T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
868.1 | sounds like a topic for MARKETING | CVG::THOMPSON | Notes Wars Veteran | Thu Jul 20 1989 12:11 | 18 |
| A1: Something doesn't have to be a US product to have a registered
trademark. Also trademarks in unrelated fields can be pretty close
to, if not completely, identical. For example, Apple is a trademark
of both Apple Computer and Apple Records. One is in computers and the
other is in recording. The British VAX vacuum has been a product a
long time in the UK. In fact the "joke" 'nothing sucks like a VAX'
has been used in actual advertising in the UK for some time.
A2: 4-in-1 is very dissimilar from ALL-IN-1. Of course both phrases
have been used in advertising for years by a variety of products.
Context and what product is being discussed are taken into account.
A3: Why wouldn't they be allowed to advertise this way? No laws are
being broken. Vacuum cleaners and computers are not all that often
confused. It's not near as bad as all those people selling digital
watches is it?
Alfred
|
868.2 | No sweat! | BMT::BOWERS | Count Zero Interrupt | Thu Jul 20 1989 12:13 | 11 |
| Jeff,
Trademarks are routinely registered in any country where you MIGHT want
to do business. There are several companies (one on the isle of
Jersey, if memory serves) that will undertake to maintain world-wide
trademark registration for clients. They monitor renewal dates, fees
and changing laws and bill you for fees paid plus a servicce charge
based on the number of trademarks and the number of ountries in which
they are registered.
-dave
|
868.3 | Perhaps not a good example | CHIRPA::SWONGER | What more could you ask for? | Thu Jul 20 1989 13:51 | 8 |
|
re: Apple trademark
I know that Apple Records was suing Apple Computer over
thsi very thing - can't recall how it turned out, if I ever
knew.
Roy
|
868.4 | Actually a good example | CVG::THOMPSON | Notes Wars Veteran | Thu Jul 20 1989 13:59 | 11 |
| There was a sort of agreement with Apple Computer and Apple Records
that Apple Computer stay out of the music business. The reason for
the suit is that Apple Records claims that the latest generation
of Apples has enough "sound" ability that they can be concidered
musical instriments and therefor are coming into the music business
that Apple Records is in.
So if VAX Vacuums had built in calculators or VAX computers cleaned
floors things might get tricky. :-)
Alfred
|
868.5 | | CSSE32::LESLIE | andy ��� leslie | Thu Jul 20 1989 18:29 | 6 |
| VAX vacuum cleaners registered their trademark first. It's my
understanding that we use it "by permission" in the UK.
And yes, "Nothing sucks like a VAX" was a real advertising line.
���
|
868.6 | | STAR::HUGHES | | Thu Jul 20 1989 18:56 | 18 |
| I think .4 has it right. There has to be the possibility of confusion between
uses of the name 'VAX' before it becomes a problem.
There are other examples of multiple companies using the same name for very
different products. I'm sure I can find lots of stores selling different kinds
of Apple products :-)
re: Apple vs Apple
The version I heard (probably on NPR) was that it was related to the use of a
multicolored apple logo and an apparent agreement on the part of Apple (the
computer co) to stay out of the music co. Same basic idea though.
As long as we don't make VAX systems that could be mistaken for vacuum cleaners,
it shouldn't be a problem. Remember the DECsystem-2020, 'the mainframe no larger
than a domestic refrigerator', as the slogan had it. It also looked like a
'fridge. Good thing noone makes DECsystem-2020 brand refrigerators....
gary
|
868.7 | | TIXEL::ARNOLD | One day at a time | Thu Jul 20 1989 21:36 | 6 |
| .1> Vacuum cleaners and computers are not all that often
.1> confused.
Alfred, I assume you do not work in marketing? ;-)
|
868.8 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Jul 20 1989 23:58 | 5 |
| When this discussion comes around, as it has many times over the years
(but not so often as in the past month), I am reminded of "Cadillac"
brand dog food.
Steve
|
868.9 | More useless trivia | BOLT::MINOW | Pere Ubu is coming soon, are you ready? | Fri Jul 21 1989 10:18 | 4 |
| Many years ago, I heard that "DEC" was trademarked by "Dairy Equipment
Cooperative" in Iowa.
M.
|
868.10 | | COMET::BARRIANO | choke me in the shallow water... | Fri Jul 21 1989 11:41 | 7 |
| re.9
> Many years ago, I heard that "DEC" was trademarked by "Dairy Equipment
> Cooperative" in Iowa
Thats udderly ridiculous ;-)
Barry
|
868.11 | Check MARKETING notes file... | LDP::CURRIE | vidi veni scripti | Fri Jul 21 1989 12:27 | 13 |
| RE: all
Ckeck note 917 in ASIMOV::MARKETING
To summarize: VAX is trademark for Vacuum in UK. DEC has
agreement (in UK) since our VAX is not a "competing" product.
Also some interesting info on who owns ALL-IN-1 vs ALL-IN-ONE and
why getting the trademarked names correct in documents is so
blasted important.
later...
jim
|
868.12 | another digression from a rathole | SALSA::MOELLER | 118�F,but it's a DRY heat.(THUD!) | Fri Jul 21 1989 14:34 | 13 |
| < Note 868.6 by STAR::HUGHES >
>re: Apple vs Apple
>The version I heard (probably on NPR) was that it was related to the use of a
>multicolored apple logo and an apparent agreement on the part of Apple (the
>computer co) to stay out of the music co.
The multicolored Apple logo is fine with Apple, the Beatles' music
co. The recent suit arose because Apple Computer developed some
music synthesizer boards for the MAC, allegedly violating the long-
held agreement that Apple Computer would not go into the music biz.
karl
|
868.13 | | TIXEL::ARNOLD | One day at a time | Fri Jul 21 1989 14:56 | 7 |
| re ALL-IN-1 vs ALL-IN-ONE
I was told several years ago that "ALL-IN-ONE" is a popular brand of
diapers in the UK. Not *necessarily* a competing product with some
software of a similar name...
Jon
|
868.14 | enter/rathole | MU::PORTER | Rightward Ho! | Sat Jul 22 1989 01:22 | 1 |
| we don't have "diapers" in the UK...
|
868.15 | pursue/rathole | BABY::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Sat Jul 22 1989 22:49 | 5 |
| re: .14
Well, here in the States, we don't have "nappies"...
Ray
|
868.16 | Let's close this discussion | EXIT26::STRATTON | I (heart) my wife | Sun Jul 23 1989 13:08 | 5 |
| Since the questions in .0 have been answered, and since
the discussion has moved well away from "the Digital way
of working", I don't think there should be any further
replies to this topic.
|
868.17 | No Nashua VAX sales pending sales training | TLE::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Sun Jul 23 1989 14:59 | 13 |
| Re .0:
The Sears in Nashua's Pheasant Lane Mall was visited on Friday. The vacuum
cleaner salesman there had only seen a reference to the VAX in some signage
recently. He said that they aren't [fully?] prepared to sell name-brands yet
(a massive change to Sears' way of doing business which readers are probably
aware of), and he has to attend product familiarization classes before he'll be
prepared to begin selling them sometime in mid-September.
I assume that there will be other brands sold there; otherwise you might say
that he'd be attending a sort of a "VAX University". It is nice to know that
Sears takes sales training at least as seriously Digital.
/AHM
|
868.18 | It wasn't a VAX at all! | VOGON::KAPPLER | What is this thing called, love? | Mon Jul 24 1989 05:36 | 11 |
| Re: .previous
For the record, the advertising slogan was:
"Nothing sucks like an Electrolux"
Yes, it was for a vacuum cleaner (or a "hoover" as they are often
called in the UK!)
The derivation to "... like a VAX" I have only ever seen in Notable
Persons personal name ........ but if you say it often enough .....
|
868.19 | 2 VAXes for the price of 1! | ZPOAC6::HWCHOY | and the answer is...FORTY-TWO | Mon Jul 24 1989 05:52 | 3 |
| Maybe if we can OEM that VAX vacuum cleaner, we could then give 1 away
for every VAX (maybe VAX 6000 and above), for the cleaning the computer
room floor, and the insides of printers,... ;?)
|