Title: | The Digital way of working |
Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 5321 |
Total number of notes: | 139771 |
I received a mail message containing the following. It certainly gives a new meaning to the term RESTRICTED DISTRIBUTION. Interestingly it was initially sent to the distribution list MEMPMC. One would have thought that the top personnel people in the company would understand the term RESTRICTED DISTRIBUTION. I have removed all content from the message so only peoplw who received this message will recognise it. It was addressing a very sensitive matter. Dave From: xxx To: @ALL CC: xxx Subj: ***URGENT NOTICE THAT NEEDS TO BE COMMUNICATED TO YOUR PEOPLE*** ******************************URGENT**************************************** Please communicate throughout your organizations. If you have any questions, please contact xxx yyy at DTN:nnn-nnnn or DTN:nnn-nnnn. DIGITAL RESTRICTED DISTRIBUTION JANUARY 28, 1990 DO NOT COPY [text deleted]
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1019.1 | delete after reading | MPGS::MCCLURE | Why Me??? | Fri Feb 02 1990 08:15 | 2 |
Looks like an IMF directive. You can tell(paraphrse) this to your team, but destroy the message after reading it. For Eyes Only! | |||||
1019.2 | mislabelled | BOMBE::JEFFERY | Tue Feb 06 1990 17:36 | 4 | |
It's a misuse of the label. The sender should be notified. I do not believe "Restricted Distribution" information can be sent electronically. | |||||
1019.3 | Restrictions | JGO::EVANS | Mon Feb 12 1990 09:12 | 12 | |
re .2 translating my super 'dutch' security guide ..... It is NOT recommended to use electronic transmision unless transmission and storage are specially protected by encryption or other ways. If electronic transmission is absolutely necessary consider making a print out on receipt and then totally destroy the electronic copy. je |