T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
322.1 | Add this in MARX::MEDICAL...KP7, SELECT, etc. | PUFFIN::OGRADY | George, ISWS 297-4183 | Fri Jun 12 1987 11:49 | 1 |
|
|
322.2 | I just got to see this... | XANADU::BANKS | David Banks -- KA1PZK | Fri Jun 19 1987 10:55 | 54 |
| <much forwarding deleted>
From: SKETCH::DFONTAINE "Dennis Fontaine * MLO8-2/L13 * 223-5709" 5-JUN-1987 13:29
To: @ID,DFONTAINE
Subj: ins memo
To: All Dec Employees From: Dennis Fontaine
Subject: Do you know what to do if you need to be hospitalized?
Under the new rules you must inform John Hancock of any
hospitalization whether it is planned or an emergency. If you fail
to notify them they will only reimburse your hospital room and board
at 80%. As a matter of fact even if you call them they may still
not reimburse you, it seems that there is at least one and I suspect
there are several incompetent people who answer your medical
questions. So to protect yourself in the event you or your
dependents are hospitalized I suggest you call John Hancock
immediately, get the name and badge number of the person you are
speaking to and ask for their supervisors name, you may need this
later on should you have to bring legal action against them.
Ah, how do I know this. When my son was hospitalized I called John
Hancock at 223-3300 to inform them due to the new hospital review
board. The women I spoke to said don't worry you will be covered and
that I really didn't have to call for this type of hospitalization
and that there was some automatic process that took place. Well here
it is three months later and I owe the hospital $900 because they
say I never notified them. Well the truth in the matter is that
223-3300 was not the correct number to call but its the only one in
the phone book and further more the person who answered the call
should have instructed me to call the hospital review board number
which is not listed in the digital directory, I guess that was too
obvious a place to put it, more incompetency.
I hope this doesn't happen to you and would be interested in hearing
from you. How many of you have had problems with John Hancock and
how many of you know you have to inform them for all types of
hospitalization, do you think the system is easy to use?
Anyway I submitted an appeal which was denied, they believe I'm
lying and never made the call and these are Digital people who
reviewed my appeal. I now have to appeal it to a higher committee,
if that fails I will have to bring legal action against them. It
really makes you feel good to know you work for such a nice company
who trusts its employees.
Please forward this message to as many people as you can so they
won't get taken for a ride.
Sincerely
Dennis Fontaine
|
322.3 | Get the provider to call | VIDEO::GOODRICH | Gerry Goodrich | Fri Jun 19 1987 13:49 | 16 |
| Unfortunately I believe .-1
The new John Hancock cards have the number to call on the
back, it is the same number that is called to verify coverage.
I think that the best method is to get the facility providing
the care to call and verify coverage. Two years ago I had
a serious stroke and was discharged from the hospital early
(my choice) since in home therapy could be arranged via the
VNA.
Six months later John Hancock claimed that they did not cover
the services the VNA had provided. The VNA had kept records
of their call to verify coverage. John Hancock shut up.
- gerry
|
322.4 | Two more weeks | ANGORA::MORRISON | Bob M. LMO2/P41 296-5357 | Fri Jun 19 1987 17:57 | 8 |
| The procedure to call John Hancock's regular number to initiate
medical review doesn't go into effect until July 1. Until then you
will have to keep the special number in your wallet. Having a
special number is awkward and I'm glad it's being abolished. What
if you are out cold and don't come to until it's too late to make
the call? I'm sure that happened to someone. The literature we got
recently suggests that you give your next of kin John Hancock's
number and give him/her instructions to cover the above situation.
|
322.5 | | HPSCAD::FORTMILLER | Ed Fortmiller | Mon Jun 22 1987 09:15 | 3 |
| re .2: If you called from a DEC facility which records out of facility
phone calls you should at least be able to prove you made the call
to that number by getting a copy of the phone records.
|
322.6 | always problems with JH | WORDS::BADGER | Happy Trails | Tue Jun 23 1987 13:37 | 18 |
|
another note in the same vain: JUST because you call John Handcock,
Just because they acknowledge your call, IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THEY'LL
PAY 100%. My son went in the hospital last year. The nurse-bean
counter that interfaced with my son's doctor gave the doctor a hard
time.
My doctor wanted my son to say an additional DAY. The nurse-bean
counter didn't agree with the doctor! I had my son stay anyways
and worked out the payment. I trust my doctor over a bean counter
any day. Doctor knows ALL my son's history, of nearly loosing my
son twice. Bean counter only knows $$$ and is measured by that.
Thats the reason I stay away from HMOs.
One of the unfortunate drawbacks of Digital self-insuring is that
it wont fight for you. The appeal process doesn't work either.
ed
|
322.7 | A Lesson Learned | KIM::KNIPP | | Mon Jul 27 1987 12:35 | 17 |
| In reply to .2
When the review process first took effect, my son had to go into
the hospital. I also called the number, 223-3300. The person I
spoke to assured me that I needed a second surgical opinion and
that was all to receive 100% coverage. Well WRONG!!!!!. After
asking her specifically if their was anyone else I needed to talk
to about this, she said NO, that a second opinion from the doctor
was fine.
Well to say the least, his bill was paid at 80% and I covered
the remainder. After a few phone calls, I found it probably wasn't
worth the effort in arguing over the 20%. I chaulked it up to a
lesson learned.
Nancee
|
322.8 | Who can I talk to within Digital re JH coverage? | WAV12::NEWMAN | What, me worry? YOU BET! | Mon Jan 11 1988 21:08 | 17 |
| I am not sure where to turn so I thought I'd try posting my question
here. I need to find out who within Digital, not John Hancock,
I can contact regarding the insurance coverage John Hancock provides.
John Hancock will not cover a medical charge that I feel they should.
My wife suffers from a rather strange eye disease. There are only
two treatments for this disease; special contact lenses or a cornea
transplant. The problem? John Hancock will not cover the cost
of the lenses and follow-up visits (they are very expensive). Other
insurance companines have, in the past, covered this charge eventhough
they did not cover expenses related to "routine eye care" as JH
is claiming.
I am looking for the name of someone within DEC I can turn to.
Thanks in advance.
Bob Newman
|
322.9 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Tue Jan 12 1988 00:04 | 4 |
| You want the corporate benefits manager - look in the back of the DEC
phone book. My experience (though from 1980) was that they were
responsive and helpful. Remember, DEC sets policy and funs the plan,
JH only acts as the service bureau
|
322.10 | Thank you | WAV14::NEWMAN | What, me worry? YOU BET! | Tue Jan 12 1988 07:57 | 1 |
| Thanks, I'll give a call
|