It may be true that you take a temporary/contract/whatever job fully
aware of the terms & conditions. That doesn't erase the fact that you
have bills to pay, groceries to buy, etc. Sometimes you do what you
have to.
I came to DEC in September 1987, as a temp from an outside agency. I
did so because I wanted to work here, and it seemed to be "common
knowledge" that just about the only way for non-engineers to get in was
to temp here first, show your stuff, and hopefully impress the right
people. Well, October '87 slowed my career down a bit, but I did
manage to "get in" in July '89. In the intervening two years I worked
for two "Kelly Services" type agencies--whose names I won't mention to
be safe/legal/whatever (NOT Kelly)--and as a DECtemp. The agencies
offered minimal benefits, usually after 6 months or a year's service.
DECtemps gives absolutely no benefits at all (except for stock, which
is not very comforting). Do not blame this on the Temporary Human
Resource Organization--they are a great bunch and they do their
best (that's where I worked for a year). The policy on this comes from
the VP level.
What this means is that the temp can look forward to short paychecks in
holiday weeks, particularly this December. Holidays become a mixed
blessing at best. And if you're sick? Oh well, "that's the way it
goes," right? I went two years without health insurance; I was darn
lucky nothing happened to me. If you want to take a vacation, of
course you don't get paid for it. But you do get time off. Once a
year DECtemps must be terminated, so that everything is legal. You may
not work at Digital in any way until a month after that termination.
All of this is legal, straightforward, whatever. You sign an agreement
as a DECtemp stating that you understand that this is the way it's
going to be. There is no coercion, deception, etc. (I want to
make it clear that I'm not accusing DEC of anything legally wrong).
But it just amazes me that a corporation such as Digital,
which is known for it's fairness beyond the minimum legal standards
with its employees, operates what is effectively its secretarial pool
in this manner. And so in answer to the question of "how does Digital
treat its temporary employees," I would answer "not very well."
Although it's not clear from the base note and its replies so far, it
is very possible that DEC will move to get rid of many DECtemps soon,
considering other events. I hope not. My wife still is one. If DEC
does, the DECtemps will not get a "financial bridge," or anything else.
One last thing. Please don't call them "TAGS." There is no such thing
as a "TAG" at Digital. That term originated from an acronym of
"temporary assistance girl," (later "group"), and is outdated, sexist,
and demeaning. It reflects the persistant outlook on temps that they
are idle housewives with nothing better to do, who are happy as
anything to work with no benefits and no security. DECtemps and agency
temps are regular working people trying to gain experience, keep
working, prove themselves in a company, etc. They are not content to
collect unemployment (read: your taxes) while waiting for a resume
blitz to pay off. That is deserving of a little respect.
I'm reaching for <ctrl><Z> with great trepidation, fearing that this
may only make things worse for the temps here, or the folks back at my
old job in Temporary Human Resources. That would be sad. Because I
think it's important for regular employees to know, and for many who
once contracted here to remember, how precarious it is to be a
temporary. You need that job just as badly as the person sitting
next to you, who at least knows he'll get a severance package if he's
let go. To say "that's the way it goes" is just too cold for me.
(<gulp> here I go again)
Brian W.
|
1210.9 | What's the business reason for quick termination? | SMAUG::GARROD | An Englishman's mind works best when it is almost too late | Mon Oct 01 1990 19:11 | 15 |
| Does anybody know the real reason why the temps/contractors were only
given a few hours notice? I would have thought that if they were in the
middle of something then it would cause the organization grief to try
and work out where these temps/contractors had got to. A week's notice
would given them time to clean things up and hand off to a full time
employee. Ie wouldn't it cost the company more giving such short notice
as against giving a week's notice.
As for all those bleeding hearts who say it is unfair on the
temps/contractors I tell you to go find out what their hourly
contracting rates are. They get these high rates precisely because they
have to put up with near instant contract terminations. If they wanted
security they wouldn't be contracting/temping.
Dave
|
1210.10 | | BLUMON::QUODLING | Are we having fun[ding] yet? | Tue Oct 02 1990 09:14 | 14 |
| My ex-secretary was a Temp, about 3-4 months ago, all of the Temps in ZKO
were given a couple of days notice. (This was a couple of 100 people, I was
told.) She started temping again a week later in MKO, and was working in
TTB last week. In the mean time, 20-30 people, including a number of
product managers were left without Secretarial support while we got a
replacement on board.
Temp purges like this do nothing for the costs. Because of the extra work,
we will soon see the "agencies" putting up their prices, fer sure. They
disrupt organizations, cutting our profitability, which is what it is all
about, not headcount...
q
|
1210.11 | DEC vs. agency temps? | BPOV06::MUMFORD | | Tue Oct 02 1990 11:04 | 10 |
| Could someone please explain the difference between a DEC temp and an
agency temp? In my experience, all temps are hired through, and work
for, outside agencies, under the umbrella of the agency contract. I
also believe that the agency contract is "at will", or terminable at
any time with little or no notice.
If these are the rules, and you know the rules when you go a-temping,
why all the hue and cry when provisions of the contract are invoked?
If the contracts are unfair, the temps have a beef with the agencies,
not DEC, IMHO.
|
1210.12 | Not a "bleeding heart"! | CARTUN::DWESSELS | of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most | Tue Oct 02 1990 11:24 | 27 |
| Just to add a few more facts to the picture, I too got my foot in the door
at DEC via the (outside) temp route in a Lead Operator position at
$8.00/hour - altho' that's more than MacDonald's pays, it's not the "big
bucks" we tend to assume all Temps/Contractors/Consultants are making in
exchange for taking the risks. I believe, correct me if I'm wrong,
that this is the range of pay that most of our DECtemps, who are
primarily in secretarial, operations, or other entry-level jobs, receive?
As that was my total household income, it was indeed a precarious route
that fortunately paid off by giving me enough in-house experience to land
a (much more lucrative) consultant position that turned permanent in May
of '87. Altho' I took a substantial drop in pay to come on board, in
October, I was *very* happy to be employed by a company that "didn't do
layoffs" and has an excellent benefits package.
BTW, when I gave DEC a weeks' notice (none was required by my agency)
that I was leaving my *temp* job as a Lead Operator to take a
consultant position, I got heat from my supervisor for not giving a month!
I've rambled a bit, but my point is that Temps are people too, and
especially considering today's economic climate, are certainly
deserving of our compassion and consideration. I hope our DECtemps who
keep coming back for assignment after assignment in hopes of "getting in
the door" are not summarily dismissed as were the Temps referenced in
the base note.
dlw
|
1210.13 | | TOPDOC::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Tue Oct 02 1990 12:27 | 15 |
| RE: .8
> What this means is that the temp can look forward to short paychecks in
> holiday weeks, particularly this December.
In another company, where I worked as a contractor, several contractors
from another agency were going to be denied holiday pay for Christmas
and New Years because they would not be working the full day before and
the full day after each holiday. They couldn't because the plant was
going to be shut down for the week. The agency was just trying to make
an extra buck off their "temps". Our boss contacted the agency and
said that if they weren't paid for the holidays (as were all the other
contractors from other agencies) they would all be let go and rehired
through another agency. They got the pay.
|
1210.14 | | WJOUSM::PAPPALARDO | | Tue Oct 02 1990 13:45 | 24 |
|
You're all forgetting something here, it's called Digital Equipment
Corporation.
Ken Olson, Jack Smith and their staffs all must do what they think is
right to save DEC from further havoc.
They must take the proper steps at exactly the right time. They must
call the shot as they see it at this time in DEC history. 5 years from
now if their asked: Would you have done (whatever their going to do)
again? They would probably answer"YES" Because, weather it was, or
was'nt the right thing to do, it was the right thing to do at the
present time, and the main objective was (IS) to save Digital and
nothing, no nothing is more important than the survival of the
Corporation. That's how I would and feel they are thinking at this
time. I don't envy their jobs when it comes to cutting people. As any
manager can state..When it's a people issue it's very difficult to deal
with. Especialy when you really have feeling for your people.
BTW: All bet's are off! meaning..Anything can happen today..ANYTHING!
No one asked, Just my opinion.
Rick
|
1210.15 | Don't be sorry for us! | AKOV06::GAMA | | Tue Oct 02 1990 14:19 | 34 |
| As a contractor at DEC I don't ask anyone to feel sorry for me if
my supervisor tells me I have to go. That's the nature of the business.
If you don't stand the heat just get out of the kitchen.
If I happen to leave a contract before it's end I like to make the
things easy to the company (you should read the supervisor), because
this way I know I can have a good reference (and references are
everything in 99% of the contracts) even though legaly I could just
walk out.
A company is in their right to cancel a contract with a few hours
notice. The contractor is in his/her right not to work for that company
again or to build into his/her rate the added risk or just to accept it
as the nature of the business.
On the other hand a person that does contracting without having the
equivalent of 6 month worth of bills in the bank, or is crazy or has been
too lucky. Every contractor should expect to be out of work an average
of 3 month a year (call it vacation if you wish).
But don't forget we also get unemployment benefits.
So please don't be sorry for the contractors in general. I'm a
contractor because I want to. I know the risks. I enjoy the benefits
of having an above average salary. Be sorry for those that spend it
all. But that's being human and I'm sure a lot of Decies fall into the
same category.
DEC management is doing their best to make DEC a profitable company
again. Times are tough, but I see the light at the end of the tunel
(where did I heard this one?). At the end we all win!
RPG
|
1210.16 | Clarifying terms | DOCTP::WESSELS | Show me the way to go home | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:53 | 20 |
| Re .11, etc:
Just to clarify--
A DECtemp is a Digital Employee, through and through. DECtemps carry a
Digital badge, they get a blue paystub from Payroll every week, they
are on the Employee Master File. But they do not get ANY benefits
besides stock. And if you want to hire them, the company calls them
"external." Like an agency temp, they may be let go without notice or
compensation.
BTW, there seems to be a blurring of terms here. "Contractor" sounds
like it's being variously used for what is often called a
"consultant"--usually brought in on a P.O., often highly paid; and for
an "agency temp" (my term) or "contract temp," someone who comes in on
a Personnel req from a "Kelly" type agency, at regular market rates for
their job, which is usually support/secretarial. Not something you can
bank a three month financial cushion doing.
Brian W.
|
1210.17 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | leslie%[email protected] | Tue Oct 02 1990 17:35 | 8 |
| re: .15 We should treat others as we would wish to be treated. Courtesy
toward all employees, including temporary employees, is no bad thing.
You shouldn't throw out the Digital way, even in these times, "Anything
may happen" is unacceptable.
/andy/
|
1210.18 | | SMEGIT::ARNOLD | Cote d'Merrimacque | Tue Oct 02 1990 20:24 | 35 |
| The person referenced in the base note is (was) a "DEC temp". True,
they get no benefits if you define benefits as meaning health, life,
etc, but they *do* get the Christmas turkey, Canobie tickets, etc. And
no, they do *not* get paid if they are sick, take vacation, and do not
get paid for national holidays. And not meaning to start a rathole,
but I understand that while DEC temps are eligible for unemployment
checks during their mandatory 6 weeks off/year, it takes almost 6 weeks
for those benefits to start rolling in after you've applied, so what's
the point, if you're going to be coming back? (Of course, "coming
back" is not a given, but it was a verbal commitment -- what are those
worth these days?)
I agree that in these economic times for Digital, the top brass need to
make decisions that aren't always going to be popular. But I think
Andy said it best in .17; ie, we (Digital) should treat others as we
would wish to be treated, extending courtesy to ALL employees,
regardless of whether they are real employees or temps.
If a temp has a contract/req that has been signed by the appropriate
level of management and that temp starts working that position, what do
you suppose management's reaction would be if the temp decided, on a
few hours notice, that this was his/her last day? You BET they'd be
steamed. Yea, the temp employee has the "legal right" to do just that,
and I think all would agree that that temp was "bad" for giving less
than adequate notice, might even be black-balled from further temp
positions at Digital. But put the shoe on the other foot, and now it's
supposed to be ok because of current economic conditions?? I think a
week or two of notice would hardly be asking too much. As it was, most
of these temps barely had time (or had no time) to train remaining
people on how to do their jobs! As Peter said, I think the work
disruption far outweighs any minor financial advantage that Digital may
have gained by getting rid of these people.
imho,
Jon
|
1210.19 | | BLUMON::QUODLING | Are we having fun[ding] yet? | Wed Oct 03 1990 08:55 | 9 |
| re .14
I think you are forgetting, that in most cases, the "silly" things that end
up happening as a result of "executive directives" in this organization,
are more often then not, mid-level managements' mis-interpretation of said
directives.
q
|
1210.20 | It must be catching | TLE::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Wed Oct 03 1990 11:09 | 3 |
| I received mail from a contractor at AT&T/Middletown NJ yesterday. At 4:40 he
(and other contractors) were told that Friday would be his last day of work.
/AHM
|
1210.21 | fact of temp life | CURIE::HAROUTIAN | | Thu Oct 04 1990 12:54 | 17 |
| My department lost two temps last week, both with a few days notice.
As a group we did lunch, cards, etc.
I've worked as a temp myself, both at Digital and at other companies.
It's been my experience that Digital, or at least the department I've
worked in, treats its temps well- by which I mean, they are included in
all the functioning of the department, attending meetings and
social-type functions, remembered on birthdays and special occasions,
etc.
Unfortunately, it's a fact of temp life that temps are not really
"owed" anything by the companies at which they are placed. I've
personally gotten 20 minutes notice, and no notice (i.e. a phone call
at home at 6:00 PM saying don't come in tomorrow), even though I've
always gotten excellent performance reports.
Lynn
|
1210.22 | the peril of blanket decisions... | DENVER::DAVISGB | Thunder 'n Litnin.... | Mon Oct 08 1990 13:25 | 14 |
| An acquaintance of mine who was recently a temp became frustrated in
her efforts to get hired full time, especially considering the current
DEConomic climate...
She went to a software house nearby with all her proposal development
talents and was hired on the spot. She now has a full time position,
matched 401K, health benefits, covered parking, an office with a door,
and makes a coup-thou more than she made as a temp with no benefits.
And where is she applying all of here talents? Helping them write
software consulting systems that are delivered on AS400's.
Gil
|
1210.23 | in Mass., anyway | LEDS::GRINCH::KALIN | I'll take New England any day... | Wed Oct 10 1990 15:04 | 15 |
| Re: 15
Try paying rent, electric, or insurance on employment
compensation.
Re: 17 Thank you. Let me reiterate:
CONSULTANTS who independently negotiate for fees/service
make big $$$.
TEMPS/CONTRACT employees work for a company which
negotiates for big $$$ (for themselves),
leaving the workers making about 5-10%
more than a permanent position pays for
the same job.
dk
|