[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

665.0. "Fulfilling Commitments" by IOENG::PARADISO (Groovy kind of love) Thu Nov 17 1988 14:45

  My Fiancee works in Hudson in the FAB (makes the chips) on third shift. She 
is exposed to numerous chemicals and the like and eventhough she wears a 
"bunny suit" that supposedly protects her, I and her father want her to get 
out of that position due to the health risks.  DEC has had the problem with 
miscarriages there and I don't want her in this position and she wants to 
leaves also.
  She originally agreed to work one-year at this position.  She has fulfilled
this requirement, but now is being told by her management that before she
is allowed to leave that she must inform them that she is leaving and then she
must work an ADDITIONAL 3 months in the FAB.
  My question is this; Is this common practice at DEC and if so what can be done
to get her out of that facility?  We both don't want to have her leave DEC, but
I told her if it comes down to a decision to leave DEC now, then she has agreed
to.

Any help I get on this will be GREATLY appreciated!

								Thanks,
								  Dave
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
665.1Not in my book!MISFIT::DEEPThis NOTE's for you! Thu Nov 17 1988 15:447
Have her ask her personnel manager to see the requirement from the Orange 
Book that says she has to give a three month notice to take a transfer.

I can't find one.


Bob
665.230 dyas?VAXRT::WILLIAMSThu Nov 17 1988 17:124
    I believe that on an internal transfer, the old cost center
    can keep you for 30 days max.
    
    /s/ Jim WIlliams
665.3GOONEY::JOYCEMy LAST name is Joyce!Thu Nov 17 1988 17:3224
Re: .0 

> She is exposed to numerous chemicals and the like and
> even though she wears a "bunny suit" that supposedly protects her,

it is my understanding that the "bunny suit" is used to protect
the fab environment from the people wearing them, not the other
way around.  it's used to prevent dirt/dust/hair/whatever from 
getting into the clean room and potentially contaminating the 
wafers or chips.

in regards to the 3 month notice, that would seem to be in 
conflict with the corporate personnel policies and procedures
manual.  the relevant policy (6.05) states several things about 
time in job expectations and length of notice.  specifically, 
time in job requirements should be communicated to applicants 
before a job offer is made.  and, the date of transfer for 
non-exempt employees (which most fab workers are) should be no
longer than two weeks.

i would suggest that your fiancee talk with her personnel rep 
regarding this apparent conflict with corporate policies.  she 
may need to involve the people in corporate personnel as well.

665.4More info please...CHEFS::HASTONMPlant Breeding: Thought for FoodFri Nov 18 1988 04:2311
  Re: < Note 665.0 by IOENG::PARADISO "Groovy kind of love" >
                          -< Fulfilling Commitments >-

  � DEC has had the problem with miscarriages there 
  
  
  News to me.
  Please substantiate this.
  What is the basis for this statement?
         
                                        Mark  
665.5Get the facts before overreactingWMOIS::D_MONTGOMERYDown at Dino&#039;s Bar &amp; GrillFri Nov 18 1988 08:1723
� DEC has had the problem with miscarriages there 
    
    	This was shown to be untrue.  After exhaustive research and
    study, it was determined that there was no statistical correlation.
    For a short period of time, there were more miscarriages per 1000
    pregnancies than the U.S. average.  However, there were not enough
    more to show conclusively that that particular environment had anything
    to do with it.    The study concluded that it was a temporary
    statistical aberration.
    
    	Obviously, you should still choose to do what you think is right,
    and if that means believing the rumors rather than the scientific
    facts, then by all means, get her into another job.     For what
    it's worth,  the infant mortality rate in the U.S. is greater than
    that of such countries as Sweden and Denmark,   but you don't see
    too many pregnant Americans packing up and flying over there.  It's
    always best to investigate the facts before overreacting to the
    rumors.
    
    Hope everything works out for you and her.
    
    -Don-

665.68^)MISFIT::DEEPThis NOTE&#039;s for you! Fri Nov 18 1988 08:503

"We're sorry Mrs. Jones... You've had a temporary statistical aberration..."
665.7Try Health Services at HLDENTON::AMARTINAlan H. MartinFri Nov 18 1988 09:2718
Re .0:

The original discussion of this problem is in topic 241 of this conference,
titled "AP news: Digital Miscarriages".

Your fiancee should also consider contacting Health Services in Hudson.  They
should be able to discuss the original report's findings with her as well as any
subsequent discoveries.  They should also know what options were originally made
available to FAB workers.  This excerpt from 241.0 is particularly relevant:

>   ``We've kept our employees informed all along,'' spokesman
>Jeffrey Gibson said Tuesday. He said Digital adopted a policy
>during the study of encouraging pregnant production workers to seek
>transfers.
>   As a further precaution, Gibson said Digital also is offering to
>transfer any female production worker of child-bearing age to
>non-production work if they have concerns about future pregnancy.
				/AHM
665.8BUNYIP::QUODLINGAnything! Just play it loud!Fri Nov 18 1988 15:268
    But how did they manage to get 1000 employees in one facility pregnant?
    
    :-) 
    
    Yet another statistically invalid statistic.
    
    q
    
665.9Does she have an offer?DR::BLINNDoctor Who?Fri Nov 18 1988 16:5315
        It sounds to me like the *first step* is to find her another job
        in the company doing work she's qualified to do in a place that
        she thinks she'll be comfortable working.  Depending on the demand
        for people with her skills (not just the ones she is using in her
        current job, but other things she can do as well), it might take
        her more than three months to find another job.  Once you've found
        a position offer, you can start to worry about educating the local
        (outgoing) personnel folks and her current manager about the
        corporate personnel policies. 
        
        Of course, before she starts looking for another job, she's
        supposed to tell her manager she's looking, but it sounds like
        that's already been made clear. 
        
        Tom
665.10IOENG::PARADISOGroovy kind of loveMon Nov 28 1988 15:5522

    re: all

     Thanks for all the feedback on my problem.  
   
     The way it stands now is that her manager told her that she would not
     stand in the way of my fiancee finding a job.  Personnel has been of
     no use and she does have work skills that would allow her to get a job
     elsewhere, but her time is limited.  It has been my observation that
     since I came into DEC about 8 years ago that the corporation seems to
     have adopted a "if you find the job we'll let you go" type of outlook
     as opposed to the old "well, if you are unhappy with current job, let's
     see if we can help you find another within DEC".  

     Has anyone else noticed this?

     She is still working there and I'm trying to help her find another
     position at the moment.

							Thanks again,
							    Dave
665.11CVG::THOMPSONI&#039;m the NRAMon Nov 28 1988 16:297
    RE: .10 I've heard all of my managers say publicly that if anyone
    in the group feels that it is time to move on they will help as
    much as they can. I believe them. We're under our budgeted head
    count (don't tell anyone :-) ) so cost savings is not the reason.
    There are still a lot of managers who care and will help.
    
    		Alfred