T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
645.1 | Please see BMT::INVESTING | EXIT26::STRATTON | I (heart) my wife | Thu Oct 27 1988 23:34 | 18 |
| <<< HUMAN::DISK$HUMAN_WRKD:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DIGITAL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< The DEC way of working >-
================================================================================
Note 642.0* STOCK BUYBACK - TAKEOVER DEFENSE? No replies
NOVA::M_DAVIS "Eat dessert first;life is uncertain." 11 lines 26-OCT-1988 11:41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesterday, DIGITAL announced it will buy back 10,000,000 shares of its
stock. This is approximately 8 or 9 per cent of those shares
outstanding.
The perennial AT&T takeover rumor has once again surfaced. For
further information on the stock buyback and for detailed information
on the financial positions of both companys, see note #1170 of the
BMT::Investing notes conference. Press kp7 or Select.
Marge
|
645.2 | DIGITAL not for general business discussion | EXIT26::STRATTON | I (heart) my wife | Thu Oct 27 1988 23:37 | 10 |
| I meant the pointer in .1 to be for discussion of another
company (e.g., AT&T) taking over Digital.
If anyone wants to discuss takeovers in general, I don't
know whether BMT::INVESTING is the place to do it. I'm
sure that the DIGITAL conference is not the place to do
it.
Jim Stratton
|
645.3 | Not good for the OSF guys | DECWET::HELSEL | Well....isn't that special? | Fri Oct 28 1988 17:30 | 15 |
| re: .2
Why not?
It certainly effects the employees.
Dileep,
I can think of one negative aspect of AT&T (specifically) taking
DEC over. I'd say that most of Heffner's group would be pounding
bricks in short order.
:-{
Brett.
|
645.4 | On second thought, I won't say the "U" word | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Fri Oct 28 1988 17:39 | 1 |
| And... AT&T would require most non-management employees to...
|
645.5 | One Vote for NO! | PARVAX::POLAKOWSKI | Changes in Attitudes, Changes in Latitudes | Fri Oct 28 1988 21:07 | 26 |
|
I spent two years with the Bell System (1979-1981), just before
divestiture. It was without a doubt, the most miserable two
years that I have spent during my career. Since I did not have
the proverbial "Bell-Shaped Head", any ideas that I had (even
the ones that my co-workers admitted had a lot of merit) were
never taken seriously. I had to fight "tooth and nail" to be
given any job that had even a moderate amount of responsibility
and when I was given such a task had to make sure that anything
that I did would stand up to an amazing amount of scrutiny.
I finally got fed up with fighting against the system and left
for greener pastures (not DEC, although it was during this 2
year period that I worked with my first VAX).
So that the readers don't get the impression that my writings
are nothing more then sour grapes, my wife has the "Bell Shaped
Head" (having spent her entire 13 year working life with Ma
Bell) and she is begininng to get upset with the build up of
bureaucratic(sp?) nonsense that has been taking place over the
last year or so.
MY OPINION OF A POSSIBLE TAKEOVER BY A T & T --- UGH!
Ken
|
645.6 | Read our lips.. | DR::BLINN | Bluegrass: music aged to perfection | Sun Oct 30 1988 21:45 | 14 |
| This is not a place for voting. As Jim Stratton already pointed
out, this really isn't the right place to discuss "takeover"
rumors. And if it were the right place, there's really no
need to start yet another topic (I'm sure this has been in
here before, but I don't really care enough to search for it
at this late hour).
In any case, it's really a more appropriate topic for SOAPBOX
than for DIGITAL, unless we confine the discussion to its impact
on "The Digital Way of Working". Personal anecdotes that put
down other companies probably aren't relevant.
Tom
another DIGITAL co-moderator
|
645.7 | | UCOUNT::BAILEY | Corporate Sleuth | Mon Oct 31 1988 15:59 | 21 |
| Takeovers I've read about (never a personal experience) have most
often resulted in the predominant company remodeling the corporate
culture of the "taken-over" in it's own image, with a significant
elimination of redundant personnel, often mostly middle managers.
Although I'd be absolutely astounded if any company was able to
take DEC over, to the extent that my imagination can encompass the
idea I think it would be a bummer. DEC has many faults I'd like
to see corrected as a workplace, but most of them are connected
to the fact that DEC is a HUGE company! A takeover would make the
company even bigger and the problems associated would magnify.
People used to a certain way of doing things would have to make
sudden probably unwanted adjustments.
And I'd fear the loss of a lot of really valuable things DEC does
to make working here better than other places. Not enough companies
appreciate the fact that employees are people and that, if treated
as people and taken care of as people, they become more valuable
as employees -- product-producers, and all that.
Sherry
|
645.8 | I vote for a poison pill defense just in case | DELNI::GOLDSTEIN | A thousand pints of Lite | Thu Nov 03 1988 17:04 | 8 |
| Hey, I have a great idea to quell the takeover rumours!
Let's change everyone's employee agreement. Any obligations that
an employee has TO the company, vis a vis things like ownership
of patents and related intellectual property created while an employee,
revert to the employee in case of takeover.
Who'd wanna buy a land bank?
|
645.9 | | DECEAT::BHANDARKAR | | Fri Nov 04 1988 20:46 | 6 |
| RE:< Note 645.8 by DELNI::GOLDSTEIN "A thousand pints of Lite" >
-< I vote for a poison pill defense just in case >-
Add eligibility to exercise stock options without restrictions to that list.
/dileep
|