T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1209.1 | | HEFTY::CHARBONND | scorn to trade my place | Mon Oct 01 1990 11:16 | 1 |
| no review of management by subordinates
|
1209.2 | TABOO | SKIWVA::MCGUFFIN | | Mon Oct 01 1990 11:49 | 2 |
|
NO DRUG ABUSE TOLERATED.
|
1209.3 | | ESCROW::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Mon Oct 01 1990 12:39 | 18 |
|
C'mon people, all that stuff has _always_ been blacklisted. Lets's get
some current, trendy taboos that we can look back on with amusement
5 years from now...
no bottled water
no Wall Street Journal
no business class international flights
no single-sided, one-up copies
no stovepipes
no porches
|
1209.4 | | COOKIE::LENNARD | | Mon Oct 01 1990 13:13 | 9 |
|
.....no serious attempt to deal with a bloated management structure.
.....no willingness to admit we may have STB on the 9000.
.....BTW we do have a form of commission system for the Sales Force.
I believe they can get up to 18K a year in bonus'.
.....No broad-based profit sharing or stock distribution plans.
|
1209.5 | | KEYS::MOELLER | DEC-rewarding successful risk takers | Mon Oct 01 1990 15:34 | 3 |
| .. no real 'satisfaction surveys', instead we Dial For Tens
karl
|
1209.6 | A new acronym? | RTL::HOBDAY | Distribution and Concurrency go hand-in-hand | Mon Oct 01 1990 23:44 | 3 |
| OK, I give "what does STB on the 9000 mean"
-Ken
|
1209.7 | | CHESS::KAIKOW | | Tue Oct 02 1990 07:48 | 5 |
| re: 1209.3
> no porches
Make that Porsches
|
1209.8 | A meta-scatalogical remark | TLE::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Tue Oct 02 1990 10:34 | 4 |
| > OK, I give "what does STB on the 9000 mean"
Trust me, you don't want him to fully expand the acronym here.
/AHM
|
1209.9 | | JUMBLY::DAY | No Good Deed Goes Unpunished | Tue Oct 02 1990 11:59 | 6 |
| Re porches/porsches. Pity about the explanation. I was just enjoying
the idea of an olde worlde porch, covered in honeysuckle, tastefully
covering the consol on the 9000. Shame.
Mike Day
|
1209.10 | | ESCROW::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Tue Oct 02 1990 12:25 | 10 |
|
Not "Porsches". I really meant "porches".
A while back we heard a lot of flap about stovepipes. Now there's a
new memo floating about, complaining about engineering groups having
porches. It seems that all the people who are supposed to be
developing the products we sell, are really goofing off with home
improvement projects. (Either that, or creating buzzwords for business
inefficiencies.)
|
1209.11 | RE: "STB": OK Alan, we've got "S" figured out, ... | YUPPIE::COLE | A CPU cycle is a terrible thing to waste | Tue Oct 02 1990 13:11 | 6 |
| ... so what's "TB"??? "FB" I could see as "For Brains"! :>) This is
a new TLA for those of us distanced from Engineering, obviously.
Oh, to add to the taboos:
No plants not nourished by mother earth itself!
|
1209.12 | | WJOUSM::PAPPALARDO | | Tue Oct 02 1990 13:19 | 10 |
|
No "Good" sales forecasts to manufacturing on hardware demand. The mix
is off.
Though there's a corporate goal of "ROI", There's no goal to win
market-share.
Rick
|
1209.13 | TB = the bed, I would guess... | CVMS::DOTEN | Right theory, wrong universe. | Tue Oct 02 1990 13:40 | 3 |
| But why have we STB with the 9000? Please say it ain't so...
-Glenn-
|
1209.14 | Another NO_NO | CSOMKT::MCMAHON | Carolyn McMahon | Tue Oct 02 1990 13:41 | 6 |
| No mileage reimbursement on less than 50 miles a shot.
(Whose idea was it to spread the "Home office" all over tarnation
anyway! Wasn't part of our agreement to scurry all around the
countryside that we'd at least be reimbursed for the cost of it - ALL
the cost for ALL the miles the tax laws would allow, anyway?)
|
1209.15 | STF | WLDWST::BURT | | Tue Oct 02 1990 21:04 | 2 |
| BTW, STB=Sunk_The_Boat, IMO. (but not w/ the 9000)
|
1209.16 | | BOLT::MINOW | Cheap, fast, good; choose two | Wed Oct 03 1990 12:53 | 5 |
| No writing operating systems in other than assembly languages.
Software not invented here is a toy.
Martin.
|
1209.17 | | COOKIE::LENNARD | | Wed Oct 03 1990 13:53 | 10 |
| Sorry about the "STB". Guess most of you have figured it out by now.
I was involved in one aspect of planning for the 9000, and was uncom-
fortable from Day One with the super optimistic forecasts. But, even
then, it wasn't so much the forecasts that bothered me, as our
publically placing such heavy reliance on the 9000 to turn things
around financially for the Corporation. I swear we'll never learn.
We could not have understood the market or the competition and been
so optimistic.
|
1209.18 | we don't do the low-end | XANADU::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (381-0899 ZKO3-2/T63) | Wed Oct 03 1990 16:18 | 16 |
| re Note 1209.17 by COOKIE::LENNARD:
> then, it wasn't so much the forecasts that bothered me, as our
> publicly placing such heavy reliance on the 9000 to turn things
> around financially for the Corporation. I swear we'll never learn.
We are pushed towards heavy reliance on the 9000 by another
set of our taboos: we can't make money in the low end, we
can't sell something for under $500, we can't sell products
through retail, we can't advertise to the general public, we
can't sell applications ....
Hey, after all that, what's left but the really big systems
and networks?
Bob
|
1209.19 | | PSW::WINALSKI | Careful with that VAX, Eugene | Wed Oct 03 1990 19:43 | 14 |
| RE: .16
>No writing operating systems in other than assembly languages.
This one is a couple of years old. The error of that way has been seen and
the taboo is gone.
>Software not invented here is a toy.
On the VMS side of the house. In OSG, the converse taboo exists: nothing we
build ourselves can possibly be any good or succeed in the marketplace.
--PSW
|
1209.20 | Can't see the forest for the trees... | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Oct 03 1990 21:42 | 13 |
| Re: .18
> Hey, after all that, what's left but the really big systems
> and networks?
Software. After all, that's where we're making money nowadays.
But don't write off the 9000 so soon. Given the activity I've seen
on it from customers, it will be a serious contributor.
Steve
|
1209.21 | Porches, none wanted | CYPRES::WILLIAMS_SC | | Wed Nov 14 1990 11:40 | 4 |
| Re: Porches
This may refer to the Jack Smith speech about tearing down his porch,
painful to do but necessary.
|
1209.22 | comments on taboo's | JAWS::FARRAND | I need an unlisted number. | Wed Nov 21 1990 14:17 | 25 |
| Reply to .1
>no review of management by subordinates
This happens in only two forms of endeavor:
Education-(at the college level) where students have an opportunity
to evaluate the instructor.
Politics- where voters can respond at the polls on a periodic
basis.
There is a third unstructured method- revolution, but that is in
the extreme.
Regarding .3
> no stove pipes.
I just left an organization which has raised stovepiping to an art
form: the stovepipe is absolute, Digital a very different second,
thought for the customer non-existent.
Another taboo- criticism of Digital in the PC market. Any good MBA
would dump this loser.
|