T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
154.1 | Don't RE-Invent the Wheel | CURIE::DOTY | Russ Doty, ESG | Mon Jul 14 1986 21:01 | 10 |
| No need to make work for yourself -- just dial directly into TSN
(Telecommunication Systems Network, or something like that). TSN
provides local numbers that put you directly on the net -- right
now, I'm sitting in Nashua, logged in to Maynard, and it is a local
call. You will need some local info to get access to TSN -- I had
a little trouble tracking in down. Send me mail if you need a copy
of the TSN users manual, including telephone numbers.
Regards,
Russ
|
154.2 | Free? | CSTVAX::MCLURE | Vaxnote your way to ubiquity | Tue Jul 15 1986 02:45 | 19 |
| Must be rough: "extra phone line reimbursed from petty cash";
I have a dedicated "extra phone line" which I only use for calling
into the computer too, but I've never charged DEC for anything other
than direct calls into Stow from Northboro. Since I've been using
TSN (Terminal Switching Network), my long-distance bills have been
reduced to almost nil, leaving only the mothly charge of $ 12.15.
I don't mind paying the monthly charge (I even paid for the $ 60.00
installation fee) as long as there aren't other people getting it for
free - then I want money too (terrible how that works isn't it?).
I can get onto a TSN line around 90% of the time, and when I can't,
I go through TYMNET to get to TSN, then get in from there the usual
way. The only time I need to dial direct, is to send a file across
the network from my Pro-350 to a VAX (I've had alot of problems in the
past using TSN for file transfers), or when absolutely nothing else
works. TYMNET is really sloooooooow, but it's better than nothing.
-DAV0
|
154.3 | | SKYLAB::FISHER | Burns Fisher 381-1466, ZKO1-1/D42 | Tue Jul 15 1986 16:31 | 6 |
| Don't forget the DTN numbers mentioned in another nearby note here
which allows you to call into a local DEC facility and get a DTN
dialtone from which you can dial any DTN number. This is another
way to avoid the "host account" hassle.
Burns
|
154.4 | TSN's not half bad | DELNI::GOLDSTEIN | Distributed Systems Ideology | Wed Jul 16 1986 16:55 | 21 |
| Your site telecom staff should have a good idea of what you can
do, from your home, to your site.
TSN (Terminal Switching Network) covers most of Greater Maynard.
It's a buyout from Tymnet, and interconnects with their network.
It's MUCH cheaper than long distance telephone, though we do pay
an hourly charge to Tymnet when dialing in via their numbers. However
TSN runs at 1200 baud now (2400 is beginning to appear), with some
echoplex delay, though not bad for a packet network and much better
than SET HOST if you have to edit.
See JETSAM::TSN if you want to read up on it.
Long distance telephone is just incredibly expensive. Off-hours
use of DTN for incoming calls is permitted, as per the aforementioned
note in this conference. If you just have to have another line
(i.e., you're not alone in the house), it's still best to order
it YOURSELF as a "residential" line, and ask for reimbursement,
rather than letting some clone at the phone company charge the ripoff
"business" rate.
fred (formerly in Corp. Telecom)
|
154.5 | prolbems | STUBBI::REINKE | | Thu Jul 17 1986 01:04 | 9 |
| re .1
I know of two problems with what you describe. The free local lines
are only available outside of normal working hours. If you happen
to be working at home during the day you have to use the toll line
and get your cost center to reimburse you. Are there other means
of access from 8 - 5? Also if you don't have a push button phone
you have to wait for someone to pick up the phone and give you the
number. If no one answers, as is often the case at night, you have
to use the toll line anyway.
|
154.6 | TSN is a full-time network | DELNI::GOLDSTEIN | Distributed Systems Ideology | Thu Jul 17 1986 18:58 | 10 |
| re:.5
TSN isn't waht you seem to think. You DON'T go through the
daytime-only lines to get there. TSN has FULL TIME numbers in MANY
locations, with public Tymnet in HUNDREDS of cities, worldwide!
TSN is a packet-switched data network, not part of DTN at all.
Just call site telecom and ask for the TSN number local to you.
TSN also publishes a little book of Tymnet and TSN numbers. And
if you can get into TSN from your site, use its HELP function to
find out numbers (I think they're in there, somewhere.)
|
154.7 | Some alternates | PAUPER::GETTYS | Bob Gettys N1BRM | Thu Jul 17 1986 20:55 | 16 |
| For those of you using the FX (local to you, but
connected to a plant such as the Mill) numbers, there is a way
to get around the "I don't have Touch Tone service" problem.
Either buy one of the newer phones that offer a
convienent switch to switch from pulse to tone (you dial the
call with pulse, then switch to tone for the plant dial tone),
or buy one of those portable touch tone generators that places
like Radio Shack carry (same trick as above except sub the tone
generator for the switch).
BTW - There are other uses for the tone generator (which
ever method you decide on) such as accessing the DCU Easy-Touch
system (when it's up that is).
/s/ Bob
|
154.8 | | WHOARU::WONG | The Mad Chinaman | Sat Jul 19 1986 11:32 | 6 |
| Does anyone have an FX number for Boston?
The one in Quincy is outside my local calling area.
Thanks.
The Mad Chinaman
|
154.9 | Try Arlington | PAUPER::GETTYS | Bob Gettys N1BRM | Sat Jul 19 1986 14:59 | 4 |
| The one listed for Arlington should be callable by
anyone in the Boston area.
/s/ Bob
|
154.10 | | WHOARU::WONG | The Mad Chinaman | Sat Jul 19 1986 23:02 | 13 |
| Isn't Arlington further than Quincy? (from Boston, that is...)
Quincy is outsidemy local unlimited calling area; I need Metropolitan
unlimited calling for Quincy.
I'll check with the phone company before I try this stunt again.
Finding out you've used 1500 message units is not a pleasant surprise.
Thanks.
The Stupid chinaman
|
154.11 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Sat Jul 19 1986 23:47 | 19 |
| Unless you live in Arlington, Belmont, Cambridge, Lexington, Medford,
Somerville, or Winchester, you'll need more than local unlimited to
call the Arlington numbers for free.
Both Arlington and Quincy are one message unit from the Central Exchange,
but neither are local unlimited. Outgoing calls from Maynard are routed
to Arlington for Boston since Arlington is closer to Maynard and we have
more lines. Arlington is also a lower number of message units to more
places on the north side of Boston, where most of DEC's business calling
goes to. There's no such thing as unlimited service for businesses in
Massachusetts.
You might check to see if you're local to the Cambridge number (look in
the front of the Boston phone book). But the Cambridge number costs DEC
money for you to call, since it crosses a LATA boundary. Yes, there's
no such thing as a flat rate foreign exchange line across LATA boundaries
any more.
/john
|
154.12 | Huh??? | PAUPER::GETTYS | Bob Gettys N1BRM | Sun Jul 20 1986 22:12 | 13 |
| >< Note 154.11 by COVERT::COVERT "John Covert" >
>
>But the Cambridge number costs DEC money for you to call, since it crosses a
>LATA boundary. Yes, there's no such thing as a flat rate foreign exchange
>line across LATA boundaries any more.
>
>/john
When did Cambridge move from Eastern Mass????? Even when the new area
code is created in a couple of years, the area currently defined by 617 will
still be only one LATA even though it will then be made up of 2 area codes.
/s/ Bob
|
154.13 | an to .6 | STUBBI::REINKE | | Sun Jul 20 1986 23:30 | 5 |
| re.6
It turns out that we live so far out in the boonies that there isn't
a TSN line local to use. Until we get put on the map I guess we'll
have to stick with what we have.
Thankyou anyway.
|
154.14 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Sun Jul 20 1986 23:42 | 11 |
| re .12
The Cambridge number terminates in Merrimack (it's the AT&T line used by
the MK and Nashua facilities for Boston area calling). Under the current
tariff structure, it is an "access line" just like any common carrier would
buy from New England Telephone. The bill consists of two parts, the flat
rate bill for the circuit paid to AT&T and the usage sensitive (on both
incoming and outgoing) access charge paid to N.E.T. (It may be even more
complex than this in detail.)
/john
|
154.15 | DEC Payment for Data Lines | MILRAT::SEGAL | Len Segal | Sun Jul 27 1986 17:14 | 44 |
| TSN is the pits, but there is an 800 # which makes it accessible
(thru Tymnet) from anywhere in the US. Last Fall, while on
vacation, I used it from Hawaii to get to MILRAT so I could send
some MAIL. [I was in our Honolulu office, but did not want to abuse
the generosity of our very hospitable Sales Manager.] The
account_name;password approach seems to be
"Pyour_regular_account_name;DEC" for using Tymnet (800 # or other
local numbers).
The FX #'s cover a very large %-age of Mass/Southern NH for after
hours usage. I always use them when available and only suffer
through TSN/Tymnet when absolutely necessary (case of last resort).
I do believe that the FX #'s probably are incrementally cheaper for
DEC, than our using TSN/Tymnet.
I have had a DEC-paid second phone line in my house for 3+ years, it
is up to your CC Mgr. In my case, as a WC4 my Mgr felt that if an
Employee was willing to put in 1-2 hours a month on his own time, it
more than paid for DEC to install and pay for the dedicated line.
Another factor was that I was using my single line in the house and
getting considerable heat from my Family, my Wife, and my
Mother-in-Law (in Florida) at not being able to reach us. The final
straw was on New Year's Day, when my Wife was rear-ended on Rte 9 in
Natick and had to send the Police to my house to reach me (I had
told her that I would be dialed-up all day and to have the Police
get me if she needed me). The next day I gave in and talked to my
Mgr. DEC IS a people-company!! [Of course, if your justification
is to read Notes and play games, forget it!!]
I chose to install it as a standard "household" line (before the
recent edict) rather than a "business" line. The cost differential
was something like $20./month vs $100.+/month (when it was
installed, today it is probably greater differential)!
My bill is presented to Petty Cash each month to reimburse me, and I
am responsible to pay the Tel Co.
BTW: DEC will NOT pay for Message Units to call DEC facilities,
since there is no proof (required for Accounting and Tax Audits)
that DEC is actually paying for a business-related expense (a former
Employee of mine tried this). They will also NOT pay for your
primary household line, NOR to add additional service to it for
DEC-related purposes. It MUST be a separate line, so DEC can prove
that it is specifically for work-related purposes.
|
154.16 | | PAPPAS::JIM | Jim Pappas | Sun Jul 27 1986 18:59 | 20 |
| > BTW: DEC will NOT pay for Message Units to call DEC facilities,
> since there is no proof (required for Accounting and Tax Audits)
> that DEC is actually paying for a business-related expense (a former
> Employee of mine tried this). They will also NOT pay for your
> primary household line, NOR to add additional service to it for
> DEC-related purposes. It MUST be a separate line, so DEC can prove
> that it is specifically for work-related purposes.
This is not true at all facilities. When this was passed down to
us at Hudson Ma, a seperate memo from our management (SEG) told
us to ignore the directive and do whatever was necessary to save
the company the most money. Isn't is nice to know that some places
are still run with common sense. Hence, I ( as well as many others
I know) have measured circle service and DEC pays the tab for all
additional message units.
Sometimes you just have to do the right thing.
Jim Pappas
|