T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
210.1 | Two possible avenues for relief | NOBUGS::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Tue Oct 28 1986 11:42 | 11 |
| Personnel Policies and Procedures section 5.13 talks about Digital's
"Business Travel Accident Insurance". It only discusses personal
injury, but since the policy says additional details on the insurance
may be obtained from Benefits Administration in Personnel, it may not tell
the whole story - perhaps there is property loss coverage, too.
If you can't get satisfaction by working within the system at Digital,
you can always talk to a laywer. What Digital policy covers voluntarily
isn't necessarily the same thing as what you are legally entitled to
(whatever that might be).
/AHM
|
210.2 | lots a luck | BPOV09::MIOLA | Phantom | Tue Oct 28 1986 12:40 | 13 |
|
Re .0
Be thankful you got the truckdriver to stop.
I had an episode this summer where a truck dropped a piece of junk
metal on 495, because of traffic conditions I couldn't avoid going
over it. It took out my transmission and other goodies to the tune
of $981. Not only did I get stuck with the deductable, but I also
was informed I was more than 50% at fault, so I have to pay a $100
surcharge. Main problem I had no witness, as the driver of the truck.
The rider in my car didn't count.
I'm going to fight it at the Insurance review board but................
|
210.3 | A common accident, apparently... | BCSE::RYAN | Mike Ryan | Tue Oct 28 1986 16:28 | 7 |
| re .2: The exact same thing happened to me on Route 3 this
summer, taking both tires and wheels on the right side. But
they didn't hit me with a surcharge.
Was the truck a flatbed with Quebec plates, by any chance?
Mike
|
210.4 | | CSSE32::PHILPOTT | CSSE/Lang. & Tools, ZK02-1/N71 | Wed Oct 29 1986 12:18 | 7 |
| It happened to a friend of mine in Britain -- his insurance company
decided that it was his fault (because he >must< have been driving
too close, else he would have had time and manoevring space to avoid
the rock). So they cancelled his "no claims bonus"!
/. Ian .\
|
210.5 | could be | BPOV09::MIOLA | Phantom | Wed Oct 29 1986 13:25 | 5 |
|
re .3
It was a flatbed, and I thought it was a white non-Mass plate,
but things happened so fast I couldn't be sure.
|
210.6 | Tax Deduction? | BARNUM::RAINS | | Thu Oct 30 1986 08:12 | 5 |
| You may be able to deduct your loss on your income tax as a
business related expense. Years ago Digital's mileage allowance
was less than that allowed by the IRS. The difference was a legitimate
deduction. This is sort of the same thing...an unreimbursed business
expense. Any tax experts out there?
|
210.7 | | ULTRA::PRIBORSKY | Tony Priborsky | Thu Oct 30 1986 15:46 | 7 |
| I doubt it would be a business-related expense. It is a casualty
loss. There is a cap on casualty losses now (I don't remember
the forumula, but it all but excludes the complete unreimbursed
loss of anything but a Rolls Royce Silver Shadow by anyone with
an income over $1. :-) That is, the deductible portion of any
casualty loss is that portion of the loss over a percentage of your
adjusted gross income. Not very many people qualify any more...)
|
210.8 | Go direct to the truck company | OASS::M_HYDE | Tenet insanabile multos scribendi caco�thes. | Fri Oct 31 1986 22:29 | 18 |
| I had a similar experience with a rock flying off the bed
of a flatbed truck and breaking my windshield. I didn't
get the truck to stop, but I managed to get the company name,
truck id number, license plate etc.
Through the Secretary of State's office in the state the
truck company was in I got the name of the president of the
company. I wrote a letter detailing the events with exact
location, date and time etc., and made the simple statement
that I expected full reimbursement.
I got a letter asking me to send them 3 written estimates.
I did and shortly received a check for the lowest of the
estimates.
Good luck.
mark
|
210.9 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Sat Nov 01 1986 21:31 | 14 |
| My opinion:
Let your manager handle getting you the reimbursement. (Don't spend
*any* of your own time on it.)
As you mentioned in .0, use AVIS cars for all business travel until
you are reimbursed.
Do not give in.
/john
P.S.: Keep us posted here. If you aren't reimbursed, maybe a mass refusal to
use anything but rental cars can be organized.
|
210.10 | Met-pay? Hmmm... | BRAT::DAVISG | Gil Davis ... the Balloonist | Sun Nov 02 1986 20:03 | 5 |
| The last time I checked METpay's rates for our two cars, I fell
over! I think they should change their name to 'pay-met'.
Outrageous! 8')
|
210.11 | | ECCGY4::JAERVINEN | Bitte ein Bit! | Mon Nov 03 1986 04:47 | 9 |
| The car policy here in Germany states quite clearly that the deductible
(is that the right word?) is paid by DEC if the car was used for
business purposes (doesn't matter whether it is your own or a company
car). On the other hand, if you have an accident with your company
car on a private trip, it's your problem.
In cases where it's not reimbursed by the employer, you can at least
deduct it from your income when doing your taxes.
|
210.12 | | PUFFIN::OGRADY | George, ISWS 297-4183 | Mon Nov 03 1986 11:20 | 5 |
|
You got the truckers info, right? Go after his company or insurance
company. Go directly to his insurance company and you'll probaly
get the full coverage. I did.
|
210.13 | I will NOT give in | STING::JELENIEWSKI | | Mon Nov 03 1986 14:26 | 13 |
| Thanks for all the encouragement, gang. I will keep you posted.
As of last week, I have begun using a rental car, even for interplant
travel. (My manager IS attempting to help, but without a whole lot
of success. And she DOES support the rental car).
I contacted the other insurance company, today. They said to send
them the information, but made no committment on whether they will
pay.
Re: .9 I will NOT give in.
|
210.14 | Official Corporate Answer --TOUGH LUCK-- | STING::JELENIEWSKI | | Wed Nov 05 1986 10:42 | 28 |
| Here is the official written response from my manager about this:
"I had a lengthy discussion on Friday with John Murphy who works
for Geoff Sackman in Corporate Personnel. Their job is to know
DEC corporate policy backwards and forwards.
John said that DEC has never paid the deductible for any damage
done on business in a personal car and there have been several cases
besides yours where damage has occurred to personal cars. DEC has
not and will not approve any expenditure to reimburse employees
under these circumstances (regardless of the fact that there was
no alternative transportation to Salem).
Like the policy used by the government, John said DEC pays $.21
per mile which is indeed intended to cover all eaxpenses incurred.
I asked him who else we could talk to about this and he said no
one.
Tom, I would ask your accountant if the deductable could be either
considered a nonreimbursed business expense or under the casualty
portion of the tax return."
So, there you have it folks. Direct from the top. If you car gets
trashed while on company business---tough luck!!
|
210.15 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Wed Nov 05 1986 11:11 | 10 |
| > Tom, I would ask your accountant if the deductable could be either
> considered a nonreimbursed business expense or under the casualty
> portion of the tax return.
Neither of these will approach the full $500 loss.
So who wants to organize a company-wide boycott of personal car use? I've
got too much work to do for the next month or two.
/john
|
210.16 | This IS NOT acceptable | RDGE28::KERRELL | Do not disturb | Thu Nov 06 1986 05:50 | 20 |
| Speaking from a purely UK point of view, the amount per mile that UK
employees receive is _not_ sufficent to cover large out of pocket
expenses for repairs or for covering the big increase in insurance
premium if you claim from your insurance. The reason for this is because
the overall cost is averaged out across all expense claimants and the
person involved in an accident is in an exception situation. In other
words all the other people receiving the same milage rate as you and who
haven't (and may never) have accidents are recieving your compensation.
This is a grossly UNFAIR system and this should be pointed out to
management NOW.
Please take this argument back to management.
The proposal is;
Establish what portion of milage expenses are attributable to large
repairs of this nature and put it into a separate fund for payment
to claimants in your predicament.
Dave.
|
210.17 | At the risk of presenting an opposing point of view... | SKYLAB::FISHER | Burns Fisher 381-1466, ZKO1-1/D42 | Thu Nov 06 1986 13:49 | 16 |
|
Let me just point out that $.21 is much more than the marginal cost
of driving one mile. It is intended to cover the entire life-cost
of the car on a per-mile basis (although it is admitted that the
life-cost/mile is higher than this). All DEC is saying here is
that collision damage deductibles are considered to be part of the
life-cost of the car.
Perhaps not "user-friendly", but I would not call it GROSSLY unfair.
I suspect that a proposal for change would be better accepted if
it included reducing the per-mile rate, since after all, if DEC
is to pay for damage incurred while driving for DEC, then said damage
should not be included in the total life-cost.
Burns
|
210.18 | | SKYLAB::FISHER | Burns Fisher 381-1466, ZKO1-1/D42 | Thu Nov 06 1986 13:51 | 6 |
| re .16 and my .17: Put another way, I claim that the amount per
mile that DEC pays is not only averaging out the costs of all
employees, but even more importantly, it is averaging the miles
you drive for DEC over the entire number of miles you drive.
Burns
|
210.19 | | MLOKAI::MACK | a(2b | Thu Nov 06 1986 13:51 | 5 |
| The real problem here, as I read it, is that your insurance didn't
cover it. It might perhaps be interesting to see if other insurance
policies do.
-Ralph
|
210.20 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Thu Nov 06 1986 17:43 | 5 |
| re .19
I've seen very few insurance companies that pay the deductible.
/john
|
210.21 | DEC insures your car when on business! | LEROUF::BREICHNER | | Fri Nov 07 1986 03:56 | 14 |
| Some Info from Europe (France):
For "occasional travellers" (e.g no company car, no leased car)
the mileage covers only the "running costs" (eg. gas,oil, tire
ware....) Your personal car insurance does not cover you. Therefore
DEC subscribed to an insurance for these travels. So even if you
are at fault in any accident, you will not suffer from increase
in rates. The deductible (500 francs) is reimbursed by DEC on
submittal of an expense claim. What is not covered in any way is
the temporary loss of your car when in repair (regardless of guilt)
This happened to me, where my car was in the shop for 2 months!
Besides that I had not to suffer from any direct financial loss.
Fred
|
210.22 | Go-oonnnn, take your own bus, it'll be ok! | NIPPER::HAGARTY | The Penultimate Rat... | Fri Nov 07 1986 07:05 | 10 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...
Sorry Burns, but the life cycle cost of a car wouldn't include getting
a rock under it. If the gearbox dropped out of it, then you may have a
case, as it would probably have bogged out anyway, but accidents are
really something that cannot be portioned out in the ratio of business
to personal mileage, in the manner that a per mile reimbursement would
indicate.
Sounds like a case of doing what is right, until it costs.
|
210.23 | | DSSDEV::KEANE | Brian Keane | Fri Nov 07 1986 12:47 | 12 |
| Of course insurance companies don't pay the deductable - if they
did it wouldn't be a deductable at all, which I suspect was your
point.
However for someone who uses a personal car for Digital business,
perhaps a wise way to spend the differential between your cost
per mile and $.21/mile would be to invest in a policy with
a lower deductable than you would normally cover yourself with.
Zero deductable comprehensive coverage is available, and I'm
fairly certain you can get zero deductable collision.
Brian
|
210.24 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Fri Nov 07 1986 12:53 | 6 |
| Zero deductible is not available in Massachusetts.
I'm about to increase my collision deductible from $300 to $500 -- the
premium is $180 lower. I risk $20!
/john
|
210.25 | No Deductible if it's not your fault | DAFFY::RICH | | Fri Nov 07 1986 17:07 | 6 |
|
If an accident is ruled to be somebody else's fault your deductible
should be paid in full. I had an unfortunate encounter with a
Friendly Ice Cream tractor-trailor, the insurance company found
the truck driver 100% liable, and they paid 100% of the adjustment.
|
210.26 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Fri Nov 07 1986 18:23 | 5 |
| >No Deductible if it's not your fault.
On Comprehensive?
/john
|
210.27 | Swedish car policies | STK01::LITBY | Per-Olof Litby, CSC Stockholm/Sweden | Sun Nov 09 1986 07:59 | 26 |
| Some thoughts from the frigid north...
Here, all people who are subject to Digital's car programme - if you drive at
least 6000 km per year on company business - have two options:
1. The company leases a car for you. This car can be used privately.
You pay for all fuel, and for each 10 km driven on company
business, you are paid 150% of the current market price of 1 litre
of petrol. All other costs are paid
by the company, including the deductible if you have an accident
while on company business.
2. You use your own private car. The company pays you (roughly)
$0.39 per mile driven on company business. This reimbursement
is intended to cover ALL costs incurred, including insurance
and deductibles costs. So, if your car runs perfectly and you
never have any accidents, you can actually end up with a
small profit. You get this reimbursement even if you are not
entitled to a company car.
I think this is a very fair policy. You have the option of using a leased
company car, which will cost you the fuel only and will not give you any
sleepless nights. You can never make a profit on it, though. Or you can
use your own car, which may even give you a profit if it runs well, but has
the potential of causing you sleepless nights if it breaks down. You just
have to decide which alternative fits you.
|
210.28 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Sun Nov 09 1986 08:58 | 11 |
| That's vaguely similar to the field leased car plan here.
But the company can't justify a leased car for people who aren't required by
their job to do customer contact to the tune of at least 3700 miles (6000 km)
per year.
The author of .0 might make a fifty mile trip once a week on the average if
he is a heavy traveller (non-field) for the company -- that's only about
2500 miles per year.
/john
|
210.29 | Company car? What's that? | MMO01::PNELSON | Longing for Topeka | Sun Nov 09 1986 11:32 | 7 |
| I drove just over 20,000 Digital miles last year. I just recently
bought a car because Plan A (company-leased vehicles) has been
abolished as a cost-cutting measure by my management. It saves the cost
center money if employees travel at their OWN expense instead of
Digital's.
Pat
|
210.30 | But YOUR management doesn't work for Digital | ATLAST::VICKERS | Don Vickers | Sun Nov 09 1986 19:10 | 6 |
| Your management works for SWR.
An escapee,
Don (-:
|
210.31 | Bonus Class? | REGENT::MINOW | Martin Minow -- DECtalk Engineering | Mon Nov 10 1986 14:33 | 16 |
| There is one very subtle disadvantage to leasing a car in Sweden --
for every year you don't have a chargeable accident, you get a
15% discount on your car insurance premium (road accidents, not
theft). The maximum (after 5 years) is 75% off. (If you have
an accident, you drop back two levels.)
As far as I understood, if you dropped the Dec car and bought
your own, the company would put you in the 0% class -- this
might have changed since I lived there, of course.
(By the way: this is a very good way to handle "careful driver"
coverage -- there is no sex or age discrimination: you stay in
a class that depends only on your own accident history.)
Martin.
|
210.32 | <Policy hurts DEC> | ACE::BREWER | John Brewer Component Engr. @ABO | Mon Nov 10 1986 21:05 | 17 |
|
re:.0 (kinda)
Same reason I take a Taxi to, and from, the airport, when I
travel on company business. DEC wont pay the deductable if my tires/
stereo/car gets ripped off sitting at the airport parking lot for
"x" days. So far some grumbles, but the expense report has always
been signed off. (even though it it costs the company about 45$
per trip.
Personally, I think I am doing "the right thing"!
-John
(It would be cheaper for DEC to assume my comprehensive deductable,
but so far, bureaucracy has marched on regardless!).... second air
trip in 2 weeks tomorrow!
|
210.33 | The insurance companies don't tell the truth | DSSDEV::REINIG | August G. Reinig | Thu Nov 13 1986 16:24 | 10 |
| re. 31
I think the reason you get dropped back to 0% is because despite
what the insurance company may say, you don't get deductions for
years without accidents, you get deductions for years you've payed
for insurance without making a claim. Very similar until you try
to get insurance on your own, after being covered on someone else's
policy for several years.
August G. Reinig
|
210.34 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Jan 20 1987 19:17 | 19 |
| STING::JELENIEWSKI update on 210 (they paid) 17 lines 20-JAN-1987 15:06
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an update on note 210.
Having got nowhere with either DEC or METPAY or the other guy's
insurance company (Metpay refused to
pay my deductable), I filed a "small claim" complaint in District
Court (Massachusetts). My Lawyer said to file a "Property Damage"
claim (which by the way, is not limited to the usuall $1500 limit).
Also this type of complaint may be filed in my own juristiction,
thereby eliminating the need to travel across the state to go to
court.
To make a long story short, the other insurance company paid the
entire claim of $1079 prior to going to court (after they at first
tried to get me to take a "low-ball" offer.
I guess it pays to be persistant.
|
210.35 | Check your coverage!! | RUTLND::MCMAHON | Tap dancin' on a landmine | Fri Oct 27 1989 13:12 | 27 |
| This looks like the appropriate note for this.
I recently bought a car and financed some of the payment through a
bank. I added the car to my coverage with METPAY, got the binder etc.
The car's registered and inspected so I'm all set, right? A day ago
I got a letter from the bank saying that my insurance had been
cancelled and that one of the terms of the loan is that I have
insurance. Now I know I didn't initiate this so I took the letter to my
local METPAY agent and he calls up and says, yup, that vehicle has
been deleted from your coverage. They don't know why or how. He said
that they went to a new computer system a couple of weeks ago and that
it probably just "fell out" of my coverage. He said he would add it
back to my coverage.
The point I'm making here is that if the bank hadn't contacted me, I
wouldn't have known that I wasn't covered.
You may want to check with METPAY to make sure your coverage is still
intact.
Side note: As we're sitting there waiting to find out what happened to
the vehicle's coverage, the METPAY-droid asks me if I have my
homeowner's with METPAY because they're really a lot cheaper than most
companies. I said that considering why I had to visit him that day, I
didn't have much confidence in METPAY. He didn't reply.
If it weren't for the convenience of payroll deduction...
|
210.36 | WOrks for me | CUSPID::MCCABE | If Murphy's Law can go wrong .. | Mon Oct 30 1989 10:07 | 4 |
| METPAY lost my coverage on one of my cars as well. No one knew
why. Metpay does not insure anything for me any longer.
|
210.37 | Who's liable? | ARCHER::LAWRENCE | | Mon Oct 30 1989 11:08 | 12 |
| > METPAY lost my coverage on one of my cars as well. No one knew
> why. Metpay does not insure anything for me any longer.
A questions: If I have coverage and have been sent all of the appropriate
paperwork (copy of policy, etc.) then Metpay 'loses' it or inadvertently
cancels the policy, would not they be liable for any claimed damages since
they are required by law to inform me prior to any cancellation?
Betty
|
210.38 | | PRAVDA::JACKSON | King Cynic | Mon Oct 30 1989 20:45 | 35 |
| RE: Lost cars
Metpay sends me a statement of my cars at least every 6 months,
probably more often because I change something (towing, change
deductibles, etc) I've been with them for 7 years now, and they've
not screwed up once. (I've even had quite favorable responses when
filing a vandalism claim)
RE: homeowners
I'd check it out. Aside from the WONDERFUL weekly deduction benefit,
they also offer a 25% discount to DEC employees. (yes, that's right,
25%) That allowed me to drop the cost of my homeowners (2 family,
Newton, replacement value house, replacement cost contents) from $1339
to $844 (the old one didn't have replacement cost on the contents
either)
They did screw one thing up on the homeowners, they didn't send a copy
of my wife's ring appraisal to Metropolitan (I did take it to the
office that day) and the home office sent me a letter asking for
a copy.
Oh, yea. Since I have a $1M umbrella policy (pretty much a required
thing if you own rental property) Metpay has different car insurance
limits IF you have the umbrella with them. That saved me an increase
of $70/car if I had raised the limits to what my old insurance company
had told me I had to.
-bill
Who's been very happy with Met for 7 years
|
210.39 | won't your pay stub alert you to changes? | REGENT::POWERS | | Tue Oct 31 1989 09:09 | 4 |
| If they accidentally drop your coverage, won't your weekly payroll deduction
change, alerting you that some change to your coverage has occurred?
- tom]
|
210.40 | some weeks I don't look at my stub at all | CVG::THOMPSON | My friends call me Alfred | Tue Oct 31 1989 09:34 | 9 |
| RE: .39 The weekly deduction may very well change but not everyone
reads every line of their check. I know that I generally only look
at a few things (vacation time is the main one). I don't
verify my deductions every week. I also don't look at them close
enough to know if they change by a small amount. Though I might
notice if one disappeared all together. Generally I assume that
things don't change with out warning.
Alfred
|
210.41 | exit | GIAMEM::MUMFORD | | Tue Oct 31 1989 09:41 | 7 |
| re: .40
I would assume that one of the things you look at is NET PAY? If
that changes from week to week, I would certainly go look at my
deductions to find out who was in the cookie jar! :-}
Dick.
|
210.42 | | CVG::THOMPSON | My friends call me Alfred | Tue Oct 31 1989 10:02 | 4 |
| RE: .41 You assume incorrectly. More then any other item I assume
that I will be warned in the case of a change to net pay.
Alfred
|
210.43 | | BUCKY::FRIEDMANN | moderate extremism | Tue Oct 31 1989 10:30 | 17 |
| Perhaps my only gripe about Metpay is that it takes at least six weeks for
policy changes to be reflected in payroll withholding. Therefore, if they
accidently dropped coverage on one car, you really would not see the change
for some time.
Most insurance companies (I hesitate to say all but all I've used fit here)
seem structured to make errors. Underpaid employees, that often seem under-
educated, handle complex forms and claims. That Metpay makes errors doesn't
surprise me. The measure of the business is how quickly the correction(s) are
effected.
I would be very surprised if, Metpay having accidently dropped coverage for
a car, that a claim would be denied. I seriously doubt that the State would
let that happen. But then I'm not an insurance expert.
Now that we have the 9000 series announced, perhaps we can convince Metropolitan
to convert to VAXen and speed up the paperwork.
|
210.44 | No real problem | RUTLND::MCMAHON | Tap dancin' on a landmine | Tue Oct 31 1989 14:44 | 17 |
| re: .39
The change in my METPAY deduction occurred the same week I got the
letter from the bank - but I got the letter on Wednesday and the
pay stub on Thursday. I pay VERY CLOSE attention to every deduction
item every week so I would have noticed it anyway.
All things considered, I don't have any real problems with METPAY.
I've been with them for about 7 years with no real problem. I was
just trying to alert others that they may want to check their
coverage in case what happened to me happened to them as well.
As far as homeowner's coverage, check the CONSUMER notesfile about
the differences others have noticed.
|
210.45 | What if you don't open your payslips until taxtime | SMAUG::GARROD | An Englishman's mind works best when it is almost too late | Tue Oct 31 1989 17:31 | 12 |
| re:
>If they accidentally drop your coverage, won't your weekly payroll deduction
>change, alerting you that some change to your coverage has occurred?
Who looks at their paystub each week? I don't even bother opening mine.
I occasionally open it to find out if I'm hitting up against the
vacation ceiling. Come tax time I pull out the 40 odd unopened pay
slips and the 10 odd opened ones, open them sort them and then verify
everything.
Dave
|
210.46 | | THEPIC::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Wed Nov 01 1989 09:12 | 4 |
| Don't forget there are an awful lot of employees in the field who don't see
the office, let alone their paycheck, for months at a time.
Bob
|
210.47 | | NEWVAX::TURRO | Hi Ho Hi Ho I'm off to ODO | Thu Nov 02 1989 02:05 | 6 |
| Now come on lets get serious. Do you always get up in the morning?
Some people have busy schedules and if your out of the US for extended
periods of time. WHo pays the bills?
mike
|
210.48 | | THEPIC::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Thu Nov 02 1989 08:53 | 5 |
| re: .47
Which reply is .47 directed at?
Bob
|
210.49 | paychecks vs. bluethings | LEZAH::QUIRIY | Christine | Thu Nov 02 1989 16:27 | 8 |
|
A lot of people (I'm one) don't ever see a paycheck because they
have their pay deposited directly into a bank account. The only
reason I pick up my "bluething" is because the secretary doesn't
appreciate it when I let them accumulate to greater than 5. And
picking it up doesn't mean I open it to see what's in there.
CQ
|
210.50 | Bringing Home The Bacon | MURFY::EARLY | Actions speak louder than words. | Thu Nov 02 1989 23:33 | 51 |
| RE: Previous notes ...
For those who get up in the morning and drive to "the office" I can
appreciate a lack of understanding for those who might not do this for
days, weeks, or even months at a time. However, there really is a group
of employees who indeed may NOT see their managers, any peers, any
other Digital employees, or even visit a Digital office for days,
weeks, and perhaps even months at a time.
One such group are our software services people who are assigned to
accounts as "residents" or those who are on long projects. These folks
report to a customer's place of business each work day. Although they
may see other Digital people if they are on a large project or in an
urban area, bear in mind that a lot of these folks are on not-so-large
projects in more rural areas. They see NOBODY!
Day after day, they go to the customer site and do their job. They have
no access to NOTES, their mail, and other things that you and I may be
able to do all day at work. (There is no network connection from the
customer's systems to ours.) These are things that the employee needs
to do at night from home (assuming, of course that their managers will
spring for a VT100 and DF03 for them to bring home). They don't get DTW
(Digital This Week). They don't have access to the wealth of Digital
products that we do in a DEC facility (only to what the cusotmer
bought). And, they don't have anybody to discuss their problems with
(face-to-face) that works for the same company that they do.
I've got to believe that this is a rather difficult assignment, at
best. I've got to believe that one starts to lose his/her identity with
the company that employs them. I've got to believe that after a while,
it's bound to be downright depressing, even for the most enthusiastic
and energetic person.
So, for those who think that not going to the office for weeks to pick
up your paycheck is a "bit odd", allow me to put forth the hypothesis
that this is reality for some of our employees. Now that you know this,
go forth in peace with a greater understanding of your fellow DECcie.
To those who are among the missing at customer sites for weeks on end:
Forgive those who don't understand you, for they know not whereof you work.
... and keep up the good work
/se
|
210.51 | a second to .50 | NYEM1::MILBERG | Barry Milberg | Fri Nov 03 1989 20:37 | 6 |
| re. .50
VERY well said! Should be required reading for some.
-Barry-
|
210.53 | Thank you, ... | ALBANY::MULLER | Fred Muller | Sun Nov 05 1989 14:23 | 33 |
| thank you, thank you, ..........................................
- From a ten year veteran of that part of our business (it's called
PSS) who bought his own fire sale PDTs and ROBINs for many years before
ol' KO got around to loaning me a terminal. Just returned from a
course at BUO last week and had the opportunity to talk to some folks
in engineering and manufacturing. I've done it before and get sick
every time. Talk about second-hand cousins! And we are supposed to be
knowledgeable about our products - no, I'll take that back - the
only criteria is that we bring in the bucks that affect the local
bottom line - NOW!
Right now I feel like I am in heaven with a borrowed-for-the-weekend
VAXstation 3100.
For some years now I have been trying to get DEC to pay $30/month
for a second line into the house (I've offered to pay the installation)
because I use this one so much for company business; especially so
since I have someone seriously ill at home right now. Gotta PROVE how
it will net out our normal profit margin ($45?) first! Guess it has
something to do with the "crack in the door" syndrome too. Never
want to be a manager and have to make decisions like that.
Thanks, but no thanks anyway. If DEC cannot afford it, neither can I
anymore. Don't misunderstand, it's a great company with some great
leaders. I am going to take a day of vacation tomorrow starting at 4AM
to drive 200 miles to hear my leader #1 at the stockholder's meeting
to make sure my stocks will be worth something again (they will).
See y'all there, Fred
Fred
|
210.54 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Mon Nov 06 1989 09:04 | 15 |
| Others are in a better position to react to .50 that I am, though
I can accept the situation as described at face value.
Let me say, however, that there's no excuse for the entirety
of the isolation described. I, for one, would insist that my pay stubs
be mailed to my home address if my business were to be regularly
out of the office. Recall that this rathole came up about peoples'
needs to check their deductions (if they choose to - those of you who
willingly ignore their paystubs and trust their monthly bank statements
can continue to do so as you wish - I have, at times, been one of you).
If you need a business justification for your group spending 50� a week
on you, just point out the cost of 1 hour of customer billable time lost
while tracking down a pay problem six weeks after it occurred, even no
more often than once a year.
- tom powers]
|
210.55 | 'lost' billable time? | THEPIC::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Mon Nov 06 1989 10:05 | 11 |
| re: .54
In some offices there is no such thing as 1 hour of billable time lost. You
put your 40+ at the customer site and anything else is on your own time.
In some areas, unit managers must forecast their employees hours a quarter
ahead and on a weekly basis, participate in a conference call with their
DM, sometimes AM, and others, and must explain EVERY variation from the
forecast.
Bob
|
210.56 | You signed the blanket authorization... | BPOV06::MUMFORD | | Mon Nov 06 1989 10:41 | 9 |
| Those who sign blanket authorizations allowing certain organizations
to withdraw money from their pay, and then do not bother to check
their paystubs or "bluethings" (love it!) regularly to assure that
said blanket authorizations are not draining their resources have
no one to complain to but themselves, IMO. It's up to you to watch
out for yourselves, not complain when someone else doesn't do it
for you!
:-)
|
210.57 | Things change | GUIDUK::B_WOOD | Once a hacker, now a hiker | Mon Nov 06 1989 19:09 | 17 |
| re: .50
I'm one of those field body's who pickup the stubs on a irregular
schedule. Been do'in it for 3+ of my 5.5 years at DEC. Used to
be that when I was a customer with a DECie onsite, the company
Fed-Ex'd the checks and stubs to the employees weekly from
Maynard. Now our substitute is the DCU 800 number to
check our balances, (an hopefully we still have money left :-} )
I like the direct deposit to DCU because it happens on wednesday.
Then, since I live on the west coast, I can write checks on Monday
and DCU has the money when they clear on Wed and Thursday.
The only suprises I get are the changes in the Stock Plan
supplemental contribution and the doubling of Life Insurance
when I hit 35 (That one I caught me by suprise :-{ ).
|