T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
246.1 | Privileged Parking for DEC Execs & Secs | SAFETY::SEGAL | Len Segal | Mon Jan 12 1987 09:15 | 10 |
| Your guess is 100% correct. Somewhere in here there is a previous
note on the subject. It is official "unofficial" parking for VP's,
KO, and their Secs. I say "unofficial" since this allows DEC to
deny that anyone is treated any differently from the grunt worker.
I got into an argument with a Security Manager about such thinly
disguised parking approximately a year ago and they admitted what
these spaces were for. [They also give visiting execs real "blue
passes to park in these spots for a meeting or such, but the
"special" DECies sport no such designations on their vehicles.]
|
246.2 | ARE THERE PRIVILEGES ? | LEROUF::BREICHNER | | Wed Jan 21 1987 07:00 | 6 |
| Seems like one of the things we used to believe in is joining
"myths of the past" again. I haven't seen many replies on this
note. Can anyone confirm/deny this ?
Fred
|
246.3 | | MILT::JACKSON | In the old days, before fair was square | Wed Jan 21 1987 09:23 | 33 |
| I tried to report a VP in Marlboro about a year ago for constantly
parking his car in the visitors spots. (even though he got there
before anyone else, and could have parked in almost any other spot
in the lot)
The converstaion with security was like this:
me: "Did you know that there is a DEC employee parked in the visitor
spot"
Security: "No, which one is it"
me: "it's that black Mercedes 190 in the second spot"
Security: "Do you know who owns it"
me: "yes, it's Harvey Weiss"
Security: "Well, I'm not going to do anything about it, why don't
YOU tell him"
After that, I was rather discouraged. (he still parked there when
I left MRO, in August, so that was at least 8 months of parking,
and last time I was there (about a month ago) he was still parking
there)
-bill
|
246.4 | sic'em | REGENT::MERRILL | If you've got it, font it. | Wed Jan 21 1987 10:11 | 6 |
| Eight months is a long "visit" isn't it! I'm sure he would have
straightened out if security had laid one of their "parking violations"
on him, right? Anyone who has to get here before anybody else
must not be quite up do doing the job, right? :-)
|
246.5 | | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Jan 21 1987 12:35 | 4 |
| I wonder what his supervisor will say when they get a copy of the
ticket? 8-)
-mark
|
246.6 | Customer parking area at MRO3 | MORRIS::MORRISON | Bob M. LMO2/O24 296-5357 | Wed Jan 21 1987 15:10 | 11 |
| I am surprised at how far they are willing to go at the Mill to
preserve the illusion that there is no "exceutive privilege" at
DEC. I would rather see them openly set aside reserved parking for
vice presidents and above.
This is slightly off the subject, but at MRO3 they roped off an
area of about 40 parking spaces for customers. I only visit MRO3
once a month and this is the first time I saw it. Half the spaces
were empty when I was there (12:30-1:15 today). Does anyone know
how long this area has been roped off, why they did it, and whether
it is permanent? I know "the customer is king", but this seems a
little excessive.
|
246.7 | | MILT::JACKSON | In the old days, before fair was square | Wed Jan 21 1987 16:05 | 17 |
| RE: .-1
I had heard about that. There used to be 1 row, with about 15
or 20 spots reserved (with signs in front of them) reserved for
customers, but folks like Weiss (and some of the people that work
for him) kept parking there. Hopefully, they got the message and
DEC doesn't have to hire a parking attendant to keep track of the
parking spaces.
As for Harvey parking at MRO3. He had one of those little 'visitor'
thingies stuck in his windshield. Security knew it was his car
(I wasn't the only person who told them about it) but did nothing
because he was a VP (they didn't say that, but I'm sure that was
the reason)
|
246.8 | Memo from Security Manager :== Proof! | SAFETY::SEGAL | Len Segal | Wed Jan 21 1987 21:18 | 15 |
| Re: .2
> Seems like one of the things we used to believe in is joining "myths
> of the past" again. I haven't seen many replies on this note. Can
> anyone confirm/deny this ?
Well, like many "myths of the past", we are getting to be a LARGE
Company and are starting to behave as such, even if we fail to admit
it!
For proof, I received a memo from a Security Manager which responded
to my flames at an Employee parked in a Visitor space. The memo
admitted that the "Blue Pass" spaces are for VP's & their
Secretaries. KO parks in a space marked "Company Vehicle" beside
Bldg 10.
|
246.9 | RIP the communal spirit | COGITO::WHITE | Bob White | Thu Jan 22 1987 10:12 | 44 |
| Commenting on: < Note 246.8 by SAFETY::SEGAL "Len Segal" >
> The memo admitted that the "Blue Pass" spaces are for VP's
> & their Secretaries.
How about Blue Pass spaces for VP's and their engineers? How about Blue
Pass spaces for VP's and their technicians? How about Blue Pass spaces
for VP's and their personnel and finance people?
> Big company and are starting to behave as such, even if we fail to admit it!
Flame on (possibly based on faulty info):
So no more equality here I guess. Is that why the masses got a 5% pay
raise last year and the VP's got 38%? (Data on VP salary raises from
secondhand report of story in the Middlesex News).
Flame off.
Well, I think it's too bad that RHIP is invading Digital. Inevitable I
suppose, but still I will mourn the passing of a democratic company.
One of the bad side effects of giving our priveledges according to rank
is that now people will devote efforts to comparing how their status
compares to the person down the hall and more effort to obtaining those
priveledges that indicate `status' instead of being productive.
This introduction of rank and status and priveledge also has another bad
effect. Those lower on the ladder now see a disproportionate reward for
their efforts. The ideal at one time that is we all worked hard we
would all share equally in the success. A status based community
removes that incentive. Patterns of thought along the lines of "why
should work harder or be more productive, the VP will get all the
good stuff and I'll just get the short end of the stick" start to show
up.
Well, RIP a democratic company. Still the best place around, but a
little less satisfying.
"every time that wheel goes 'round,
bound to cover just a little more ground..."
Bob
|
246.10 | Not the birth of privilege, but the death of honesty | KIRK::JOHNSON | Notes is an expert system | Thu Jan 22 1987 10:25 | 10 |
| Privileges like executive parking don't bother me much. The
way I figure, if you can woo someone with a free privilege
rather than pay him or her a few bucks more, you've saved
the company some money.
However, the deceptive marking of the spaces is very bothersome.
It's a "white lie" told at a company that used to have honesty
at the top of the list of its rules.
MATT
|
246.11 | slot #1 | BISTRO::PATTERSON | dont duke it out=>nuke it out! | Fri Jan 23 1987 04:22 | 6 |
| DEC should have reserved parking slots by badge number....KO
gets #1, etc.
KMP
|
246.12 | Oh no! Not badge numbers again! | GOBLIN::MCVAY | Pete McVay, VRO (Telecomm) | Fri Jan 23 1987 08:12 | 15 |
| > DEC should have reserved parking slots by badge number....KO
> gets #1, etc.
U.S. military officers have "seniority numbers", which determine
rank and seniority between any two individuals. I have seen
many fights break out using these numbers, for such things
as size and location of an office, parking space assignments,
and seating arrangements in the dining room. I would hate
to see badge numbers be used as a basis for anything except
identification.
When you joined the company is only an unofficial seniority
and has nothing to do with business. Trying to mix this in,
even for something as "innocent" as parking places, would
interfere with the genuine management seniority structure.
|
246.13 | experience with reserved slots | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Fri Jan 23 1987 08:18 | 18 |
| I used to work for a company in which all parking slots were reserved
by badge number. My badge number was 18026, and I had a slot well
away from the main door. When I'd been there about 6 years I got
a call from a secretary telling me that because of my comparatively
low badge number I now qualified for a slot close to the main door.
I turned down the offer, because my old slot was close to the side
door leading to the basement, and my office was in the basement.
I told her to give my privileged slot to someone who would otherwise
not get one.
Here at Digital my badge number is 41223, so I would probably have
to wait a long time to get the slot nearest the door. I prefer
the current first-come-first-served scheme. I was the second car
in the parking lot this morning, so I got a very good slot. I normally
come in early: partly to read NOTES but mostly because I like parking
close to the door.
John Sauter
|
246.14 | My $.02 pro and con | SYSENG::COULSON | Roger Coulson | Fri Jan 23 1987 08:40 | 22 |
| With all this activity about Blue Pass parking I thought I should
add my $.02 here also.
There was and still is some good reason to have reserved spots for
VP's and the like. Some of these people come and go a lot during
the day and for them I think the spaces are justified. How would
you like one of our VP's being late for a meeting with an important
customer group having to say: I was in the XYZ plant this morning;
sorry I'm late but I had to park at a meter downtown.
The former three deep parking lot would make a lot of sense for
an executive and customer lot; it is used for that most of the time
anyway.
I DON'T LIKE THE WHITE LIES ABOUT WHAT THE SPACES ARE FOR EITHER!!!
(That's my other $.01 worth on the subject.)
P.S. On medical spaces some of them used to have the badge number
of the owner on them.
/s/ Roger
|
246.15 | Be Honest, Do it the "DEC Way"! | SAFETY::SEGAL | Len Segal | Fri Jan 23 1987 08:41 | 15 |
| I have no beef with privileged parking for KO & VP's, since they
frequently have to run to meetings at various sites and their time
is tight and valuable {please no flames about us grunts and relative
values of our time}.
My beef is relative to our insistence that such privileges do not
exist. It may be a "small" lie, but it certainly is not in keeping
with the DEC philosophy of honesty and "doing the right thing". We
should own up to what we are doing.
As for parking by badge number, no thanks! Even some of our VP's
have high badge numbers. If one started early with DEC, quit and
comes back 20 years later, they still have their original badge
number, but very low seniority.
|
246.16 | someday we'll get respect!! | BISTRO::PATTERSON | dont duke it out=>nuke it out! | Mon Jan 26 1987 07:51 | 10 |
| The "DEC Way" = do what's right. And, when right changes...guess
what happens? (As is the case with contracts, software & 1000's
of other things).
Parking by badge number...and how about seating by seniority,
too? What happened to respectin' your elders??
KMP
|
246.17 | Parking shortage at MRO3 | PLDVAX::MORRISON | Bob M. LMO2/P41 296-5357 | Fri Jan 30 1987 18:49 | 18 |
| I visited MRO3 again yesterday and that area of the parking lot was
still roped off. Now there is a new wrinkle: the entrance to the
north parking lot was blocked off with orange cones.
What's going on here? It appears that the parking lots are chock
full and the only way they can provide enough parking for customers
and the like is to use unpredictable restrictions. Unlike the Mill,
there is plenty of land on which to build more parking lots. Why
don't they do it?
An even better idea would be to seriously promote carpools and
vanpools. The (temporary?) end of the energy crisis has not elim-
inated the need. Building and maintaining parking lots is expensive,
and you can only put so many parking spaces within reasonable walk-
ing distance of a plant.
Those of you who have been with DEC may remember the carpool maps
DEC issued about 5 years ago. You can't get them any more. I wanted
to get another copy a few years ago for a friend who didn't know
his way around and couldn't; I had to use the copy machine. Lucky
I had kept my carpool map on file.
|