[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

322.0. "Gaps in John Hancock Coverage" by BMT::COMAROW () Sat Jun 06 1987 23:24

    
    Background:  More about our benefits that might surprise you.
    
    My wife broke 4 bones in her leg, and has been hospitalized for 10
    days.  She might need to return for an additional operation. She has a
    weirdly bent 50 pound cast, is unable to navigate or take care of
    herself, but since we have home health care, and she hated to be in the
    hospital, we arranged to have her taken home in lieu of hospitalization.
    
    We'll our home health care benefit includes
    1:  In lieu of hospitalization - true, (big savings for DEC.)
    2:  In hospital for at least 3 days. (true)
    3:  Confined to home. (what she gonna do?)
    4:  Providing medical care.  
 (3.22)   
           Since her care would be custodial in nature (just like in the
    hospital), it is not covered.
    
    A:  On home health care appliances.
       They would not pay for a walker.
       They would not pay for a commode with "arms" so she can use a
    bathroom, get up and down safely (or at all).
    
    Luckily, my step daughter (an RN) has come up to care for her for
    a week.
            
    What will happen next week?
    
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
322.1Add this in MARX::MEDICAL...KP7, SELECT, etc.PUFFIN::OGRADYGeorge, ISWS 297-4183Fri Jun 12 1987 11:491
    
322.2I just got to see this...XANADU::BANKSDavid Banks -- KA1PZKFri Jun 19 1987 10:5554
    <much forwarding deleted>
    
From:	SKETCH::DFONTAINE    "Dennis Fontaine * MLO8-2/L13 * 223-5709"  5-JUN-1987 13:29
To:	@ID,DFONTAINE   
Subj:	ins memo

      To: All Dec Employees                From: Dennis Fontaine
      
      
      Subject: Do you know what to do if you need to be hospitalized?
      
      Under the new rules you must inform John Hancock of any 
      hospitalization whether it is planned or an emergency. If you fail 
      to notify them they will only reimburse your hospital room and board 
      at 80%.  As a matter of fact even if you call them they may still 
      not reimburse you, it seems that there is at least one and I suspect 
      there are several incompetent people who answer your medical 
      questions. So to protect yourself in the event you or your 
      dependents are hospitalized I suggest you call John Hancock 
      immediately, get the name and badge number of the person you are 
      speaking to and ask for their supervisors name, you may need this 
      later on should you have to bring legal action against them.
      
      Ah, how do I know this. When my son was hospitalized I called John 
      Hancock at 223-3300 to inform them due to the new hospital review 
      board. The women I spoke to said don't worry you will be covered and 
      that I really didn't have to call for this type of hospitalization 
      and that there was some automatic process that took place. Well here 
      it is three months later and I owe the hospital $900 because they 
      say I never notified them. Well the truth in the matter is that 
      223-3300 was not the correct number to call but its the only one in 
      the phone book and further more the person who answered the call 
      should have instructed me to call the hospital review board number 
      which is not listed in the digital directory, I guess that was too 
      obvious a place to put it, more incompetency.
      
      I hope this doesn't happen to you and would be interested in hearing 
      from you. How many of you have had problems with John Hancock and 
      how many of you know you have to inform them for all types of 
      hospitalization, do you think the system is easy to use?
      
      Anyway I submitted an appeal which was denied, they believe I'm 
      lying and never made the call and these are Digital people who 
      reviewed my appeal. I now have to appeal it to a higher committee, 
      if that fails I will have to bring legal action against them. It 
      really makes you feel good to know you work for such a nice company 
      who trusts its employees.
      
      Please forward this message to as many people as you can so they 
      won't get taken for a ride.
      
      Sincerely
      
      Dennis Fontaine
322.3Get the provider to callVIDEO::GOODRICHGerry GoodrichFri Jun 19 1987 13:4916
    Unfortunately I believe .-1
    
    The new John Hancock cards have the number to call on the
    back, it is the same number that is called to verify coverage.
    
    I think that the best method is to get the facility providing
    the care to call and verify coverage.  Two years ago I had
    a serious stroke and was discharged from the hospital early
    (my choice) since in home therapy could be arranged via the
    VNA.
    
    Six months later John Hancock claimed that they did not cover
    the services the VNA had provided.  The VNA had kept records
    of their call to verify coverage. John Hancock shut up.
    
    - gerry
322.4Two more weeksANGORA::MORRISONBob M. LMO2/P41 296-5357Fri Jun 19 1987 17:578
The procedure to call John Hancock's regular number to initiate
medical review doesn't go into effect until July 1. Until then you
will have to keep the special number in your wallet. Having a
special number is awkward and I'm glad it's being abolished. What
if you are out cold and don't come to until it's too late to make
the call? I'm sure that happened to someone. The literature we got
recently suggests that you give your next of kin John Hancock's
number and give him/her instructions to cover the above situation.
322.5HPSCAD::FORTMILLEREd FortmillerMon Jun 22 1987 09:153
    re .2:  If you called from a DEC facility which records out of facility
    phone calls you should at least be able to prove you made the call
    to that number by getting a copy of the phone records.
322.6always problems with JHWORDS::BADGERHappy TrailsTue Jun 23 1987 13:3718
    
    another note in the same vain:  JUST because you call John Handcock,
    Just because they acknowledge your call, IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THEY'LL
    PAY 100%.  My son went in the hospital last year.  The nurse-bean
    counter that interfaced with my son's doctor gave the doctor a hard
    time.
    My doctor wanted my son to say an additional DAY.  The nurse-bean
    counter didn't agree with the doctor!  I had my son stay anyways
    and worked out the payment.  I trust my doctor over a bean counter
    any day.  Doctor knows ALL my son's history, of nearly loosing my
    son twice.  Bean counter only knows $$$ and is measured by that.
    Thats the reason I stay away from HMOs.
    
    One of the unfortunate drawbacks of Digital self-insuring is that
    it wont fight for you.  The appeal process doesn't work either.
    
    ed
    
322.7A Lesson LearnedKIM::KNIPPMon Jul 27 1987 12:3517
     In reply to .2
    
       When the review process first took effect, my son had to go into
    the hospital.  I also called the number, 223-3300.  The person I
    spoke to assured me that I needed a second surgical opinion and
    that was all to receive 100% coverage.  Well WRONG!!!!!.  After
    asking her specifically if their was anyone else I needed to talk
    to about this, she said NO, that a second opinion from the doctor
    was fine.
    
       Well to say the least, his bill was paid at 80% and I covered
    the remainder.  After a few phone calls, I found it probably wasn't
    worth the effort in arguing over the 20%.  I chaulked it up to a
    lesson learned.
    
    Nancee
     
322.8Who can I talk to within Digital re JH coverage?WAV12::NEWMANWhat, me worry? YOU BET!Mon Jan 11 1988 21:0817
    I am not sure where to turn so I thought I'd try posting my question
    here.  I need to find out who within Digital, not John Hancock,
    I can contact regarding the insurance coverage John Hancock provides.
    John Hancock will not cover a medical charge that I feel they should.
    My wife suffers from a rather strange eye disease.  There are only
    two treatments for this disease; special contact lenses or a cornea
    transplant.  The problem?  John Hancock will not cover the cost
    of the lenses and follow-up visits (they are very expensive).  Other
    insurance companines have, in the past, covered this charge eventhough
    they did not cover expenses related to "routine eye care" as JH
    is claiming.
    
    I am looking for the name of someone within DEC I can turn to.
    
    Thanks in advance.
    
    Bob Newman
322.9BINKLY::WINSTONJeff Winston (Hudson, MA)Tue Jan 12 1988 00:044
You want the corporate benefits manager - look in the back of the DEC 
phone book.  My experience (though from 1980) was that they were 
responsive and helpful.  Remember, DEC sets policy and funs the plan, 
JH only acts as the service bureau
322.10Thank youWAV14::NEWMANWhat, me worry? YOU BET!Tue Jan 12 1988 07:571
    Thanks,  I'll give a call