Title: | The Digital way of working |
Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 5321 |
Total number of notes: | 139771 |
HELP! We are producing a proposal, putting the final touches to it tonight, and have just realised that our Digital figures [profit, turnover, no. of employees etc] are for 1988. Can anyone point us in the right direction to get the 1989 figures NOW, and if that includes UK figures, all the better. Many thanks, Kate Risdon
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
950.1 | this may be too obvious | CIMNET::WILKES | Thu Oct 05 1989 18:22 | 2 | |
Why don't you look in the 1989 Annual Report which was distributed a week or two ago. | |||||
950.2 | WELSWS::RISDON | A wild one | Thu Oct 05 1989 18:30 | 3 | |
If only it had reached the UK! Nice thought, though. Kate | |||||
950.3 | Figures from the 1989 Annual Report | VAXRT::BRIDGEWATER | Thu Oct 05 1989 19:03 | 27 | |
From the 1989 Annual Report: 1988 1989 ---- ---- Total operating revenues $11,475,446,000 $12,741,956,000 Net income (after taxes) $1,305,633,000 $1,072,610,000 Net income per share $9.90 $8.45 Total stockholders' equity $7,510,374,000 $8,035,673,000 Number of stockholders 103,162 99,084 Stockholders' equity per share $59.47 $66.12 Return on equity 18.9% 13.8% Return on assets 14.1% 10.3% Number of employees at year-end 121,500 125,800 I couldn't find a number for employee turnover. There are many financial figures in the annual report, but I don't know which ones you want and I'd rather not type them all in. There are some figures on International Operations in the annual report but there are no figures for the UK. A couple of figures for Europe are shown in it, but I think they are a bit difficult to interpret without presenting them in context. - Don | |||||
950.4 | WELSWS::RISDON | A wild one | Thu Oct 05 1989 19:09 | 9 | |
Many many thanks, Don. Those figures are just what we need. What a terrific response! Thanks again, Kate |