T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
884.1 | | HYDRA::ECKERT | Jerry Eckert | Fri Aug 04 1989 14:29 | 4 |
| It *used to be* free.
I sent back their invoice marked "CANCEL" and noted that I get the same
information from Digital Review for free.
|
884.2 | 'only' $38.00.. what a deal | SALSA::MOELLER | Mean, with a large deviation | Fri Aug 04 1989 14:41 | 5 |
| Just got the letter 10 minutes ago.
Went right in file 13.
karl
|
884.3 | Just an idea | CHIRPA::SWONGER | Remember our Korean War Veterans | Fri Aug 04 1989 15:38 | 6 |
|
If it's a business return mail form, you might want to
return it with the statement "CANCEL - DIGITAL REVIEWE IS
FREE" on it.
Roy
|
884.4 | Digital News ---> Digital-Less News | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Fri Aug 04 1989 17:25 | 10 |
| I received the same letter yesterday. Guess they don't want Digital
folks on their mailing list. Maybe 3rd party advertisers don't
want to pay premium prices for high-circulation ads, when many of
the readers are Digital employees (and, therefore, are less likely
to buy non-DEC equipment).
Regardless, I guess Digital News is off my reading list. I wonder
if Digital Review will follow suit?
-- Russ
|
884.5 | PAY! Never. | JACOB::FAZIO | | Fri Aug 04 1989 20:39 | 7 |
| What really bothered me were the 3 requests to fill out their
subscription renewal form (to extend the 'free' subscription) then
finding out they actually want to bill me for it. I was led to believe
the free subscription would continue. Anyway I tossed the bill into
the dead zone....
|
884.6 | | ULTRA::PRIBORSKY | All things considered, I'd rather be rafting. | Fri Aug 04 1989 20:42 | 3 |
| The last time I got one of these "your subscription isn't free any
more but you're welcome to become a paying customer" notices, the rag
went under in about three months.
|
884.7 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Aug 04 1989 21:11 | 9 |
| I also got one of these, and returned it with "Cancel". But in a sense I
understand. Digital employees are hardly the audience their advertisers
are trying to woo. But I'm also surprised because ad revenues are tied
to circulation, and this is surely a circulation-cutting mechanism if I
ever saw one.
But then I wouldn't be surprised if Digital Review did the same thing.
Steve
|
884.8 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Sat Aug 05 1989 12:14 | 12 |
| >I also got one of these, and returned it with "Cancel". But in a sense I
>understand. Digital employees are hardly the audience their advertisers
>are trying to woo.
You've hit the nail on the head.
>But I'm also surprised because ad revenues are tied to circulation, and this
>is surely a circulation-cutting mechanism if I ever saw one.
They're tied to "qualified" circulation. The advertisers won't count the part
of the circulation which is DEC employees, so a loss of DEC employees won't
hurt ad revenues.
|
884.9 | It's not black and white | STAR::ROBERT | | Sat Aug 05 1989 16:50 | 19 |
| Some of the advertisers would like to reach us --- potential buyouts,
potential CSOs, and products that sales references to solve customer
problems where Digital does not have an acceptable solution.
Additionally, some of these products are purchased by DEC for
internal use.
"Qualification" is the key word --- how many advertisers want to
reach DEC and what share of the overall subscription list to they
want DEC versus non-DEC to be?
I suspect DN and DR also want to reach DEC since that assists them
in obtaining both interviews and rumours.
Perhaps they are just trying to prune the list a bit. We'd have
to have all the demographics plus the advertisers desired distribution
of those demographics to know.
- greg
|
884.10 | DR 250$/year here | EBLA03::CIPOLLA | | Sun Aug 06 1989 15:08 | 3 |
| oh, fyi, DR here is 250$/year and we are willing to pay for it..
Bruno Cipolla swas Rome, Italy
|
884.11 | It's just another rag... | LESLIE::LESLIE | Y'see, my life doesn't understand me... | Sun Aug 06 1989 16:46 | 3 |
| Why?
- ���
|
884.12 | Wait-not so hasty... | SX4GTO::BERNARD | Dave from Cleveland | Tue Aug 08 1989 11:55 | 15 |
|
Before you throw out the subscription solicitations...
Write on it that you're in software services, and you depend heavily
on the ads and product reviews to help you determine what products
your customer might need, that DEC doesn't itself market. Then tell
them that you'll miss the information available in their mag, and so
will your customers.
Seal the envelope and mail it back. At worst, they'll have to pay
the postage on it. At best, they'll be inundated by a lot of such
comments, and reconsider their move. Maybe they'll make it available
free again to DEC people. If they do, as soon as it arrives in your
mailbox, throw it away. (Heh-heh-heh).
|
884.13 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Tue Aug 08 1989 13:47 | 17 |
| A lot of the 'trade rags' have two sets of subscribers, free and paid.
Most, if not all, have some accommodation for paying subscribers,
and they probably get a few libraries and foreign subscribers at pay rates.
I've had free subscriptions for a couple of years and been asked to switch
over, but I always toss 'em. Computer Graphics World, Computer Graphics
Today, and Electronic News have all graced me with free subscriptions
for what are normally not free. Electronic News is the only one
who wouldn't keep me for free.
Some magazines have self-imposed quotas on all distribution.
There used to be a limit and a waiting list for free subscriptions
to Datamation.
Digital News solicited me at my home address, so that's where
I have it delivered, still free.
- tom]
|
884.14 | | NCPROG::KERNS | Fast - maybe, Good - maybe, Cheap - never! | Thu Aug 10 1989 00:10 | 6 |
| If Digital News is doing it, is DEC Professional far behind? I do believe
the people who own Digital News also owns DEC Professional.
Personally, I think DEC Professional is a much better magazine.
Steve
|
884.15 | Better check it out | VINO::MCGLINCHEY | Sancho! My Armor! My TECO Macros! | Thu Aug 10 1989 12:07 | 9 |
|
>> I do believe
>> the people who own Digital News also owns DEC Professional.
Not true. Check the mastheads of each - they're entirely different.
-- Glinch (who once wrote a regular column in The DEC Professional)
|
884.16 | | MPO::GILBERT | The Wild Rover - MAXCIM Program Office | Thu Aug 10 1989 12:08 | 6 |
| Digital News is an International Data Group publication (Infoworld,
ComputerWorld, PCworld, etc).
DEC Professional is a Professional Press publication.
No relation.
|
884.17 | where to send protests | MPO::GILBERT | The Wild Rover - MAXCIM Program Office | Thu Aug 10 1989 12:16 | 9 |
| FWIW - If you're truly interested in protesting their action IDG
may be a better target. Their chairman lives locally (Weston or
Wellesley I believe). I can't remember his name for sure but I believe
it's Pat Maguire. Their offices are located on rte 30 in Framingham.
IDG Communications INC. 375 Cochituate Rd. Framingham, Ma.
Maybe a few phone calls/letters to his office will get some response.
|
884.18 | Some suggestions | STAR::BUDA | Putsing along... | Thu Aug 10 1989 14:30 | 19 |
| Here are some suggestions:
When they ask for your company name put down D&C. It looks like
DEC, but the computer doesn't think so. I just received a FREE
renewel notice.
Another way: Have your wife (or whoever) subscribe at home.
Lastly: Someone should put a message out into usenet about that
they just received mail from DN that they now want money. Ask
how many other people are receiving it. Mention that they
know of other people who also are getting these mailings.
I have a feeling there will be quite a wailing and things
would change...
- mark
|
884.19 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Aug 10 1989 16:27 | 14 |
| Re: .18
> Lastly: Someone should put a message out into usenet about that
> they just received mail from DN that they now want money. Ask
> how many other people are receiving it. Mention that they
> know of other people who also are getting these mailings.
No, no, no! Don't do this! It would be a sure-fire way to get yourself
and Digital in mucho hot water.
Personally, I'll miss DN, but I'll live. Datamation took me off their
free list some time ago, and I haven't lost sleep over it.
Steve
|
884.20 | Just send to: Curly's Consulting Consortium | LAIDBK::PFLUEGER | Beer isn't just for breakfast anymore! | Thu Aug 10 1989 17:02 | 5 |
| If you don't want to loose your copy, then just send in a subscription
request for a mailing to your home - to you private consulting firm
address ;^). Who's the wiser to know?
-Jp
|
884.21 | ethics | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Fri Aug 11 1989 09:47 | 8 |
| re: .20---The losers in this scenario are the advertisers. They pay to
get their message to a certain number of "qualified" readers. If you
lie about your qualifications, they are being cheated.
Yes, I'm sure it happens all the time. The advertising industry isn't
well known for its high standard of business ethics. That doesn't make
it right, however.
John Sauter
|
884.22 | mail it back! | CARDIF::SEIDMAN_ER | Eric, Sales Exec in Training | Fri Aug 11 1989 19:39 | 2 |
| If your really hacked off about the cancel notice . . . tape the
pre-payed postage envelope to a brick and . . .
|
884.23 | Slip out a back door? | FINSER::BARRETT | Wait'll they get a load of me | Thu Aug 31 1989 13:01 | 2 |
| Has anybody tested the idea that it only applies to DEC employees?
How about trying to get it for free without referencing DEC?
|