T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
843.1 | Revenge of the Bean Counters | HEFTY::CHARBONND | I'm the NRA | Tue Jun 20 1989 10:11 | 14 |
| To take a night course :
1. Fill out education req. form (ERF)
2. have supervisor sign ERF
3. take ERF to Financial Analyst for blessing
4. take ERF to Personnel for blessing
5. Personnel sends ERF back to Finance for additional blessing
6. finance sends ERF to Petty Cash
7. Petty Cash says Supervisor signature not enough, need
manager signature
8. get managers' signature
9. return to Petty Cash, receive check
All this for $156
|
843.2 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Jun 20 1989 12:01 | 7 |
| re .0
Why should Digital pay for subscriptions to magazines at all?
Save trees. Save our stock price. Go to your library.
/john
|
843.3 | I don't think that what it is is the issue | CVG::THOMPSON | Protect the guilty, punish the innocent | Tue Jun 20 1989 12:24 | 9 |
| RE: .2 I think the point may be that a $30-$100 dollar expenditure
is too small to take to that high a level. A first level manager
should be able to say yes or know to that small of an amount without
using the excuse that it needs a country manager ok.
While in general I agree that DEC should not pay for subscriptions
for individuals there are times when no library will do.
Alfred
|
843.4 | | BOSTON::SOHN | Substitute Ronette | Tue Jun 20 1989 13:26 | 16 |
| re: < Note 843.3 by CVG::THOMPSON "Protect the guilty, punish the innocent" >
> While in general I agree that DEC should not pay for subscriptions
> for individuals there are times when no library will do.
Correct. The best example of this is daily magazines/newspapers
like American Banker.
Also, some of the magazines in question are *not* available in
libraries, or are certainly not available on a timely basis.
BTW, we *are* talking about job-related magazines, aren't we?
If so, DEC should pay - it makes the employee more useful and
valuable to the company.
eric
|
843.5 | real cost control | HPSMEG::ANDREW | I used to be a Duck | Tue Jun 20 1989 13:55 | 7 |
| I do not know if this should go here but, if you want cost control
the company needs to stop using so much outside consultants. We
have our own people that can due the job. If you want financial
controls that has to be at the field level and hold the Managers
accountable for profit and loss. This includes magazine subscriptions.
|
843.6 | | VIA::GLANTZ | Mike, DTN 381-1253 | Tue Jun 20 1989 14:13 | 10 |
| Re .2 ("Go to your library") the author of .0 has probably found that
many of the American technical magazines which interest him are not
readily available in the libraries in Rome.
As to why a country manager would require that such approvals go
through him, it often serves to raise the awareness of employees at
all levels by showing that expense control is a very serious matter.
In any specific instance, it's not likely to be a cost-effective
procedure, but as a "public relations" exercise, it could, in the long
run, be very effective.
|
843.7 | | NIGE::LESLIE | andy ��� leslie, csse | Tue Jun 20 1989 15:43 | 2 |
| In the UK, Low Value Purchase Orders of up to �2500 (approx $5000) may
be signed off by a level 2 Manager.
|
843.8 | Petty Cash is a state of mind | STAR::HUGHES | | Tue Jun 20 1989 18:59 | 15 |
| re .0
> is this DEC style?
If you mean 'is it DEC style for senior managers to be excessively
involved in day to day decision', I'd say the answer is 'yes'.
If you mean 'is it DEC style to require all manner of approvals for
magazine subscriptions', the answer is also 'yes'. For some reason,
magazine subscriptions have been singled out in the past as a subject
for intense scrutiny. I once tried to get a subscription approved, with
my cost center manger's approval, and finally put it in the 'too hard'
basket.
gary
|
843.9 | Courses ok, mag's no go | DIODE::CROWELL | Jon Crowell | Wed Jun 28 1989 20:00 | 14 |
|
It seems funny that our policy is for the engineers to take expensive
courses and stay up-to-date. If we want to take a course for $1500
its no-problem if its related.
If we want to join the IEEE and get some important education like
spectrum, transactions on computers, Computer mag, ect. All this
costs about $100. It would take an act of god to get this ok'ed.
The last company would pay for ANY and ALL professional societys
and mag's and journals...
Strange logic....
Jon
|
843.10 | IEEE membership benefits DEC | FRAGLE::RICHARD | | Thu Jun 29 1989 02:01 | 5 |
| Re -.1, Every time I go to a IEEE conference, DEC gets a discount on
the symposium fees. The IEEE Electron Device journals that I receive
are well used, not only by myself but my coworkers as well. But will
DEC pay the IEEE dues, no way. The company benefits many times over
the yearly dues, which are up to something like $130/yr.
|
843.11 | ECA recently told me that IEEE (etc.) dues will be paid | WKRP::CHATTERJEE | Only laughter translates freely | Fri Jun 30 1989 14:07 | 11 |
| >>> But will DEC pay the IEEE dues, no way.
I can speak for PSS in ECA. I was recently told that since in ECA
we are required to ACTIVELY belong to professional orgs to get promoted
within the Consultant/Manager levels, DEC WILL pay for the dues.
In my case, I am about to submit for reimbursment of dues for IEEE,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and Society
for Technical Communication. Have been told that they will probably
pass muster.
....... Suchindran
|
843.12 | +++ | DPDMAI::WOODWARD | Gentlemen, set phasers on kill. | Wed Jul 05 1989 04:48 | 4 |
| It is stated in the Personnel Policies and Procedures manual that
DIGITAL will not reimburse IEEE dues. I tried.
|
843.13 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Wed Jul 05 1989 17:48 | 23 |
| It takes $1000 worth of effort to get a $50 expense approved because
the disincentive (the hassle involved) is worth the 20:1 impact as a
preventative measure. People will examine other avenues ("go to the
library") rather than automatically spend the $50. If 20 people
succeed through these other avenues, the system has broken even.
If 100 people (or 1000) DON'T EVEN MAKE THE ATTEMPT, the company is 'way ahead.
Is there an lost opportunity cost? Probably some.
Does it cost the Company in the end? Who can say?
A friend who worked at Bell Labs in the early 1970s (when pocket calculators
first came out) has an anecdote that reflects on this theory.
At that time, Bell Labs engineers could order, on their own signatory
authority, something like $500-$1000 per month in materials, test equipment,
and the like. When the HP35 came out, at $395, new rules were put into
effect to DISALLOW this item from the engineers' normal purchasing allowance.
It was easily seen that EVERYONE would be buying one (or more), and that
total costs would really add up. In this case, bulk purchases by Labs
as a whole eventually supplied the engineers' needs, but in a controlled
and less expensive manner.
I believe that similar thinking applies in the matter expressed in .0.
- tom]
|
843.14 | | CURIE::VANTREECK | | Thu Jul 13 1989 18:33 | 4 |
| IEEE and other professional dues and subscriptions are tax deductable.
So what's your beef? You'll get the money back at end of the year.
-George
|
843.15 | Isn't Tax Deduction < Dues Spent? | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Thu Jul 13 1989 19:02 | 12 |
| re: .14
Doesn't the tax deduction simply reduce the taxable income of the
individual? If so, you would receive the tax amount back, not the
amount of the expenditure.
Example: $100 dues for an individual in the 28% tax bracket would
reduce your tax by $28, not $100. You'd eat $72.
If I am incorrect on this assumption, please correct me.
-- Russ
|
843.16 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | Week 3: Raising the Roof | Thu Jul 13 1989 19:13 | 8 |
| re: .14 and .15
Not only does the comment in .15 apply, but isn't there a new threshhold for
miscellaneous deductions. I believe that only the amount above 2% of
your adjusted gross income is deductible. That's quite a few
societies.
Gary
|
843.17 | | HYDRA::ECKERT | Jerry Eckert | Thu Jul 13 1989 19:19 | 5 |
| re: .15
Almost correct - you may also reduce your state and/or local income tax
by a few dollars. However, deductions are of absolutely no use to
those whose itemized deductions are below the standard deduction.
|
843.18 | | VIA::GLANTZ | Mike, DTN 381-1253 | Fri Jul 14 1989 10:45 | 1 |
| such tax deductions don't exist in most countries in which Digital operates.
|