T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
506.1 | Sounds pretty hairbrained to me | SMAUG::GARROD | DTN 226-7114 | Mon Apr 04 1988 17:39 | 10 |
| What a ridiculous idea. I presume next they'll be saying that all
salesreps should give up their DECATHLON awards so that they will
be shared by all. And how about every employee in the company being
paid equally...
I think people that travel a lot deserve their frequent flight bonuses,
it's just one of the perks of the job. Anyway to most people who
have to travel it is a chore not a privilege.
Dave
|
506.3 | they'll have to pry them from my dead hands... | VIDEO::LASKO | There are no temporary workarounds... | Mon Apr 04 1988 20:07 | 5 |
| Only if you are silly enough to give Travel Services your frequent
flyer numbers....
there's also some discussion, although dated, on this issue in
DELNI::ON_THE_ROAD, the business travel conference.
|
506.4 | What do you mean? | FENNEL::STEVENSON | | Tue Apr 05 1988 10:13 | 5 |
| re: .2 (Ithink)
What do yo mean it is already happening with travel services? Do
yo mean if you get your tickets thru travel services that somehow
they claim your mileage bonus?
|
506.5 | check youre w2 and watch out for the IRS | NEWVAX::FILER | | Tue Apr 05 1988 10:31 | 7 |
| Sort of a side note here. If you look at the new w2 form it
has a section "non cash prizes & awards". This means that if you
get a trip, plaque, or dinner and it gets reported properly you
will have to pay tax on the value of this as if it were income.
I don't think I'd turn down a nice trip to some exoctic spot
but I doubt it I will be keeping any award that I don't want to
pay taxes on.
|
506.6 | They don't (currently) tax Frequently Flier Awards | QBUS::MITCHAM | Andy in Atlanta | Tue Apr 05 1988 13:13 | 0 |
506.7 | awards... | WINERY::BOUCHARKE | | Tue Apr 05 1988 19:22 | 6 |
| re: .5
The story is:(I called corporate to find out) Any award that an
employee gets for *service* (years with the company) is not taxed.
Also,DEC gives employees who get those trips to nice places,a tax
adder which means they pay the taxes...nice,huh?
|
506.8 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Tue Apr 05 1988 23:48 | 4 |
| DEC can't claim your frequent flyer bonuses - the airlines won't
let them. You can only get the bonus by sending in the form that
is sent directly to you.
Steve
|
506.9 | No problems since AMEX | CSCMA::PLAISTED | Migration Expertise Center | Wed Apr 06 1988 09:37 | 10 |
| Since AMEX took over flight bookings, I had asked about f.f. numbers.
AMEX said that they will automatically post your f.f. number to
all bookings for you. There will be no "loss" of f.f. miles at all.
It is a standard service that they provide and has nothing to do
with DEC.
Since they told me this, I have called my airlines after receving
my tickets to make sure that the f.f. numbers were posted to the
bookings, and they were.
|
506.10 | It should all be taxed....... | MSCSSE::LENNARD | | Fri Jul 08 1988 16:14 | 20 |
| Let me offer the thought that frequent flyer bonus' should absolutely
be turned back into the company. After all, they paid for the ticket.
Surely no one believes that they are "free". The same applies to
the relatively newer "frequent sleeper" bonus' primarily being hyped
by Marriot and their ilk.
Secondarily, if the company is not interested in the hassle of
administrating this, then the benefit should definitely be taxed
as income. I'm sorry, but I just saw too much mis-use of this system
by Digital employees during my brief, painful sojourn with the
ill-fated Target Sales Force. I personally know of several people
wh consistently flew more expensive flights to get the points, and
also who stayed in expensive hotels for the same reason. I actual
saw a guy take a totally unneeded late night flight to Pittsburg
just to be able to stay in a hotal which offered the points.
Of course, none of this was as bad as the Target Sales Force member
who also owned a travel bureau and actively solicited people to
let him make their flight arrangements for obvious conflict of interest
reasons.
|
506.11 | | BUNYIP::QUODLING | It's my foot! I'll Shoot it! | Sat Jul 09 1988 02:18 | 10 |
| If the corporation wishes me to surrender my frequent flyer
bonuses, then all of my travel will be done during business
hours from now on. I often do international travel for the
company, and more often than not it is on the weekend, getting
up at 4 AM to catch a plane and not hitting the hotel till
10PM at night. There is a certain amount of fair give and take
amongst those of us that travel a lot.
q
|
506.12 | taxing/confiscating not appropriate. | DECWET::COOMBS | | Sat Jul 09 1988 03:32 | 13 |
|
If employees of cost center YXX are flying inappropriate routes
and staying in overly expensive hotels to accumulate frequent
flier miles, the solution to that problem is to put heat on the
cost center manager, involved financial people, and the employee
to stop the abuse.
Taking frequent flier bonuses away from folks who suffer
significant personal inconvenience & strain (along with their
families) is not an appropriate response to the abuses of the few.
jc
|
506.13 | | DIXIE1::HARPER | Kernel ala mode | Mon Jul 11 1988 12:42 | 8 |
| re las couple
Agreed.
If you want frequent flyer bonuses, then star spending 5-6 weeks
on the road.
/Pat
|
506.14 | | PRAVDA::JACKSON | All I want is the key to your Ferarri | Thu Jul 21 1988 12:40 | 30 |
| I'm another of those who believe that the frequent 'anything' benefits
belong with the employee. I've spent many a night/weekend traveling
on business for this company. Since I'm a salaried employee, they
think nothing of asking me to fly on my time to get to a trade show
at 8:00 AM in Los Angeles on a Monday morning. If they'd like to
start paying me extra time (or comp time) for the time spent away,
then fine. Current company policy says that the company doesn't
want the miles, and I think it should stay that way.
As for people abusing the system. Our whole group was once sent
a memo about expenses and abuse of the system. The memo said that
some employees were taking advantage of the $20.00 minimum and thus
not justifying their expenses. In order to crack down on this,
the manager said that receipts would be required for anything over
$10.00 (not company policy). To this, I responded that if he had
a problem with "some people" then he should fix that problem and
not make the others in the group suffer unnecessary hassle in dealing
with the problem of the others. Same goes here. If there are people
doing unnecessary travel, then fix that problem. I and many others
have never rented a more expensive car (we have specific discount
arrangements with car rental people, who we must use), stayed in
a more expensive hotel (again, discounts are arranged by the company)
or flew a more expensive flight (in fact, I've spent some serious
time in the Denver airport because I was REQUIRED to fly on Continental
(the absolute pits) to get a cheaper fair)
-bill
|
506.15 | "REQUIRED?" | VAXRT::WILLIAMS | | Thu Jul 21 1988 16:16 | 6 |
| re: .14
You can't be required to fly CONTINENTAL. Just add to your travel
profile the words "NO CONTINENTAL".
/s/ Jim Williams (whose profile contains those words.)
|
506.16 | | PRAVDA::JACKSON | All I want is the key to your Ferarri | Fri Jul 22 1988 17:02 | 6 |
| Well, maybe not required, but told that we needed a VP signiture
to get a direct flight (which was the non-Continental flight that
got us there in time)
-bill
|
506.17 | Horse patoot, if you ask me | DR::BLINN | This space intentionally left blank | Mon Jul 25 1988 18:26 | 10 |
| Did you get the part about needing a VP signature in writing?
I really doubt that the VP in question made that "policy".
VPs generally don't want to be bothered with such trivia.
As long as you're not "breaking a rule" (going outside of the
established guidelines, like asking for a business class ticket
when a cheaper fare is available), you don't need signature
approval from anyone any higher up than your manager, who has
to sign the travel approval form for you to pick up the tickets.
Tom
|