T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
665.1 | Not in my book! | MISFIT::DEEP | This NOTE's for you! | Thu Nov 17 1988 15:44 | 7 |
| Have her ask her personnel manager to see the requirement from the Orange
Book that says she has to give a three month notice to take a transfer.
I can't find one.
Bob
|
665.2 | 30 dyas? | VAXRT::WILLIAMS | | Thu Nov 17 1988 17:12 | 4 |
| I believe that on an internal transfer, the old cost center
can keep you for 30 days max.
/s/ Jim WIlliams
|
665.3 | | GOONEY::JOYCE | My LAST name is Joyce! | Thu Nov 17 1988 17:32 | 24 |
| Re: .0
> She is exposed to numerous chemicals and the like and
> even though she wears a "bunny suit" that supposedly protects her,
it is my understanding that the "bunny suit" is used to protect
the fab environment from the people wearing them, not the other
way around. it's used to prevent dirt/dust/hair/whatever from
getting into the clean room and potentially contaminating the
wafers or chips.
in regards to the 3 month notice, that would seem to be in
conflict with the corporate personnel policies and procedures
manual. the relevant policy (6.05) states several things about
time in job expectations and length of notice. specifically,
time in job requirements should be communicated to applicants
before a job offer is made. and, the date of transfer for
non-exempt employees (which most fab workers are) should be no
longer than two weeks.
i would suggest that your fiancee talk with her personnel rep
regarding this apparent conflict with corporate policies. she
may need to involve the people in corporate personnel as well.
|
665.4 | More info please... | CHEFS::HASTONM | Plant Breeding: Thought for Food | Fri Nov 18 1988 04:23 | 11 |
| Re: < Note 665.0 by IOENG::PARADISO "Groovy kind of love" >
-< Fulfilling Commitments >-
� DEC has had the problem with miscarriages there
News to me.
Please substantiate this.
What is the basis for this statement?
Mark
|
665.5 | Get the facts before overreacting | WMOIS::D_MONTGOMERY | Down at Dino's Bar & Grill | Fri Nov 18 1988 08:17 | 23 |
| � DEC has had the problem with miscarriages there
This was shown to be untrue. After exhaustive research and
study, it was determined that there was no statistical correlation.
For a short period of time, there were more miscarriages per 1000
pregnancies than the U.S. average. However, there were not enough
more to show conclusively that that particular environment had anything
to do with it. The study concluded that it was a temporary
statistical aberration.
Obviously, you should still choose to do what you think is right,
and if that means believing the rumors rather than the scientific
facts, then by all means, get her into another job. For what
it's worth, the infant mortality rate in the U.S. is greater than
that of such countries as Sweden and Denmark, but you don't see
too many pregnant Americans packing up and flying over there. It's
always best to investigate the facts before overreacting to the
rumors.
Hope everything works out for you and her.
-Don-
|
665.6 | 8^) | MISFIT::DEEP | This NOTE's for you! | Fri Nov 18 1988 08:50 | 3 |
|
"We're sorry Mrs. Jones... You've had a temporary statistical aberration..."
|
665.7 | Try Health Services at HL | DENTON::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Fri Nov 18 1988 09:27 | 18 |
| Re .0:
The original discussion of this problem is in topic 241 of this conference,
titled "AP news: Digital Miscarriages".
Your fiancee should also consider contacting Health Services in Hudson. They
should be able to discuss the original report's findings with her as well as any
subsequent discoveries. They should also know what options were originally made
available to FAB workers. This excerpt from 241.0 is particularly relevant:
> ``We've kept our employees informed all along,'' spokesman
>Jeffrey Gibson said Tuesday. He said Digital adopted a policy
>during the study of encouraging pregnant production workers to seek
>transfers.
> As a further precaution, Gibson said Digital also is offering to
>transfer any female production worker of child-bearing age to
>non-production work if they have concerns about future pregnancy.
/AHM
|
665.8 | | BUNYIP::QUODLING | Anything! Just play it loud! | Fri Nov 18 1988 15:26 | 8 |
| But how did they manage to get 1000 employees in one facility pregnant?
:-)
Yet another statistically invalid statistic.
q
|
665.9 | Does she have an offer? | DR::BLINN | Doctor Who? | Fri Nov 18 1988 16:53 | 15 |
| It sounds to me like the *first step* is to find her another job
in the company doing work she's qualified to do in a place that
she thinks she'll be comfortable working. Depending on the demand
for people with her skills (not just the ones she is using in her
current job, but other things she can do as well), it might take
her more than three months to find another job. Once you've found
a position offer, you can start to worry about educating the local
(outgoing) personnel folks and her current manager about the
corporate personnel policies.
Of course, before she starts looking for another job, she's
supposed to tell her manager she's looking, but it sounds like
that's already been made clear.
Tom
|
665.10 | | IOENG::PARADISO | Groovy kind of love | Mon Nov 28 1988 15:55 | 22 |
|
re: all
Thanks for all the feedback on my problem.
The way it stands now is that her manager told her that she would not
stand in the way of my fiancee finding a job. Personnel has been of
no use and she does have work skills that would allow her to get a job
elsewhere, but her time is limited. It has been my observation that
since I came into DEC about 8 years ago that the corporation seems to
have adopted a "if you find the job we'll let you go" type of outlook
as opposed to the old "well, if you are unhappy with current job, let's
see if we can help you find another within DEC".
Has anyone else noticed this?
She is still working there and I'm trying to help her find another
position at the moment.
Thanks again,
Dave
|
665.11 | | CVG::THOMPSON | I'm the NRA | Mon Nov 28 1988 16:29 | 7 |
| RE: .10 I've heard all of my managers say publicly that if anyone
in the group feels that it is time to move on they will help as
much as they can. I believe them. We're under our budgeted head
count (don't tell anyone :-) ) so cost savings is not the reason.
There are still a lot of managers who care and will help.
Alfred
|