T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
256.1 | Its about time!!!!! | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | There is no 'N' in TURNKEY | Tue Jan 20 1987 11:41 | 47 |
| set flame /gasoline_fed
I haven't heard this yet, but it is long overdue. When I started
with Digital 7 years ago, the plan B rate was $165/month. In the
first six months I was here it was raised twice to $180/month. The
last increase in the plan B reimbursement rate, to the current
$180/month, occured in September of 1980! Tell me it doesn't cost
any more to buy, fuel, maintain, and insure a car today than it
did in 1980 :-(
For those folks who chose plan A, my cost center pays out almost
twice the $180, even after you consider the drivers contribution.
They do not pay tax on their "benefit", those of us on plan B do
(the IRS considers thys as part of my salary regardless of
Digitals thoughts on the matter). I have also seen plenty of high
level managers who are not entitled to plan A cars who
unofficially have them, and I doubt they even pay the $24/month
since technically the cars are floaters.
In our office, new hires are now forced onto plan B. I don't think
I would be allowed to switch to plan A at this point even thou
I've been here for 7 years. Those folks on plan A don't expect to
get any more new cars after the current round of orders are done.
for our group, the car is definitely a benefit, not a business
need, but that is not true elsewhere. Most of our travel is thru
O'Hare, not by our car.
The cars offered on plan A are usually pretty scuzzy. We have a
lot full of Tempo/Topaz/Taurus pre-scrap waiting to be hauled
away, but meanwhile being driven around. I constantly hear
complaints from plan A drivers about GELCO, who seem to refuse
maintenance necessary to keep our cars in safe operationg
conditions in order to save a dollar or two. I have heard of them
trying to replace one tire on a car with a bias belted tire when
the rest are radials, refusing to repair serious safety defects
(steering, suspension, etc.) because the car is close to trade-in,
and other such nightmares.
Anyone travelling lots of mileage should be careful before going
on plan B. At over 15K miles/year, you actually get a larger
reimbursement by taking no plan, and collecting the full mileage
reimbursement form Digital. Considering the tax paid on the
$180/month the break even point may drop as low as 10K miles/year.
Also note that plan B requires that your car be less than 4 years
old, but if you are in a low business mileage job like I am, that
forces you to replace your car more often than necessary, with no
way to write off any of the extra expenses.
|
256.2 | correction, I think | TIXEL::ARNOLD | Stop Continental Drift! | Tue Jan 20 1987 12:24 | 6 |
| re .-1
I've only been out of the field for a year, but don't you mean $24
per WEEK, not $24 per month for Plan A??
Jon
|
256.3 | Condition vs. Age | KIRIN::R_MISKOWITCH | | Tue Jan 20 1987 14:07 | 14 |
| You're correct it is $24 per WEEK not per month. .-2 brought up
another good point, or should I say bad. The cars that we buy for
plan B must be 4 years old or newer. Granted a DECmobile after
four years and six owners is in pretty sorry shape, but as for a
personal car that is four years old, is another story. If they
don't want to increase the $180 p/m, the least they can do is allow
us to have a car five, six maybe even seven years old. Instead
of making it an age make it the condition the car is in. What is
stopping me from buying a 1987 car that has been hail damaged?
If digital is worried about it's image, it should be more concerned
about the condition rather than the age. :^(
Rob,
|
256.4 | Plan B loophole? | THE780::FARLEE | So many NOTES, so little time... | Tue Jan 20 1987 15:46 | 13 |
| As I understand it from people on plan B that I work with,
the car must be under 4 years old when it is enrolled in
plan B. However, nobody seems to check that it remains
under 4 years old while enrolled... which is to say that
there doesn't seem to be any "expiration date" in practice.
The official policy may differ from this, but my feeling is that
if you don't say anything about the car being now 5 years old,
they won't either.
Anybody have any direct experience with this?
Kevin
|
256.5 | More Plan B rumors. | CAADC::MANGU | | Tue Jan 20 1987 17:48 | 22 |
| > As I understand it from people on plan B that I work with,
> the car must be under 4 years old when it is enrolled in
> plan B. However, nobody seems to check that it remains
> under 4 years old while enrolled... which is to say that
> there doesn't seem to be any "expiration date" in practice.
I am new to SWS, but I was told from someon else in the group who
is on Plan B, that the Fleet Administration notifies you two months
in advance of when your car reaches over the 4 yr limit that you
will be taken off Plan B because your car is too old. They do this
in advance so that you will have enough time to replace your car
to continue being on Plan B.
My biggest problem was that there is no Intro to the Field document
out here. I was also not given any orientation to this job. So
everytime someone (usually my manager) notices I didn't turn in
a form or fill it in properly, etc. I get the a mini-intro to this
form and that form.
|
256.6 | ps to .-1 | CAADC::MANGU | | Tue Jan 20 1987 17:52 | 11 |
|
PS. what is the $.08/per mile for? I thought the $180/month covered
it all. Has anyone analyzed this Plan thoroughly for what it's worth.
I'm not on it yet as I have to register my car in this state still.
I also found out that I have to upgrade my insurance quite a bit.
So far my business travel is to the other facility ocassionally
which is 10 miles away. So I'm trying to decide if this plan is
worth the hassel of reporting taxes, increasing my insurance, etc.
when I have a simpler life without it.
|
256.7 | $180 plus $.08 per BUSINESS mile | NY1MM::LEIGH | But why New York? | Wed Jan 21 1987 16:44 | 0 |
256.8 | well, that depends | FSTVAX::FOSTER | Frank Foster -- Cincinnati Kid | Thu Jan 22 1987 08:29 | 15 |
| RE .0
This rumor has been going around since I first came to DEC in 1983.
re .6:
When I was in the field, I had a Plan A car for a while then switched
to Plan B. I did so because I was only putting 18 miles/day on the car and
$24/week was a lot to pay for that. If, however, you commute a long way to
work, Plan A might be better. At one time I wrote a program which compared
the costs/benefits of the 2 plans -- inputs included things like insurance
& registration costs, gas price, MPG of cars under consideration, etc. I'll
look around and see if I still have the program.
Frank
|
256.9 | RAISE PLAN B REIMBURSEMENT NOW | CRVAX1::KAPLOW | There is no 'N' in TURNKEY | Thu Jan 22 1987 18:36 | 36 |
| Hi Jon. I guess my brain couldn't get thru to my burning fingers.
It is $24/week, not per month. VMS V5 wishlist SET TERM /NOTYPO!
Fleet administration doesn't seem to do anything about cars being
over 4 years old. They never did anything about mine, even thou
they kept asking for insurance certificates, and that clearly
indicated how old my car was. I finally bought a new car, but was
well over the 4 years until last month. I was once told that it
was up to our cost center managers to inspect both plan A and B
cars at something like monthly intervals to insure compliance with
all fleet rules. Until recently that cost center manager was the
same one who had a "floater" car. I've never seen nor heard of
this being done anywhere. I'd be the first to agree that the four
year limit alone serves no purpose, the criteria should be that
the car provide safe reliable transportation.
BTW, as far as insurance goes, listing the car as "business" with
Digital as an additional insured costs me nothing. I carry the
$100K/300K liability anyway. The agent asked me what my daily
commute miles to/from work are (under 5 miles, thus cheapest
class), and what my typical weekly additional business mileage was
(honest, documentable answer: zero), thus there was no additional
charge.
The plan B reimbursement is $180/month to cover fixed costs plus
$.08/mile variable costs. The difference between the $.08 and
whatever the IRS allows for business mileage is deductable as a
business expense, and will offset some of the $180/month that they
report as income, depending on your mileage.
What I am trying to figure out now is how I can write off the rest
of the $180/month since "policy" did require me to buy a new car
that I otherwise wouldn't have bought at this time. Anyone got any
ideas on how to do that? Can I do this only the year I bought the
car, or will this cover the next several years worth of payments
as well?
|
256.10 | Tax Question | MDVAX3::SOCHA | | Wed Mar 11 1987 22:36 | 11 |
| I too would like to get some information on the tax procedures
regarding Plan B cars. I know that the $180/month shows up
on the W2, and I'm reasonably sure that one can deduct $.13/business
mile (.21 - .08). But can a Plan B car be depreciated?? The major
point seems to be whether Digital requires us to own a car. Though
I haven't seen it in writing, I can't imagine how as a software
specialist one could meet with customers etc. without one.
Does anyone have any facts on this issue?
Kevin @STO
|
256.11 | Depreciation: YES, Deduct .13/mile: NO? | DACT6::COLEMAN | I'm getting my ACT together! | Thu Mar 12 1987 13:28 | 6 |
| I have been able to depreciate my Plan B car the last three years.
Of course you can only deduct the business percent of the depreciation,
but it helps. I have never been able to deduct .13/mile, though.
My accountant ADDS the .08/mile*business_miles to my income.
Perry
|
256.12 | Can't do both. | ODIXIE::JENNINGS | Dave Jennings | Sun Mar 15 1987 11:46 | 5 |
| Your can deduct 13� a mile (which includes things like depreciation)
*or* you can deduct the business percentage of the actual costs
(which includes things like depreciation). The bottom line is you
can't do both. You either deduct actual expenses or the standard
milage rate.
|
256.13 | They're everywhere, they're everywhere! | NCADC1::PEREZ | Batches, we don't need no stinkin' batches | Wed Apr 29 1987 23:04 | 12 |
| In regard to the notification on cars 4 years old:
I know of at least two instances (in different districts) where
cost center managers received some kind of notification of cars
that were approaching the limit. What the nature of the notifications
were, and the actions forced, I don't know.
Big brother IS somehow aware.
Dave
|
256.14 | More rumors.. | 37090::HERB | AL | Mon Oct 24 1988 19:33 | 7 |
| Since you're all on rumors...I heard that there may be an improvement
on B compensation. Uplift of currenct $200/Mo. Also heard on news
that the mileage reimbursment was going to $.24/Mi. The 2nd part
was on radio, while the 1st was "normal" rumor.
Any comments?
|
256.15 | Me Toooo..... | PH4VAX::MCBRIDE | scalp burns before skin surface | Wed Oct 26 1988 20:57 | 6 |
| I love rumors!!!! They have the crazy tendency to come true! The
more outrageous they are the more likely they are to be true. For
example, I heard today that if you are not eligible for the "A"
plan, and ARE eligible for the "B" plan but choose not to do it,
then you get 8 cents a mile for business mile anyway. How about
that?????
|