T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
730.1 | it's also a dangerous world! | YARD::RUSSELL | Oh, NO! You didn't press THAT key! | Mon Feb 20 1989 04:35 | 7 |
| re .0;
doesn't it say a lot for the airline security that they didn't know
who was sitting in that seat?
Peter.
|
730.2 | Not really | CHEFS::HASTONM | I'm a police car | Mon Feb 20 1989 05:03 | 6 |
| I often move about aircraft to get a better seat.
I'm more interested in employees flying Business Class rather than
`standard', what happened to the drive to cut expenses?
Emm
|
730.3 | Let's cut some slack here.... | YUPPIE::COLE | The TOUGH survive the bleeding edge! | Mon Feb 20 1989 07:55 | 12 |
| RE: .2
First, just because you're in Business Class doesn't mean you're on
business. Dillep never said what his purpose on the trip was. People take
vacations, you know!
Secondly, if international travel is still monitored by VP's, I'm sure
his appearance over there was very important to SOMEONE high up, and the
rigors of one of these trips demands at LEAST Business Class. I would bet he
was on that plane 14 hours or more, and "losing" time as he flew east!
Finally, any bets that the owner of the document will respond HERE? :>)
|
730.4 | what the "good book" says | SETH::CHERSON | create facts in the field | Mon Feb 20 1989 09:22 | 4 |
| The corporate P&P states that flights of over five hours in duration
require business class.
David
|
730.5 | bumps - cuts - | CSSE::CACCIA | the REAL steve | Mon Feb 20 1989 09:29 | 24 |
|
RE - .2 "move to cut expenses"
How many times have you rented a car and it was supposed to be one
of those super economy micromets or whatever and you get to the
agency counter and they say, "we're sorry, but we are forced to
let you have an Olds Cutlass because we are temporarily out of stock"
Same thing happens with airlines when they overbook economy or what
ever class it happens to be this week. They will bump upward if there
is room on the plane.
RE - .1 what security?
I saw a cartoon that seems pretty indicative of airport security.
It shows a rather scruffy looking guy in need of a shave with a
cigarette in his mouth. He is dressed in fatigues and combat
boots with grenades, hand guns and knives in the belt, a large
automatic rifle on the shoulder and a couple of bandoleers of
ammo heading for a boarding gate.
The security guard is telling him he can't smoke on the plane.
|
730.6 | | HOCUS::KOZAKIEWICZ | Shoes for industry | Mon Feb 20 1989 09:31 | 34 |
| re: .2
Know the policy!
PP&P 5.11
- Domestic First Class Night Coach is acceptable on "red eye" flights
if the price is equal to or less than Day Economy.
- First Class is acceptable if the employee has a physical problem
that would make them extremely uncomfortable in Economy and it is
approved in advance by the employee's manager.
- If the employee is travelling with a customer who is flying First
Class or Business Class the employee may also.
- If the employee is restricted to one flight and Economy is not
available the employee may fly First or Business Class.
* International Business Class is authorized for flights of five
hours or more and is acceptable for continuing flights if the routing
and stopover privileges produce an equal or lower priced ticket
then Standard Economy.
- Domestic Business Class is acceptable when it represents the lowest
available airfare for the dates and times requested.
In short, Business class is OK for international legs of five hours
flight time or more.
Al
|
730.7 | Rathole Alert | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Mon Feb 20 1989 10:17 | 14 |
| > In short, Business class is OK for international legs of five hours
> flight time or more.
Depends on the cost center; DEC employees flying on Standards business are not
authorized business class.
I also won't normally authorize myself business class across the Atlantic; I
can't see spending $2400 when $400 would do, if the trip is planned far enough
in advance. You can even blow away the $400 and pay the full $1400 if plans
change and not waste the full $2000.
But I'm smaller than most people and am not as uncomfortable in coach.
/john
|
730.8 | So what's it about? | DELNI::JONG | Steve Jong/NaC Pubs | Mon Feb 20 1989 11:01 | 5 |
| Returning to the topic...
If you tell us what's on the cover (topic, author or authoring group),
I'll bet someone can claim it pretty quickly. I'm not being curious,
I'm just trying to be helpful 8^)
|
730.9 | cannot name it in this conference | DECEAT::BHANDARKAR | Good enough is not good enough | Mon Feb 20 1989 23:17 | 8 |
| RE: < Note 730.8 by DELNI::JONG "Steve Jong/NaC Pubs" >
-< So what's it about? >-
It is a preliminary draft of the Architecture Document for an unnannounced
software product with a 4 letter acronymn. It appears that it was written with
ultimate distribution outside the company.
Dileep
|
730.10 | | BUNYIP::QUODLING | Apologies for what Doug Mulray said... | Thu Feb 23 1989 22:42 | 9 |
| The security issue does bring up another thing related to travel.
I was on the way back home the other day. 2-3 hour flight. Trying
to do some work. A document slipped from my lap to the floor. It
wasn't until the plane had landed and emptied that I could reach
under the seat to pick it up. Why is it that aircraft design
engineers assume everyone is a 5ft 100lb weakling....
q
|
730.11 | Business flights are a necessary evil! | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Fri Feb 24 1989 09:31 | 9 |
| Hi, "q" - I have the same problem, being nearly six feet tall - the
"flying sardine can" method of airplane design (at least in the
"business class" section - you all know I am far too cheap to pay extra
to fly on the same plane but get a bigger chair, right?) allows them to
fit one more row of seats in then they would otherwise. It's just a
good thing I am not claustrophobic, but it is a real drag after the
first couple of hours to be trying to sit in a seat where my knees are
jammed into the back of the seat in front of me. But you have to
travel *somehow*, right?
|
730.12 | | STAR::HUGHES | | Mon Feb 27 1989 12:58 | 9 |
| Don't shoot the designers. Most (all?) current airliners have
adjustable seat pitch (the spacing between seats) and it is the airline
that decides the actual spacing when they purchase or reconfigure the
plane. When I travelled more frequently, I would ask for seat diagrams
etc and, if a choice were available, select flights on that basis (it
also helps you avoid seats near the above wing exits, as they usually
have even less leg room).
gary
|
730.13 | Watch what you say | NYEM1::MILBERG | Barry Milberg | Sat Mar 04 1989 08:25 | 33 |
| very interesting that only 2 of the 12 replies deal with the subject-
security of documents!
On my last flight I found a very interesting report on the perceived
positioning of automobile manufacturers in the marketplace in the
seatpocket in front of me. That study, from JD Power, cost someones
company a lot of money!
Have also heard a lot of interesting conversations in seats around
me. Nice of people to have luggage tags with company logos or business
cards or to carry binders with the company name boldly imprinted.
What was the WW-II expressions-
LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS
Now back to the rathole-
While the company policies on classes of flights, rental cars, etc.
have been quoted there is nothing that says that the individual:
cannot pay for an upgrade him/herself
cannot use a frequent flyer upgrade
cannot use a rental car upgrade certificate
Do not be so quick to judge and jump on someones class of service
if you don't know the facts. For example, Continental offers Y-OnePass
that is a first class seat for a coach fare.
-Barry-
|
730.14 | | HANZI::SIMONSZETO | Simon Szeto @HGO, Hongkong | Sun Mar 05 1989 19:30 | 15 |
| I wonder if Dileep ever found the person who dropped the document.
My first guess would have been somebody flying from Seoul (or maybe
by way of Seoul) to Greater Maynard. For a flight like that, I'm
glad that company policy provides for Business Class travel for
long flights. Five hours is peanuts when your journey takes something
like twenty-four hours and thirteen time zones.
Dropping important business papers is a definite risk with people
who take their business with them into Business Class. I guess
many people find it necessary to use their time that way. So far
I have done very little of it, but maybe next time I'd think twice
before I take something out of my attach� case.
--Simon
|
730.15 | update | DECEAT::BHANDARKAR | Good enough is not good enough | Tue Mar 07 1989 22:18 | 24 |
| RE: < Note 730.14 by HANZI::SIMONSZETO "Simon Szeto @HGO, Hongkong" >
No, I did not find the "owner". I even tried asking Corporate Travel, but
they did not know who was on that flight. I returned the document to the
project leader for the project.
I am going back to Japan later this month. Hope I don't find something equally
interesting again.
RE: Business Class travel
Business Class fare ($2585 round trip) is only $300 more than regular coach.
Supersaver coach with 2-week advance purchase is only $1300. The flight from
Boston to SFO is almost 7 hours; SFO to Tokyo is almost 12 hours. I flew to
Japan 5 years ago in coach. With a full plane it was no fun. Business class was
a lot better.
I used to fly coach even though the policy allowed business; but not anymore.
If I put my body through a 1 week trip to Japan with 4 days of work, I don't
feel guilty about travelling in comfort. Many companies, including the U.S.
Govt, allow business Class travel on these long flights. There were hardly any
unoccupied seats on my flights.
Dileep
|
730.16 | Trying a red-eye close call???? Fly First Class to be alive | WKRP::CHATTERJEE | A fool and your $ go to Wash DC | Tue Mar 07 1989 23:33 | 9 |
| I recently had the "pleasure" of flying a red-eye back from SFO
to CVG (San Francisco to Cincinnati) because I had a 6:00 pm (PST)
meeting in SFO and a 7:30 am (EST) meeting the next day at CVG.
I know, I know; I'll never do that again. Anyway, I flew coach
and was a sight to behold at the end of the second day. If I do
this again (????) I will fly First Class so I at least look and
feel half good. I think Dileep in -.1 has the right idea.
......... Suchindran
|
730.17 | | BUNYIP::QUODLING | Apologies for what Doug Mulray said... | Tue Mar 07 1989 23:46 | 6 |
| Bear in mind, that Travel is an acceptable cost of doing business,
that would come off digital's pre tax expenses. So by flying
cheaper, you are just increasing DEC's tax bill....
q
|
730.18 | ...let's be serious | BEES::BURKE | Andy � | Wed Mar 08 1989 08:33 | 1 |
| ...no one is in the 100% tax bracket......yet....
|
730.19 | more enlightened policy? | NYEM1::MILBERG | Barry Milberg | Wed Mar 08 1989 13:26 | 8 |
| A number of our client's companies have interesting travel policies:
fly during working hours - coach
fly on personal time - business or first class
Barry_who_usually_flies_after_work_to_not_lose_a_day_each_way
|
730.20 | Yes, but... | PEKING::HASTONM | Emm | Thu Mar 09 1989 05:58 | 23 |
| Let me make clear that I've nothing against people flying business
class. If that's the rule(s) that's fine.
But I think, some clarification may be required.
- Expensive travel reducing DIGITAL's tax bill
Cobblers. It reduces the ammount of $$s available to pay wage
increments and fund R&D.
- Benefits of Business class on long-haul flights. (Jet-lag?)
Possibly valid on West->East flights. However, if _I_ were to
undertake such a journey (in either direction) I wouldn't presume
that the "benefits" of Business class obviated a good nights sleep
at the other end prior to the meeting(s). Presumably DIGITAL
personnel don't fly log-haul for `the day'.
Many companies (this from memory, no references available) _insist_
that personnel flying long-haul arrive a day before their meetings
to get over any `lag' problems.
The article I saw this in (and it wasn't a plug for hotel chain 8^)
made no mention of the flight class.
All 'n' all though, I *like* the idea of "business" or "first-class"
travel. Hmm, now when I fly the atlantic.....
Concorde anyone? Or does the P&P say "...subsonic only". *8^)
M
|
730.21 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Thu Mar 09 1989 09:31 | 26 |
|
� Concorde anyone? Or does the P&P say "...subsonic only". *8^)
It doesn't have to: it says "Business Class", and "Concorde Class"
is a sort of super first class. However I am sure that if you were
escorting a customer who insisted on flying Concorde you'd have
no problem "hitching a ride".
Getting a decent nights sleep the night before isn't always possible:
many international destinations have only one flight a day. Example
Boston to Heathrow offers several options, but all take off at
approximately the same time in the evening arriving at breakfast
time in London. Either you take a full day off (sightseeing?) before
getting your sleep, or you sleep on the plane, which more or less
requires the extra leg room you get with business class.
On several occasions I have made this trip business class and got
straight off the plane and driven 200 miles to my destination. On
occasions when I flew coach class I have always been so tired as
to have to go to sleep on arrival, and spend an expensive (~�120
or about $200) day in an airport hotel before completing my journey.
I guess it all depends where you want to spend your company's money,
and never forget that time is money...
/. Ian .\
|
730.22 | | BUNYIP::QUODLING | Apologies for what Doug Mulray said... | Fri Mar 10 1989 03:20 | 6 |
| There is a difference between Trans U.S.A. and transatlantic to
the 30 plus hours in a plane that one spends going from sydney to
Boston.
q
|
730.23 | Halfway around is better than red-eye | HWSSS0::SZETO | Simon Szeto @HGO, Hongkong | Fri Mar 10 1989 07:37 | 10 |
| I've had better luck with East-Coast-to-East-Coast (Asia<-->N. America)
than with red-eyes trans-NA or trans-Atlantic. Being able to get a
night's sleep after arrival is good compensation for the 11- to 12-hour
jet lag. A full day's work the next day hasn't been a problem.
Ironically, in my experience the second day is worse than the first day
after arrival as far as jet lag is concerned. Different people react
to jet lag differently, of course.
--Simon
|
730.24 | What's one more night in a hotel? | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Mon Mar 13 1989 12:35 | 12 |
| I'm not real good at sleeping in an airplane seat either, but what
bothers me more than being scheduled for a business trip on the
"red-eye" is being told that DEC won't pay for an extra night in a
hotel so that I have to leave the conference early the last day in
order to catch the last flight back to Boston (and risk getting to
spend a night in some other hotel anyhow if the plane connections don't
match up due to delays, since I'm on the last plane!). I don't know
what happens if the paper I'm presenting is scheduled for late
afternoon of the last day, but, from the number of both DEC and non-DEC
people leaving early, that is a real poor time to have to do your
presentation because half of the participants have already flown home,
so DEC isn't the only company with this cheap policy!
|
730.25 | depends on cost center manager | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Mon Mar 13 1989 16:30 | 10 |
| re: .24
I've always found my cost center to be pretty flexible with respect to
scheduling the return trip. A few years ago I went to DECUS in San
Diego. Because I couldn't get a return flight to Manchester, NH, on
Friday after the last session, I got to stay until Monday.
(This was before there were several airlines serving Manchester. If I
remember correctly, there was only one flight a day, from Boston.)
John Sauter
|
730.26 | Strange behavior | DECEAT::BHANDARKAR | Good enough is not good enough | Mon Mar 13 1989 20:42 | 14 |
| RE: < Note 730.24 by CADSYS::RICHARDSON >
> I'm not real good at sleeping in an airplane seat either, but what
> bothers me more than being scheduled for a business trip on the
> "red-eye" is being told that DEC won't pay for an extra night in a
> hotel so that I have to leave the conference early the last day in
> order to catch the last flight back to Boston (and risk getting to
You must have a very strange manager. I am surprised that they even sent you to
the conference. I have never been forced to fly the red eye. I often do it by
choice because I hate to waste a whole day on an airplane. Sometimes I do it
because I have an important meeting to get to.
Dileep
|