T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1050.1 | Could you expound on this 100-year land-lease ... | JAWJA::JCOLE | Wish? Did somebody say "Wish"? | Fri Mar 16 1990 11:52 | 9 |
| ... thing, because I know I never heard of anything like it. Is it
something that ties up the ground rights, as opposed to the structure? Is there
some NH politics mingled in here?
Whatever, you are in a fix, and your attitude, not to mention history,
is exactly the kind we need out of the folks coming to the field! How far have
you elevated it?
Good luck! We don't need to lose folks like you!
|
1050.2 | | FDCV07::HSCOTT | Lynn Hanley-Scott | Fri Mar 16 1990 12:18 | 9 |
| I'd encourage you to elevate it as high as Dave Grainger -- I'm sure he
has a strong interest in removing stumbling blocks to get folks
(especially those who are willing, and ready to sell) back to the
field.
I'd also suggest you try John Sims, VP Personnel -
best wishes,
|
1050.3 | | STAR::MFOLEY | Jammin with Bill and Ted | Fri Mar 16 1990 23:15 | 8 |
| RE: .0
I agree with .2. The reasoning is crazy and to lose someone
valuable in these hard times for something this stupid is
even more stupid.
Good luck
mike
|
1050.4 | Supply and demand? | MUSKIE::SCOTTG | Greg Scott, Minneapolis SWS | Sat Mar 17 1990 01:47 | 20 |
| I've found over the years that the old-fashioned rules of supply
and demand also often come into play.
If they want you as bad as you want them, everyone with an interest
in this new office will have incentive to find some creative way to
quietly make this situation right.
Before elevating, try and see if there's a way around the bureaucracy.
It is sometimes easier to go around the mountain than climb it. Be
creative. Somebody *wants* that office to open. You want to open that
office. Get that person's support, maybe that person or people can be
creative and find a way to help quietly resolve your situation without
elevating it.
Maybe not. Free advice is worth just what you paid for it.
If you try the quiet, creative approach first, then at least you should
have more support when you raise hell. I hope this turns out right.
- Greg Scott
|
1050.5 | Make lots of noise!! | ASDS::NIXON | Me ... Forweird?? | Sun Mar 18 1990 10:06 | 20 |
| > <<< Note 1050.4 by MUSKIE::SCOTTG "Greg Scott, Minneapolis SWS" >>>
> -< Supply and demand? >-
Greg,
I don't agree at all that Jerry should try and "go around" the
system in this case. I think that it's absolutely rediculous that
relo isn't there for him!! Here's and incredibly talented, proved
sales person who very much wants to get back out into the field and
the company is trying to take advantage of him. That's how I see
it wanyway and I think it's wrong.
We need people like Jerry out in the field. Why should he have
to use a large portion of his savings to move himself? The company
should be doing that without this sort of hassle. And if he's
quiet about things how many others are going to get hit with the
same sort of nonsense? Why would anyone want to go out to the
field if there are going to be issues like this??
Vicki
|
1050.7 | What happend to the right thing to do? | XCUSME::KOSKI | This NOTE's for you | Mon Mar 19 1990 08:53 | 14 |
| Jerry , I can't believe some of the injustice going on with relo!
Here you have every right in the world to expect Digital to pick
up your house on relo and they are trying to stiff you. My roommate
is getting moved to CA lock stock and condo. It ticks me off that
a valued sales person can get the run around and my roomie can
slide in under the CCD veil of relo. As far as I can see, an engineer
should not be eligible for this type of extra help.
This is particularly ironic because DEC will be sitting on this
condo for a good while, it's right down the street from Jerry's.
And I'm looking for a place to live with out benefit of relo.
Gail
|
1050.8 | | MSCSSE::LENNARD | | Mon Mar 19 1990 10:39 | 20 |
| Pardon me people, but I'm having a little problem understanding why
Digital should bail people out of bad investments. I dropped about
9K on the stock market last year, but don't expect KO to help out.
Let's face it, the real estate market in NH and Mass has collapsed,
just as it did in many other areas previously. That ain't Digital's
problem! You still get all the other relo assistance. Why not rent it
out and then rent in your new location until the situation get's better
as it always does.
Because I want to be free to react when opportunity presents itself
(soon I think), I sold my house privately, paid a 16K real estate fee
and moved into a rental. When it somes time to relocate, I won't
expect DEC to reimburse me the 16K. I made a strategic decision and
there was a short term cost associated with it.
I will depart with the comment, (and I absolutely am not targeting .0)
that I fear there are still too many DECies who somehow expect to reap
a windfall associated with relocation. It ain't gonna happen any
more!!
|
1050.9 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Mar 19 1990 16:47 | 24 |
| re .6:
I think you misunderstand. Presumably, Jerry knew when he bought
the condo that the land was leased. In some places (Hawaii?), that's
the way things normally work.
re .7:
Gail, aren't you the one who got the raise? Maybe you could buy it.
re .8:
Jerry's not (yet) complaining about the lousy deal that Digital's
giving him for his condo. They won't even consider buying it
because of some obscure rule.
Speaking of relocation being a free lunch, the new relocation
program *does* give a free lunch for temporary living expenses.
When I relocated, we were paid for our actual living expenses,
which came to a couple of hundred dollars for the few days we
stayed at a hotel while waiting for our household goods.
Under the new program, employees get a flat stipend based on
number of dependents -- you get $3500 plus $1000 for the 1st dependent
and $500 for each additional dependent.
|
1050.10 | | SCCAT::BOUCHARD | Ken Bouchard WRO3-2 | Mon Mar 19 1990 22:05 | 6 |
| This is a perfect example of a problem that could be solved by the
mythical DEC OMBUDSMAN.This position could be filled by one of our
myriad VP's.(I'd love to see it filled by the one who probably made up
that rule)
Ken
|
1050.11 | We talking two different things here! | CURIE::BEELER | Really, this is my first time.. | Mon Mar 19 1990 22:13 | 41 |
| .8>..I'm having a little problem understanding why Digital should bail
.8> people out of bad investments.
I'd have a big problem with Digital bailing people out of bad
investments. It's not the "investment" - I could CARE LESS about losing
some money on the place. I DO CARE a great deal that customers have
been told that an office is going to be opened in their area - that they
have a salesperson of 14 years experience with DEC will be running it -
that a secretary has been hired to help open the office - that a junior
sales person has been hired to help open the office ... and that things
are being "delayed" because of .... well ... you fill in the blanks.
.8> Why not rent it out and then rent in your new location until the
.8> situation get's better as it always does.
I'd sooner go ahead and declare bankruptcy. I can't A-F-F-O-R-D to pay
rent and take the risk of not being able to renting the condo...we're
talking *one* salary increase in FIVE years and two kids in college.
.8> I will depart with the comment, (and I absolutely am not targeting .0)
.8> that I fear there are still too many DECies who somehow expect to reap
.8> a windfall associated with relocation. It ain't gonna happen any
.8> more!!
If I stay with it ... this will be my 4th move with DEC - I have to
make as much as $1 on a relocation - I lost *significantly* on the last
one. I have but one goal in mind and that is to do for this company
what I can do best - SELL, and, I have a track record to prove it.
Opening a remote office requires a different and special "mentality" and
level of experience - I have the "mentality" and experience. Five
years from now I have every intention of saying "Here, DEC, here's $25
million in profitable business and each and every customer is
*satisfied*. That is *all* that I want to do, and, am bogged down in
bureaucratic internal paperwork.
If I can get to the field and sell good profitable business for Digital,
the rest will come naturally ... you may not understand ... I LOVE
selling! That's ALL that I want to do!
^^^
Jerry
|
1050.12 | What's the real problem here?.l | TARKIN::HAYS | Lately it occurs to me ................ Phil Hays BXB02-2/G06 | Tue Mar 20 1990 00:37 | 21 |
| RE:.11 by CURIE::BEELER "Really, this is my first time.."
.8>..I'm having a little problem understanding why Digital should bail
.8> people out of bad investments.
> It's not the "investment" - I could CARE LESS about losing some money on
> the place.
If so, why not sell it? The DEC purchase program will usually give you a
price lower than you can get in 60-90 days on the market.
If you have no equity at the current prices, mail in the keys and sign over
the deed and let the bank worry about it. (Called a "Voluntary deed" or a
"deed in lu of foreclosure"). Check this with a lawyer, as state laws vary
a lot. This is better than bankruptcy or foreclosure for both you and the
bank.
What's the real problem here?
Phil
|
1050.13 | The soft approach | GYPSC::BINGER | Explode an acronym | Tue Mar 20 1990 02:36 | 19 |
| > -< Make lots of noise!! >-
>
>> <<< Note 1050.4 by MUSKIE::SCOTTG "Greg Scott, Minneapolis SWS" >>>
>> -< Supply and demand? >-
>
> Greg,
>
> I don't agree at all that Jerry should try and "go around" the
> system in this case. I think that it's absolutely rediculous that
> relo isn't there for him!!
I have found mountains of red tape disappear as soon as you start
to walk around them. Fighting takes energy. At this moment in time the
opposition has not started fighting. If he walks round them� he could gain
quickly and start selling sooner.
Rgds,
them� the ones who presented the red tape in the first place.
|
1050.14 | Why should what you live in, make a difference? | FSDB00::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Tue Mar 20 1990 10:53 | 13 |
| re: .12
> What's the real problem here?
If Jerry owned a house, Digital/its agent, would make him an offer. He
may not like it, but he would get an offer. If he rented a
house/apartment, I suspect they would buy-out the rest of his lease.
However, he owns some sort of condo and Digital/its agent won't do
anything.
Doesn't sound like 'the right thing' to me.
Bob
|
1050.15 | use the exception process | MAHIMA::TOPPING | | Tue Mar 20 1990 11:30 | 22 |
| re: .0
I hope you are aware that there are provisions in all the relo policies
for "exceptions". These have to be approved at a higher than usual
level, but these provisions are made to order for your situation.
Clearly, your situation is sort of nonstandard, and the purpose of the
exception process is to put the situation in front of someone who can
see the INTENT of the policy. Details on relo exceptions are in any
policy manual.
Your case seems to be so straightforward that I would be very suprised
if you didn't prevail. People like you are really needed in the field.
Follow the exception process and I bet you'll be OK.
Don't assume anyone is intentionally standing in your way. Probably
the person who is saying "no" has not been delegated the authority to
make exceptions - just find someone who is. i really don't think
anyone is your advesery here.
Good luck and good selling!
GT
|
1050.16 | Significant financial risk? | CURIE::BEELER | Really, this is my first time.. | Tue Mar 20 1990 13:06 | 23 |
| I have too much equity to simply walk away from it, or, believe me, I'd
do it in a second.
The "lease" that we're talking about, the reason that DEC won't offer
me ANYTHING...
$42 /month
and, it's solid until the year 3020 ...
The home purchase program is more for convienence than anything else,
just like the trade-in program on some of of our hardware - it's a
convienence to the customer - makes it easier to do business with DEC.
Am I to interpret this $42/month is much too significant a risk to
take? I wonder if the sale of one 9000 may just cover that?
The whole thing is depressing...
:-(
Jerry
|
1050.17 | | FDCV07::HSCOTT | Lynn Hanley-Scott | Tue Mar 20 1990 13:38 | 13 |
| You write a good case on .0, and you've clearly spent some effort here
in DIGITAL with the discussion. I'm curious to know if you've also
started working the exception process mentioned back a few replies?
And/or elevating this thrugh Grainger, Colatosti and/or others who have
a real stake in COD and its efforts to get folks out to the field?
I repeat what I said earlier -- the fact that you've sold before,
you're willing to relocate, AND that you're opening a new office make
it clear that time is of the essence here -- Use that as an opening
argument and go to it!
Best wishes,
|
1050.18 | Is this the situation? | FSDB00::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Tue Mar 20 1990 16:11 | 9 |
| re: .16
Let me see if I understand. The property on which your condo is built
is leased from someone until the year 3020. Your units share of the
lease expense is $42/month. However, because you only own the building
and not the land, Digital/its agent is unwilling to do the normal
relo-buyout.
Bob
|
1050.19 | empathy | NOVA::NEEDLEMAN | yesterdays technology tomorrow | Tue Mar 20 1990 17:31 | 23 |
| Jerry, you have my empathy. I relocated and HE offered me what appeared
to be fair market value less three months carrying costs. A local real
estate broker "guaranteed" he could get me fair market within 90 days.
Well, I just did not want to get caught with two mortgages so I sold to
HE taking (to me anyway) a significant loss from my purchase price.
90 days later, when the unit was still unsold, I congratulated myself
on cutting my losses. The unit eventually sold after 2 price cuts.
Digital ( I believe) is the big loser on those cuts, not HE.
I agree, go for an exception. If that fails, go for a rental. You can
hire a local management company and cut your losses on a monthly basis.
You can also hold the property this way until someday the market may
come back. Your third choice is look at the economic impact to your
family and make the best personal choice, hard as it may be.
You are in a difficult spot but at least it still has alternatives.
good luck,
Barry
|
1050.20 | Sell a creative solution to the problem | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Mar 20 1990 20:25 | 5 |
| Jerry,
Sounds like you've got a selling job to do.
/john
|
1050.21 | | REORG::MURRAY | Chuck Murray | Wed Mar 21 1990 17:44 | 13 |
| Assuming that .18's interpretation of your situation is correct, it
seems that the only additional risk (i.e., in addition to the risks
if yours was a standard home or condo) to Digital or its agent is
that it would have to make lease payments as long as the property
was unsold.
Maybe you could guarantee that you'd make the $42/month payments
until the unit was sold. Or maybe you could offer to put $500 in
an escrow account to cover lease payments (about a year's worth) if
the unit didn't sell quickly. That might help you get the exception
referred to by some previous noters.
Just some thoughts. BTW, I sympathize with you. Good luck.
|
1050.22 | Anybody got a carrot. | GRANPA::JFARLEY | | Wed Mar 21 1990 21:59 | 7 |
| I would go back to whoever "they "are who want you to open the sales
office and tell them no can do. If "they" really want you there and
the blesssings came from a higher authority then this is nothing to
even consider.You would really be surprized if KO's secretary got
wind of this as bad as the company needs bottom line dollars. If
"they" want you there then "they" can make it happen, if it doesn't
happen-Well Welcome To the DANGLE THE CARROT CLUB..
|
1050.23 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu Mar 22 1990 09:11 | 28 |
| I won't address Digital's obligations in the sales office matter,
but I have some observations on the real estate aspects of the deal....
> Assuming that .18's interpretation of your situation is correct, it
> seems that the only additional risk (i.e., in addition to the risks
> if yours was a standard home or condo) to Digital or its agent is
> that it would have to make lease payments as long as the property
> was unsold.
I would imagine that HE's problem is less with the cost of the lease
than with the fact that the property arrangement is "unusual" for this part
of the country, and that this gives them fear that the property will be
less saleable. The running cost of the lease ought not be a problem.
If they (HE) are in the habit of accepting condos in general, they are
used to paying running commons fees, and would thus be used to a continuing
cash outflow as a carrying charge.
Has anybody ever been denied HE benefits based on an unusual easement
or zoning deficiency? That would be a precedent for their being selective
about properties to take on.
You do mean the lease runs until 2020 or 2030, don't you?
A 1000 year lease sounds odd besides everything else, and a thirty
or forty year lease could possibly mean that a standard mortgage
would exceed the remainder of the lease, which would (in bankers'
theory) cause funding problems for a potential buyer.
- tom]
|
1050.24 | Go Jerry! | SMOOT::ROTH | Somthing has to be done about this! | Sat Mar 24 1990 22:48 | 8 |
| Looks like .0 is another litmus test for the
"less-red-tape-lets-get-the-job-done" Digital.
It will be interesting to see how this turns out and I hope for .0's and
Digital's sake it gets resolved. When the company begins to frustrate
people with this kind of dedication and loyalty we will all lose.
Lee
|
1050.25 | Update of sorts... | CURIE::BEELER | o res mirabilis! | Sun Mar 25 1990 19:43 | 53 |
| .24> "less-red-tape-lets-get-the-job-done" Digital.
I want to make one thing clear. This is the essence of this note. I
don't believe that anyone is "incompetent" or derelict in doing their
job. They are doing what they are told to do. Personally, COD is
one of the best programs that I've seen in my 14 years at DEC - but -
this "red tape" is just about to wear me to a frazzle. Yes, I've seen
worse, and, "this too shall pass", and, I'm doing to do my best to work
within the "channels" available to me, and, God willing, as fast as
humanly possible...before I crater.
I received six different written offers after COD II. I interviewed
all of the locations, and, chose the one which I thought that I could
produce more, fastest, for Digital. Now, of all of my friends that I
know received offers concurrent with mine - they're gone - in the field
and working. This Sales Executive is still trying to get the basic
rudiments of relocation working.
I'm going to cross my fingers and pray that sooner or later this log
jamb will break and I can hit the road selling - and - concurrent with
that, I'm continuing to make contact with the largest customers in the
area of the new office, and, beginning to build the relationships which
are so very valuable to the selling process. Yes, I know that I'm
taking a "risk" of sorts for if this doesn't "happen" there's going to
be some very VERY unhappy customers, and, potential customers.
Yes, my nerves are just about thoroughly shot, and, sleep is getting
hard to come by, and, all of the other attendant problems, but, I love
this company, and, I love selling, and, I'm going to hold on as long as
possible.
With respect to the "real estate" problem. My neighbor, two doors
down, ran into the same identical problem (he's in the same condo
complex and has been here for eight years). According to him, and,
note that this is "second hand", when he talked to someone (I believe
in real estate) it was sort of a "well_this_is_the_first_time_this_has
happened_and_it_was_easier_to_say_no" type of response. Needless to
say, I was devastated.
I'll continue to "keep the faith" as long as possible. That's about
all that I can say.
With respect to earlier notes and Home Equity...HE has no problems with
it, they made it clear that it is DIGITAL's decision and not theirs.
Yes, the "red tape" has GOT to be broken ... I can't help but think how
much "risk" about $20 million in sales, over the next few years, would
cover.
Waiting...drinking coffee...praying...smoking too much...I remain,
Sales Executive in limbo,
Jerry
|
1050.26 | Stress can hurt | RIPPLE::YARBOROUG_HE | | Tue Mar 27 1990 04:05 | 13 |
| Jerry,
I empathize with your situation. And as I have been following
the notesfile, I have the feeling that you are so distraught about
your plight that perhaps you are stressing yourself out.
Nothing is worth your health. You are doing the best that
you can, and in a time like this, I think it is best to just relax.
I have come to the opinion that 'Whatever will be, will be."
As the song goes, "Casera, sera,".
Regards, H
|
1050.27 | mind your language :-) | MARVIN::COCKBURN | SCOTLAND 13, England 7 !!! | Tue Mar 27 1990 06:20 | 8 |
| > <<< Note 1050.26 by RIPPLE::YARBOROUG_HE >>>
> -< Stress can hurt >-
> As the song goes, "Casera, sera,".
Or even 'Que sera sera'
Craig
|
1050.28 | Keep at it... | BLUMON::QUODLING | C - the Sears Language | Wed Mar 28 1990 00:26 | 9 |
| And, of course, if the corporation were full of people happy to
let "whatever will be, will be", then we might as well all pack up
and go home. It is the kind of enthusiasm for selling (or
designing or maintaining etc etc etc) that one sees in the likes
of Jerry, that give us an edge. If jerry were to take the "Que
Sera sera" approach, then he would be happy to stay where he is,
and/or take a $5M sales budget instead of a $50M budget.
q
|
1050.29 | One who has been there... | CARP::LITASI | to the land of Gitchi-Goommie.... | Fri Apr 06 1990 15:06 | 78 |
| I haven't been in this notes file for 6 months, but someone told me
about this note, so here I am.
Jerry, I want to tell you first, to hang in there. I know it's tough
because I went thru the same thing. I was in COD I...one of the guinea
pigs. I relocated from Colo Spgs to Minneapolis. COD created all kinds of
hell for the relo people within Digital...their work load increased
dramatically! The last week on my old job they *finally* got around
to appraising my house...most of the delay was due to getting
signatures in Colorado, Minnesota, Chicago and various offices around
Boston. They couldn't start *anything* until the signatures were
there....delays of 4 or 5 weeks over the approval process for COD II.
So. I was in training at Parker St when I found out (late on a Friday
afternoon) that my house appraised below what any reasonable human
could *ever* expect. (5 acres, indoor swimming pool, jacuuzi, etc)
I had $159K into it and built it over the past 17 years by sweat
equity, so it really had more value than $159... The 3rd party offer
was $112.5. I was insulted, angry, and feeling desparate! I still
had 2 weeks of training left and during breaks I sent mail, made phone
calls, and pursued every lead possible. The COD office had their
phones on the answering maching ALL the time...I was in class and
couldn't be reached directly so I found out who sat across the aisle
and called her...that's the only way I got thru.
My new manager and the district manager did their best by requesting
an exception and trying to following it thru, but of course, they always
got the answering machine. Finally, on one successfull call, I found
out that a VIP relo person was located in the building where my (3rd
week) class was located. I looked up her pole location and stood
around waiting for a chance to talk. She was extremely helpful and
understanding! I felt like someone actually cared...and I found out
that I wasn't alone. I also found out that a new exception policy was
in the works and waiting VP approval. Based on her recommendation,
I cancelled the movers (scheduled the following week), and returned
to Colorado for Christmas.
Things dragged on over Christmas and New Years with folks on vacation.
It was the worst experience of my life, waiting by the phone, no
mail contact, not knowing if I was going to move or stay. Fortunately
the wonderful folks at the Denver ACT gave me a backup opportunity, but
I had committed to MPO and wanted to see the thing thru.
Finally, 6 weeks after the appraisal was revealed, my new mgr said it
looked like the exception was going to be approved...so I flew
back to Minnesota. Two days later I received the approval, then
had to reschedule the move and all the other details that I had
worked out and then cancelled. Talk about lost productivity!
I still lost $20K *real* equity, ie...money actually spent, but now
after 3 months here, I know I made the right decision. I love my
job and the people I work with are super! The field is a different
place, and needs people who can tough it out...I guess this was my
initiation ;^)
Greg said to try to go around the system. The system is Digital...
I say, do whatever works to get to the people who make the decisions.
People are just doing their jobs, and they are doing the best they
can to follow policy. Find the people who make the policy. The people
who want to hire you should be involved. They should know exactly what
you are going thru. It meant alot to me to have my new mgmt in my
corner. It's hard enough to relocate (and I'm just beginning to
understand all that I've been thru these past months), so you don't
need to feel like you are in limbo. It's a tragedy to get left out
in a system that needs you. Don't give up. It will work out in the
end. Do what it takes to take care of yourself. That means exercise
to release some of the stress. Cut down on food, liquor and smoking.
Get in touch with your feelings so they don't give you ulcers. Try
to stay busy - I know it's hard to do, you don't think of anything
else but this problem.
Sorry if I've rambled on too long...I really tried to simplify and
summarize what happened. Writing this brought back some of the pain,
yet I'm still a devoted Deccie and somehow I knew Digital would do the
right thing.
Sherry
|
1050.30 | Maybe we don't need sales that badly? | ABACUS::BEELER | You do your worst, I'll do my best | Mon Apr 16 1990 00:11 | 37 |
| Well, I'm going to take Sherry's advice and do my best to hang in
there. I've got to get to my new location and start selling so I found
a house that I can get into and all I need to do is drain my life's
savings, which I've done. I've put my place on the market and will be
making payments both in New Hampshire and California, I'm going to
sell my car and get out from under those payments (take the fleet plan
car) and I've sold some furniture that I can really do without. I only
wish I were a religious person, 'cause I could use some good prayer
about now...
....so....any spare food y'all have around...send mail and I'll tell
you where to send it!!
Am I *really* doing this? God...I guess I really do love selling...
I talked to someone in 'real estate' and tried to get an explanation
as to why property that was FHA approved, HUD backed, financed by mortgage
companies .... was such a significant risk for Digital...on that subject,
I think that I have given up....I don't really know...it's so very de-
pressing that I don't think that I can continue to pursue that avenue.
Yeah, I sure wish I had the guts to write Grainger...the customers out
there were told that a Sales Executive with 14 years of experience in
selling would be there in early March (which I should have been) and
they are not exactly "happy"....I had the occasion to make *one* sales
call and managed to stop a Novel network from going in...One customer
told me that it took him *weeks* to find someone to give him a DECmove
quote...and the national account manager told me that this guy wants
to buy a 6200 system....that alone might, just might, cover the "risk"
that real estate says they're taking with my property.
WHEN are we going to find a way to cut through this blessed red tape
and get to the business of satisfying our customers FIRST ... all for a
$52/month issue....depressing....genuinely...
\Jerry/
|