T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
317.1 | SSD reduces LTD | HARPO::CACCIA | | Thu Jun 04 1987 17:05 | 27 |
|
Another limit on the benefits paid by your LTD are your social security
disabilty benefits.
If you are termed permanently disabled after a review of your doctor's
findings and you will be unable to return to work for a minimum
of one year you may apply for Social Security Disability benefits.
These payments are based on your average salary over the past years
of employment. LTD will reduce your benifits to a minimum payment
of $50 per month or an amount to maintain your monthly income at
80% of your gross pay prior to your disability, whichever is greater.
EXAMPLE
gross pay $1000
SSD pays $0000 SSD pays $500 SSD pays $800 SSD pays $1000
LTD pays $800 LTD pays $300 LTD pays $50 LTD pays $50
Bottom line is you will never get more than 80% of your pay from
LTD but you will never get less than $50 per month.
I had a car accident 10 years ago and was out of work for over
years and that is how it was working at that time.
BTW: my left leg qualifies me for handicap status but does not qualify
for disability. Even though the leg is 1 1/2 inches short I do have
almost 100% mobility and strength.
|
317.2 | More info , the new plan | VIDEO::GOODRICH | Gerry Goodrich | Mon Jun 08 1987 10:40 | 23 |
| re: .1
You are correct but at least the information you mention
IS in the information given to employees. I do believe that
the current income level is 66.66% (tax free) instead of
80% as you mentioned.
I have been actively working these issues with corporate
benefits folks and some clarifications are in order.
1. It seems that even though the words are unclear, the
PSA manuals (not generally available to employees) state
that benefits such as life insurance ARE maintained even
if the individual works part time.
2. DEC has never reclassified to a lower job level, the
practice has been to return the employee to total disability.
3. The new LTD package effective July 1st does NOT improve
the part-time situation. You still either stay on disability
or take the income reduction.
- gerry
|
317.3 | | HYDRA::ECKERT | Jerry Eckert | Mon Jun 08 1987 10:56 | 7 |
| Gerry,
Where did you get the 66.66% figure? I believe the 80% figure
was included in information that was mailed to employees within
the past month; I'll have to check to make sure.
- Jerry
|
317.4 | Source of info | VIDEO::GOODRICH | Gerry Goodrich | Mon Jun 08 1987 12:19 | 16 |
| re .3
> Where did you get the 66.66% figure? I believe the 80% figure
> was included in information that was mailed to employees within
> the past month; I'll have to check to make sure.
Personnel Policies and Proceedures, section 4.09, page 2
&
86 benefits book, page 5.10
I read the new package and didn't see any change. I am referring
to LTD, perhaps you saw the Accident and Sickness plan for
Wage class 1,2 & 3. It has a 6 month limit.
- gerry
|
317.5 | recommend | VIDEO::TEBAY | Natural phenomena invented to order | Tue Jun 16 1987 15:08 | 10 |
| I highly recommend that everyone secure LTD from a private
source.I spent 11 months on part time disability which meant
I got $50.00 a month from the LTD plan while only receiving
one half my pay. I had to sell assets in order to eat and pay my
bills and the experience has left me behind in terms of financial
security. The system does not provide any motivation to work
part time. I did and now wish I hadn't. BTW my doctor recommended
that I take full time disability.
And the way the 66% was figured is also a ripoff.
|
317.6 | | VCQUAL::THOMPSON | Noter at Large | Wed Jun 17 1987 10:14 | 4 |
| RE: .5 How many ways are there to figure 66% of current income?
And which one is used for LTD?
Alfred
|
317.7 | 66% | VIDEO::TEBAY | Natural phenomena invented to order | Wed Jun 17 1987 10:37 | 8 |
| They take the number of days in the month and use this figure
to base the gross on. Mine varied from 200-300 a month.
Than they subtract gross pay if your are working part time.
They go on a monthly (calendar) basis. What this means
bottom line is that your all over gross that they take
the 66% of is lowered. Working 20 hours a week will blow
any benefits and you get the minimum payment.
|
317.8 | Can we do this in computer talk? | VCQUAL::THOMPSON | Noter at Large | Wed Jun 17 1987 13:51 | 30 |
| I'm trying to understand what you're saying but I'm
getting lost somewhere along the line. Let me put it
in computer talk and you can tell me where I'm lost.
Gross pay = (annual pay/365) * # days in the month
Is this right? this is pretty much how real paychecks work
except they run gross pay = (annual pay/52) * a week
benefit paid = (gross pay*.66) - part time pay
This way you subtract the part time pay from the benefit. Unless
the part time pay is greater then 66% of your regular pay you get
some benefit. Either way you get at least 66% of what you were
getting working full time.
or is it
benefit paid = (gross pay - part time pay) * .66
This way you subtract the part time pay from your normal gross
pay and get a benefit of 66% of the remainder. Your part time
pay would have to be at least what your full time pay was to
zero out the benefit. If your part time pay was half your normal
pay you'd wind up with about 83% of your normal pay.
In either case I can't understand how you'd wind up with less then
66% of what you'd get in full time pay.
Alfred
|
317.9 | nit from ex-personnel person | VORTEX::JOVAN | living on the edge | Wed Jun 17 1987 17:05 | 14 |
|
> Is this right? this is pretty much how real paychecks work
> except they run gross pay = (annual pay/52) * a week
I know this is a nit, but having worked in personnel, I know that gross
pay is figured as follows:
gross pay = hourly rate X 2080
2080 is the hours in a year ( and no, I don't know what the number is for a
leap year! ).
Angeline
|
317.10 | have to find doc | VIDEO::TEBAY | Natural phenomena invented to order | Thu Jun 18 1987 11:46 | 5 |
| I will have to find the worksheet to verify the math but
I ended up with less than 50% pay. According to personnel
the 66% was only if full time disability than 66% of gross
would be paid tax free.
|
317.11 | Pushing for plain English | VIDEO::GOODRICH | Gerry Goodrich | Thu Jun 18 1987 12:08 | 119 |
| It seems that I am not the only one confused, it turns out
that many things concerning LTD are unclear. I have sent
the following memo to the corporate benefits folks, it contains
some fiction but I am hoping that the response is explicit.
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
| d i g i t a l | INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
-----------------
SUBJECT: LTD Benefits - Plain English
After reading the information in the employee benefits book (86), the
recently mailed information regarding the new policy, and DEC's
Personnel Policies and Procedures it appears that much information is
not clear or omitted. This is confusing to all involved and getting
accurate details is not a simple task.
Creating a plain English document and including specific detail should
not be a difficult task, the following are examples of such wording.
The examples may not reflect reality since some of the information is
not available to me (or any employee) and some examples reflect what I
feel should occur as opposed to current policies. I would appreciate
your review of this and an explicate response as to what actually
would occur in these situations.
Thanks - Gerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefits if employee is fully disabled:
Income - 66 & 2/3's percent of base salary coordinated with Social
Security, tax free. There are no cost of living increases except
that Social Security increases will not decrease the LTD benefit.
The following benefits continue at the rate/value in effect at the
time of disability and Digital waves the normal employee payroll
deductions. These include dependent coverages.
Life insurance
Medical & Dental insurance (coordinated with Medicare)
Vacation continues to be accrued up to maximum
Pension accrual
Benefits during rehabilitation employment:
Income - 66 & 2/3's percent of base salary, tax free reduced
by 50% of the the income earned. Salary increases due to merit
raises will not decrease the LTD benefit.
Benefits during rehabilitation employment cont:
The following benefits continue at the rate/value in effect at the
time of disability and Digital pro-rates the normal employee
payroll deductions. These include dependent coverages.
Life insurance
Medical & Dental insurance
Vacation continues to be accrued up to maximum
Pension accrual
Salary review periods will be extended to include the same
number of hours worked as the original salary plan called for.
Benefits after rehabilitation employment time limit:
Employment status - If after the rehabilitation time limit,
the employee can not perform his/her original job his/her
situation will be reviewed and one of several courses of action
will be taken:
1. Employee returned to full time disability status.
2. Employee offered an alternate job consistent with his/her
abilities, education and experience at a salary and benefits
at least equal to his/her position prior to the disability.
Should the employee decline this offer, LTD benefits
terminate.
3. Employee reclassified to permanent part-time, however the
employee's benefits will remain not less than as during
rehabilitation employment. Salary review periods become
that of standard permanent part-time status.
In situation 3, actual benefits are:
Income - 66 & 2/3's percent of base salary, tax free reduced
by 50% of the the income earned. Salary increases due to merit
raises will not decrease the LTD benefit.
The following benefits continue at the rate/value in effect at the
time of disability except as noted. Digital pro-rates the normal
employee payroll deductions. These include dependent coverages.
Life insurance - value increases based pro rata on actual merit
raises
Medical & Dental insurance
Vacation - accrues based upon hours actually worked and total
years employed. Maximum prorated based upon hours actually
worked except that no previously accrued vacation will be
lost.
Pension accrual - based upon pre-disability income and
pro rata increased based upon actual merit raises.
LTD benefits for new disability - pro rata adjusted to reflect
actual merit raises.
15-Jun-87 gog
|
317.12 | what happened on this? | OG1BA1::WEIGL | | Thu Mar 24 1988 11:51 | 5 |
|
Long ago and far away, but...
What ever happened with this issue? Did you ever get a response
from the Benefits folks?
|
317.13 | A follow up | RETORT::GOODRICH | Taking a long vacation | Tue Aug 09 1988 09:33 | 23 |
|
I can't afford to work!
It has been a fair amount of time since I entered the base
note. I have been on LTD for a year now. I probably could
be productive to some extent part-time but would go broke
if I tried.
You see, Social Security cut you off if you work at all,
LTD has a time limit for rehabilitation but then cut you
off also.
Even if LTD didn't, Social security considers you a dead-beat
if you work part time and thus your retirement benefits are
adjusted accordingly.
DEC is pretty good about the whole thing, I couldn't expect
much more from any company.
So here I sit at home, if I wish to feed my kids and send
them to college, it is my only choice.
- gerry
|
317.14 | 88 ? | REGENT::MERRILL | Glyph it up! | Wed Aug 24 1988 12:59 | 3 |
| Doesn't the new 1988 Benefits book answer this satisfactorily?
|
317.15 | ??????????????????????? | EISNOW::GOLDROSEN | | Tue Apr 02 1991 23:38 | 14 |
| Yesterday, I talked with a the men from personal in Seattle.
After that meeting, I need to now about the follow items:
Can I get LTD and latter I get a part-time job? The
personal man told me that I can't have a part-time.
Will LTD, can I get health, dental, and life insurance?
The personal man told me that I can not have it.
Is the amount of pay is .66, or.666666666666666666666666666
of the salary. The personal told me that the later figure is right.
If I get $1 before, the LTD is .66 with the first rate, or
.66666666666666666666 with the second rate.
|
317.16 | Some dated info... | EXPRES::SORRELLS | Live Music Are Better | Wed Apr 03 1991 09:26 | 16 |
| re: -1
Perhaps someone has a more recent benefits book handy, but my 1988
version says:
The definition of disability is (for the first 30 months) "unable to
perform any and every part of your job" and (after 30 months) "unable
to engage in any gainful occupation for which you are reasonably
qualified." Some "rehabilitative work" is allowed. Otherwise, you're
not totally disabled.
My book seems to say that medical and dental benefits continue on LTD,
but this may have changed in the last 2-3 years.
Good luck - hope you get some more current information.
|
317.17 | You get what you pay for... | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Wed Apr 03 1991 09:48 | 11 |
| re: .15, .16
Not being able to work on LTD...
That's one of the the reasons I pay for my own disability policy from a company
other than Digital. My policy says that as long as I am unable to completely
perform the job I had when I was disabled, I'm considered disabled. There are
no limitations on outside income. BTW, this policy is considerably more
expensive than the standard Digital disability policy.
Bob
|
317.18 | | CSSE32::VERGE | | Wed Apr 03 1991 15:52 | 3 |
| Personnel Policies and Procedures Book is available
On-Line through VTX. Check out the latest version . .
|
317.19 | | COMET::PERCIVAL | I'm the NRA, USPSA/IPSC, NROI-RO | Tue Apr 16 1991 15:46 | 34 |
|
The P&P is very little help in determining what happens
when you go on LTD. Remember, LTD is a group insurance
plan, not a benefit. If you have difficulties dealing with
Prudential, you can expect little or no help from Personnel
or Benefits folks.
The payout is 66 2/3% (your .6666666 number), BUT you will
be expected to file for Social Security disability payments
(you are eligible 5 months after the start of your disability)
IMMEDIATELY. If you do not file or do not pursue all avenues
of appeal within the SS system, Prudential can reduce your
payout to reflect what the SS benefit WOULD have been.
When/If you recieve a SS disability award there will ususally
be a "lump sum" payout of back benefits, you will be expected
to pay this to Prudential. After you start receiving regular
SS checks Prudential will reduce their payout to you to maintain
the 66 2/3% number. SS increases after this will NOT affect the
amount that Prudential pays (so to some degree you can try to
keep up with the cost-of-living).
The BEST advice is to get a lawyer that specializes in SS
diability cases. Payments to the lawyer will be 25% of the
"lump sum" (plus reasonable expenses). This ammount is deducted
BEFORE you get your first check and is deducted from the amount
that you must pay back to Prudential.
Between SS and Prudential be prepared to have one of the more
frustrating times of your life (as if the disability itself
` were not enough). Actually, the Prudential people make the
folks at Social Security look extremely competent.
Jim (Who's wife has gone through this process).
|
317.20 | what I heard | LEDS::UYENO | | Tue Jun 18 1991 13:48 | 6 |
| I, too, would recommend getting LTD from a private insurance company. I
had my insurance agent check into DEC's LTD offering. As I understand
it, you would be required to take on any job that you are qualified
for. That would mean that you may have to take on a job that would
leave you financially unstable and that doesn't help out much when you
are already partially disabled.
|
317.21 | From U.S. Livewire | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Jun 18 1991 15:01 | 18 |
| Digital's Long-Term Disability premium rate increases
On July 1, Digital's Long-Term Disability (LTD) premium rate will increase
from $.34 to $.36 for each $100 of base weekly salary. The new rate will
begin in employees' July 11 pay statements. This adjustment is required as
part of the initial agreement between Digital and the Prudential Insurance
Company of America, the company's long-term disability insurance carrier.
Employees who are not currently participating in the LTD Plan may apply for
coverage at any time. They must, however, complete a Long-Term Disability
Evidence of Insurability form available from local Personnel offices.
These forms should be submitted to Personnel, who then forwards the forms to
Prudential. Prudential determines whether coverages are approved or denied.
Employees will receive a letter through interoffice mail during the last
week in June explaining the rate increase. Those with further questions
about LTD benefits should refer to the recently updated "Your Benefits Book"
or contact local Personnel offices.
|
317.22 | I'm confused?!?1 | ROYALT::MAY | | Wed Jul 07 1993 15:33 | 29 |
|
A question on my mind is:
How come LTD(Prudential) "forces" you to apply for $$benefits, and if
you don't they take 200. away from the 66% you get?? I pay into LTD AND
SS each and every week I work, then Prudential "BALES OUT" of paying
once SSbenefits start..
I'm confused....
This did happen to my wife...We were told if you don't pay LTD weekly ,
you CAN NOT apply for LTD if you become disabled. If you DO pay into
LTD weekly, you can then "apply" for LTD benefits and somethimes be
turned down. My thoughts when I signed up for this 20 years ago and my
wife 15 years ago, was the INSURANCE CO. would pay your LTD if you
ever needed it. THEY then force you to apply for SS and bale out on you
once you get other bennies..Ya my wife GETS 100./month from Prudential,
but that sure isn't the 66% of her annual salary they promised...
How come???????
Boy did we get a piece of a rock...
John
|
317.23 | | GSFSYS::MACDONALD | | Thu Jul 08 1993 11:52 | 12 |
| The insurance that you get from LTD promises that when disabled your
total income from all sources will equal 66% of your current pay. What
that means is that if and when SS benefits kick in, the insurance
continues to pay that amount necessary to bring the SS payment and
insurance payment together to equal 66% of your pay. Otherwise if they
paid you 66% of your pay AND you received SS benefits you would likely
be getting more than 100% of the pay that you received working. No
insurance is going to provide that. The obvious incentive to stay
"disabled" would make the system a bigger mess than it already is.
Steve
|
317.24 | doublecheck the policy | WMOIS::JALBERT_C | | Thu Jul 08 1993 12:29 | 5 |
| LTD is no longer 66% of pay. You should refer to BENEFIT policy 4.09,
on VTX which speaks to disability coverage after 13 weeks.
|
317.25 | | GSFSYS::MACDONALD | | Thu Jul 08 1993 14:05 | 14 |
|
Re: .24
> LTD is no longer 66% of pay.
I recall that you could elect different levels of coverage of
LTD depending on how much you were willing to pay for it. In
any event the point is that the amount guaranteed by the insurance
is always indexed against anything you may be eligible for from
SS.
Steve
|
317.26 | They're still baling out.. | ROYALT::MAY | | Thu Jul 08 1993 14:38 | 16 |
| RE.23
I understand that we can't collect from both LTD and SS. I'm confused
that they(Prudential) can force us to apply for SS in the first place.
I pay LTD for long term disability and thought I paid SS weekly for
when I retire...Aren't they two different things??
Even as I write this , I understand SS hs more than just retirement
bennies... ie .. disability payments..but how can the insurance co.
"seem" to bale out so easily. If I were to take out Home
insurance(which I have) and god forbid my house burns down, I wouldn't
expect State Fram to force me to apply for SS benefits to pay for
repairs..Boy Am I confused?!?!
john
|
317.27 | SS activation NOT Digital's rule.... | 29563::REESE_K | Three Fries Short of a Happy Meal | Thu Jul 08 1993 15:25 | 40 |
| I just returned to work 7 JUN 93 after disk surgery/fusion. Unfor-
tunately I was already in the 3rd month of STD when I had surgery;
under the new disability program LTD commenced for me 9 MAR 93. My
26 week combination of STD/LTD were up 7 JUN 93, thus my return.
The neurosurgeon was agreeable to my returning to work half days
for 2 months - because of our new disability policy it was not an
option (not an option if I cared to return to my existing job....my
manager had held it open at his discretion for the 13 weeks of LTD,
he couldn't hold it if I stayed out). There is some permanent nerve
damage that has affected my left arm; hopefully in time (at least 2
years), additional functionality *should* return. I made the decision
to return to work rather than face the upcoming hassle.....our own
health services people (corporate) acknowledged that someone having
the procedure I did would not be expected back to work much before
September <--- this was assuming there were no complications. Once
I knew I could recover some use of the arm thru intensive physical
therapy it was always my intention to return to work as soon as
possible.
The SS requirement to remain out on LTD is not a rule of Prudential;
my packet describing "how it would work" was mailed out by our new
LTD carrier - The Travelers. The packet contained a booklet entitled
"Disability" <---- a publication of the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. I pay the LTD amount that covers 100% of my salary,
so you can imagine my surprise when I saw the forms to be filled out
for Social Security. I did contact my case worker assigned by The
Travelers, she assured me that utilizing SS at this point would
not reduce my benefits later (assuming I live long enough to collect
them). I still have not received a satisfactory explanation as to
*why* SS would have been invoked, though.....and the govt booklet
was less than clear - ask me if I'm surprised :-)
I have mixed feelings about utilizing SS (assuming I had not regained
*any* use of my left arm and had been forced to remain out under the
"next phase" of disability). As I mentioned, I pay the LTD premium
for 100% of salary.....does anyone know the answer to this?
Karen
|
317.28 | | GSFSYS::MACDONALD | | Fri Jul 09 1993 12:11 | 40 |
|
Re: .26 and .27
In a previous life I sold disability insurance so I'm at least
familiar with the industry and its practices though not up to
date.
When you sign up for 100% or 90% or whatever else, what that means is
that the insurance company guarantees that you will receive the
percent of your salary that you sign up for. What most people do not
realize, however, is that this is not the same as saying that the
insurance company guarantees to cut you a check for that amount each
month. They are just saying that they guarantee that that is the
total amount that you will receive.
All disability plans that I know of are intended to index their
payments to whatever SS benefits you may be eligible for. So what
the insurance company is saying is that if you sign up for 100% of pay
when disabled, the company will pay an amount that when coupled with
any SS benefits for which you may eligible will produce an amount
paid to you that equals 100% of your regular pay.
So if you are not eligible for SS benefits, then the insurance must
cut you a check each month for the percent that you signed up for.
Because the plan is indexed to SS disability benefits, however, the
company has the legal right under the terms of the policy to require
you to apply for SS benefits. If you refuse to apply, then the company
has the right to assume that you are eligible and to reduce the amount
they pay you by the amount you "should" be receiving from SS.
Pulling it all together, perhaps the simplest way to look at it is
that disability insurance is a really a supplement to what you are
eligible for from SS.
I'm not saying this is the right way to do it, but just that this is
the way that it is.
Steve
|
317.29 | UNderstandable...but is it right?? | ROYALT::MAY | | Fri Jul 09 1993 12:31 | 10 |
| re.28
I guess that's the best explaination I'll ever get...so I'll except
that...I do understabd that if an insurance company HAD to pay EACH LTD
insurer their XXX% without another supplement(SS), they most likely
would go out of business REAL soon. ....considering we only pay
2-5.00/wk for LTD disability INS.
john
|
317.30 | | 29563::REESE_K | Three Fries Short of a Happy Meal | Fri Jul 09 1993 13:43 | 22 |
| Thanks Steve, appreciate the info. I knew I couldn't (through any
means) exceed the equivalent of 100% of my salary; I just didn't
realize SS would be used to supplement the LTD coverage I was
paying for. I guess I understand the rationale that SS might have
to be invoked if it were to be determined that I would NEVER be able
to work again; fortunately this isn't the case for me, but in reality
I did need a little more time out than was available to me after
the surgery in February. The old STD/LTD program would probably have
fit my personal scenario a little better. Oh well, can't win them
all.
One thing I did notice reading the government booklet; even after
you apply for SS and sign the release for your doctor to provide
SS with info on illness/treatment etc.....SS *can* deny you benefits.
According to the booklet, I might have had trouble even if I never
regained use of my left arm.....per SS I would have had to lose use of
BOTH arms, or one arm and one leg to be considered for the next
phase of LTD!! Ever try driving a 5 speed without power steering
with just one good arm......I don't think so :-(
Karen
|
317.31 | You're in good hands with ALLSOP | ROYALT::MAY | | Fri Jul 09 1993 14:40 | 18 |
| re.30
As you mentioned..You must apply for SS and can be denied..We
were..
My wife suffered a stroke due to a rare blood vessel disease(no
cure,not sure of cause, 330 cases reported in country). The stroke came
without warnings, was gone in 30 minutes but left herr left side
parilyzed(sp), blind and brain damage. The paralisys(sp) went away,
sight came back,etc but she damaged the left side of the brain
(reading,writing,logic,math) due to lack of oxygen. SS denied us and a
another company named ALLSOP(working for Pru) made us fill out ALL the
forms a second time and said they'd fight for SS for us and PRU(NO
CHARGE to US). They got them and my wife was on the old STD/LTD plan so
her benefits are the same as before they rewrote the package.
john
|
317.32 | | CSOA1::LENNIG | Dave (N8JCX), MIG, Cincinnati | Fri Jul 09 1993 14:58 | 12 |
| re: .30, .31
My mom when through this, too, and the procedure was as indicated.
You supply SS with all sorts of info, they evaluate it, they deny it,
the insurance company appeals it (at their cost), then you get it.
In fact, the lawyer they used in my mom's case (all that this lawyer
does is "work" the SS system) indicated that SS almost always denies
the initial filing, and that it usually requires the second or third
appeal to get their approval. So be forwarned...
Dave
|