T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
352.1 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Wed Jul 22 1987 22:13 | 13 |
| In Mass. and NH we have MANY picnics at Canobie Lake Park in
Salem, NH. These are spread out across a 6 week period and
each plant has a specific day (usually with a few other plants).
These are fun, a good place to enjoy oneself and munch on Ptobin
Ptomaine Burgers.
The WORST memory I have is, I think, 1976 or 1977, when DEC
decided to send ALL of DEC New England to Rocky Point Park in
Rhode Island on ONE DAY! It took two hours to get from the
highway to the parking lot, three hours to get lunch, and
if you could go on two rides all day you were lucky. They'll
never do THAT again!
Steve
|
352.2 | Great Times! | NCVAX1::DICKS | Re-Use, Don't Abuse Good Code | Thu Jul 23 1987 00:32 | 11 |
|
We have had them every year (14 years) I have been with the company.
It's a real event. Several guys get up at 3AM and start a pig
roasting, play cards, Trivial Pursuit etc., Second shift arrives,
About 1PM we start playing volleyball, we usally do a little boating,
water skiing. Last year some of us went Scuba diving. Obviously,
I have lots of great memories.
Worst Memory: The year my boss would not let us roast a pig.
|
352.3 | Munich, Germany | DCC::JAERVINEN | Down with gravity! | Thu Jul 23 1987 05:18 | 5 |
| There's one for the German HQ in Munich every year. This year it
wasn't a real picnic, it was arranged in a park downtown Munich.
It was the first time I went; wasn't too great, the only thing that
was well organized was beer (and other drinks).
|
352.4 | Do we really only remember the good ones? | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Pat Sweeney | Thu Jul 23 1987 09:51 | 3 |
| What about the DECtown picnic complete with a long bus ride,
long lines for food, boring speeches, boring music from Peter, Paul,
and Mary, and a boring bus ride back to the hotels...
|
352.5 | | CUPOLA::HAKKARAINEN | This too shall pass | Thu Jul 23 1987 13:00 | 2 |
| The nicest thing about the Canobie outings is that families get
to spend a day with a crowd that has not been drinking.
|
352.6 | Well, I enjoyed DECtown | ATLAST::VICKERS | What is our goal? | Thu Jul 23 1987 14:03 | 8 |
| Re: .4 (DECtown picnic)
I thought the DECtown picnic was great fun, pretty good food, pretty
good entertainment, and a great time.
Maybe it was the companionship,
Don
|
352.7 | ''ah yes...I remember it well.'' | JAWS::DAVIS | Gil Davis | Thu Jul 23 1987 14:08 | 14 |
| I remember standing in the food line at the DECtown picnic with
Joel Schwartz and Ed Kramer behind me talking about business...
When the lady I was with asked 'I wonder who they contrracted with
to provide all this food..?' Schwartz answered 'probably the lowest
bidder..'
Actually I thought it was a great time. Visited the Kennedy library..
ate, heard the words, and enjoyed the two beards and a blonde.
Canobie Lake is a scream! I remember the guy standing in front of
the food lines directing the hordes with a megaphone...and then
the icr cream trucks throwing boxes of ice cream sandwiches at the
crowds...what fun!
|
352.8 | If you could read their minds... | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Pat Sweeney | Thu Jul 23 1987 18:58 | 4 |
| Gil,
At the time, did you think to ask Joel Schwartz and Ed Kramer where
they thought DEC's stock was heading?
|
352.9 | Ah Canobie Lake .... | ATLAST::BOUKNIGHT | Everything has an outline | Thu Jul 23 1987 22:37 | 9 |
| I just arrived in the company jsut before the Rocky Point picnic,
and didn't go. I remember it well though, cause I heard nothing but
bitching about it for weeks thereafter.
As to Canobie lack, all recollections herein are good ones, including
the one in our 25th year when they served up the HUGE birthday cake
EVERY day we had a crowd there.
Jack
|
352.10 | Dejavu | RSTS32::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Fri Jul 24 1987 14:56 | 12 |
| My worst memory of Canobie Lake outings reoccurs every year -
The DEC employees who request (and oddly enough *RECEIVE* somehow) additional
tickets for people other than members of their immediate family and then tow
the Mongolian hordes along with them to increase the size of the crowd by
about 20% or so. Sorry, I guess I'm being a hardnose about this, but it seems
to me as if DEC is willing to foot the bill for employees and their *FAMILIES*
to have a day of food and fun, it's kind of like looking a gift horse in the
mouth to abuse the benefit this way.
-Jack
|
352.11 | | CSSE::MDAVIS | Grins | Fri Jul 24 1987 15:59 | 8 |
| Would your objection hold if both parents were DECies and they each
requested tickets for the kids?
The reason I ask is that my "ex" and I used to do this. The kids
were so spread in age that they didn't want to be together at the
park...they preferred to bring a friend their own age.
Marge
|
352.12 | Read the ticket request form | ISTG::ENGHOLM | Larry Engholm | Sat Jul 25 1987 18:41 | 3 |
| If they're not members of your immediate family they aren't invited,
and you're a thief (in my opinion).
Larry
|
352.13 | Back up, please. | CADSYS::MCDONOUGH | | Sun Jul 26 1987 18:33 | 17 |
|
re: < Note 352.12 by ISTG::ENGHOLM "Larry Engholm" >
>>"and you're a thief (in my opinion)."
In **my** opinion, Larry, the second part of your sentence was rude and
obnoxious. Please note that I didn't say that *you* are rude and obnoxious.
I may disagree with something you write, just as you disapprove of something
that DEC employees with families choose to do; neither of us, however, has
the right to pass judgement and call names.
I don't know the person you branded personally, but recognize the name as a
thoughtful contributor to a couple of Notes files that I browse. She, and all
of us, deserve better treatment.
Kevin McDonough
|
352.14 | I overdid it, sorry | ISTG::ENGHOLM | Larry Engholm | Mon Jul 27 1987 01:11 | 19 |
| Maybe you're right. I thought twice before entering the note, but it
is how I feel. DEC trusts us not to take unfair advantage of our
benefits, and it's made clear who the tickets are meant for when we
accept them. To use them for anybody else is dishonest, and in my
mind is the same as stealing.
I'm not claiming that I wouldn't do the same thing she did in the same
situation. I don't know. But if I did, I'd recognize that I was
stealing. (Hmm. Saying "...that I'm a thief" doesn't sound as good.
I guess you're right, I didn't word my original note very well. Sorry.)
I don't know Marge either (except from notes here). Even if she
wasn't a thoughtful contributor, I wouldn't mean to treat her badly.
I appreciate her honesty in .11. Maybe I was being brutally honest in
answering her question (addressed to somebody else), but I don't mean
to cause bad feelings.
Larry
Amendment: "and you were stealing (in my opinion)."
|
352.15 | I have outgrown Canobie | MARCIE::JLAMOTTE | Somewhere Over the Rainbow | Mon Jul 27 1987 07:23 | 19 |
| It seems to me that the goal of the company would be to provide
an activity that the largest percentage of the company could enjoy.
It seems to me that Marge did indeed follow the 'rule' in that she
was entitled to tickets for her immediate family as was her then-
husband.
As a ten year veteran of the company the Digital picnic use to be
an event that my whole family enjoyed. Now that my children are
grown and no longer 'dependent' instead of six tickets I am
'eligible' for two.
In my opinion the company should revisit this benefit and consider
a similar activity that would be of interest to a larger group of
people. This activity seems to be geared to the young family and
as Digital matures employees with young families are no longer the
largest portion of the workforce.
|
352.16 | !?! | INANNA::SUSEL | | Mon Jul 27 1987 09:57 | 10 |
| I have been with DEC for over 8 years, and enjoy Canobie lake.
I now have a daughter, and she enjoys it also. I seem to run into
alot of people from other plants I worked at there also.
DECTOWN.. What a time. I was paid time and a half with mileage
to attend! What did I do???
I wore yellow nylons, yellow swim fins, and feathers!!
Bruce....Who was BIG bird at Dectown
|
352.17 | cant please all of the people all of the time | QBUS::BAUER | | Mon Jul 27 1987 11:00 | 11 |
| Is Canobie Park a place with roller coasters and amusement rides?
I've read here some references to a limitation on who attends, is
there some 'official' rule, something printed on the invitation?
If so, how is it worded?
I'm working on our Summer Outing here in Atlanta, and trying to
avoid doing things that upset people and make it as fun as possible
for a variety of people.
Linda
|
352.18 | "Maturity" vs. growth... | TSG::BRADY | Bob Brady, TSG, LMO4-1/K4, 296-5396 | Mon Jul 27 1987 12:53 | 21 |
| -< I have outgrown Canobie >-
> It seems to me that the goal of the company would be to provide
> an activity that the largest percentage of the company could enjoy.
...
> In my opinion the company should revisit this benefit and consider
> a similar activity that would be of interest to a larger group of
> people. This activity seems to be geared to the young family and
> as Digital matures employees with young families are no longer the
> largest portion of the workforce.
Please take care not to confuse the "maturation" of Digital as
a company with the "maturation" of individual employees...Digital's
corporate maturation has been accompanied by massive new hiring and given
the nature of our industry I would be very surprised to find that our
workforce were mostly past the family-rearing years...but if anyone
has stats to the contrary, I'd be very interested.
|
352.19 | oops | TSG::BRADY | Bob Brady, TSG, LMO4-1/K4, 296-5396 | Mon Jul 27 1987 12:56 | 2 |
| BTW, .18 replies to .15
|
352.20 | | FROST::BARBER | | Mon Jul 27 1987 14:14 | 23 |
| I have worked at DEC for 6 years now in BTO. The first three years
our outing was at the Basin Harbor Club, Vergennes, on Lake Champlain
(where els!). I thought is was great fun. We had games for the
kids, bingo, movies, band to listen to while we ate our buffet style
cook out. There were boats available for renting, a tour boat and
a fishing contest for the kids. Oh yes, and swimming!
Then for two years they had the carnival type outing at the fair
grounds. I was interested. My son insists on going to the State
Fair every year, so he didn't miss not going. I hate standing in
lines for rides!
This year promises to be interesting. We have all day tickets to
the Shelburne Museum, a cook out and then a circus at 8 p.m.
I understand the frustration of not being able to get extra tickets.
Our tickets say you are allowed to bring just one guest and any
dependent children that live in your household. Obviously my husband
is my guest. That leaves our son quite on his own when we go.
Donna B.
|
352.21 | | FROST::BARBER | | Mon Jul 27 1987 14:20 | 8 |
|
> Then for two years they had the carnival type outing at the fair
> grounds. I was interested.
Oops! That should have been "I wasn't interested".
------
|
352.22 | beer???? | FROST::BARBER | | Mon Jul 27 1987 14:27 | 8 |
|
ref .3
> the only thing that was well organized was beer (and other drinks).
I know in the US that we are not allowed to serve alcohol at any
DEC sponsered function. Is it not the same in Germany?
|
352.23 | OK in Deutschland | JAWS::DAVIS | Gil Davis | Mon Jul 27 1987 15:01 | 8 |
| I don't believe it's the same in Germany. I was in Munich last March,
and noticed the beer that was being sold in the employee cafeteria.
Personally, if I drank one for lunch, I'd be snoozing by 2:00 (no
'so what's different?' jokes puleeeeze). But there were a lot of
DEC folks having a brew (German) for lunch..
Gil
|
352.24 | | LESLIE::ANDY | CSSE M.E. for Digital's OSI Products | Mon Jul 27 1987 18:18 | 5 |
| <sigh>, as in innumerable other notes in this and other notesfiles,
let me reassure you that DEC in the USA is far more parnoid about
alcohol than it's european sister companies.
Andy
|
352.25 | This has already been discussed at length elsewhere in this conference | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Mon Jul 27 1987 19:34 | 7 |
| Not only is beer sold in the cafeteria in DECpark Munich, but there are also
beer vending machines located throughout the facility, so you can take beer
back to your desk just like you'd get a soda here in the U.S.
Banning beer at work in Germany would mean losing most of our employees.
/john
|
352.26 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Mon Jul 27 1987 22:32 | 19 |
| To answer the earlier question: yes, Canobie Lake Park is an amusement
park with rides, roller coasters, etc.
The wording on the ticket request form as I remember it is:
1. If married, you can get tickets for yourself, your spouse
and your dependent children
2. If single, you get tickets for yourself, a guest, and
your dependent children
I understand the ethics with the literal interpretation of the above
rules, but I have a hard time condemning anyone who stretches them
reasonably, such as bringing along the kids' babysitter, or a visiting
grandparent. While I have never taken anyone with me who didn't
meet the guidelines, nor have I ever requested more tickets than
I was entitled to, I have at times given surplus tickets to other
employees who wanted them.
Steve
|
352.27 | Extra people? I didn't notice any... | REGENT::EPSTEIN | Bruce Epstein | Tue Jul 28 1987 15:54 | 6 |
| If Digital provides a benefit (in this case, Canobie Park),
and then the rules become so restrictive as to inhibit many
employees from enjoying the benefit, then of what value is the
benefit?
Bruce (My wife and I enjoy Canobie even without children)
|
352.28 | | PIWACT::KLEINBERGER | MAXCIMize your efforts | Tue Jul 28 1987 20:25 | 18 |
| My kids are already asking when is their time to go to Canobie Lake
this year... they do enjoy it...
As for extra tickets...
If worker A and B are entitled to two tickets, and choose to obtain
them, and give them to me, for me to take two underpriviledged kids
with my kids, what is the difference. Two people went. The two
that give up their tickets to me did not go, so that two others
could go. As far as I am concerned, it was an even exchange... I
can't see where the complaint is...
DISCLAIMER: I have not brought anyone who was not entitled to a
ticket to Canobie Lake. The above was a hypothetical situation
only.
GLK
|
352.29 | | ARMORY::CHARBONND | Noto, Ergo Sum | Wed Jul 29 1987 09:11 | 7 |
| Out here in Western Mass., the Springfield and Westfield plants
rent a park just over the Conn. line for a big picnic, with
softball and volleyball, and a pool. No drinking - officially.
Lotsa parking-lot parties. I don't go now, too far to walk from
the car to the food :-)
Re. Munich - I think i'll start studying German !!
|
352.30 | Inflation | RSTS32::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Fri Jul 31 1987 09:42 | 32 |
| Re: several
When I expressed my original concern about people obtaining tickets
they weren't entitled to, I should have been more clear, but I guess
I didn't feel it necessary to go into a whole lot of tactical detail.
In strict principle, I think that at least to some extent, its an
abuse of a benefit to bring people to Canobie Lake that aren't
"invited". As someone mentioned, the form says "employee, spouse/guest,
and dependent children", not your son's/daughter's friends. Look at
it this way - if anyone cared to enforce it, would you be willing to
defend your "right" to take your kids' friends?
I point of fact, I must admit that I myself have been guilty of this
violation. Several years when my wife didn't want to go and my two
daughters did, I've allowed one or the other of them to bring a friend
to use the ticket my wife wasn't using. As someone mentioned, if the
tickets are available to you and you use them, the number of people
doesn't change so what's the difference, even if you've gotten the
tickets from another employee who chooses not to use their own.
My real complaint was addressed at was those employees who request
(from personnel, or whomever is responsible for doling out the tickets)
EXTRA tickets - i.e. MORE than they are entitled to - in order to
bring extra people to inflate the crowd. Maybe part of my anger
should be addressed at personnel (or whoever is responsible for
doling out the tickets) as they should have access to the Employee
Master File to verify the number of tickets any particular DEC badge
holder is entitled to. Yet I see people with two kids having eight or
ten tickets being dispensed to them. Something just isn't right there.
-Jack
|
352.31 | A novel idea: do what's "right" | TOPDOC::SLOANE | Bruce is on the loose | Fri Jul 31 1987 10:49 | 12 |
| Several years ago I had 4 tickets: myself, wife, and 2 kids.
Because of a family emergency we were unable to attend. My manager
gave my tickets to 2 other employees, who were able to bring friends
and out of town relatives.
It's true these people weren't DECies, but the alternative would
have been to throw the tickets out.
Giving the tickets to others certainly seemed like the sensible and
"right" thing to do.
-bs
|
352.32 | | ARMORY::CHARBONND | Real boats rock! | Fri Jul 31 1987 10:59 | 2 |
| Once the ticket requests are put in, food is ordered for
X number of people, so it makes sense to send someone.
|
352.33 | | COUGAR::MORRISON | Bob M. LMO2/P41 296-5357 | Tue Aug 04 1987 18:26 | 7 |
| I agree that Personnel should check the files when issuing tickets
to be sure the children are "real". I think this can be on-line.
If not, I suppose they could legitimately say it would be too time-
consuming.
If you enjoy spending 3-4 hours waiting in lines to go on rides
and for food, you will like the outing. And if you don't go on the
rides there is not enough to do to make it worth going.
|
352.34 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Tue Aug 04 1987 20:00 | 3 |
| Do you register your children with personnel? I don't. How are
they supposed to check?
Steve
|
352.35 | | ANGORA::MORRISON | Bob M. LMO2/P41 296-5357 | Wed Aug 05 1987 12:37 | 3 |
| The number of exemptions on your federal tax withholding form,
which personnel has on file, is usually equal to or slightly greater
than the number of dependent children.
|
352.36 | avoid assumptions | MPGS::MCCLURE | Why Me??? | Wed Aug 05 1987 12:44 | 10 |
| re .35
the number of exemptions on your federal witholding is a function
of a)your actual # of dependents b)your overall tax situation or
c)your personal preference.
Bob Mc
PS, slightly smaller maybe, but I can't think of a reason to claim
more unless some form of b) causes it.
Bob Mc
|
352.37 | | VCQUAL::THOMPSON | Noter at large | Wed Aug 05 1987 14:04 | 7 |
| RE: .35 My W-4 shows no deductions which even if I did not have
a family would be somewhat less then my actual situation since there
would still be me. I know people in other situations who claim much
more then their actual deductions because of other things that they
will be able to deduct at year end.
Alfred
|
352.38 | Don't Be a Dog in the Manger | DELNI::JONG | Steve Jong/NaC Pubs | Wed Aug 05 1987 15:08 | 9 |
| [Re: .37]: What you claim for deductions is no one else's business;
not even the IRS's, if you pay what you owe on 15-APR.
[Re: jam-packed Canobie Lake Park]: I used to go to Honeywell Day
at CLP. It was jammed. Then the company went down the tubes, and
Family Day was cancelled... 8^(
Don't complain about the crowds. Be happy they're all still part
of the "family."
|
352.39 | | MILT::JACKSON | Bill Jackson DOESN'T take American Express | Thu Aug 06 1987 08:42 | 10 |
| my W4 has 9 deductions. I have no kids.
Does this mean that I should get 9 tickets?????
-bill
|
352.40 | I think there's no way to tell | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Tue Aug 11 1987 17:34 | 9 |
| Well, my W4 had 7 deductions, and Paul had 1 (I think), but now
that we are married and pay much higher taxes, we both have negative
dedcutions (0 + withhold EXTRA money per week - it's been five years,
and my take-home pay is still lower than it was when I was single,
and Paul's was until his last raise! Good grief!!). So, I guess
we get NEGATIVE numbers of Canobie tickets.
I don't think the company has any info that would tell it how many
an employee is really entitled to.
|
352.41 | DO THEY LET YOU HIDE THEM YOUR HAREM ? | ISOLA::BREICHNER | | Wed Aug 12 1987 08:52 | 7 |
| Gee folks, there seems to be a significant difference in US versus
European personnel policies. Over here (at least in France) you
are required to communicate to personnel data such as:
marital status, number of kids, home address.....
and any changes when they occur. This is mandatory (I think by the
laws).
Fred_who_knows_that_personnel_knows_that_he's_got_five_kids.
|
352.42 | | CSSE::MDAVIS | Reality, a collective hunch... | Sat Aug 15 1987 09:10 | 1 |
| Here it is between you and the tax collector...
|
352.43 | beware for your older dependants | FSHQOA::CGILMORE | | Tue Sep 01 1987 15:45 | 10 |
|
The invitation for Canobie tickets states (and has always stated)
that if you are married, you are entitled to tickets for you,
your spouse and your dependant children.
This year they have decided the age limit is 23, regardless,
meaning the 25 and 26 year old children who still live at home
with mom and have gone to Canobie with her for the past 9 years
suddenly are 'too old' and can't go this year.
|
352.44 | Digital has grown too large for one park | TLE::SAVAGE | Neil, @Spit Brook | Tue Oct 20 1987 11:17 | 16 |
| Note 262 in UCOUNT::NEW_HAMPSHIRE discusses peoples reactions to
the Canobie Lake Outing on Sunday, October 18, 1987.
I won't rehash that discussion here, except to point out that that
Sunday's attendance was approximately 8,000 in excess of the park's
rated capacity of 10,000 visitors.
Safety considerations, as well as the comfort and good humor of the
attendees, would appear to demand that Digital consider some
alternatives. New Hampshire's climate would seem to preclude simply
reserving more fall weekends--I believe the number is now up to five.
I suggested (in note 262.5) that Digital distribute the load to another
park.
Is the only other choice to abandon this kind of company-wide outing
altogether? What say the readers of this conference?
|
352.45 | Continue! | REGENT::MERRILL | He who sells last, sells least | Tue Oct 20 1987 15:08 | 9 |
| START EARLIER: i.e. reserve some of the weekends of the regular
season.
Allow rained-out ticket to be used on ANY "day". Variation: give out
assigned tickets, but accept them any day so that people have more
choice - most will come on the assigned day.
rmm
|
352.46 | | BUSY::KLEINBERGER | Have a MAXCIMum Day! | Wed Oct 21 1987 08:25 | 7 |
| RE: Rained out tickets...
We were to go on Sept 13th... It rained that day... we were told
we could go as a rain day of September 25th, or October 18th...
Neither one of those days could we go due to previous plans...
My family went on September 26th... our tickets were honored...
no problem... So people didn't HAVE to wait until the last day...
|
352.47 | A great time was had by all! | JAWS::DAVIS | Gil Davis | Wed Oct 21 1987 11:41 | 6 |
| We went on Saturday, apparently before the hordes on Sunday. There
were some lines, but it wasn't too bad. We even walked back in
the late afternoon and revived ourselves with a hotdog and a
few (more) ice creams for the little folks...
Gil
|
352.48 | we like it | WORDS::BADGER | Happy Trails | Wed Oct 21 1987 13:42 | 26 |
|
I got a suggestion.
Go to Canobie lake park as we do now, or get a $20 [per employee]
certificate to a local restraunt.
The real story is that not all employees can make it to the outting.
Not all are getting a bennie. But these same people who can't make
it to the outting give their tickets to someone who needs an extra.
Why do people need an extra?, ok consider that parents with maybe
a 4 year old and maybe a 10 year old. They both don't want to ride
on the same rides. The 10 year old is a little indepentant. Ok,
get him an extra ticket and he can take a friend. OK folks, noone
wants to lie or cheat DEC but they have taken a child that doesn\'t
belong if they do this. I think that same parent would gladly pay
$10 for that ticket if allowed to purchase it.
Please don't do away with it. I've gone to 16 outtings [I missed
Rocky point,thank you]. We've always had fun. Did you ever get
there at 9AM and have coffee and doughnuts? they're provided.
our kids start riding at 10am. no lines. we eat at 1 and leave.
This year I noticed the attendents particularly friendly.
ed
|
352.49 | | ATPS::MALLORY | SPM V3.2 or bust... | Wed Oct 21 1987 23:00 | 19 |
| Speaking as someone who went to Canobie for the 'first' time...
I think it was over-crowded.
I am thankful for a change to get some of the 'benefits' that DEC
advertises. I used to work in the 'field' in Dallas, Texas. This
office has about 300-500 people. In the 2.5 years that I was there
not once did I ever get to attend 'company' paid events, because
'management' didn't allow us to leave 'revenue' producing customers
to go to them. 'Management' scheduled them during the day. The
only benefit of this type that the field has is a 'Holiday' Party.
No Turkey, No Canobie Lake, nothing... I guess what I think it
boils down to for me is that, yeah i s**ked becuase it was so crowded,
but I'm *REAL* thankful to get some 'fun' benefits for a change..
Kevin (new to ZKO last january)
who's looking forward to cooking a DEC turkey!
|
352.50 | Another vote for gift certif. option | PLDVAX::MORRISON | Bob M. LMO2/P41 296-5357 | Wed Oct 28 1987 14:27 | 9 |
| > No Turkey, No Canobie Lake, nothing... I guess what I think it
The field office managers might have a legitimate excuse for no turkeys: the
expense of delivering a small number to an isolated DEC site. But there is no
excuse for not giving them something else of comparable value. The same goes
for the outing. I think the suggestion of having a choice between the outing
and a gift certificate at a local restaurant (or only the gift certificate if
the site doesn't have amusement park outings) is an excellent one.
|
352.51 | Lets Make A Deal | VAXWRK::CONNOR | I see the bad moon arising | Wed Oct 28 1987 15:04 | 2 |
| Tell you tell. I swap my Turkey card and Canobie lake
tickets for your company car :-).
|
352.52 | No turkeys here! | USFHSL::FULLER | F/S: When in doubt, swap it out | Fri Oct 30 1987 09:41 | 14 |
| re: .50
In the Detroit area, we have perhaps 500 people in Field Service,
Sales and Software Services, plus the ECA management center, an
Ed Svcs center, etc. I don't consider this a small number at an
isolated DEC site. But, we don't get turkeys either.
re: .51
Company cars are NOT benefits, they are tools. Of course, when
I interviewed for my position within Field Service, it wasn't mentioned
that the company car was a tool, but was given the impression that
is was a benefit. I reckon it depends onthe situation, eh?
|
352.53 | On a clear day... | SEAPEN::PHIPPS | Digital Internal Use Only | Fri Oct 30 1987 11:03 | 6 |
| > Company cars are NOT benefits, they are tools. Of course, when
> I interviewed for my position within Field Service, it wasn't mentioned
> that the company car was a tool, but was given the impression that
> is was a benefit. I reckon it depends onthe situation, eh?
Or on which side of the desk you were sitting :-)
|