T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
232.1 | Deposits before withdrawls @Baybank | MLOKAI::MACK | a(2b | Wed Dec 10 1986 09:24 | 11 |
| That's wild. I know Baybank does just the opposite. The deposits
are put into the nightly batch and then the withdrawls are made.
We've taken advantage of this, taking our theatre night on Wednesday
rather than Thursday in order to avoid the lines. DEC deposits the
money at the end of the business day on Wednesday. The auto-teller
withdrawl gets batched in after the paycheck is deposited.
One more reason not to open a DCU checking account.
Ralph
|
232.2 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Wed Dec 10 1986 10:24 | 15 |
| This seems to be an example of toy programmers working on a real project.
1. I've never heard of a bank doing anything other than processing all deposits
then all withdrawals.
2. Only with unique transaction IDs assigned from a single central source (a
totally unrealistic concept) you could sequence transactions by absolute
time (another unrealistic concept in a distributed system) and process them
in order.
3. Processing withdrawals before deposits is wrong.
This leaves only the first choice.
/john
|
232.3 | I've seen it elsewhere | JON::MORONEY | Obedience To Law Is Liberty. | Thu Dec 11 1986 19:50 | 15 |
| I know of a bank in Buffalo that wouldn't seem to "bounce" a check until the
end of a business day, or something. I made a mistake once balancing my
checkbook (forgot to subtract a charge for checks) which gave the following
sequence of events on the statement:
Account (slightly) positive
Small check clears, causing account to go negative
Deposit on same day, account goes positive
3 days later: another check (~$100) presented, account goes negative (by $1)
Another small ($1) check presented.
The $100 check bounces, account goes positive so $1 check clears.
Was tough living close to the edge (college student)
-Mike
|
232.4 | don't count on it | VIKING::FLEISCHER | Bob Fleischer | Fri Dec 12 1986 16:59 | 13 |
| re Note 232.1 by MLOKAI::MACK:
> DEC deposits the money at the end of the business day on Wednesday.
This certainly WAS the pattern, as confirmed by years of bank statements.
But just a month ago I was socked with a NSF charge for a payment made by
check to BayBanks itself on a Wednesday. I checked my recent account
statements, which I hadn't really looked at for several months, and the
payroll deposits were no longer being credited on Wednesday but on Thursday.
Have you checked your statements lately?
Bob
|
232.5 | Seconding... | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | I Use VMS. My Cereal? Raw Bits! | Fri Dec 12 1986 17:13 | 4 |
| I noticed the same effect (Thursday deposits) as Bob Fleischer,
starting some number of months ago.
Atlant
|
232.6 | I'm no banker, so this may not make sense, but . . . | NOBUGS::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Fri Dec 12 1986 17:43 | 9 |
| I had heard some number of years ago that BayBanks was "mounting the
DEC payroll tape" on Wednesday to get the float on the money a day early,
and that when DEC found out, told them to do it right, or they would
stop doing auto-deposit to BayBank. Considering the number of accounts
that BayBanks would lose (10's of thousands?), they supposedly stopped
screwing around.
Maybe the same thing happenned again?
/AHM
|
232.7 | | EUREKA::KRISTY | Subject to bursts of enthusiasm! | Fri Dec 12 1986 21:58 | 11 |
| We just had something similar to us with this week's paychecks.
We went in on Thursday around 1:00 to check on our bank balance,
and were told that DEC hadn't gotten the tape to them yet for the
automatic deposits. Unfortunately, our deposits didn't come through
until today!! (Friday)
When I do my monthly statements, I've noticed that the withdrawals
are always done first before the deposits. It's always been done
that way... and it stinks! *sigh*
*** Kristy ***
|
232.8 | Accounting Follies | ZEPPO::KUSCHER | Ken Kuscher | Sun Dec 14 1986 19:28 | 76 |
|
We as a family have several accounts with the DCU as well
as one account in a bank. I will now list some of the
problems we have had:
1. My wife and I have a checking account at Souhegan in
N.H. which gets the automatic deposit. My wife went to
cash a check one Friday morning and found that the
deposit had not been made. The bank's story was that
apparently quite often the tape is not ready for the
courier so then the tape does not get picked up until the
next time the courier gets there. In this particular
case, the money wasn't available to my wife until
Saturday. I remember back when they presented the option
of getting direct deposit and one of the insentives to go
along with this direct deposit was that the money was
actually deposited on Wednesday night and so you could
write a check Wednesday night if you wanted to. At least
you were assured that the money was there on Thursday
morning. Does anyone else remember being told that line?
2. My brother who is a trucker has an account with the
DCU with only his name on it. I deposit his checks
weekly into his savings account. His account number is
my badge number with a prefix in front of it. My wife
also has her own account with my badge number and a
different prefix. You guessed it -- his money went into
my wife's account!!! He was not thrilled; my wife was!!
3. Total inconsistency abounds -- one week when I
deposit my brothers money (by the way we use a stamp to
endorse the check with my brothers name on it and the
proper DCU account number with the -S1 to signify the
savings account) they may give me a sealed envelope with
the transaction inside; one week they may just mail the
transaction slip to my brother and then in another week
they may just hand me the slip of paper with the
transaction on it for me to read. Sometimes they don't
put the money into the savings but rather put it into the
checking account (unless, of course, they've put it into
my wife's account!!)
4. Both my wife and my brother had trouble getting a
photocopy of a check for proof of payment. DCU's policy
is that if it is needed for proof of payment they will
not charge for the copy. Not only did they charge both
my brother and my wife but they had to go to great
lengths to call up headquarters and tell them they had to
take the charge away (the local branch tells us we don't
pay for these photocopies but headquarters charge
anyway). One wonders just how many people end up paying
this charge where they shouldn't be required to pay it.
Not to mention the fact that it takes about 3 weeks to
get the photocopy you need. Actually, it took more
than one phone call to get those copies for both my wife
and brother.
5. My wife would use her deposit slip from the back
of her checkbook and she endorsed the check with her
account number that appears on the bottom of her check
(just like in the real world of checking accounts at
banks). The DCU tellers certainly don't like that and
can't seem to cope with that method. Why is that? That
is in fact the account number -- why are those numbers on
the checks and deposit slips if they are not the account
number? My wife continually tries to do this -- she can
get quite presistent when she thinks she is correct.
6. Does my wife exist on our joint DCU account? When the
statement arrives at our house the only name on the whole
statement is mine. She really loves that!!
7. On the same theme as No. 6 -- when we used the DCU
for our house mortgage the DCU refused to acknowledge that
my wife does exist until it came time to sign papers.
|
232.9 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Sun Dec 14 1986 22:25 | 7 |
| Regarding 232.8, point 6: DCU does not believe in joint accounts,
period. In a joint account, all "members" have equal rights and
status. DCU allows you to add additional people as being authorized
to use your account, and may even print their name on the check,
but to them, it's still your account only.
Steve
|
232.10 | tape from dec probably on time | BOEHM::CBRADLEY | Chuck Bradley | Mon Dec 15 1986 09:00 | 22 |
| i used to have an account at baybank. when a dec deposit showed up
late i inquired about it with both baybank and the dec treasurer.
from the dec treasurer i got the exact date and time it was delivered.
from baybank i got the runaround.
both agreed on one thing: there is a "clearinghouse" that accepts tapes
from firms with autodeposit and makes tapes for banks.
if the dec tape was late, all deposits at all banks would be late.
in this case, i'll bet on dec.
all this was long ago, probaly about 1979.
after about 30 years of banking, in three states, seven cities,
and about 12-15 banks, few banks have ben as good as dcu.
but then, i've not had some of the troubles that some of the noters had.
when esablishing an account i usually ask when the deposits and checks
are posted. the answer has always been that the batch runs do deposits
first. once, and i do not remember which bank, the statement seemed to
indicate they were posted last. i asked about it and was told that the
balance test at the end of the day was the only one that triggered a charge
and the end of day balance was used for the average and minimum balance
calculations. i was never in a position to determine if that was true.
|
232.11 | Joint Ownership | ZEPPO::KUSCHER | Ken Kuscher | Mon Dec 15 1986 12:09 | 34 |
|
> Regarding 232.8, point 6: DCU does not believe in joint accounts,
> period. In a joint account, all "members" have equal rights and
> status. DCU allows you to add additional people as being authorized
> to use your account, and may even print their name on the check,
> but to them, it's still your account only.
The DCU agreement as printed on the application for
membership states:
I (we) apply for membership in the Digital Employees'
Federal Credis Union (DCU). I (we) are in the field of
membership and agree to follow the by-laws of DCU.
I (we) authorize DCU to recognize any of the signatures
on the opposite side of the card as equal owners of the
share account(s) excluding the share draft account with
equal reghts to make deposits, withdrawals and with
rights of survivorship.
.....
Then on the back is a place for the "prime member" to sign
and a place for the "joint member" to sign.
The application for checking also has a place for the
the "joint owner" to sign.
This looks to me like the DCU recognizes Joint Owners.
Ken
|
232.12 | Yes, but... | DSSDEV::EPPES | Dignity, always dignity | Wed Dec 17 1986 17:59 | 22 |
| RE < Note 232.11 by ZEPPO::KUSCHER "Ken Kuscher" >
>> Regarding 232.8, point 6: DCU does not believe in joint accounts,
>> period. In a joint account, all "members" have equal rights and
>> status. DCU allows you to add additional people as being authorized
>> to use your account, and may even print their name on the check,
>> but to them, it's still your account only.
> [info on places where "joint owner" signs on application...]
> This looks to me like the DCU recognizes Joint Owners.
Yes, but the account is under one of the joint owners' badge
number, hence, it is technically that person's account (I assume).
When my Significant Other (also a DEC employee) and I opened a joint
checking account, we had to do it under my badge number because he
already had a checking account under his badge number. Friends of ours,
a married couple and both DEC employees, cannot have a joint account at
DCU because they each have their own checking accounts. A joint account
at DCU can't have a completely different number because DCU accounts go
by badge numbers...
-- Nina
|
232.13 | You can have a 2nd checking account. | VAXWRK::GOLDENBERG | Ruth Goldenberg | Wed Dec 17 1986 19:13 | 8 |
| RE < 232.12 >
It is possible to have two checking accounts. My significant other and I
have 3 accounts between us - his, mine, and ours. The joint account is a
2nd account under one of our badge numbers, with some leading (or following,
I forget) digits to distinguish it.
reg
|
232.14 | One of my hot buttons... | NY1MM::LEIGH | But why New York? | Wed Dec 17 1986 21:58 | 12 |
| Re .12, .13
Sounds like the folks at the DCU would rather you conformed to the design
of their system (which assumes that DEC couples will not exist, or at least
will not want joint accounts), but if you complain loud and long enough,
they will indeed find a way for the system to accommodate reality.
Other examples are the fact that both PCS (prescription card) and HCS (bulk
prescription filling by mail) -- parts of our health benefits -- expect
all dependents of an employee to share the same last name.
Bob
|
232.15 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | A disgrace to the forces of evil | Thu Jan 22 1987 08:36 | 13 |
| re:.10 & .7
Since I work for the data center that processes the payroll
every week, I can tell you that the deposit information for
all banks is completed *well* before midnight on Tuesday
(barring a really bad problem --- unfortunately, some really
bad problems occurred in early December). The window is
such that the Feds have the info by early Wednesday morning.
There have even been times when I have personally delivered
deposit tapes to a bank in Boston on Tuesday night.
--- jerry
|
232.16 | ya need a new law! | BISTRO::PATTERSON | dont duke it out=>nuke it out! | Fri Jan 23 1987 04:28 | 7 |
| Pay once per month! Paying once per week is outrageous, not
to mention a waste of time/effort. I know the Mass. law, change
it...
KMP
|
232.17 | Have you ever been paid once a month? | GOBLIN::MCVAY | Pete McVay, VRO (Telecomm) | Fri Jan 23 1987 08:13 | 3 |
| I have. Trying to live until the end of the month, even with
a good salary, is trying at times. I like the once-per-week
system.
|
232.18 | yes | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Fri Jan 23 1987 08:30 | 7 |
| When I first moved to New Hampshire I was paid once a month. The
first check didn't come until the end of the second month, of course--
just like with weekly paychecks, you are paid for the previous
period's work. My wife was still in California, living on what
was left of our bank account while finishing school, so I didn't
eat much the first 6 weeks!
John Sauter
|
232.19 | no sweat!!! | BISTRO::PATTERSON | dont duke it out=>nuke it out! | Fri Jan 23 1987 08:35 | 10 |
| Being paid once per month then isnt the real problem, what is
is controlling the spending. Gees, we havent been paid since 19
December and there's no problem (that's being mentioned) that I
can see. Some of my bills are quarterly, and one utility bill is
twice yearly. Actually, getting paid once per quarter would be
even better!! One has exactly the same amount of money, you know.
KMP (probably we'll get paid next week!!!)
|
232.20 | NO Mass Law Specifies Payroll Frequency | SAFETY::SEGAL | Len Segal | Fri Jan 23 1987 09:10 | 39 |
| RE: < Note 232.16 by BISTRO::PATTERSON >
> -< ya need a new law! >-
> Pay once per month! Paying once per week is outrageous, not
> to mention a waste of time/effort. I know the Mass. law, change
> it...
If I interpret your comment correctly, you are telling us that Mass
law either REQUIRES payment weekly, or PROHIBITS payment on a
monthly basis.
If you are actually telling me this, you are WRONG!
I once worked for Raytheon (in Waltham, MASS) and we were paid
MONTHLY (and due to their policy of early December checks, you wait
6 WEEKS for the January check), and that hasn't changed. Only last
week I was discussing this issue with a DECcie whose Husband is a
CURRENT Raytheon employee.
My Wife was a teacher in a MASS school system for three years, prior
to joining DEC. She was paid every TWO weeks. We have a number of
friends who are still teaching school and they are all paid every
TWO weeks!
Sorry, there is NO LAW in MASS which specifies any specific pay
period, just that you eventually get paid!
The weekly payroll is a tremendously costly program, but it is KO's
edict. I suspect that when someone else takes over the "helm" (when
KO retires, and NO I am not speculating when that may be), that will
probably change (I will speculate that it would probably change to
every two weeks).
Until you try living on a monthly check, you wouldn't understand
what it is like!! I lived like that for 18 months and let me tell
you that "cash flow" is the real issue. My policy is to pay bills
~20 days after receipt, and almost all my bills are monthly (only
water bill, real estate tax, rubbish pickup, insurance payments are
less frequent than monthly).
|
232.21 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Fri Jan 23 1987 09:51 | 12 |
| re .20:
> there is NO LAW in MASS which specifies any specific pay period
I'm not too sure about that, Len. I had thought that some people are
required to be paid weekly, and within 5 or 6 days of the last day of
the week. Mostly, the jobs that fall under this law are paid as
hourly or piece-work wages. Jobs that are classified as
'professional', which are generally salaried, would be exempt from
this law.
--Don
|
232.22 | What's the beef? Pay *yourself* monthly! | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Fri Jan 23 1987 13:04 | 13 |
| I was paid monthly before coming to work for DEC 12 years ago. Over the six
years in my previous job, I got used to it and liked it.
For the entire twelve years I've been at DEC I have stuffed my pay stubs away
until the end of the month, at which time I write one deposit in my checkbook
for the full month's pay. Months with five Thursdays are especially nice,
though sometimes I shove that paycheck into savings.
If you prefer monthly checks, you can do this, too. (And if you run short in
any particular month, you don't have to ask anyone but yourself for an advance
on part of next month's pay.)
/john
|
232.23 | NY has a law too | SKYLAB::FISHER | Burns Fisher 381-1466, ZKO1-1/D42 | Fri Jan 23 1987 17:46 | 9 |
| I was paid monthly when I worked at the University of Rochester,
NY. I believe there was a law in NY specifying pay frequency for
non-exempt personnel, because the secretaries were paid bi-weekly.
It was a bit bizzare, since we were paid on the (I think) 26th,
and they were paid every other Friday. Sometimes the two days would
match up and all hell broke out in payroll.
Burns
|
232.24 | pay quarterly... | BISTRO::PATTERSON | dont duke it out=>nuke it out! | Mon Jan 26 1987 07:56 | 11 |
| Yea, paying monthly is ok. There could still be less strain
by paying quarterly. One place I lived all bills (except rent)
were due quarterly. Rent was a pain...always had to drive down
and pay in cash (not check).
We just got our paystubs today...1st ones since 19 December,
saves a lot of hastle with bank acounts, etc.
KMP
|
232.25 | | HOMBRE::CONLIFFE | Store in a horizontal position | Mon Jan 26 1987 09:04 | 8 |
| I've been paid weekly, fortnightly, and monthly in Mass! (no, not all
at Digital). The only legal impact I could see was that there were certain
notices which had to be given to an employee (dismissal, for example) which
were required to be given n pay periods in advance (where n was a small
number). So, if you're paid by the week, they give you two weeks notice;
if you're paid by the month, they give you two months notice.
Nigel
|
232.26 | Monthly Payment Implications | GHANI::KEMERER | Sr. Sys. Sfw. Spec.(8,16,32,36 bits) | Mon Jan 26 1987 15:46 | 18 |
| Re: Being Paid Monthly
There is an unspoken implication here that for a monthly pay
schedule to work implies that you have 1 month's pay ALWAYS
in the bank. That way you always have the money for whatever
bills hit you on a monthly basis.
All the problems I've ever seen with when one gets paid have
to do with how one budgets their money. My motto is always
live one pay period in advance. If you get paid every week,
then have one week's pay ALWAYS in the bank, etc.
If this method is followed, you never notice how often you get
paid. (Of course, sometimes it is difficult to get to the point
where you HAVE a month's pay in the bank!!)
Warren
|
232.27 | getting back to the main topic. | CAADC::MANGU | | Mon Jan 26 1987 18:43 | 29 |
|
I find it easier to budget my weekly paychecks as opposed to monthly
ones. 5 weeks in a month can be nice.
Getting back on track:
Starting last summer, I found that random withdrawals for $100/-
each were being made from my saving account. These withdrawals were
then corrected the next day. When I asked DCU about this, I was
told that they had converted to a new system, which seemed to have
more bugs than they expected. I also heard from one of the tellers
(they all look alike) that DCU bought a new system, because the
cost of each ATM of the old system was too expensive. Other than
this my experience with DCU had always been pretty good. Some of
their services I found to be better than my bank (where I have an
account). For example, I once withdrew most of my money when I went
on an extended vacation. The DCU teller told me what checks had
cleared since my last statement without any trouble. Of course I
went when there was noone waiting to use DCU. When I asked my bank,
for the same service, I was told that they would take a minimum
of 3 days at $30/hr for any time spent on this "problem".
BTW does anyone remember the article in Reader's Digest from 1986
which explained the differences between Banks, Credit Unions, Savings
and Loans Institutions, etc. I would like a copy if anyone can find
it.
|
232.28 | :-) | MLOKAI::MACK | Embrace No Contradictions | Mon Jan 26 1987 19:35 | 2 |
| Budget? Huh?
|
232.29 | | RICKS::SPEAR | The Culture Penguin | Fri Feb 06 1987 12:14 | 17 |
| RE: .-2 Differences between different bank types
I have looked into this a little. A Credit Union can not do any commercial
work, which is why my investment club (a partnership) can not get an account
with DCU.
A regular bank (such as BayBanks) can not pay interest on a commercial
account. The fees they charge for commercial checking accounts are downright
usurious - $100 a year for the account I looked at. Hudson Savings Bank has
no charges other than printing checks as long as the balance stays above $100,
and they pay 5.25% interest! Such a deal!
FYI: Bay Banks charges $7 a month for a commercial checking account, plus $.20
a check, plus $.65 per deposit, plus $.07 per item deposited. My personal DCU
account never looked so good!
cbs
|
232.30 | U-SU'RI-OUS | CAD::FARMER | | Fri Feb 06 1987 17:36 | 5 |
| u-su'ry (yoo'zhe-ree), n. 1. The lending of money at an
exorbitant rate of interest. 2. Such an excessive rate of
interest. --- u-su'ri-ous adj.
|