T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
408.1 | | WME::MACOMBER | | Mon Oct 26 1987 19:56 | 16 |
| I think that DEC will give you the average of the highest 2 out of 3
real estate appraisals. I.E.
100,000
95,000
105,000
DEC would do: 102,500 ... Atleast this is what a friend told me when she
relocated with DEC.
Even if it was a little less than what you expected, it may be the best
bet considering that the real estate market seems to be quite slow.
Anyways: Ask Corporate Relocation
/Ted
|
408.2 | We had GOOD luck with the "DEC" way in 79. | SSDEVO::EKHOLM | | Mon Oct 26 1987 23:01 | 15 |
| I sold my house in Clinton, Mass in 1979 to "DEC". It sure cut down
on the worry and fuss in our move from Mass to Colorado. The price
was about right (+/- 3k) and we where given 90% of our money very
soon (a couple of days if I remember correctly). The other 10% was
sent to us after the house was sold & CLOSED ON! This way we knew
how long the house was on the market. I'm glad we sold to "DEC"
as the time delay between getting the 90% and the additional 10%
was about 2 months. With houses staying on the market here in Colorado
as long as they do, I'd recommend the "DEC" way. Now if houses move
in two days where your trying to sell, then consider the options.
DEC no longer uses the same firm they did in 1979, so maybe others
have more recent experiences. Ours went well, our house was in better
than average condition, and each case is different.
Good Luck.
|
408.3 | Currently in the machine... | ATPS::GRASMANN | l� | Tue Oct 27 1987 09:18 | 15 |
| My current experience of the 3rd party purchase is that the best
they (DEC?) can do for me is about $22K >less< than I even owe on
the house! This is based on what the realtor has told me. I have
yet to learn what the appraisers say it's worth, however.
I guess I can't expect them to give me anything more than what the
market will command, considering the state of affairs in Houston,
Texas. Therefore, I'm allowing a realtor to try to make it assumable
with 0 (zero) equity. This may be the only alternative for me to get
out from under the mortgage payments honorably.
If you're interested, I'll keep you posted, as I'm supposed to hear
more this week.
Steve
|
408.4 | Risk reduction at a price... | DPDMAI::RESENDEP | Topeka is in Texas | Thu Oct 29 1987 17:52 | 14 |
| My experience on two DIGITAL relocations has been that you can get
5 - 10% more by selling your house yourself. Selling to DIGITAL,
however, is far easier and risk-free since you know both when and
how much you will receive. How fast your house will move if you
try and sell it yourself depends on lots of things of course, so
it's a decision you'll have to make yourself. Whatever you decide,
I *highly* recommend you get the appraisals done. It doesn't cost
you anything, and then you know where you stand. Also, if you decide
later to take the house off the market and sell to DIGITAL, you
already have an offer so things can move just that much quicker.
Good luck!
Pat
|
408.5 | Go for it | GENRAL::BANKS | David Banks -- N0ION | Mon Nov 02 1987 11:35 | 45 |
| Re: .1
>I think that DEC will give you the average of the highest 2 out of 3
>real estate appraisals. I.E.
>
> 100,000
> 95,000
> 105,000
>
>DEC would do: 102,500
WRONG! It used to be that three appraisals were required and, as
long as they agreed within 5%, then the average of ALL THREE was
the amount of the offer.
Apparently, this has now changed slightly. On our recent move we
had TWO appraisals and a "Market Analysis" conducted by a local
Realtor as opposed to an appraiser. Still, it is required that
the three agree within 5% and I think the offer is still the average
of all three.
This is the third time we've taken advantage of the third party
purchase program. It has always been satisfactory as far as the
amount is concerned. Once we thought we'd been short-changed, but
the market was on the brink of a nosedive and the amount offered
is what the house would be expected to bring if sold within a certain
time period (90 days, or 120 days -- I'm not sure). So it was actually
quite good (the house didn't actually sell for a year, and for $15K
less than we'd been paid for it!).
The major problem is that Homequity, the third party purchase company
Digital uses, tends to be slow in what they do. Everything is done in
serial mode so you need to talk to someone who has been through it
recently and find out what you're going to need at each step. That way
you can minimize delays by having ready the necessary information as
it's required. But don't expect them to be any quicker than they
say they will or you *will* be disappointed.
On the whole, I'd recommend it for the convenience. Yes, you might
be able to get a little more by selling yourself, but ask yourself
whether it's worth the aggravation and the possibility of carrying
two mortgages if you're unable to sell in the time you need to or
perhaps even losing a house you intend to buy.
- David
|
408.6 | Good for us! | DECWIN::FISHER | Burns Fisher 381-1466, ZKO3-4/W?? | Sat Nov 14 1987 22:07 | 17 |
| We had *very* good luck with the home company in Dec 1985 when we
moved out of MA to NH. I believe that I got *more* than I could
have sold it for. We were just leaving the peak season, and I think
that two out of the 3 appraisors were giving summer prices rather
than late fall. In any case, we got a super price.
In addition, the timing was critical for us; we needed the money
to close on our new house before Xmas, but we needed to delay moving
as long as possible because of renovations being done. The company
was *very* obliging about helping us make sure that the money arrived
on exactly the right day via wire. They also were flexible in letting
us leave a few days late.
It was a good experience for us.
Burns
|
408.7 | | ABSZK::GREENWOOD | Tim - Asian Base Systems Software | Sat Nov 21 1987 15:26 | 29 |
| We recently sold our house in the UK through Homeequity when we
relocated to the US. I would recommend anyone in a similar position
to use the third party program. The policy details in the UK may
differ from those here. I went through the following steps:
1) Two assessments are taken. If they are within a certain percentage
(I forget the number) the average is taken. If not a third assessment
is taken and the average of the top two is taken.
2) When title is cleared Homeequity transferred the money to my lawyer
who closed the mortgage and sent the remnant to me. Clearing title
takes rather a long time in the UK.
3) Homeequity puts the house on the market. For a month I could set
the asking price and accept or refuse any offers. After a month
I had no say in the matter. If the house is sold at more than the
assessed value I got the difference. If less then Homeequity/Digital
eat the difference. In fact although the house was sold after the
one month period did fetch several thousand pounds over the estimated
value.
The person that I dealt with at Homeequity was very helpful, although
a little over optimistic as to the length of time the process would
take. We eventually received our money just a few days before our
closing date here. Selling a house at long distance is a little
harrowing in any circumstances, but I could not have done it at
all without the third party program.
Tim
|
408.8 | more on UK relocation | RDGENG::KEDMUNDS | I don't have an fm2r... | Mon Nov 23 1987 03:27 | 28 |
| Just to tidy up some points from .-1:
� 1) Two assessments are taken. If they are within a certain percentage
� (I forget the number) the average is taken. If not a third assessment
� is taken and the average of the top two is taken.
The percentage is 5%; if a third assessment is taken, the average
of the *closest* two is used.
� For a month I could set
� the asking price and accept or refuse any offers.
...as long as they are not less than the value calculated in
step 1.
The above is just to set the record straight; I've just been
through the process (internally to the UK), and I agree that Homequity
are very helpful. For any UK readers, a conference discussing
relocation is located at:
FOOT::RELOCATION_ISSUES
- the usual <KP7> or <SELECT> to add. Sorry, but this conference
does *not* cover US internal relocations (the rules are too
different!).
Keith
|
408.9 | It is a benefit, and a tool | IPOVAX::FELDMAN | | Tue Jan 26 1988 16:55 | 32 |
| I used the Home equity deal and I feel I made out very well on convenience
and price. I would advise you to understand the *CURRENT* arrangement for
pricing etc. since it changes and in some cases it is subject to the
subcontractor DEC has arranged with. FYI, it is not DEC who buys the house
but another company DEC has an arrangement with.
What few people realize is that the purchase company gives you an offer on
your home, this is based on some fair market value etc. At that point you
have thirty days (typically) to accept the offer. During that time you
can look for a better offer. This is an amazing tool if you know how to
use it. What I said to my realtor, in effect is, "Dont even show the home
unless they are prepared to outdo the homeequity offer, there is simply no
benefit to me in talking about a lower price." This really cuts the crap
with realtors etc. Suddenly you only have a highly motivated buyers and
a realtor who knows they have to perform in thirty days or lose out totally.
Be sure to add a rider to your realtor contract about them *NOT* being
entitled to a commission on the home equity offer.
Once you have the offer from someone else, you then assign it over to home
equity. When you move out, you get the money home equity offered. When
the house closes with the better offer, you get the difference. If the
deal falls through, you loose but you have the money from home equity.
This eliminates the cost of bridge loans etc. and eliminates the jitters of
not selling the house.
I sold my house for *MORE* than I thought it was worth. The reason is I had
the home equity offer (which was totally fair) and I was able to push an extra
5k from someone who fell in love with it. They knew they had to come up with
that money or forget it and so did the realtor.
Geoff
|
408.10 | take the relo if prices are dropping | DELNI::GOLDSTEIN | Baba ROM DOS | Thu Jan 28 1988 11:32 | 16 |
| In the falling Boston market, relo firms often pay more than market.
Relo estimates are based on historical numbers. If the trend is
down, then the current value is less than you're likely to actually
get, so the relo deal can be a big win.
Case in point: There's a house for sale today which has been vacant
since August. The relo firm paid about $260k for it, and put it
on the market for $275k asking. (That's breakeven after paying
the broker.) The asking is now down to $257k, but it's still on
the market; they said in November that they wouldn't accept below
the mid-250s, and they're no doubt feeling a bit stuck.
The house would have sold in mid-1986 for $275k or more, in about
a day.
fred
|