T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
236.1 | You Have My Sympathy! | DEREP::JONG | Steve Jong/NaC Pubs | Sat Dec 13 1986 23:23 | 4 |
| This may be of no use to you, but I've been told that job-offer
letters are legally binding. My former company acted as if that
were so, as well.
|
236.2 | What good does this do? | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Sat Dec 13 1986 23:36 | 10 |
| You have my sympathy as well, but I am of the opinion that it is
not proper to discuss such things in notes conferences. Notes should
not be a "kangaroo court" where only one side of an argument is
presented. (Even if both sides WERE presented, I still don't think
it's proper.)
You are annoyed, and apparently rightly so, but you don't help your
case by airing your gripes in this forum.
Steve "The Grouch"
|
236.3 | Where to "talk" | FRSBEE::COOPER | | Sun Dec 14 1986 00:08 | 18 |
| re .2
Steve, Thank you for your time to answer. But I must point out
that there were certain pieces of information left out, not to
bias an opinion but to keep from having this note from getting too
deep over a "public" note. The reason for the initial note was
to help me in obtaining insight as to what resourses might be available
to me. I KNOW what happen was incorrect on the part of DEC. I just
need some guidiance as to how to go about showing those that made
this poor decision where the error is, and what should be done to
correct it. Also to remove from the system thoses elments that caused
this "mistake" to happen.
Again thank you for your time.
George C.
|
236.4 | Here's a Contact Person | SAFETY::SEGAL | Len Segal | Sun Dec 14 1986 02:05 | 6 |
| I suggest that you contact Geoff (CELICA::) Sackman about this
problem. It sounds like you have a good case and he is a good
person (responsible for Personnel Policies & Procedures) to help you
win your case.
Good Luck
|
236.5 | This is THE place. | RDGE40::KERRELL | with a little bit of top and side | Mon Dec 15 1986 09:17 | 11 |
| re .2:
I disagree, this is just the kind of issue that needs airing. In my
short experience in DEC I have already come across many people who
have been treated badly and would have benefited from the advice
of such a forum.
As long as no names are mentioned this is the place to post these
issues.
Dave.
|
236.6 | Keep a simple story | HUMAN::CONKLIN | Peter Conklin | Mon Dec 15 1986 22:27 | 26 |
| A transfer falls into one of three possible categories:
(a) level transfer. This is the most common. Check your new and
old job codes. Ask personnel what "level" each is. If the same,
then the normal procedure involves no change of salary at the time
of the transfer.
(b) promotion. Also fairly common. Typically, the level moves up
one or two. Since there is a substantial overlap in the salary ranges,
it is common for there to be no change of salary at the time of
the transfer. In any case, if you are below the minimum, there is
a "requirement" to bring you up to minimum within six months of
the transfer.
(c) to a lower level. Very rare. This is the only case in which
salary would drop. It is so rare, that it could hardly result in
a typo.
From your description, it seems unlikely that the original intent
was case (c). I would suggest that you keep pushing. Best is to
work it up through the personnel and line managements in your group.
Use DIGITAL's open door policy to appeal this one all the way to
a VP if necessary. Just make sure your story is clear. Also, be
polite--you will end up working for these people after all!
Good luck.
|
236.7 | And ANOTHER piont... | FRSBEE::COOPER | | Tue Dec 16 1986 00:50 | 10 |
| RE: -1
How (or where) would you put a down transfer that goes from
second to first shift? That's another problem that come into the
question of where you are and where your're going.
The plot thickins
George C.
|
236.8 | Sounds like the old run around | BAXTA::FOOTER_JOE | | Tue Dec 16 1986 07:58 | 5 |
|
A job offer letter is legally binding. I'd go up to the appropriate
V.P. and present my case in a forthright manner, if no positive
results I'd get a lawyer.
|
236.9 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Tue Dec 16 1986 08:02 | 9 |
| Ooops... wait a second. The plot thickens...
Does your new first shift salary differ from the job offer by more than the
shift differential from second shift to first? I can see where the error
may have been made. It sucks, but it may have really been an error if the
offer was based on your old second shift salary, and the difference is only
the loss of the differential to second shift.
/john
|
236.10 | verbal offers | TIGEMS::ARNOLD | Are we having fun yet? | Tue Dec 16 1986 09:04 | 15 |
| re .7
Many times Digital tends to be very informal. Having transferred
a few times, I've never gotten a written offer letter. It was agreed
to verbally, then when I started the new position, I got an official
letter of welcome, here's your salary, here's your position type
of letter.
In one instance (intent to transfer to DEC Geneva) I got standard
verbal offer, which I accepted, then they decided they had a hiring
freeze & the position could not be filled, regardless of the fact
that I had gotten an offer, albeit verbal, from the hiring manager.
Are "verbal contracts" worth only the paper they're written on?
Jon
|
236.11 | Expanding on questions | FRSBEE::COOPER | | Wed Dec 17 1986 01:37 | 12 |
|
Re .9
The differance was larger than the shift compensation. As I
stated to the super of the position I would not even consider the
position at the second rate offering.
Re -1
I was VERY carfule not to make ANY comitments on the postion
until I got the offer in wrighting.
|