T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
608.1 | | NEWS::HAKKARAINEN | One organism, one vote | Thu Sep 01 1988 13:17 | 10 |
| For a while, my wife the HMO coverage (including dependent) while
I had John Hancock. That allowed us to use our HMO and our
chiropractor.
Canobie tickets are another ponderable. What are you gonna do with
all those tickets?
SAVE, stock, and other gems are up to you. We kick in money from
both paychecks, figuring that, if it's good for one, it's good for
both.
|
608.2 | Here is how we handle it | RADVAX::THOMPSON | | Thu Sep 01 1988 13:23 | 16 |
| I can tell you how my husband and I handle it. We both do SAVE, LTD,
optional life insurance, and stock purchase. (Remember that SAVE is
retirement money you are putting away BEFORE taxes and accumulated by
your social security number for tax purposes.) He has the house and
car insurances deducted from his pay and I have the dependent life and
medical deducted from my pay. I also have a DCU deduction for my car
loan.
I works out well since we have a joint checking account and both
checks are on direct deposit. Can't wait for next Spring when my
car is paid off...
Patti
|
608.3 | Forgot to mention medical | RADVAX::THOMPSON | | Thu Sep 01 1988 13:44 | 14 |
| I forgot to mention that we both let DEC pay for John Hancock Medical
insurance and I pay for dependent coverage for the baby. The only
problem I have had is with the hospital assuming that my husband's
insurance (by badge with John Hancock) covered the bills. After persisting
with the billing department of Emerson to change my base record on
their computer system (a VAX computer), that has been straightened
out. (It defaults to husband as guarantor.) Ask your PSA if it would
save DEC or you money to have your wife as a dependent on your medical
insurance. It's costing me ~$9.00/week for medical coverage for my baby.
FWIW, my husband worked at DEC first.
Patti
|
608.4 | Talk to your PSA | DR::BLINN | General Eclectic | Thu Sep 01 1988 13:51 | 18 |
| You should talk to your PSA about health insurance coverage,
as there are some complicated options. Clearly, only one of
you should purchase dependent coverage, and I believe that
it's possible for you to cover your wife under your dependent
coverage, as well as your children. There was a memo about
this that I saw several months ago, perhaps in Mgmt Memo, but
I can't find it right now.
Things like SAVE, stock, LTD, and life insurance are on a per-
person basis. You have to decide what insurance you need and
what is the best way to buy it, but it's hard to go wrong with
the DEC plans for LTD and additional life coverage. Similarly,
you have to decide about saving for retirement, for which both
the SAVE plan and stock purchase are good approaches. (Stock
may also be a good way to save money to finance college for
your children, if you see that in the future.)
Tom
|
608.5 | spreadsheet time | VAXRT::WILLIAMS | | Thu Sep 01 1988 15:42 | 28 |
| Note that the "legal" way to determine the primary carrier when
you both have health insurance that covers each other is by the
birthday of each, the one withethe earliest birthday (not birthdate)
is the primary.
The health coverage is the primary thing that gets tangled up, followed
by the choices for life insurance (two primary versus one primary
and one dependent).
The best way is to simply run the numbers, calculate the costs for
each variation and minimize.
Getting personnel to understand what you want may be another story:
My wife's employer offers HMO and Blue Cross. Since they kick in
the same amount for either plan, and since BC is HIGH, family coverage
for HCHP thru her was less than thru DEC (for "exactly" the same
coverage). So she picked me up and I wanted to "drop" health coverage
at DEC. We went round and round at personnel... Finally they decided
that I had to have at least individual coverage, so now I have JH,
which costs me nothing (unless I tell the HMO, in which case I'm
back to filling out forms and calculating deductables). But it
took three visits to Personnel and finally the magic phrase "If
you're not able to figure out a way to do this, maybe we should
see your supervisor and perhaps all of us can fingure it out".
/s/ Jim Williams
|
608.6 | | DPDMAI::RESENDEP | Following the yellow brick road... | Thu Sep 01 1988 19:59 | 9 |
| > ...I believe that it's possible for you to cover your wife under your
> dependent coverage, as well as your children.
You mean, I can cover my husband as a dependent on the HMO, and
he can cover me as a dependent on JH, and we can both have access
to either or both health plans as we desire???? I thought that
was not allowed. If it is, it's sure a good deal!
Pat
|
608.7 | This can be expensive | NOVA::MOY | Michael G. Moy, CSSE Database Systems | Fri Sep 02 1988 10:49 | 8 |
| Re .6
This can be expensive. It costs me $3/week for HMO coverage for
myself and $15/week for my wife.
michael
|
608.8 | My $.02 | BARTLE::NELSONK | | Fri Sep 02 1988 13:27 | 22 |
| I (I'm quoting our accountant now) strongly recommend that your
spouse join the SAVE plan. It's skimmed right off the top, you
don't pay taxes on it till you get the funds, and it is a good
way to save for retirement.
I agree with the noter who recommended that you split up the
benefits to see what works best for you. My feeling is, both
of you should have SAVE and LTD for your own selves. Perhaps
the person with the higher salary could carry the health insurance...
FWIW, my husband has Blue Cross Master Health Plus where he works,
and I carry JH (including dependent coverage). Our experience has
been that, what BC doesn't pick up, JH frequently does. Last year
Mike had a lot of tests performed in connection with his annual
physical, and after all was said and done, we paid only $30 for
everything. And when our son was born in March, JH picked up all
but $125. That included a C-section, 5 days in a private room,
circumcision, the whole works.
Good luck...welcome your wife to DEC for us!
KAte
|
608.9 | Company improving on health insurance | NAC::PLOUFF | Beautiful downtown Littleton | Fri Sep 02 1988 18:28 | 9 |
| Insurance companies in Massachusetts do not understand coordination
of benefits between two working spouses as well as other parts of
the country. In Illinois, insurance companies resolved overlapping
health coverage directly between themselves, no hassle to the
individual.
Digital in Mass. did not understand, at one time, the advantages
of couples both working for DEC getting only one set of health
insurance, not two. But the company is learning.
|
608.10 | JH coverage if both work for DEC | MSDOA2::MAYEUX | Swapped Out | Mon Sep 12 1988 18:49 | 17 |
| My husband and I both work for DEC. We live in New Orleans, and
HMO is not an option.
You and your spouse can both take SAVE, LTD, optional life, and
dependent life. However, you CAN NOT both get John Hancock coverage.
DEC will cover each of you, and your own bills must be submitted
with each individual badge number. If you have children, you
would submit claims under whichever of you have dependent covreage.
This becomes a problem if you meet the family deductible, by not
your personal. If you call personnel, they will "fix it", but it
will take a lot of talking.
When she joins DEC, call JH and let them know. JH should put a
"pointer" in your records to your spouses record. It does not always
work as it should, so be careful - especially with deductibles.
|
608.11 | coord. of benefits? | GLASS::HULL | Is there life after Plan A? | Sun Oct 02 1988 18:24 | 20 |
|
My wife is also finally joining the company after DECtemp-ing for
a year (Ugghhh!).
I currently have HMO coverage (myself and dependant, which up to
now covered her and our son).
I'm wondering if she gets JH coverage for herself (no cost), will
we have full coordination of benefits on any services not covered
in full? Stock, SAVE, LTD are fairly obvious to do, but the
health coverage issue is still somewhat confusing, even after
reading the prior replies in this note. Her new-employee
orientation is tomorrow morning, and I have half a mind to tag
along with her to see what personnel says about all this.
2 more double-digits in the ranks -
Regards,
Al (6+ yrs)
|
608.12 | | MSDOA::MAYEUX | Swapped Out | Wed Nov 16 1988 11:38 | 16 |
| Since I am not allowed to have HMO coverage, I can not answer from
that view.
However, although my husband carries JH dependent medical, in order
to cover our two children. JH covers me for free since I am an
employee. If I did not work for the company I would be covered
under my husband's policy. However, since I do work for the company,
I am covered under my own policy. I can not collect any benefits
under his policy.
Before my husband worked for DEC, we both had dependent coverage
through our employeers. His policy covered what mine did not.
Since we now both work for DEC, we can not do this.
|
608.13 | Could you expand on that statement? | DR::BLINN | The best mechanics are self-taught | Wed Nov 16 1988 12:15 | 10 |
| .12> Since I am not allowed to have HMO coverage, I can not answer from
.12> that view.
Could you clarify this? Why are you "not allowed to have HMO
coverage"? Is it because it's not available in your area, or were
you told by someone that, because your husband is covered under
John Hancock, you can not select an HMO? I could understand the
former, but I don't believe the latter is Digital's policy.
Tom
|
608.14 | Sorry about wording | MSDOA::MAYEUX | Swapped Out | Wed Nov 30 1988 15:32 | 8 |
| SORRY - HMO coverage is not available in your area. Very poor wording
on my part. The whole note was poor wording - I thought I said
NO for add note to the confrence, but it added it anyway. I must
had made a typo.
Sorry again.
Janet
|
608.15 | Possible tax benefit? | NCPROG::KOWALSKI | Rather swing on a star? | Thu Dec 01 1988 14:20 | 2 |
| Gee, seems like you might see some tax savings if you file
separately and take all the SAVE from the higher salary. Not so?
|